Loading…

Injecting Risk Behavior among Traveling Young Injection Drug Users: Travel Partner and City Characteristics

Young injection drug users (IDUs), a highly mobile population, engage in high levels of injecting risk behavior, yet little is understood about how such risk behavior may vary by the characteristics of the cities to which they travel, including the existence of a syringe exchange program (SEP), as w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of urban health 2013-06, Vol.90 (3), p.500-515
Main Authors: Montgomery, Martha E., Fatch, Robin S., Evans, Jennifer L., Yu, Michelle, Davidson, Peter J., Page, Kimberly, Hahn, Judith A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-a1f97e058a4d0a8878f0dbee8b59473450620352055cdd2f425c3b4f9b0c150d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-a1f97e058a4d0a8878f0dbee8b59473450620352055cdd2f425c3b4f9b0c150d3
container_end_page 515
container_issue 3
container_start_page 500
container_title Journal of urban health
container_volume 90
creator Montgomery, Martha E.
Fatch, Robin S.
Evans, Jennifer L.
Yu, Michelle
Davidson, Peter J.
Page, Kimberly
Hahn, Judith A.
description Young injection drug users (IDUs), a highly mobile population, engage in high levels of injecting risk behavior, yet little is understood about how such risk behavior may vary by the characteristics of the cities to which they travel, including the existence of a syringe exchange program (SEP), as well as travel partner characteristics. In 2004–2005, we conducted a 6-month prospective study to investigate the risk behavior of 89 young IDUs as they traveled, with detailed information gathered about 350 city visits. In multivariable analyses, travel to larger urban cities with a population of 500,000–1,000,000 was significantly associated with injecting drugs (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.71; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.56–8.82), ancillary equipment sharing (AES; AOR = 7.05; 95 % CI, 2.25–22.06) and receptive needle sharing (RNS; AOR = 5.73; 95 % CI, 1.11–27.95), as compared with visits to smaller cities with populations below 50,000. Region of the country, and the existence of a SEP within the city visited, were not independently associated with injecting drugs, AES, or RNS during city visits. Traveling with more than one injecting partner was associated with injecting drugs during city visits (AOR = 2.77; 95 % CI, 1.46–5.27), when compared with traveling alone. Additionally, both non-daily and daily/almost daily alcohol use during city visits were associated with AES (AOR = 3.37; 95 % CI, 1.42–7.68; AOR = 3.03; 95 % CI, 1.32–6.97, respectively) as compared with no alcohol consumption. Traveling young IDUs are more likely to inject when traveling with other IDUs and to engage in higher risk injection behavior when they are in large cities. Risk behavior occurring in city visits, including equipment sharing and alcohol consumption, suggests further need for focused interventions to reduce risk for viral infection among this population.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11524-012-9718-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3665972</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1372062364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-a1f97e058a4d0a8878f0dbee8b59473450620352055cdd2f425c3b4f9b0c150d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1LHDEUhoO0VGv7A7wpA73xZtqTr0nihVC3X4KgFL3wKmQymd2ss4lNZhb8982yq1jBm-SQ9zlvzuFF6AjDFwwgvmaMOWE1YFIrgWVN9tABZk0pZKPelBqUqilrYB-9z3kJgBsmyDu0T4hgjCh6gO7Ow9LZ0Yd59cfnu-rMLczax1SZVSxv18ms3bBRb-NUzh0dQ_U9TfPqJruUT3ZUdWXSGFxpDV018-NDNVuYZOzoks-jt_kDetubIbuPu_sQ3fz8cT37XV9c_jqffbuoLQc61gb3Sjjg0rAOjJRC9tC1zsmWKyYo49AQoJwA57brSM8It7RlvWrBYg4dPUSnW9_7qV25zrowJjPo--RXJj3oaLz-Xwl-oedxrWnTcCVIMTjeGaT4d3J51CufrRsGE1ycssZUkDIEbVhBP79Al3FKoaxXKM6lBKagUHhL2RRzTq5_GgaD3kSpt1HqEqXeRKk3Q3x6vsVTx2N2BSBbIBcpzF169vWrrv8A6_mqJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1355880490</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Injecting Risk Behavior among Traveling Young Injection Drug Users: Travel Partner and City Characteristics</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Montgomery, Martha E. ; Fatch, Robin S. ; Evans, Jennifer L. ; Yu, Michelle ; Davidson, Peter J. ; Page, Kimberly ; Hahn, Judith A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Martha E. ; Fatch, Robin S. ; Evans, Jennifer L. ; Yu, Michelle ; Davidson, Peter J. ; Page, Kimberly ; Hahn, Judith A.</creatorcontrib><description>Young injection drug users (IDUs), a highly mobile population, engage in high levels of injecting risk behavior, yet little is understood about how such risk behavior may vary by the characteristics of the cities to which they travel, including the existence of a syringe exchange program (SEP), as well as travel partner characteristics. In 2004–2005, we conducted a 6-month prospective study to investigate the risk behavior of 89 young IDUs as they traveled, with detailed information gathered about 350 city visits. In multivariable analyses, travel to larger urban cities with a population of 500,000–1,000,000 was significantly associated with injecting drugs (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.71; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.56–8.82), ancillary equipment sharing (AES; AOR = 7.05; 95 % CI, 2.25–22.06) and receptive needle sharing (RNS; AOR = 5.73; 95 % CI, 1.11–27.95), as compared with visits to smaller cities with populations below 50,000. Region of the country, and the existence of a SEP within the city visited, were not independently associated with injecting drugs, AES, or RNS during city visits. Traveling with more than one injecting partner was associated with injecting drugs during city visits (AOR = 2.77; 95 % CI, 1.46–5.27), when compared