Loading…
Adaptation of the Patient Feedback Survey at a Community Treatment Setting
The Patient Feedback Survey is a performance improvement measure designed to assess the quality of outpatient substance abuse treatment. We modified and administered this measure to 500 individuals at a multisite treatment provider. Although the feedback scores were high in general, analyses of vari...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal on addictions 2012-01, Vol.21 (1), p.63-71 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5437-56d5b3f17d042a3eb559b492b8f98d72e3acd45150b87ca3b524fa9cc08d0bb23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5437-56d5b3f17d042a3eb559b492b8f98d72e3acd45150b87ca3b524fa9cc08d0bb23 |
container_end_page | 71 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | The American journal on addictions |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Kolodziej, Monika E. Muchowski, Patrice M. Hamdi, Nayla R. Morrissette, Paula McGowan, Alicen J. Weiss, Roger D. |
description | The Patient Feedback Survey is a performance improvement measure designed to assess the quality of outpatient substance abuse treatment. We modified and administered this measure to 500 individuals at a multisite treatment provider. Although the feedback scores were high in general, analyses of variance showed score variability in relation to type and length of treatment. Moreover, respondents who reported any use of marijuana, cravings for substances, or mutual‐support group attendance (ie, Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous) had lower feedback scores than respondents without these experiences. We highlight the importance of investigating treatment evaluations in the context of other recovery experiences. (Am J Addict 2011;21:63–71) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00197.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3699190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>964269639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5437-56d5b3f17d042a3eb559b492b8f98d72e3acd45150b87ca3b524fa9cc08d0bb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQtRCIlsJfQL5xSvBHnMQHkFZbtlBVgNRCJS4j23Fab_OxtZ2y--9x2LKCG3PxWPPem9F7CGFKcprq7TqngtGMcElzRijNCaGyyrdP0PFh8DT1RIiMFLI8Qi9CWJNUtSyfoyPGGKW8qI_R-aJRm6iiGwc8tjjeWvw1_ewQ8craRitzhy8n_2B3WEWs8HLs-2lwcYevvFWxn4GXNkY33LxEz1rVBfvq8T1B31YfrpYfs4svZ5-Wi4vMiIJXmSgboXlLq4YUTHGrhZC6kEzXraybilmuTFMIKoiuK6O4FqxolTSG1A3RmvET9H6vu5l0bxuTTvCqg413vfI7GJWDfyeDu4Wb8QF4KSWVJAm8eRTw4_1kQ4TeBWO7Tg12nALIsmClLLlMyHqPNH4Mwdv2sIUSmJOANcyGw2w4zEnA7yRgm6iv_77yQPxjfQK82wN-us7u_lsYFueL09QlfrbnuxDt9sBX_g7KilcCrj-fwer6x_dTlhrGfwF-K6di</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>964269639</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adaptation of the Patient Feedback Survey at a Community Treatment Setting</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>SPORTDiscus</source><creator>Kolodziej, Monika E. ; Muchowski, Patrice M. ; Hamdi, Nayla R. ; Morrissette, Paula ; McGowan, Alicen J. ; Weiss, Roger D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kolodziej, Monika E. ; Muchowski, Patrice M. ; Hamdi, Nayla R. ; Morrissette, Paula ; McGowan, Alicen J. ; Weiss, Roger D.</creatorcontrib><description>The Patient Feedback Survey is a performance improvement measure designed to assess the quality of outpatient substance abuse treatment. We modified and administered this measure to 500 individuals at a multisite treatment provider. Although the feedback scores were high in general, analyses of variance showed score variability in relation to type and length of treatment. Moreover, respondents who reported any use of marijuana, cravings for substances, or mutual‐support group attendance (ie, Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous) had lower feedback scores than respondents without these experiences. We highlight the importance of investigating treatment evaluations in the context of other recovery experiences. (Am J Addict 2011;21:63–71)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-0496</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-0391</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00197.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22211348</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Ambulatory Care - methods ; Ambulatory Care - standards ; Cannabis ; Community Mental Health Services - methods ; Community Mental Health Services - standards ; Feedback ; Female ; Health Care Surveys ; Humans ; Male ; Narcotics Anonymous ; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care ; Outpatient treatment ; Patient Preference ; Psychotherapy, Group - methods ; Psychotherapy, Group - standards ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods ; Research Design ; Residential Treatment - methods ; Residential Treatment - standards ; Self-Help Groups - standards ; Substance abuse ; Substance-Related Disorders - psychology ; Substance-Related Disorders - therapy ; Therapeutic Community ; Treatment methods</subject><ispartof>The American journal on addictions, 2012-01, Vol.21 (1), p.63-71</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry</rights><rights>Copyright © American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5437-56d5b3f17d042a3eb559b492b8f98d72e3acd45150b87ca3b524fa9cc08d0bb23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5437-56d5b3f17d042a3eb559b492b8f98d72e3acd45150b87ca3b524fa9cc08d0bb23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22211348$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kolodziej, Monika E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muchowski, Patrice M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamdi, Nayla R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrissette, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Alicen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Roger D.