Loading…

fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains

Two lines of evidence indicate that there exists a reciprocal inhibitory relationship between opposed brain networks. First, most attention-demanding cognitive tasks activate a stereotypical set of brain areas, known as the task-positive network and simultaneously deactivate a different set of brain...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2013-02, Vol.66, p.385-401
Main Authors: Jack, Anthony I., Dawson, Abigail J., Begany, Katelyn L., Leckie, Regina L., Barry, Kevin P., Ciccia, Angela H., Snyder, Abraham Z.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c414c2de5e0e63d596da0a9c86e52a4811db2ed06288b233b7749a2f8e056db53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c414c2de5e0e63d596da0a9c86e52a4811db2ed06288b233b7749a2f8e056db53
container_end_page 401
container_issue
container_start_page 385
container_title NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)
container_volume 66
creator Jack, Anthony I.
Dawson, Abigail J.
Begany, Katelyn L.
Leckie, Regina L.
Barry, Kevin P.
Ciccia, Angela H.
Snyder, Abraham Z.
description Two lines of evidence indicate that there exists a reciprocal inhibitory relationship between opposed brain networks. First, most attention-demanding cognitive tasks activate a stereotypical set of brain areas, known as the task-positive network and simultaneously deactivate a different set of brain regions, commonly referred to as the task negative or default mode network. Second, functional connectivity analyses show that these same opposed networks are anti-correlated in the resting state. We hypothesize that these reciprocally inhibitory effects reflect two incompatible cognitive modes, each of which may be directed towards understanding the external world. Thus, engaging one mode activates one set of regions and suppresses activity in the other. We test this hypothesis by identifying two types of problem-solving task which, on the basis of prior work, have been consistently associated with the task positive and task negative regions: tasks requiring social cognition, i.e., reasoning about the mental states of other persons, and tasks requiring physical cognition, i.e., reasoning about the causal/mechanical properties of inanimate objects. Social and mechanical reasoning tasks were presented to neurologically normal participants during fMRI. Each task type was presented using both text and video clips. Regardless of presentation modality, we observed clear evidence of reciprocal suppression: social tasks deactivated regions associated with mechanical reasoning and mechanical tasks deactivated regions associated with social reasoning. These findings are not explained by self-referential processes, task engagement, mental simulation, mental time travel or external vs. internal attention, all factors previously hypothesized to explain default mode network activity. Analyses of resting state data revealed a close match between the regions our tasks identified as reciprocally inhibitory and regions of maximal anti-correlation in the resting state. These results indicate the reciprocal inhibition is not attributable to constraints inherent in the tasks, but is neural in origin. Hence, there is a physiological constraint on our ability to simultaneously engage two distinct cognitive modes. Further work is needed to more precisely characterize these opposing cognitive domains. ► Physical reasoning tasks activate the TPN and deactivate the DMN. ► Social reasoning tasks deactivate the TPN and activate the DMN. ► Activated/deactivated regions match areas of maxim
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.061
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3602121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811912010646</els_id><sourcerecordid>3396571371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c414c2de5e0e63d596da0a9c86e52a4811db2ed06288b233b7749a2f8e056db53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkluLFDEQhRtR3HX1L0iDCL70mEsnnbwIunhZWFFEn0M6qZ7J0JOMSffI_nurmXFXfdmnCqmvDid1UlU1JStKqHy9XUWYcwo7u4YVI5Th9YpI-qA6p0SLRouOPVzOgjeKUn1WPSllSwjRtFWPqzPGKSVKsfPq6_D521Wd4QB2LFhd2Ofk7FiHuAl9mEKKdQ_TL4BYl-QCdmz09X5zU8KCubSOSB2g9mlnQyxPq0cDSsGzU72ofnx4__3yU3P95ePV5dvrxkkup8a1tHXMgwACknuhpbfEaqckCGZbNO17Bp5IplTPOO-7rtWWDQqIkL4X_KJ6c9Tdz_0OvIM4ZTuafcal5BuTbDD_dmLYmHU6GC4Jo4yiwKuTQE4_ZyiT2YXiYBxthDQXQyXluhWsY_ejgpBOSqU5oi_-Q7dpzhE3gZRghLGWL4LqSLmcSskw3PqmxCwJm625S9gsCS8dTBhHn__97tvBP5Ei8PIE2IIJDdlGF8od1yGn2xa5d0cOMKVDgGyKCxAd-IDfYDI-hfvd_Abdr8nU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1552022432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Jack, Anthony I. ; Dawson, Abigail J. ; Begany, Katelyn L. ; Leckie, Regina L. ; Barry, Kevin P. ; Ciccia, Angela H. ; Snyder, Abraham Z.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jack, Anthony I. ; Dawson, Abigail J. ; Begany, Katelyn L. ; Leckie, Regina L. ; Barry, Kevin P. ; Ciccia, Angela H. ; Snyder, Abraham Z.</creatorcontrib><description>Two lines of evidence indicate that there exists a reciprocal inhibitory relationship between opposed brain networks. First, most attention-demanding cognitive tasks activate a stereotypical set of brain areas, known as the task-positive network and simultaneously deactivate a different set of brain regions, commonly referred to as the task negative or default mode network. Second, functional connectivity analyses show that these same opposed networks are anti-correlated in the resting state. We hypothesize that these reciprocally inhibitory effects reflect two incompatible cognitive modes, each of which may be directed towards understanding the external world. Thus, engaging one mode activates one set of regions and suppresses activity in the other. We test this hypothesis by identifying two types of problem-solving task which, on the basis of prior work, have been consistently associated with the task positive and task negative regions: tasks requiring social cognition, i.e., reasoning about the mental states of other persons, and tasks requiring physical cognition, i.e., reasoning about the causal/mechanical properties of inanimate objects. Social and mechanical reasoning