Loading…
Clinical Implications of Numeracy: Theory and Practice
Background Low numeracy is pervasive and constrains informed patient choice, reduces medication compliance, limits access to treatments, impairs risk communication, and affects medical outcomes; therefore, it is incumbent upon providers to minimize its adverse effects. Purpose We provide an overview...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of behavioral medicine 2008-06, Vol.35 (3), p.261-274 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-32604840177c533a7a0367d81f5ffaba7628a7c4222535c5f9b9287cd83ea3713 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-32604840177c533a7a0367d81f5ffaba7628a7c4222535c5f9b9287cd83ea3713 |
container_end_page | 274 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 261 |
container_title | Annals of behavioral medicine |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Nelson, Wendy Reyna, Valerie F. Fagerlin, Angela Lipkus, Isaac Peters, Ellen |
description | Background
Low numeracy is pervasive and constrains informed patient choice, reduces medication compliance, limits access to treatments, impairs risk communication, and affects medical outcomes; therefore, it is incumbent upon providers to minimize its adverse effects.
Purpose
We provide an overview of research on health numeracy and discuss its implications in clinical contexts.
Conclusions
Low numeracy cannot be reliably inferred on the basis of patients’ education, intelligence, or other observable characteristics. Objective and subjective assessments of numeracy are available in short forms and could be used to tailor health communication. Low scorers on these assessments are subject to cognitive biases, irrelevant cues (e.g., mood), and sharper temporal discounting. Because prevention of the leading causes of death (e.g., cancer and cardiovascular disease) depends on taking action now to prevent serious consequences later, those low in numeracy are likely to require more explanation of risk to engage in prevention behaviors. Visual displays can be used to make numerical relations more transparent, and different types of displays have different effects (e.g., greater risk avoidance). Ironically, superior quantitative processing seems to be achieved by focusing on qualitative gist and affective meaning, which has important implications for empowering patients to take advantage of the evidence in evidence-based medicine. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12160-008-9037-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3694344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69432509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-32604840177c533a7a0367d81f5ffaba7628a7c4222535c5f9b9287cd83ea3713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC8SPHiL7vduPAhS_CgU9VDPy3a7aVOSbN1NhP57N6RYFTzNMPPMOzO8AJwjeI0gFDcBYcRhCqFMM0hEKg_AEDGCUyoyfgiGUEqSco7wAJyEsIYQEor4MRggyYWgDA8BH5dFXRhdJpNqU8akKVwdEpcnL21lvTbb22S2ss5vE10vkrdYaQpjT8FRrstgz3ZxBN4fH2bj53T6-jQZ309TwwhpUoI5pJJCJERX0EJDwsVCopzluZ5rwbHUwlCMMSPMsDybZ1gKs5DEaiIQGYG7XnfTziu7MLZuvC7VxheV9lvldKF-d-pipZbuUxGeUUJpFLjaCXj30drQqKoIxpalrq1rg-owzGAWwcs_4Nq1vo7PKSxoPIVjEiHUQ8a7ELzNvy9BUHWWqN4SFS1RnSVKxpmLny_sJ3YeRAD3QIitemn9fvP_ql-bIJVO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>274713623</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Implications of Numeracy: Theory and Practice</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Nelson, Wendy ; Reyna, Valerie F. ; Fagerlin, Angela ; Lipkus, Isaac ; Peters, Ellen</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Wendy ; Reyna, Valerie F. ; Fagerlin, Angela ; Lipkus, Isaac ; Peters, Ellen</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Low numeracy is pervasive and constrains informed patient choice, reduces medication compliance, limits access to treatments, impairs risk communication, and affects medical outcomes; therefore, it is incumbent upon providers to minimize its adverse effects.
Purpose
We provide an overview of research on health numeracy and discuss its implications in clinical contexts.
Conclusions
Low numeracy cannot be reliably inferred on the basis of patients’ education, intelligence, or other observable characteristics. Objective and subjective assessments of numeracy are available in short forms and could be used to tailor health communication. Low scorers on these assessments are subject to cognitive biases, irrelevant cues (e.g., mood), and sharper temporal discounting. Because prevention of the leading causes of death (e.g., cancer and cardiovascular disease) depends on taking action now to prevent serious consequences later, those low in numeracy are likely to require more explanation of risk to engage in prevention behaviors. Visual displays can be used to make numerical relations more transparent, and different types of displays have different effects (e.g., greater risk avoidance). Ironically, superior quantitative processing seems to be achieved by focusing on qualitative gist and affective meaning, which has important implications for empowering patients to take advantage of the evidence in evidence-based medicine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-6612</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4796</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12160-008-9037-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18677452</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMBEEH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Communication ; Comprehension ; Decision Making ; Educational Status ; Family Medicine ; General Practice ; Health Psychology ; Humans ; Mathematics ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Article ; Patient Compliance ; Risk Assessment - statistics & numerical data ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Annals of behavioral medicine, 2008-06, Vol.35 (3), p.261-274</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2008</rights><rights>The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2008</rights><rights>The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2008 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-32604840177c533a7a0367d81f5ffaba7628a7c4222535c5f9b9287cd83ea3713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-32604840177c533a7a0367d81f5ffaba7628a7c4222535c5f9b9287cd83ea3713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18677452$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyna, Valerie F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fagerlin, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipkus, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Ellen</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Implications of Numeracy: Theory and Practice</title><title>Annals of behavioral medicine</title><addtitle>ann. behav. med</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Behav Med</addtitle><description>Background
Low numeracy is pervasive and constrains informed patient choice, reduces medication compliance, limits access to treatments, impairs risk communication, and affects medical outcomes; therefore, it is incumbent upon providers to minimize its adverse effects.
