Loading…

Adaptation of the Patient Feedback Survey at a Community Treatment Setting

The Patient Feedback Survey is a performance improvement measure designed to assess the quality of outpatient substance abuse treatment. We modified and administered this measure to 500 individuals at a multisite treatment provider. Although the feedback scores were high in general, analyses of vari...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal on addictions 2012-01, Vol.21 (1), p.63-71
Main Authors: Kolodziej, Monika E., Muchowski, Patrice M., Hamdi, Nayla R., Morrissette, Paula, McGowan, Alicen J., Weiss, Roger D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5437-56d5b3f17d042a3eb559b492b8f98d72e3acd45150b87ca3b524fa9cc08d0bb23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5437-56d5b3f17d042a3eb559b492b8f98d72e3acd45150b87ca3b524fa9cc08d0bb23
container_end_page 71
container_issue 1
container_start_page 63
container_title The American journal on addictions
container_volume 21
creator Kolodziej, Monika E.
Muchowski, Patrice M.
Hamdi, Nayla R.
Morrissette, Paula
McGowan, Alicen J.
Weiss, Roger D.
description The Patient Feedback Survey is a performance improvement measure designed to assess the quality of outpatient substance abuse treatment. We modified and administered this measure to 500 individuals at a multisite treatment provider. Although the feedback scores were high in general, analyses of variance showed score variability in relation to type and length of treatment. Moreover, respondents who reported any use of marijuana, cravings for substances, or mutual‐support group attendance (ie, Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous) had lower feedback scores than respondents without these experiences. We highlight the importance of investigating treatment evaluations in the context of other recovery experiences. (Am J Addict 2011;21:63–71)
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00197.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3699190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>964269639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5437-56d5b3f17d042a3eb559b492b8f98d72e3acd45150b87ca3b524fa9cc08d0bb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQtRCIlsJfQL5xSvBHnMQHkFZbtlBVgNRCJS4j23Fab_OxtZ2y--9x2LKCG3PxWPPem9F7CGFKcprq7TqngtGMcElzRijNCaGyyrdP0PFh8DT1RIiMFLI8Qi9CWJNUtSyfoyPGGKW8qI_R-aJRm6iiGwc8tjjeWvw1_ewQ8craRitzhy8n_2B3WEWs8HLs-2lwcYevvFWxn4GXNkY33LxEz1rVBfvq8T1B31YfrpYfs4svZ5-Wi4vMiIJXmSgboXlLq4YUTHGrhZC6kEzXraybilmuTFMIKoiuK6O4FqxolTSG1A3RmvET9H6vu5l0bxuTTvCqg413vfI7GJWDfyeDu4Wb8QF4KSWVJAm8eRTw4_1kQ4TeBWO7Tg12nALIsmClLLlMyHqPNH4Mwdv2sIUSmJOANcyGw2w4zEnA7yRgm6iv_77yQPxjfQK82wN-us7u_lsYFueL09QlfrbnuxDt9sBX_g7KilcCrj-fwer6x_dTlhrGfwF-K6di</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>964269639</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adaptation of the Patient Feedback Survey at a Community Treatment Setting</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>SPORTDiscus</source><creator>Kolodziej, Monika E. ; Muchowski, Patrice M. ; Hamdi, Nayla R. ; Morrissette, Paula ; McGowan, Alicen J. ; Weiss, Roger D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kolodziej, Monika E. ; Muchowski, Patrice M. ; Hamdi, Nayla R. ; Morrissette, Paula ; McGowan, Alicen J. ; Weiss, Roger D.</creatorcontrib><description>The Patient Feedback Survey is a performance improvement measure designed to assess the quality of outpatient substance abuse treatment. We modified and administered this measure to 500 individuals at a multisite treatment provider. Although the feedback scores were high in general, analyses of variance showed score variability in relation to type and length of treatment. Moreover, respondents who reported any use of marijuana, cravings for substances, or mutual‐support group attendance (ie, Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous) had lower feedback scores than respondents without these experiences. We highlight the importance of investigating treatment evaluations in the context of other recovery experiences. (Am J Addict 2011;21:63–71)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-0496</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-0391</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00197.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22211348</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Ambulatory Care - methods ; Ambulatory Care - standards ; Cannabis ; Community Mental Health Services - methods ; Community Mental Health Services - standards ; Feedback ; Female ; Health Care Surveys ; Humans ; Male ; Narcotics Anonymous ; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care ; Outpatient treatment ; Patient Preference ; Psychotherapy, Group - methods ; Psychotherapy, Group - standards ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods ; Research Design ; Residential Treatment - methods ; Residential Treatment - standards ; Self-Help Groups - standards ; Substance abuse ; Substance-Related Disorders - psychology ; Substance-Related Disorders - therapy ; Therapeutic Community ; Treatment methods</subject><ispartof>The American journal on addictions, 2012-01, Vol.21 (1), p.63-71</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry</rights><rights>Copyright © American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5437-56d5b3f17d042a3eb559b492b8f98d72e3acd45150b87ca3b524fa9cc08d0bb23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5437-56d5b3f17d042a3eb559b492b8f98d72e3acd45150b87ca3b524fa9cc08d0bb23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22211348$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kolodziej, Monika E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muchowski, Patrice M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamdi, Nayla R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrissette, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Alicen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Roger D.