</creatorcontrib><title>Adaptation of the Patient Feedback Survey at a Community Treatment Setting</title><title>The American journal on addictions</title><addtitle>Am J Addict</addtitle><description>The Patient Feedback Survey is a performance improvement measure designed to assess the quality of outpatient substance abuse treatment. We modified and administered this measure to 500 individuals at a multisite treatment provider. Although the feedback scores were high in general, analyses of variance showed score variability in relation to type and length of treatment. Moreover, respondents who reported any use of marijuana, cravings for substances, or mutual‐support group attendance (ie, Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous) had lower feedback scores than respondents without these experiences. We highlight the importance of investigating treatment evaluations in the context of other recovery experiences. (Am J Addict 2011;21:63–71)</description><subject>Ambulatory Care - methods</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - standards</subject><subject>Cannabis</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Services - methods</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Services - standards</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Narcotics Anonymous</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Outpatient treatment</subject><subject>Patient Preference</subject><subject>Psychotherapy, Group - methods</subject><subject>Psychotherapy, Group - standards</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Residential Treatment - methods</subject><subject>Residential Treatment - standards</subject><subject>Self-Help Groups - standards</subject><subject>Substance abuse</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Therapeutic Community</subject><subject>Treatment methods</subject><issn>1055-0496</issn><issn>1521-0391</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQtRCIlsJfQL5xSvBHnMQHkFZbtlBVgNRCJS4j23Fab_OxtZ2y--9x2LKCG3PxWPPem9F7CGFKcprq7TqngtGMcElzRijNCaGyyrdP0PFh8DT1RIiMFLI8Qi9CWJNUtSyfoyPGGKW8qI_R-aJRm6iiGwc8tjjeWvw1_ewQ8craRitzhy8n_2B3WEWs8HLs-2lwcYevvFWxn4GXNkY33LxEz1rVBfvq8T1B31YfrpYfs4svZ5-Wi4vMiIJXmSgboXlLq4YUTHGrhZC6kEzXraybilmuTFMIKoiuK6O4FqxolTSG1A3RmvET9H6vu5l0bxuTTvCqg413vfI7GJWDfyeDu4Wb8QF4KSWVJAm8eRTw4_1kQ4TeBWO7Tg12nALIsmClLLlMyHqPNH4Mwdv2sIUSmJOANcyGw2w4zEnA7yRgm6iv_77yQPxjfQK82wN-us7u_lsYFueL09QlfrbnuxDt9sBX_g7KilcCrj-fwer6x_dTlhrGfwF-K6di</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Kolodziej, Monika E.</creator><creator>Muchowski, Patrice M.</creator><creator>Hamdi, Nayla R.</creator><creator>Morrissette, Paula</creator><creator>McGowan, Alicen J.</creator><creator>Weiss, Roger D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Adaptation of the Patient Feedback Survey at a Community Treatment Setting</title><author>Kolodziej, Monika E. ; Muchowski, Patrice M. ; Hamdi, Nayla R. ; Morrissette, Paula ; McGowan, Alicen J. ; Weiss, Roger D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5437-56d5b3f17d042a3eb559b492b8f98d72e3acd45150b87ca3b524fa9cc08d0bb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory Care - methods</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - standards</topic><topic>Cannabis</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Services - methods</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Services - standards</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Narcotics Anonymous</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Outpatient treatment</topic><topic>Patient Preference</topic><topic>Psychotherapy, Group - methods</topic><topic>Psychotherapy, Group - standards</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Residential Treatment - methods</topic><topic>Residential Treatment - standards</topic><topic>Self-Help Groups - standards</topic><topic>Substance abuse</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Therapeutic Community</topic><topic>Treatment methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kolodziej, Monika E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muchowski, Patrice M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamdi, Nayla R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrissette, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Alicen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Roger D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The American journal on addictions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kolodziej, Monika E.</au><au>Muchowski, Patrice M.</au><au>Hamdi, Nayla R.</au><au>Morrissette, Paula</au><au>McGowan, Alicen J.</au><au>Weiss, Roger D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adaptation of the Patient Feedback Survey at a Community Treatment Setting</atitle><jtitle>The American journal on addictions</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Addict</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>63-71</pages><issn>1055-0496</issn><eissn>1521-0391</eissn><abstract>The Patient Feedback Survey is a performance improvement measure designed to assess the quality of outpatient substance abuse treatment. We modified and administered this measure to 500 individuals at a multisite treatment provider. Although the feedback scores were high in general, analyses of variance showed score variability in relation to type and length of treatment. Moreover, respondents who reported any use of marijuana, cravings for substances, or mutual‐support group attendance (ie, Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous) had lower feedback scores than respondents without these experiences. We highlight the importance of investigating treatment evaluations in the context of other recovery experiences. (Am J Addict 2011;21:63–71)</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>22211348</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00197.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1055-0496 |
ispartof | The American journal on addictions, 2012-01, Vol.21 (1), p.63-71 |
issn | 1055-0496 1521-0391 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3699190 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; SPORTDiscus |
subjects | Ambulatory Care - methods Ambulatory Care - standards Cannabis Community Mental Health Services - methods Community Mental Health Services - standards Feedback Female Health Care Surveys Humans Male Narcotics Anonymous Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care Outpatient treatment Patient Preference Psychotherapy, Group - methods Psychotherapy, Group - standards Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods Research Design Residential Treatment - methods Residential Treatment - standards Self-Help Groups - standards Substance abuse Substance-Related Disorders - psychology Substance-Related Disorders - therapy Therapeutic Community Treatment methods |
title | Adaptation of the Patient Feedback Survey at a Community Treatment Setting |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T16%3A11%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adaptation%20of%20the%20Patient%20Feedback%20Survey%20at%20a%20Community%20Treatment%20Setting&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20on%20addictions&rft.au=Kolodziej,%20Monika%20E.&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=63-71&rft.issn=1055-0496&rft.eissn=1521-0391&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00197.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E964269639%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5437-56d5b3f17d042a3eb559b492b8f98d72e3acd45150b87ca3b524fa9cc08d0bb23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=964269639&rft_id=info:pmid/22211348&rfr_iscdi=true |