with traveling alone. Additionally, both non-daily and daily/almost daily alcohol use during city visits were associated with AES (AOR = 3.37; 95 % CI, 1.42–7.68; AOR = 3.03; 95 % CI, 1.32–6.97, respectively) as compared with no alcohol consumption. Traveling young IDUs are more likely to inject when traveling with other IDUs and to engage in higher risk injection behavior when they are in large cities. Risk behavior occurring in city visits, including equipment sharing and alcohol consumption, suggests further need for focused interventions to reduce risk for viral infection among this population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-3460</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2869</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11524-012-9718-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22744293</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Alcohol Drinking - epidemiology ; Alcoholic beverages ; Cities ; Drug use ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health Informatics ; Humans ; Injection ; Injections ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Multivariate Analysis ; Needle Sharing - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Needle-Exchange Programs ; Prospective Studies ; Public Health ; Risk taking ; Self Report ; Sexual Partners ; Substance Abuse, Intravenous - epidemiology ; Travel ; United States - epidemiology ; Young Adult ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Journal of urban health, 2013-06, Vol.90 (3), p.500-515</ispartof><rights>The New York Academy of Medicine 2012</rights><rights>The New York Academy of Medicine 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-a1f97e058a4d0a8878f0dbee8b59473450620352055cdd2f425c3b4f9b0c150d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-a1f97e058a4d0a8878f0dbee8b59473450620352055cdd2f425c3b4f9b0c150d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1355880490/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1355880490?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21373,27901,27902,33588,33589,43709,73964</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22744293$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Martha E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatch, Robin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Judith A.</creatorcontrib><title>Injecting Risk Behavior among Traveling Young Injection Drug Users: Travel Partner and City Characteristics</title><title>Journal of urban health</title><addtitle>J Urban Health</addtitle><addtitle>J Urban Health</addtitle><description>Young injection drug users (IDUs), a highly mobile population, engage in high levels of injecting risk behavior, yet little is understood about how such risk behavior may vary by the characteristics of the cities to which they travel, including the existence of a syringe exchange program (SEP), as well as travel partner characteristics. In 2004–2005, we conducted a 6-month prospective study to investigate the risk behavior of 89 young IDUs as they traveled, with detailed information gathered about 350 city visits. In multivariable analyses, travel to larger urban cities with a population of 500,000–1,000,000 was significantly associated with injecting drugs (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.71; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.56–8.82), ancillary equipment sharing (AES; AOR = 7.05; 95 % CI, 2.25–22.06) and receptive needle sharing (RNS; AOR = 5.73; 95 % CI, 1.11–27.95), as compared with visits to smaller cities with populations below 50,000. Region of the country, and the existence of a SEP within the city visited, were not independently associated with injecting drugs, AES, or RNS during city visits. Traveling with more than one injecting partner was associated with injecting drugs during city visits (AOR = 2.77; 95 % CI, 1.46–5.27), when compared with traveling alone. Additionally, both non-daily and daily/almost daily alcohol use during city visits were associated with AES (AOR = 3.37; 95 % CI, 1.42–7.68; AOR = 3.03; 95 % CI, 1.32–6.97, respectively) as compared with no alcohol consumption. Traveling young IDUs are more likely to inject when traveling with other IDUs and to engage in higher risk injection behavior when they are in large cities. Risk behavior occurring in city visits, including equipment sharing and alcohol consumption, suggests further need for focused interventions to reduce risk for viral infection among this population.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alcohol Drinking - epidemiology</subject><subject>Alcoholic beverages</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health Informatics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Injections</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Needle Sharing - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Needle-Exchange Programs</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Sexual Partners</subject><subject>Substance Abuse, Intravenous - epidemiology</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>1099-3460</issn><issn>1468-2869</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1LHDEUhoO0VGv7A7wpA73xZtqTr0nihVC3X4KgFL3wKmQymd2ss4lNZhb8982yq1jBm-SQ9zlvzuFF6AjDFwwgvmaMOWE1YFIrgWVN9tABZk0pZKPelBqUqilrYB-9z3kJgBsmyDu0T4hgjCh6gO7Ow9LZ0Yd59cfnu-rMLczax1SZVSxv18ms3bBRb-NUzh0dQ_U9TfPqJruUT3ZUdWXSGFxpDV018-NDNVuYZOzoks-jt_kDetubIbuPu_sQ3fz8cT37XV9c_jqffbuoLQc61gb3Sjjg0rAOjJRC9tC1zsmWKyYo49AQoJwA57brSM8It7RlvWrBYg4dPUSnW9_7qV25zrowJjPo--RXJj3oaLz-Xwl-oedxrWnTcCVIMTjeGaT4d3J51CufrRsGE1ycssZUkDIEbVhBP79Al3FKoaxXKM6lBKagUHhL2RRzTq5_GgaD3kSpt1HqEqXeRKk3Q3x6vsVTx2N2BSBbIBcpzF169vWrrv8A6_mqJw</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Montgomery, Martha E.</creator><creator>Fatch, Robin S.