Loading…
Influence of post-thickness and material on the fracture strength of teeth with reduced coronal structure
Purpose: To evaluate the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with reduced coronal structure reinforced with glass-fiber posts and cast posts and core (nickel-chromium alloy) with different thickness. Materials and Methods: Forty maxillary central incisors were sectioned at 1 mm of the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of conservative dentistry 2013-03, Vol.16 (2), p.139-143 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496c-c92ffd0fccd48882a44063fd1b691e854abf58797d14ab7cab75cc5408cabce43 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 143 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 139 |
container_title | Journal of conservative dentistry |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Bacchi, Ataís Fernandes dos Santos, Mateus Pimentel, Marcele Caetano, Conrado Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre Consani, Rafael Leonardo |
description | Purpose: To evaluate the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with reduced coronal structure reinforced with glass-fiber posts and cast posts and core (nickel-chromium alloy) with different thickness.
Materials and Methods: Forty maxillary central incisors were sectioned at 1 mm of the cementoenamel junction and endodontically treated. The teeth were divided into four groups ( n = 10) and restored with cast post and core and glass-fiber posts with diameters of 1.5 mm and 1.1 mm. The fracture strength was evaluated using a Universal Testing Machine (Instron 1144) at 45° of angulation. The results were submitted to analysis of variance two-way and Tukey′s test ( P < 0.05). The failure mode was also evaluated.
Results: Cast post and core were statistically superior to the glass-fiber posts with the self-post diameter ( P = 0.001). When the self-post material was considered, no significant difference was observed between the two post-diameters ( P = 0.749). The glass-fiber post-groups presented more fractures in the cervical third than the cast post and core groups.
Conclusion: Teeth restored with cast post and cores present higher fracture strength than those reinforced with glass-fiber posts. An increased post-thickness does not increase the fracture strength. Glass-fiber posts lead to less severe fractures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/0972-0707.108196 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3659859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A324679756</galeid><sourcerecordid>A324679756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496c-c92ffd0fccd48882a44063fd1b691e854abf58797d14ab7cab75cc5408cabce43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptksFvFCEUxidGY2v17slMYmJ6mRUGhhkuJrWp2qSJFz0Tlnns0GVgBaYb_3uZTlt3jSHAC_y-j_DyFcVbjFYUI_IR8bauUIvaFUYd5uxZcZqPaNXUiDy_r5frk-JVjLcIMUo5elmc1KTFjDN2Wphrp-0ETkHpdbnzMVVpMGrrIMZSur4cZYJgpC29K9MApQ5SpSlAGVMAt0nDrEsAudibvAToJwV9qXzwLssyNt0LXhcvtLQR3jzsZ8XPL1c_Lr9VN9-_Xl9e3FSKcqYqxWute6SV6mnXdbWkFDGie7xmHEPXULnWTdfytse5bFWejVINRV0uFVByVnxafHfTeoRegUtBWrELZpTht_DSiOMbZwax8XeCsIZ3Dc8G5w8Gwf-aICYxmqjAWunAT1Fg0jDesBbPb73_B731U8jfnqmaUM5rgv9SG2lBGKd9flfNpuKC1JTlzzQsU6v_UHn0MBrlHWiTz48EHw4EA0ibhujtlIx38RhEC6iCjzGAfmoGRmLOkZiDIuagiCVHWfLusIlPgsfgZODzAuy9zQGJWzvtIYjMbp3fHxlXB8a5LVw8Ro78AVIw2Jg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1323499231</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of post-thickness and material on the fracture strength of teeth with reduced coronal structure</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bacchi, Ataís ; Fernandes dos Santos, Mateus ; Pimentel, Marcele ; Caetano, Conrado ; Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre ; Consani, Rafael Leonardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Bacchi, Ataís ; Fernandes dos Santos, Mateus ; Pimentel, Marcele ; Caetano, Conrado ; Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre ; Consani, Rafael Leonardo</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To evaluate the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with reduced coronal structure reinforced with glass-fiber posts and cast posts and core (nickel-chromium alloy) with different thickness.
Materials and Methods: Forty maxillary central incisors were sectioned at 1 mm of the cementoenamel junction and endodontically treated. The teeth were divided into four groups ( n = 10) and restored with cast post and core and glass-fiber posts with diameters of 1.5 mm and 1.1 mm. The fracture strength was evaluated using a Universal Testing Machine (Instron 1144) at 45° of angulation. The results were submitted to analysis of variance two-way and Tukey′s test ( P < 0.05). The failure mode was also evaluated.
Results: Cast post and core were statistically superior to the glass-fiber posts with the self-post diameter ( P = 0.001). When the self-post material was considered, no significant difference was observed between the two post-diameters ( P = 0.749). The glass-fiber post-groups presented more fractures in the cervical third than the cast post and core groups.
Conclusion: Teeth restored with cast post and cores present higher fracture strength than those reinforced with glass-fiber posts. An increased post-thickness does not increase the fracture strength. Glass-fiber posts lead to less severe fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-0707</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-5203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.108196</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23716966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications</publisher><subject>Dentin ; Injuries ; Original ; Studies ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Journal of conservative dentistry, 2013-03, Vol.16 (2), p.139-143</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd Apr 2013</rights><rights>Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496c-c92ffd0fccd48882a44063fd1b691e854abf58797d14ab7cab75cc5408cabce43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3659859/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1323499231?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23716966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bacchi, Ataís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes dos Santos, Mateus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimentel, Marcele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caetano, Conrado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consani, Rafael Leonardo</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of post-thickness and material on the fracture strength of teeth with reduced coronal structure</title><title>Journal of conservative dentistry</title><addtitle>J Conserv Dent</addtitle><description>Purpose: To evaluate the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with reduced coronal structure reinforced with glass-fiber posts and cast posts and core (nickel-chromium alloy) with different thickness.
