Loading…

Impact of Lymph Node Ratio on Survival in Papillary Thyroid Cancer

Background In papillary thyroid cancer, the role of lymph node dissection remains controversial, and staging systems consider metastatic lymph nodes as a binary entity. The purpose of this study was to determine a threshold lymph node ratio (LNR) that impacted disease-specific mortality (DSM). Metho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of surgical oncology 2013-06, Vol.20 (6), p.1906-1911
Main Authors: Schneider, David F., Chen, Herbert, Sippel, Rebecca S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-223f2568b1816fed63648d9b31744c1477f06a5d0b296828bf94e57db200634d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-223f2568b1816fed63648d9b31744c1477f06a5d0b296828bf94e57db200634d3
container_end_page 1911
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1906
container_title Annals of surgical oncology
container_volume 20
creator Schneider, David F.
Chen, Herbert
Sippel, Rebecca S.
description Background In papillary thyroid cancer, the role of lymph node dissection remains controversial, and staging systems consider metastatic lymph nodes as a binary entity. The purpose of this study was to determine a threshold lymph node ratio (LNR) that impacted disease-specific mortality (DSM). Methods We utilized the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database to analyze adult patients who underwent thyroidectomy with lymph node dissection. A LNR (metastatic lymph nodes to total lymph nodes) was calculated after eliminating patients with less than three nodes collected. Kaplan–Meier estimates for DSM were plotted for LNRs and compared by the log rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate LNR with other known clinical and pathologic determinants of prognosis. Results A total of 10,955 cases contained data on lymph nodes. Median follow-up time was 25 months (range 0–59 months), and the mean LNR was 0.28 ± 0.37. After comparing Kaplan–Meier survival estimates and overall DSM rates, we found that a LNR ≥0.42 best divided those with lymph node metastasis based on DSM ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1245/s10434-012-2802-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3609925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2977024371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-223f2568b1816fed63648d9b31744c1477f06a5d0b296828bf94e57db200634d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtP3DAUhS1UxGPgB7CpLLFhk3L9jLOpBCNKkUaAKF1bTuIwRkkc7GSk-ff1MBRRpK5s-X4-9557EDoh8I1QLs4jAc54BoRmVAHN1A46ICK9cKnIl3QHqbKCSrGPDmN8BiA5A7GH9imjkhXAD9DlTTeYasS-wYt1Nyzxra8tfjCj89j3-NcUVm5lWux6fG8G17YmrPHjch28q_Hc9JUNR2i3MW20x2_nDP3-cfU4_5kt7q5v5heLrBJMjhmlrKFCqpIoIhtbSya5qouSkZzzivA8b0AaUUNJC6moKpuCW5HXJQWQjNdshr5vdYep7Gxd2X4MptVDcF0aSnvj9L-V3i31k19pJqEoqEgCZ28Cwb9MNo66c7GyyVNv_RQ1YYKlhRJQCT39hD77KfTJ3iuVp_0SSBTZUlXwMQbbvA9DQG8S0tuEdEpIbxLSG-WvH128__gbSQLoFoip1D_Z8KH1f1X_AIhqmY8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1353768110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Lymph Node Ratio on Survival in Papillary Thyroid Cancer</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Schneider, David F. ; Chen, Herbert ; Sippel, Rebecca S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schneider, David F. ; Chen, Herbert ; Sippel, Rebecca S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background In papillary thyroid cancer, the role of lymph node dissection remains controversial, and staging systems consider metastatic lymph nodes as a binary entity. The purpose of this study was to determine a threshold lymph node ratio (LNR) that impacted disease-specific mortality (DSM). Methods We utilized the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database to analyze adult patients who underwent thyroidectomy with lymph node dissection. A LNR (metastatic lymph nodes to total lymph nodes) was calculated after eliminating patients with less than three nodes collected. Kaplan–Meier estimates for DSM were plotted for LNRs and compared by the log rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate LNR with other known clinical and pathologic determinants of prognosis. Results A total of 10,955 cases contained data on lymph nodes. Median follow-up time was 25 months (range 0–59 months), and the mean LNR was 0.28 ± 0.37. After comparing Kaplan–Meier survival estimates and overall DSM rates, we found that a LNR ≥0.42 best divided those with lymph node metastasis