Loading…
Views of UK-trained medical graduates of 1999–2009 about their first postgraduate year of training: national surveys
Background In the UK, doctors’ first year of medical work is also their first year of postgraduate training. It is very important that their experience of work and training is good. Design Surveys of entire cohorts graduating in particular years. Setting UK. Method Questionnaires sent 1 year after q...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMJ open 2013-01, Vol.3 (4), p.e002723 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-6678cc54caf9d1b0f7318e50886b89ece386ebf2b03059ca08af2a9c421d3d363 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-6678cc54caf9d1b0f7318e50886b89ece386ebf2b03059ca08af2a9c421d3d363 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e002723 |
container_title | BMJ open |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Lambert, Trevor W Surman, Geraldine Goldacre, Michael J |
description | Background In the UK, doctors’ first year of medical work is also their first year of postgraduate training. It is very important that their experience of work and training is good. Design Surveys of entire cohorts graduating in particular years. Setting UK. Method Questionnaires sent 1 year after qualification to all UK medical graduates of 1999, 2000, 2002, 2005, 2008 and 2009. Results The study comprised 17 831 respondents. Variation in views across cohorts was modest. Overall, 30% agreed their training had been of a high standard; 38% agreed educational opportunities had been good; 52% agreed they had to do too much routine non-medical work; and 16% agreed they had to perform clinical tasks for which they felt inadequately trained. Job enjoyment, rated from 1 (‘I didn't enjoy it at all’) to 10 (‘I enjoyed it greatly’), improved from 70% of doctors in the 1999 cohort scoring 7–10 to 75% in the 2009 cohort. Satisfaction with available leisure time, rated from 1 (‘not at all satisfied’) to 10 (‘extremely satisfied’), rose from 24% scoring 7–10 in the 1999s to 49% in the 2009s. Male–female differences were small. Conclusions There was improvement over the decade in some aspects of work, particularly satisfaction with time off work for leisure, and overall enjoyment of the job. There was little change in doctors’ views about the training experience offered by the F1 year. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002723 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3641473</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4031452541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-6678cc54caf9d1b0f7318e50886b89ece386ebf2b03059ca08af2a9c421d3d363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EolXpEyAhS2zYTOvfsc0CCVX8VFRiQ9laHs-d1NFkHGxPqux4B96QJ8Fp0qqwwptr6X7n6B4dhF5SckYpb8-71TKuYWoYobwhhCnGn6BjRoRoWiLl00f_I3Sa85LUJ6SRkj1HR4xLSYgRx2jzPcBtxnHA11-aklyYoMcr6IN3I14k18-uwN2eGmN-__zFqg67Ls4FlxsICQ8h5YLXMZd7HG_BpZ3kzi9Mi7d4ciXEqVrmOW1gm1-gZ4MbM5we5gm6_vjh28Xn5urrp8uL91dNJxQrTdsq7b0U3g2mpx0ZFKcaJNG67bQBD1y30A2sI5xI4x3RbmDOeMFoz3ve8hP0bu-7nruaysNUbxrtOoWVS1sbXbB_b6ZwYxdxY3krqFC8Grw5GKT4Y4Zc7CpkD-PoJohztpQzroxUwlT09T_oMs6phq6U0lzqWoiqFN9TPsWcEwwPx1Bid9XaQ7V2V63dV1tVrx7neNDcF1mBsz1Q1f_l-AfV2rFH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1783580447</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Views of UK-trained medical graduates of 1999–2009 about their first postgraduate year of training: national surveys</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>BMJ Journals (Open Access)</source><source>BMJ Journals</source><creator>Lambert, Trevor W ; Surman, Geraldine ; Goldacre, Michael J</creator><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Trevor W ; Surman, Geraldine ; Goldacre, Michael J</creatorcontrib><description>Background In the UK, doctors’ first year of medical work is also their first year of postgraduate training. It is very important that their experience of work and training is good. Design Surveys of entire cohorts graduating in particular years. Setting UK. Method Questionnaires sent 1 year after qualification to all UK medical graduates of 1999, 2000, 2002, 2005, 2008 and 2009. Results The study comprised 17 831 respondents. Variation in views across cohorts was modest. Overall, 30% agreed their training had been of a high standard; 38% agreed educational opportunities had been good; 52% agreed they had to do too much routine non-medical work; and 16% agreed they had to perform clinical tasks for which they felt inadequately trained. Job enjoyment, rated from 1 (‘I didn't enjoy it at all’) to 10 (‘I enjoyed it greatly’), improved from 70% of doctors in the 1999 cohort scoring 7–10 to 75% in the 2009 cohort. Satisfaction with available leisure time, rated from 1 (‘not at all satisfied’) to 10 (‘extremely satisfied’), rose from 24% scoring 7–10 in the 1999s to 49% in the 2009s. Male–female differences were small. Conclusions There was improvement over the decade in some aspects of work, particularly satisfaction with time off work for leisure, and overall enjoyment of the job. There was little change in doctors’ views about the training experience offered by the F1 year.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002723</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23550094</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Bias ; Careers ; Health education ; Medical Education and Training ; Physicians ; Response rates</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2013-01, Vol.3 (4), p.e002723</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions 2013 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-6678cc54caf9d1b0f7318e50886b89ece386ebf2b03059ca08af2a9c421d3d363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-6678cc54caf9d1b0f7318e50886b89ece386ebf2b03059ca08af2a9c421d3d363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1783580447/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1783580447?