Materials and Methods: Forty maxillary central incisors were sectioned at 1 mm of the cementoenamel junction and endodontically treated. The teeth were divided into four groups ( n = 10) and restored with cast post and core and glass-fiber posts with diameters of 1.5 mm and 1.1 mm. The fracture strength was evaluated using a Universal Testing Machine (Instron 1144) at 45° of angulation. The results were submitted to analysis of variance two-way and Tukey′s test ( P < 0.05). The failure mode was also evaluated.
Results: Cast post and core were statistically superior to the glass-fiber posts with the self-post diameter ( P = 0.001). When the self-post material was considered, no significant difference was observed between the two post-diameters ( P = 0.749). The glass-fiber post-groups presented more fractures in the cervical third than the cast post and core groups.
Conclusion: Teeth restored with cast post and cores present higher fracture strength than those reinforced with glass-fiber posts. An increased post-thickness does not increase the fracture strength. Glass-fiber posts lead to less severe fractures.</description><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>0972-0707</issn><issn>0974-5203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptksFvFCEUxidGY2v17slMYmJ6mRUGhhkuJrWp2qSJFz0Tlnns0GVgBaYb_3uZTlt3jSHAC_y-j_DyFcVbjFYUI_IR8bauUIvaFUYd5uxZcZqPaNXUiDy_r5frk-JVjLcIMUo5elmc1KTFjDN2Wphrp-0ETkHpdbnzMVVpMGrrIMZSur4cZYJgpC29K9MApQ5SpSlAGVMAt0nDrEsAudibvAToJwV9qXzwLssyNt0LXhcvtLQR3jzsZ8XPL1c_Lr9VN9-_Xl9e3FSKcqYqxWute6SV6mnXdbWkFDGie7xmHEPXULnWTdfytse5bFWejVINRV0uFVByVnxafHfTeoRegUtBWrELZpTht_DSiOMbZwax8XeCsIZ3Dc8G5w8Gwf-aICYxmqjAWunAT1Fg0jDesBbPb73_B731U8jfnqmaUM5rgv9SG2lBGKd9flfNpuKC1JTlzzQsU6v_UHn0MBrlHWiTz48EHw4EA0ibhujtlIx38RhEC6iCjzGAfmoGRmLOkZiDIuagiCVHWfLusIlPgsfgZODzAuy9zQGJWzvtIYjMbp3fHxlXB8a5LVw8Ro78AVIw2Jg</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Bacchi, Ataís</creator><creator>Fernandes dos Santos, Mateus</creator><creator>Pimentel, Marcele</creator><creator>Caetano, Conrado</creator><creator>Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre</creator><creator>Consani, Rafael Leonardo</creator><general>Medknow Publications</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Influence of post-thickness and material on the fracture strength of teeth with reduced coronal structure</title><author>Bacchi, Ataís ; Fernandes dos Santos, Mateus ; Pimentel, Marcele ; Caetano, Conrado ; Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre ; Consani, Rafael Leonardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496c-c92ffd0fccd48882a44063fd1b691e854abf58797d14ab7cab75cc5408cabce43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bacchi, Ataís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes dos Santos, Mateus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimentel, Marcele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caetano, Conrado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consani, Rafael Leonardo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of conservative dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bacchi, Ataís</au><au>Fernandes dos Santos, Mateus</au><au>Pimentel, Marcele</au><au>Caetano, Conrado</au><au>Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre</au><au>Consani, Rafael Leonardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of post-thickness and material on the fracture strength of teeth with reduced coronal structure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of conservative dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Conserv Dent</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>139-143</pages><issn>0972-0707</issn><eissn>0974-5203</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To evaluate the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with reduced coronal structure reinforced with glass-fiber posts and cast posts and core (nickel-chromium alloy) with different thickness.
Materials and Methods: Forty maxillary central incisors were sectioned at 1 mm of the cementoenamel junction and endodontically treated. The teeth were divided into four groups ( n = 10) and restored with cast post and core and glass-fiber posts with diameters of 1.5 mm and 1.1 mm. The fracture strength was evaluated using a Universal Testing Machine (Instron 1144) at 45° of angulation. The results were submitted to analysis of variance two-way and Tukey′s test ( P < 0.05). The failure mode was also evaluated.
Results: Cast post and core were statistically superior to the glass-fiber posts with the self-post diameter ( P = 0.001). When the self-post material was considered, no significant difference was observed between the two post-diameters ( P = 0.749). The glass-fiber post-groups presented more fractures in the cervical third than the cast post and core groups.
Conclusion: Teeth restored with cast post and cores present higher fracture strength than those reinforced with glass-fiber posts. An increased post-thickness does not increase the fracture strength. Glass-fiber posts lead to less severe fractures.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications</pub><pmid>23716966</pmid><doi>10.4103/0972-0707.108196</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0972-0707 |
ispartof | Journal of conservative dentistry, 2013-03, Vol.16 (2), p.139-143 |
issn | 0972-0707 0974-5203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3659859 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Dentin Injuries Original Studies Teeth |
title | Influence of post-thickness and material on the fracture strength of teeth with reduced coronal structure |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A13%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20post-thickness%20and%20material%20on%20the%20fracture%20strength%20of%20teeth%20with%20reduced%20coronal%20structure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20conservative%20dentistry&rft.au=Bacchi,%20Ata%C3%ADs&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=139-143&rft.issn=0972-0707&rft.eissn=0974-5203&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/0972-0707.108196&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA324679756%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496c-c92ffd0fccd48882a44063fd1b691e854abf58797d14ab7cab75cc5408cabce43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1323499231&rft_id=info:pmid/23716966&rft_galeid=A324679756&rfr_iscdi=true |