tasks were presented to neurologically normal participants during fMRI. Each task type was presented using both text and video clips. Regardless of presentation modality, we observed clear evidence of reciprocal suppression: social tasks deactivated regions associated with mechanical reasoning and mechanical tasks deactivated regions associated with social reasoning. These findings are not explained by self-referential processes, task engagement, mental simulation, mental time travel or external vs. internal attention, all factors previously hypothesized to explain default mode network activity. Analyses of resting state data revealed a close match between the regions our tasks identified as reciprocally inhibitory and regions of maximal anti-correlation in the resting state. These results indicate the reciprocal inhibition is not attributable to constraints inherent in the tasks, but is neural in origin. Hence, there is a physiological constraint on our ability to simultaneously engage two distinct cognitive modes. Further work is needed to more precisely characterize these opposing cognitive domains. ► Physical reasoning tasks activate the TPN and deactivate the DMN. ► Social reasoning tasks deactivate the TPN and activate the DMN. ► Activated/deactivated regions match areas of maximal anti-correlation. ► Findings are not explained by task engagement, or internal vs. external attention. ► TPN versus DMN dichotomy reflects opposing cognitive modes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23110882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anti-correlated networks ; Attention - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognition - physiology ; Default network ; Dual-process theory ; Female ; fMRI ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Rest - physiology ; Task negative ; Task-positive ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2013-02, Vol.66, p.385-401</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Feb 1, 2013</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c414c2de5e0e63d596da0a9c86e52a4811db2ed06288b233b7749a2f8e056db53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c414c2de5e0e63d596da0a9c86e52a4811db2ed06288b233b7749a2f8e056db53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27110944$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23110882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jack, Anthony I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Abigail J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begany, Katelyn L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leckie, Regina L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barry, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciccia, Angela H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Abraham Z.</creatorcontrib><title>fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>Two lines of evidence indicate that there exists a reciprocal inhibitory relationship between opposed brain networks. First, most attention-demanding cognitive tasks activate a stereotypical set of brain areas, known as the task-positive network and simultaneously deactivate a different set of brain regions, commonly referred to as the task negative or default mode network. Second, functional connectivity analyses show that these same opposed networks are anti-correlated in the resting state. We hypothesize that these reciprocally inhibitory effects reflect two incompatible cognitive modes, each of which may be directed towards understanding the external world. Thus, engaging one mode activates one set of regions and suppresses activity in the other. We test this hypothesis by identifying two types of problem-solving task which, on the basis of prior work, have been consistently associated with the task positive and task negative regions: tasks requiring social cognition, i.e., reasoning about the mental states of other persons, and tasks requiring physical cognition, i.e., reasoning about the causal/mechanical properties of inanimate objects. Social and mechanical reasoning tasks were presented to neurologically normal participants during fMRI. Each task type was presented using both text and video clips. Regardless of presentation modality, we observed clear evidence of reciprocal suppression: social tasks deactivated regions associated with mechanical reasoning and mechanical tasks deactivated regions associated with social reasoning. These findings are not explained by self-referential processes, task engagement, mental simulation, mental time travel or external vs. internal attention, all factors previously hypothesized to explain default mode network activity. Analyses of resting state data revealed a close match between the regions our tasks identified as reciprocally inhibitory and regions of maximal anti-correlation in the resting state. These results indicate the reciprocal inhibition is not attributable to constraints inherent in the tasks, but is neural in origin. Hence, there is a physiological constraint on our ability to simultaneously engage two distinct cognitive modes. Further work is needed to more precisely characterize these opposing cognitive domains. ► Physical reasoning tasks activate the TPN and deactivate the DMN. ► Social reasoning tasks deactivate the TPN and activate the DMN. ► Activated/deactivated regions match areas of maximal anti-correlation. ► Findings are not explained by task engagement, or internal vs. external attention. ► TPN versus DMN dichotomy reflects opposing cognitive modes.</description><subject>Anti-correlated networks</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Default network</subject><subject>Dual-process theory</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Rest - physiology</subject><subject>Task negative</subject><subject>Task-positive</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkluLFDEQhRtR3HX1L0iDCL70mEsnnbwIunhZWFFEn0M6qZ7J0JOMSffI_nurmXFXfdmnCqmvDid1UlU1JStKqHy9XUWYcwo7u4YVI5Th9YpI-qA6p0SLRouOPVzOgjeKUn1WPSllSwjRtFWPqzPGKSVKsfPq6_D521Wd4QB2LFhd2Ofk7FiHuAl9mEKKdQ_TL4BYl-QCdmz09X5zU8KCubSOSB2g9mlnQyxPq0cDSsGzU72ofnx4__3yU3P95ePV5dvrxkkup8a1tHXMgwACknuhpbfEaqckCGZbNO17Bp5IplTPOO-7rtWWDQqIkL4X_KJ6c9Tdz_0OvIM4ZTuafcal5BuTbDD_dmLYmHU6GC4Jo4yiwKuTQE4_ZyiT2YXiYBxthDQXQyXluhWsY_ejgpBOSqU5oi_-Q7dpzhE3gZRghLGWL4LqSLmcSskw3PqmxCwJm625S9gsCS8dTBhHn__97tvBP5Ei8PIE2IIJDdlGF8od1yGn2xa5d0cOMKVDgGyKCxAd-IDfYDI-hfvd_Abdr8nU</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Jack, Anthony I.