based on DSM ( p  &lt; 0.01). Those with a LNR ≥0.42 experienced a DSM rate of 1.72 % while those with a LNR &lt;0.42 had a DSM rate of 0.65 % ( p  &lt; 0.01). In addition, patients with a LNR ≥0.42 experienced a 77 % higher DSM rate compared to those with metastatic lymph nodes as a whole. When considered with other known determinants of prognosis, we found that LNR was strongly associated with DSM (hazard ratio 4.33, 95 % confidence interval 1.68–11.18, p  &lt; 0.01). Conclusions LNR is a strong determinant of DSM, and a threshold LNR of 0.42 can be used to risk-stratify patients with metastatic lymph nodes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2802-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23263904</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Carcinoma - mortality ; Carcinoma - pathology ; Carcinoma, Papillary ; Confidence Intervals ; Endocrine Tumors ; Female ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Oncology ; Proportional Hazards Models ; SEER Program ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Thyroid Cancer, Papillary ; Thyroid Neoplasms - mortality ; Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2013-06, Vol.20 (6), p.1906-1911</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2012</rights><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-223f2568b1816fed63648d9b31744c1477f06a5d0b296828bf94e57db200634d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-223f2568b1816fed63648d9b31744c1477f06a5d0b296828bf94e57db200634d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23263904$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schneider, David F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sippel, Rebecca S.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Lymph Node Ratio on Survival in Papillary Thyroid Cancer</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background In papillary thyroid cancer, the role of lymph node dissection remains controversial, and staging systems consider metastatic lymph nodes as a binary entity. The purpose of this study was to determine a threshold lymph node ratio (LNR) that impacted disease-specific mortality (DSM). Methods We utilized the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database to analyze adult patients who underwent thyroidectomy with lymph node dissection. A LNR (metastatic lymph nodes to total lymph nodes) was calculated after eliminating patients with less than three nodes collected. Kaplan–Meier estimates for DSM were plotted for LNRs and compared by the log rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate LNR with other known clinical and pathologic determinants of prognosis. Results A total of 10,955 cases contained data on lymph nodes. Median follow-up time was 25 months (range 0–59 months), and the mean LNR was 0.28 ± 0.37. After comparing Kaplan–Meier survival estimates and overall DSM rates, we found that a LNR ≥0.42 best divided those with lymph node metastasis based on DSM ( p  &lt; 0.01). Those with a LNR ≥0.42 experienced a DSM rate of 1.72 % while those with a LNR &lt;0.42 had a DSM rate of 0.65 % ( p  &lt; 0.01). In addition, patients with a LNR ≥0.42 experienced a 77 % higher DSM rate compared to those with metastatic lymph nodes as a whole. When considered with other known determinants of prognosis, we found that LNR was strongly associated with DSM (hazard ratio 4.33, 95 % confidence interval 1.68–11.18, p  &lt; 0.01). Conclusions LNR is a strong determinant of DSM, and a threshold LNR of 0.42 can be used to risk-stratify patients with metastatic lymph nodes.</description><subject>Carcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Papillary</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Endocrine Tumors</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>SEER Program</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Thyroid Cancer, Papillary</subject><subject>Thyroid Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUtP3DAUhS1UxGPgB7CpLLFhk3L9jLOpBCNKkUaAKF1bTuIwRkkc7GSk-ff1MBRRpK5s-X4-9557EDoh8I1QLs4jAc54BoRmVAHN1A46ICK9cKnIl3QHqbKCSrGPDmN8BiA5A7GH9imjkhXAD9DlTTeYasS-wYt1Nyzxra8tfjCj89j3-NcUVm5lWux6fG8G17YmrPHjch28q_Hc9JUNR2i3MW20x2_nDP3-cfU4_5kt7q5v5heLrBJMjhmlrKFCqpIoIhtbSya5qouSkZzzivA8b0AaUUNJC6moKpuCW5HXJQWQjNdshr5vdYep7Gxd2X4MptVDcF0aSnvj9L-V3i31k19pJqEoqEgCZ28Cwb9MNo66c7GyyVNv_RQ1YYKlhRJQCT39hD77KfTJ3iuVp_0SSBTZUlXwMQbbvA9DQG8S0tuEdEpIbxLSG-WvH128__gbSQLoFoip1D_Z8KH1f1X_AIhqmY8</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Schneider, David F.