Loading…

Role of Fetal Doppler and Non-Stress Test in Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restriction

s Objectives To study the efficacy of fetal Doppler and non-stress test (NST) in predicting fetal compromise in preeclampsia and growth-restricted fetuses. Methods ln a prospective study, 189 pregnant women beyond 32 weeks of gestation with preeclampsia or growth-restricted fetuses confirmed by ultr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India 2013-06, Vol.63 (3), p.168-172
Main Authors: Yelikar, Kanan A., Prabhu, Akshata, Thakre, Ganesh G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-22852bb9d1433ae0689e23589989a1f8e048499592f8f5cc3de1e7f4deba3c5c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-22852bb9d1433ae0689e23589989a1f8e048499592f8f5cc3de1e7f4deba3c5c3
container_end_page 172
container_issue 3
container_start_page 168
container_title Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India
container_volume 63
creator Yelikar, Kanan A.
Prabhu, Akshata
Thakre, Ganesh G.
description s Objectives To study the efficacy of fetal Doppler and non-stress test (NST) in predicting fetal compromise in preeclampsia and growth-restricted fetuses. Methods ln a prospective study, 189 pregnant women beyond 32 weeks of gestation with preeclampsia or growth-restricted fetuses confirmed by ultrasound were evaluated by Doppler velocimetry (umbilical and middle cerebral artery) and non-stress testing. The outcome of pregnancy was recorded according to Group I ( n  = 109, Doppler and NST normal), Group II ( n  = 48, Doppler abnormal and NST normal), Group III ( n  = 14, Doppler normal and NST abnormal), and Group IV ( n  = 18, Doppler and NST both abnormal). The evaluation was done by Chi square testing. Results Both Doppler and NST had a better specificity and negative predictive value, indicating that these tests were more predictive of a healthy fetus. The fetal compromise in terms of APGAR scores, NICU admissions, birth weight, etc., was greater when both Doppler and NST were abnormal. Doppler detected changes earlier in the disease cascade than NST as evidenced by the lead time of 5.86 days. Conclusion The use of both the tests is necessary as it helps in detecting a spectrum of fetuses compromised at various stages of disease affection.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13224-012-0322-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3696136</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1490715385</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-22852bb9d1433ae0689e23589989a1f8e048499592f8f5cc3de1e7f4deba3c5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3TAQRq0KxKv8gG4qL9kY_EziTSVEy0NCgCgskeXrTMAo107thMe_x5cLiG5YeaQ583nsg9APRncZpfVeZoJzSSjjhJaKPH1DG1TXilRSyJXXmhHNKV9HmznfU6pqyuUaWudSClYJtoFuLmMPOHb4EEbb499xGHpI2IYWn8VA_o4JcsZXkEfsA75IAK638yF7-8qchDHZaYTkA-CjFB_HO3xZ4OTd6GP4jlY722fYfju30PXhn6uDY3J6fnRysH9KnJR8JJw3is9mumVSCAu0ajRwoRqtG21Z1wCVjdRaad41nXJOtMCg7mQLMyuccmIL_VrmDtNsDq2DxVq9GZKf2_RsovXm_07wd-Y2PhhR6YqJqgTsvAWk-G8qDzBznx30vQ0Qp2yY1LRmSjSqoGyJuhRzTtB9XMOoWWgxSy2maDELLeapzPz8vN_HxLuHAvAlkEsr3EIy93FKofzZF6kvlzSaBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1490715385</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of Fetal Doppler and Non-Stress Test in Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restriction</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Yelikar, Kanan A. ; Prabhu, Akshata ; Thakre, Ganesh G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yelikar, Kanan A. ; Prabhu, Akshata ; Thakre, Ganesh G.</creatorcontrib><description>s Objectives To study the efficacy of fetal Doppler and non-stress test (NST) in predicting fetal compromise in preeclampsia and growth-restricted fetuses. Methods ln a prospective study, 189 pregnant women beyond 32 weeks of gestation with preeclampsia or growth-restricted fetuses confirmed by ultrasound were evaluated by Doppler velocimetry (umbilical and middle cerebral artery) and non-stress testing. The outcome of pregnancy was recorded according to Group I ( n  = 109, Doppler and NST normal), Group II ( n  = 48, Doppler abnormal and NST normal), Group III ( n  = 14, Doppler normal and NST abnormal), and Group IV ( n  = 18, Doppler and NST both abnormal). The evaluation was done by Chi square testing. Results Both Doppler and NST had a better specificity and negative predictive value, indicating that these tests were more predictive of a healthy fetus. The fetal compromise in terms of APGAR scores, NICU admissions, birth weight, etc., was greater when both Doppler and NST were abnormal. Doppler detected changes earlier in the disease cascade than NST as evidenced by the lead time of 5.86 days. Conclusion The use of both the tests is necessary as it helps in detecting a spectrum of fetuses compromised at various stages of disease affection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0971-9202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0975-6434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13224-012-0322-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24431631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Springer India</publisher><subject>Gynecology ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Original ; Original Article</subject><ispartof>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2013-06, Vol.63 (3), p.168-172</ispartof><rights>Federation of Obstetric &amp; Gynecological Societies of India 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-22852bb9d1433ae0689e23589989a1f8e048499592f8f5cc3de1e7f4deba3c5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-22852bb9d1433ae0689e23589989a1f8e048499592f8f5cc3de1e7f4deba3c5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3696136/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3696136/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27911,27912,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24431631$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yelikar, Kanan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhu, Akshata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thakre, Ganesh G.