</creator><creator>Dawson, Abigail J.</creator><creator>Begany, Katelyn L.</creator><creator>Leckie, Regina L.</creator><creator>Barry, Kevin P.</creator><creator>Ciccia, Angela H.</creator><creator>Snyder, Abraham Z.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains</title><author>Jack, Anthony I. ; Dawson, Abigail J. ; Begany, Katelyn L. ; Leckie, Regina L. ; Barry, Kevin P. ; Ciccia, Angela H. ; Snyder, Abraham Z.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c414c2de5e0e63d596da0a9c86e52a4811db2ed06288b233b7749a2f8e056db53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Anti-correlated networks</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Default network</topic><topic>Dual-process theory</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Rest - physiology</topic><topic>Task negative</topic><topic>Task-positive</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jack, Anthony I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Abigail J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begany, Katelyn L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leckie, Regina L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barry, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciccia, Angela H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Abraham Z.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jack, Anthony I.</au><au>Dawson, Abigail J.</au><au>Begany, Katelyn L.</au><au>Leckie, Regina L.</au><au>Barry, Kevin P.</au><au>Ciccia, Angela H.</au><au>Snyder, Abraham Z.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>66</volume><spage>385</spage><epage>401</epage><pages>385-401</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>Two lines of evidence indicate that there exists a reciprocal inhibitory relationship between opposed brain networks. First, most attention-demanding cognitive tasks activate a stereotypical set of brain areas, known as the task-positive network and simultaneously deactivate a different set of brain regions, commonly referred to as the task negative or default mode network. Second, functional connectivity analyses show that these same opposed networks are anti-correlated in the resting state. We hypothesize that these reciprocally inhibitory effects reflect two incompatible cognitive modes, each of which may be directed towards understanding the external world. Thus, engaging one mode activates one set of regions and suppresses activity in the other. We test this hypothesis by identifying two types of problem-solving task which, on the basis of prior work, have been consistently associated with the task positive and task negative regions: tasks requiring social cognition, i.e., reasoning about the mental states of other persons, and tasks requiring physical cognition, i.e., reasoning about the causal/mechanical properties of inanimate objects. Social and mechanical reasoning tasks were presented to neurologically normal participants during fMRI. Each task type was presented using both text and video clips. Regardless of presentation modality, we observed clear evidence of reciprocal suppression: social tasks deactivated regions associated with mechanical reasoning and mechanical tasks deactivated regions associated with social reasoning. These findings are not explained by self-referential processes, task engagement, mental simulation, mental time travel or external vs. internal attention, all factors previously hypothesized to explain default mode network activity. Analyses of resting state data revealed a close match between the regions our tasks identified as reciprocally inhibitory and regions of maximal anti-correlation in the resting state. These results indicate the reciprocal inhibition is not attributable to constraints inherent in the tasks, but is neural in origin. Hence, there is a physiological constraint on our ability to simultaneously engage two distinct cognitive modes. Further work is needed to more precisely characterize these opposing cognitive domains. ► Physical reasoning tasks activate the TPN and deactivate the DMN. ► Social reasoning tasks deactivate the TPN and activate the DMN. ► Activated/deactivated regions match areas of maximal anti-correlation. ► Findings are not explained by task engagement, or internal vs. external attention. ► TPN versus DMN dichotomy reflects opposing cognitive modes.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23110882</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.061</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8119
ispartof NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2013-02, Vol.66, p.385-401
issn 1053-8119
1095-9572
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3602121
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Anti-correlated networks
Attention - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Brain - physiology
Brain Mapping
Cognition & reasoning
Cognition - physiology
Default network
Dual-process theory
Female
fMRI
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Hypotheses
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Rest - physiology
Task negative
Task-positive
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
Young Adult
title fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A57%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=fMRI%20reveals%20reciprocal%20inhibition%20between%20social%20and%20physical%20cognitive%20domains&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Jack,%20Anthony%20I.&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=66&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=401&rft.pages=385-401&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3396571371%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c414c2de5e0e63d596da0a9c86e52a4811db2ed06288b233b7749a2f8e056db53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1552022432&rft_id=info:pmid/23110882&rfr_iscdi=true