How important tasks are performed: peer review

The advancement of various fields of science depends on the actions of individual scientists via the peer review process. The referees' work patterns and stochastic nature of decision making both relate to the particular features of refereeing and to the universal aspects of human behavior. Her...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2013-04, Vol.3 (1), p.1679-1679, Article 1679
Main Authors: Hartonen, T., Alava, M. J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
631/378
639/766
639/766/408/530
639/766/408/747
Competition
Decision Making
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
multidisciplinary
Peer review
Peer Review - methods
Reviews
Science
Time Factors
Workload - statistics & numerical data
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The advancement of various fields of science depends on the actions of individual scientists via the peer review process. The referees' work patterns and stochastic nature of decision making both relate to the particular features of refereeing and to the universal aspects of human behavior. Here, we show that the time a referee takes to write a report on a scientific manuscript depends on the final verdict. The data is compared to a model, where the review takes place in an ongoing competition of completing an important composite task with a large number of concurrent ones - a Deadline -effect. In peer review human decision making and task completion combine both long-range predictability and stochastic variation due to a large degree of ever-changing external “friction”.
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/srep01679