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,230,314,727,780,784,885,3192,25751,27547,27548,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,53789,53791,74896,77364,77365,77371,77402</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23550094$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Trevor W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surman, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldacre, Michael J</creatorcontrib><title>Views of UK-trained medical graduates of 1999–2009 about their first postgraduate year of training: national surveys</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>Background In the UK, doctors’ first year of medical work is also their first year of postgraduate training. It is very important that their experience of work and training is good. Design Surveys of entire cohorts graduating in particular years. Setting UK. Method Questionnaires sent 1 year after qualification to all UK medical graduates of 1999, 2000, 2002, 2005, 2008 and 2009. Results The study comprised 17 831 respondents. Variation in views across cohorts was modest. Overall, 30% agreed their training had been of a high standard; 38% agreed educational opportunities had been good; 52% agreed they had to do too much routine non-medical work; and 16% agreed they had to perform clinical tasks for which they felt inadequately trained. Job enjoyment, rated from 1 (‘I didn't enjoy it at all’) to 10 (‘I enjoyed it greatly’), improved from 70% of doctors in the 1999 cohort scoring 7–10 to 75% in the 2009 cohort. Satisfaction with available leisure time, rated from 1 (‘not at all satisfied’) to 10 (‘extremely satisfied’), rose from 24% scoring 7–10 in the 1999s to 49% in the 2009s. Male–female differences were small. Conclusions There was improvement over the decade in some aspects of work, particularly satisfaction with time off work for leisure, and overall enjoyment of the job. There was little change in doctors’ views about the training experience offered by the F1 year.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Medical Education and Training</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EolXpEyAhS2zYTOvfsc0CCVX8VFRiQ9laHs-d1NFkHGxPqux4B96QJ8Fp0qqwwptr6X7n6B4dhF5SckYpb8-71TKuYWoYobwhhCnGn6BjRoRoWiLl00f_I3Sa85LUJ6SRkj1HR4xLSYgRx2jzPcBtxnHA11-aklyYoMcr6IN3I14k18-uwN2eGmN-__zFqg67Ls4FlxsICQ8h5YLXMZd7HG_BpZ3kzi9Mi7d4ciXEqVrmOW1gm1-gZ4MbM5we5gm6_vjh28Xn5urrp8uL91dNJxQrTdsq7b0U3g2mpx0ZFKcaJNG67bQBD1y30A2sI5xI4x3RbmDOeMFoz3ve8hP0bu-7nruaysNUbxrtOoWVS1sbXbB_b6ZwYxdxY3krqFC8Grw5GKT4Y4Zc7CpkD-PoJohztpQzroxUwlT09T_oMs6phq6U0lzqWoiqFN9TPsWcEwwPx1Bid9XaQ7V2V63dV1tVrx7neNDcF1mBsz1Q1f_l-AfV2rFH</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Lambert, Trevor W</creator><creator>Surman, Geraldine</creator><creator>Goldacre, Michael J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Views of UK-trained medical graduates of 1999–2009 about their first postgraduate year of training: national surveys</title><author>Lambert, Trevor W ; Surman, Geraldine ; Goldacre, Michael J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-6678cc54caf9d1b0f7318e50886b89ece386ebf2b03059ca08af2a9c421d3d363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Medical Education and Training</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Trevor W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surman, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldacre, Michael J</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Journals (Open Access)</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lambert, Trevor W</au><au>Surman, Geraldine</au><au>Goldacre, Michael J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Views of UK-trained medical graduates of 1999–2009 about their first postgraduate year of training: national surveys</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e002723</spage><pages>e002723-</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>Background In the UK, doctors’ first year of medical work is also their first year of postgraduate training. It is very important that their experience of work and training is good. Design Surveys of entire cohorts graduating in particular years. Setting UK. Method Questionnaires sent 1 year after qualification to all UK medical graduates of 1999, 2000, 2002, 2005, 2008 and 2009. Results The study comprised 17 831 respondents. Variation in views across cohorts was modest. Overall, 30% agreed their training had been of a high standard; 38% agreed educational opportunities had been good; 52% agreed they had to do too much routine non-medical work; and 16% agreed they had to perform clinical tasks for which they felt inadequately trained. Job enjoyment, rated from 1 (‘I didn't enjoy it at all’) to 10 (‘I enjoyed it greatly’), improved from 70% of doctors in the 1999 cohort scoring 7–10 to 75% in the 2009 cohort. Satisfaction with available leisure time, rated from 1 (‘not at all satisfied’) to 10 (‘extremely satisfied’), rose from 24% scoring 7–10 in the 1999s to 49% in the 2009s. Male–female differences were small. Conclusions There was improvement over the decade in some aspects of work, particularly satisfaction with time off work for leisure, and overall enjoyment of the job. There was little change in doctors’ views about the training experience offered by the F1 year.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>23550094</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002723</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2044-6055 |
ispartof | BMJ open, 2013-01, Vol.3 (4), p.e002723 |
issn | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3641473 |
source | PubMed Central (Open Access); Publicly Available Content Database; BMJ Journals (Open Access); BMJ Journals |
subjects | Bias Careers Health education Medical Education and Training Physicians Response rates |
title | Views of UK-trained medical graduates of 1999–2009 about their first postgraduate year of training: national surveys |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T06%3A18%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Views%20of%20UK-trained%20medical%20graduates%20of%201999%E2%80%932009%20about%20their%20first%20postgraduate%20year%20of%20training:%20national%20surveys&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Lambert,%20Trevor%20W&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e002723&rft.pages=e002723-&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002723&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4031452541%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-6678cc54caf9d1b0f7318e50886b89ece386ebf2b03059ca08af2a9c421d3d363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1783580447&rft_id=info:pmid/23550094&rfr_iscdi=true |