</creator><creator>Evans, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>Yu, Michelle</creator><creator>Davidson, Peter J.</creator><creator>Page, Kimberly</creator><creator>Hahn, Judith A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Injecting Risk Behavior among Traveling Young Injection Drug Users: Travel Partner and City Characteristics</title><author>Montgomery, Martha E. ; Fatch, Robin S. ; Evans, Jennifer L. ; Yu, Michelle ; Davidson, Peter J. ; Page, Kimberly ; Hahn, Judith A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-a1f97e058a4d0a8878f0dbee8b59473450620352055cdd2f425c3b4f9b0c150d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alcohol Drinking - epidemiology</topic><topic>Alcoholic beverages</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health Informatics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Injections</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Needle Sharing - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Needle-Exchange Programs</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Sexual Partners</topic><topic>Substance Abuse, Intravenous - epidemiology</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Martha E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatch, Robin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Judith A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of urban health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Montgomery, Martha E.</au><au>Fatch, Robin S.</au><au>Evans, Jennifer L.</au><au>Yu, Michelle</au><au>Davidson, Peter J.</au><au>Page, Kimberly</au><au>Hahn, Judith A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Injecting Risk Behavior among Traveling Young Injection Drug Users: Travel Partner and City Characteristics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of urban health</jtitle><stitle>J Urban Health</stitle><addtitle>J Urban Health</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>500</spage><epage>515</epage><pages>500-515</pages><issn>1099-3460</issn><eissn>1468-2869</eissn><abstract>Young injection drug users (IDUs), a highly mobile population, engage in high levels of injecting risk behavior, yet little is understood about how such risk behavior may vary by the characteristics of the cities to which they travel, including the existence of a syringe exchange program (SEP), as well as travel partner characteristics. In 2004–2005, we conducted a 6-month prospective study to investigate the risk behavior of 89 young IDUs as they traveled, with detailed information gathered about 350 city visits. In multivariable analyses, travel to larger urban cities with a population of 500,000–1,000,000 was significantly associated with injecting drugs (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.71; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.56–8.82), ancillary equipment sharing (AES; AOR = 7.05; 95 % CI, 2.25–22.06) and receptive needle sharing (RNS; AOR = 5.73; 95 % CI, 1.11–27.95), as compared with visits to smaller cities with populations below 50,000. Region of the country, and the existence of a SEP within the city visited, were not independently associated with injecting drugs, AES, or RNS during city visits. Traveling with more than one injecting partner was associated with injecting drugs during city visits (AOR = 2.77; 95 % CI, 1.46–5.27), when compared with traveling alone. Additionally, both non-daily and daily/almost daily alcohol use during city visits were associated with AES (AOR = 3.37; 95 % CI, 1.42–7.68; AOR = 3.03; 95 % CI, 1.32–6.97, respectively) as compared with no alcohol consumption. Traveling young IDUs are more likely to inject when traveling with other IDUs and to engage in higher risk injection behavior when they are in large cities. Risk behavior occurring in city visits, including equipment sharing and alcohol consumption, suggests further need for focused interventions to reduce risk for viral infection among this population.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>22744293</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11524-012-9718-2</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1099-3460
ispartof Journal of urban health, 2013-06, Vol.90 (3), p.500-515
issn 1099-3460
1468-2869
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3665972
source Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Link
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Alcohol Drinking - epidemiology
Alcoholic beverages
Cities
Drug use
Epidemiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Health Informatics
Humans
Injection
Injections
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Multivariate Analysis
Needle Sharing - statistics & numerical data
Needle-Exchange Programs
Prospective Studies
Public Health
Risk taking
Self Report
Sexual Partners
Substance Abuse, Intravenous - epidemiology
Travel
United States - epidemiology
Young Adult
Young adults
title Injecting Risk Behavior among Traveling Young Injection Drug Users: Travel Partner and City Characteristics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T11%3A47%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Injecting%20Risk%20Behavior%20among%20Traveling%20Young%20Injection%20Drug%20Users:%20Travel%20Partner%20and%20City%20Characteristics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20urban%20health&rft.au=Montgomery,%20Martha%20E.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=500&rft.epage=515&rft.pages=500-515&rft.issn=1099-3460&rft.eissn=1468-2869&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11524-012-9718-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1372062364%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-a1f97e058a4d0a8878f0dbee8b59473450620352055cdd2f425c3b4f9b0c150d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1355880490&rft_id=info:pmid/22744293&rfr_iscdi=true