</creator><creator>Chen, Herbert</creator><creator>Sippel, Rebecca S.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Impact of Lymph Node Ratio on Survival in Papillary Thyroid Cancer</title><author>Schneider, David F. ; Chen, Herbert ; Sippel, Rebecca S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-223f2568b1816fed63648d9b31744c1477f06a5d0b296828bf94e57db200634d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Carcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Papillary</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Endocrine Tumors</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>SEER Program</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Thyroid Cancer, Papillary</topic><topic>Thyroid Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneider, David F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sippel, Rebecca S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneider, David F.</au><au>Chen, Herbert</au><au>Sippel, Rebecca S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Lymph Node Ratio on Survival in Papillary Thyroid Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1906</spage><epage>1911</epage><pages>1906-1911</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background In papillary thyroid cancer, the role of lymph node dissection remains controversial, and staging systems consider metastatic lymph nodes as a binary entity. The purpose of this study was to determine a threshold lymph node ratio (LNR) that impacted disease-specific mortality (DSM). Methods We utilized the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database to analyze adult patients who underwent thyroidectomy with lymph node dissection. A LNR (metastatic lymph nodes to total lymph nodes) was calculated after eliminating patients with less than three nodes collected. Kaplan–Meier estimates for DSM were plotted for LNRs and compared by the log rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate LNR with other known clinical and pathologic determinants of prognosis. Results A total of 10,955 cases contained data on lymph nodes. Median follow-up time was 25 months (range 0–59 months), and the mean LNR was 0.28 ± 0.37. After comparing Kaplan–Meier survival estimates and overall DSM rates, we found that a LNR ≥0.42 best divided those with lymph node metastasis based on DSM ( p  &lt; 0.01). Those with a LNR ≥0.42 experienced a DSM rate of 1.72 % while those with a LNR &lt;0.42 had a DSM rate of 0.65 % ( p  &lt; 0.01). In addition, patients with a LNR ≥0.42 experienced a 77 % higher DSM rate compared to those with metastatic lymph nodes as a whole. When considered with other known determinants of prognosis, we found that LNR was strongly associated with DSM (hazard ratio 4.33, 95 % confidence interval 1.68–11.18, p  &lt; 0.01). Conclusions LNR is a strong determinant of DSM, and a threshold LNR of 0.42 can be used to risk-stratify patients with metastatic lymph nodes.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>23263904</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-012-2802-8</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-9265
ispartof Annals of surgical oncology, 2013-06, Vol.20 (6), p.1906-1911
issn 1068-9265
1534-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3609925
source Springer Nature
subjects Carcinoma - mortality
Carcinoma - pathology
Carcinoma, Papillary
Confidence Intervals
Endocrine Tumors
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Oncology
Proportional Hazards Models
SEER Program
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Thyroid Cancer, Papillary
Thyroid Neoplasms - mortality
Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology
title Impact of Lymph Node Ratio on Survival in Papillary Thyroid Cancer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T09%3A16%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Lymph%20Node%20Ratio%20on%20Survival%20in%20Papillary%20Thyroid%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Schneider,%20David%20F.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1906&rft.epage=1911&rft.pages=1906-1911&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-012-2802-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2977024371%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-223f2568b1816fed63648d9b31744c1477f06a5d0b296828bf94e57db200634d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1353768110&rft_id=info:pmid/23263904&rfr_iscdi=true