</creatorcontrib><title>Role of Fetal Doppler and Non-Stress Test in Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restriction</title><title>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India</title><addtitle>J Obstet Gynecol India</addtitle><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol India</addtitle><description>s Objectives To study the efficacy of fetal Doppler and non-stress test (NST) in predicting fetal compromise in preeclampsia and growth-restricted fetuses. Methods ln a prospective study, 189 pregnant women beyond 32 weeks of gestation with preeclampsia or growth-restricted fetuses confirmed by ultrasound were evaluated by Doppler velocimetry (umbilical and middle cerebral artery) and non-stress testing. The outcome of pregnancy was recorded according to Group I ( n  = 109, Doppler and NST normal), Group II ( n  = 48, Doppler abnormal and NST normal), Group III ( n  = 14, Doppler normal and NST abnormal), and Group IV ( n  = 18, Doppler and NST both abnormal). The evaluation was done by Chi square testing. Results Both Doppler and NST had a better specificity and negative predictive value, indicating that these tests were more predictive of a healthy fetus. The fetal compromise in terms of APGAR scores, NICU admissions, birth weight, etc., was greater when both Doppler and NST were abnormal. Doppler detected changes earlier in the disease cascade than NST as evidenced by the lead time of 5.86 days. Conclusion The use of both the tests is necessary as it helps in detecting a spectrum of fetuses compromised at various stages of disease affection.</description><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>0971-9202</issn><issn>0975-6434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtP3TAQRq0KxKv8gG4qL9kY_EziTSVEy0NCgCgskeXrTMAo107thMe_x5cLiG5YeaQ583nsg9APRncZpfVeZoJzSSjjhJaKPH1DG1TXilRSyJXXmhHNKV9HmznfU6pqyuUaWudSClYJtoFuLmMPOHb4EEbb499xGHpI2IYWn8VA_o4JcsZXkEfsA75IAK638yF7-8qchDHZaYTkA-CjFB_HO3xZ4OTd6GP4jlY722fYfju30PXhn6uDY3J6fnRysH9KnJR8JJw3is9mumVSCAu0ajRwoRqtG21Z1wCVjdRaad41nXJOtMCg7mQLMyuccmIL_VrmDtNsDq2DxVq9GZKf2_RsovXm_07wd-Y2PhhR6YqJqgTsvAWk-G8qDzBznx30vQ0Qp2yY1LRmSjSqoGyJuhRzTtB9XMOoWWgxSy2maDELLeapzPz8vN_HxLuHAvAlkEsr3EIy93FKofzZF6kvlzSaBA</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Yelikar, Kanan A.</creator><creator>Prabhu, Akshata</creator><creator>Thakre, Ganesh G.</creator><general>Springer India</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Role of Fetal Doppler and Non-Stress Test in Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restriction</title><author>Yelikar, Kanan A. ; Prabhu, Akshata ; Thakre, Ganesh G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-22852bb9d1433ae0689e23589989a1f8e048499592f8f5cc3de1e7f4deba3c5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yelikar, Kanan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhu, Akshata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thakre, Ganesh G.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yelikar, Kanan A.</au><au>Prabhu, Akshata</au><au>Thakre, Ganesh G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of Fetal Doppler and Non-Stress Test in Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restriction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India</jtitle><stitle>J Obstet Gynecol India</stitle><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol India</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>168-172</pages><issn>0971-9202</issn><eissn>0975-6434</eissn><abstract>s Objectives To study the efficacy of fetal Doppler and non-stress test (NST) in predicting fetal compromise in preeclampsia and growth-restricted fetuses. Methods ln a prospective study, 189 pregnant women beyond 32 weeks of gestation with preeclampsia or growth-restricted fetuses confirmed by ultrasound were evaluated by Doppler velocimetry (umbilical and middle cerebral artery) and non-stress testing. The outcome of pregnancy was recorded according to Group I ( n  = 109, Doppler and NST normal), Group II ( n  = 48, Doppler abnormal and NST normal), Group III ( n  = 14, Doppler normal and NST abnormal), and Group IV ( n  = 18, Doppler and NST both abnormal). The evaluation was done by Chi square testing. Results Both Doppler and NST had a better specificity and negative predictive value, indicating that these tests were more predictive of a healthy fetus. The fetal compromise in terms of APGAR scores, NICU admissions, birth weight, etc., was greater when both Doppler and NST were abnormal. Doppler detected changes earlier in the disease cascade than NST as evidenced by the lead time of 5.86 days. Conclusion The use of both the tests is necessary as it helps in detecting a spectrum of fetuses compromised at various stages of disease affection.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>24431631</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13224-012-0322-x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0971-9202
ispartof Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2013-06, Vol.63 (3), p.168-172
issn 0971-9202
0975-6434
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3696136
source Springer Nature; PubMed Central
subjects Gynecology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery
Original
Original Article
title Role of Fetal Doppler and Non-Stress Test in Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restriction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A17%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20Fetal%20Doppler%20and%20Non-Stress%20Test%20in%20Preeclampsia%20and%20Intrauterine%20Growth%20Restriction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology%20of%20India&rft.au=Yelikar,%20Kanan%20A.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=168-172&rft.issn=0971-9202&rft.eissn=0975-6434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13224-012-0322-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1490715385%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-22852bb9d1433ae0689e23589989a1f8e048499592f8f5cc3de1e7f4deba3c5c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1490715385&rft_id=info:pmid/24431631&rfr_iscdi=true