Purpose
We provide an overview of research on health numeracy and discuss its implications in clinical contexts.
Conclusions
Low numeracy cannot be reliably inferred on the basis of patients’ education, intelligence, or other observable characteristics. Objective and subjective assessments of numeracy are available in short forms and could be used to tailor health communication. Low scorers on these assessments are subject to cognitive biases, irrelevant cues (e.g., mood), and sharper temporal discounting. Because prevention of the leading causes of death (e.g., cancer and cardiovascular disease) depends on taking action now to prevent serious consequences later, those low in numeracy are likely to require more explanation of risk to engage in prevention behaviors. Visual displays can be used to make numerical relations more transparent, and different types of displays have different effects (e.g., greater risk avoidance). Ironically, superior quantitative processing seems to be achieved by focusing on qualitative gist and affective meaning, which has important implications for empowering patients to take advantage of the evidence in evidence-based medicine.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Family Medicine</subject><subject>General Practice</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0883-6612</issn><issn>1532-4796</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC8SPHiL7vduPAhS_CgU9VDPy3a7aVOSbN1NhP57N6RYFTzNMPPMOzO8AJwjeI0gFDcBYcRhCqFMM0hEKg_AEDGCUyoyfgiGUEqSco7wAJyEsIYQEor4MRggyYWgDA8BH5dFXRhdJpNqU8akKVwdEpcnL21lvTbb22S2ss5vE10vkrdYaQpjT8FRrstgz3ZxBN4fH2bj53T6-jQZ309TwwhpUoI5pJJCJERX0EJDwsVCopzluZ5rwbHUwlCMMSPMsDybZ1gKs5DEaiIQGYG7XnfTziu7MLZuvC7VxheV9lvldKF-d-pipZbuUxGeUUJpFLjaCXj30drQqKoIxpalrq1rg-owzGAWwcs_4Nq1vo7PKSxoPIVjEiHUQ8a7ELzNvy9BUHWWqN4SFS1RnSVKxpmLny_sJ3YeRAD3QIitemn9fvP_ql-bIJVO</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>Nelson, Wendy</creator><creator>Reyna, Valerie F.</creator><creator>Fagerlin, Angela</creator><creator>Lipkus, Isaac</creator><creator>Peters, Ellen</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>Clinical Implications of Numeracy: Theory and Practice</title><author>Nelson, Wendy ; Reyna, Valerie F. ; Fagerlin, Angela ; Lipkus, Isaac ; Peters, Ellen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-32604840177c533a7a0367d81f5ffaba7628a7c4222535c5f9b9287cd83ea3713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Family Medicine</topic><topic>General Practice</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyna, Valerie F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fagerlin, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipkus, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Ellen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of behavioral medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Wendy</au><au>Reyna, Valerie F.</au><au>Fagerlin, Angela</au><au>Lipkus, Isaac</au><au>Peters, Ellen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Implications of Numeracy: Theory and Practice</atitle><jtitle>Annals of behavioral medicine</jtitle><stitle>ann. behav. med</stitle><addtitle>Ann Behav Med</addtitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>274</epage><pages>261-274</pages><issn>0883-6612</issn><eissn>1532-4796</eissn><coden>AMBEEH</coden><abstract>Background
Low numeracy is pervasive and constrains informed patient choice, reduces medication compliance, limits access to treatments, impairs risk communication, and affects medical outcomes; therefore, it is incumbent upon providers to minimize its adverse effects.
Purpose
We provide an overview of research on health numeracy and discuss its implications in clinical contexts.
Conclusions
Low numeracy cannot be reliably inferred on the basis of patients’ education, intelligence, or other observable characteristics. Objective and subjective assessments of numeracy are available in short forms and could be used to tailor health communication. Low scorers on these assessments are subject to cognitive biases, irrelevant cues (e.g., mood), and sharper temporal discounting. Because prevention of the leading causes of death (e.g., cancer and cardiovascular disease) depends on taking action now to prevent serious consequences later, those low in numeracy are likely to require more explanation of risk to engage in prevention behaviors. Visual displays can be used to make numerical relations more transparent, and different types of displays have different effects (e.g., greater risk avoidance). Ironically, superior quantitative processing seems to be achieved by focusing on qualitative gist and affective meaning, which has important implications for empowering patients to take advantage of the evidence in evidence-based medicine.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>18677452</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12160-008-9037-8</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-6612 |
ispartof | Annals of behavioral medicine, 2008-06, Vol.35 (3), p.261-274 |
issn | 0883-6612 1532-4796 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3694344 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Communication Comprehension Decision Making Educational Status Family Medicine General Practice Health Psychology Humans Mathematics Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Article Patient Compliance Risk Assessment - statistics & numerical data Studies |
title | Clinical Implications of Numeracy: Theory and Practice |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A46%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Implications%20of%20Numeracy:%20Theory%20and%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20behavioral%20medicine&rft.au=Nelson,%20Wendy&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=274&rft.pages=261-274&rft.issn=0883-6612&rft.eissn=1532-4796&rft.coden=AMBEEH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12160-008-9037-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69432509%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-32604840177c533a7a0367d81f5ffaba7628a7c4222535c5f9b9287cd83ea3713%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=274713623&rft_id=info:pmid/18677452&rfr_iscdi=true |