</creatorcontrib><title>Adaptation of the Patient Feedback Survey at a Community Treatment Setting</title><title>The American journal on addictions</title><addtitle>Am J Addict</addtitle><description>The Patient Feedback Survey is a performance improvement measure designed to assess the quality of outpatient substance abuse treatment. We modified and administered this measure to 500 individuals at a multisite treatment provider. Although the feedback scores were high in general, analyses of variance showed score variability in relation to type and length of treatment. Moreover, respondents who reported any use of marijuana, cravings for substances, or mutual‐support group attendance (ie, Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous) had lower feedback scores than respondents without these experiences. We highlight the importance of investigating treatment evaluations in the context of other recovery experiences. (Am J Addict 2011;21:63–71)</description><subject>Ambulatory Care - methods</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - standards</subject><subject>Cannabis</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Services - methods</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Services - standards</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Narcotics Anonymous</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Outpatient treatment</subject><subject>Patient Preference</subject><subject>Psychotherapy, Group - methods</subject><subject>Psychotherapy, Group - standards</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Residential Treatment - methods</subject><subject>Residential Treatment - standards</subject><subject>Self-Help Groups - standards</subject><subject>Substance abuse</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Therapeutic Community</subject><subject>Treatment methods</subject><issn>1055-0496</issn><issn>1521-0391</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQtRCIlsJfQL5xSvBHnMQHkFZbtlBVgNRCJS4j23Fab_OxtZ2y--9x2LKCG3PxWPPem9F7CGFKcprq7TqngtGMcElzRijNCaGyyrdP0PFh8DT1RIiMFLI8Qi9CWJNUtSyfoyPGGKW8qI_R-aJRm6iiGwc8tjjeWvw1_ewQ8craRitzhy8n_2B3WEWs8HLs-2lwcYevvFWxn4GXNkY33LxEz1rVBfvq8T1B31YfrpYfs4svZ5-Wi4vMiIJXmSgboXlLq4YUTHGrhZC6kEzXraybilmuTFMIKoiuK6O4FqxolTSG1A3RmvET9H6vu5l0bxuTTvCqg413vfI7GJWDfyeDu4Wb8QF4KSWVJAm8eRTw4_1kQ4TeBWO7Tg12nALIsmClLLlMyHqPNH4Mwdv2sIUSmJOANcyGw2w4zEnA7yRgm6iv_77yQPxjfQK82wN-us7u_lsYFueL09QlfrbnuxDt9sBX_g7KilcCrj-fwer6x_dTlhrGfwF-K6di</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Kolodziej, Monika E.</creator><creator>Muchowski, Patrice M.</creator><creator>Hamdi, Nayla R.</creator><creator>Morrissette, Paula</creator><creator>McGowan, Alicen J.</creator><creator>Weiss, Roger D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Adaptation of the Patient Feedback Survey at a Community Treatment Setting</title><author>Kolodziej, Monika E. ; Muchowski, Patrice M. ; Hamdi, Nayla R. ; Morrissette, Paula ; McGowan, Alicen J. ; Weiss, Roger D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5437-56d5b3f17d042a3eb559b492b8f98d72e3acd45150b87ca3b524fa9cc08d0bb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory Care - methods</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - standards</topic><topic>Cannabis</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Services - methods</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Services - standards</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Narcotics Anonymous</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Outpatient treatment</topic><topic>Patient Preference</topic><topic>Psychotherapy, Group - methods</topic><topic>Psychotherapy, Group - standards</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Residential Treatment - methods</topic><topic>Residential Treatment - standards</topic><topic>Self-Help Groups - standards</topic><topic>Substance abuse</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Therapeutic Community</topic><topic>Treatment methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kolodziej, Monika E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muchowski, Patrice M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamdi, Nayla R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrissette, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Alicen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Roger D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The American journal on addictions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kolodziej, Monika E.</au><au>Muchowski, Patrice M.</au><au>Hamdi, Nayla R.</au><au>Morrissette, Paula</au><au>McGowan, Alicen J.</au><au>Weiss, Roger D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adaptation of the Patient Feedback Survey at a Community Treatment Setting</atitle><jtitle>The American journal on addictions</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Addict</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>63-71</pages><issn>1055-0496</issn><eissn>1521-0391</eissn><abstract>The Patient Feedback Survey is a performance improvement measure designed to assess the quality of outpatient substance abuse treatment. We modified and administered this measure to 500 individuals at a multisite treatment provider. Although the feedback scores were high in general, analyses of variance showed score variability in relation to type and length of treatment. Moreover, respondents who reported any use of marijuana, cravings for substances, or mutual‐support group attendance (ie, Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous) had lower feedback scores than respondents without these experiences. We highlight the importance of investigating treatment evaluations in the context of other recovery experiences. (Am J Addict 2011;21:63–71)</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>22211348</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00197.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1055-0496
ispartof The American journal on addictions, 2012-01, Vol.21 (1), p.63-71
issn 1055-0496
1521-0391
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3699190
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; SPORTDiscus
subjects Ambulatory Care - methods
Ambulatory Care - standards
Cannabis
Community Mental Health Services - methods
Community Mental Health Services - standards
Feedback
Female
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Male
Narcotics Anonymous
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
Outpatient treatment
Patient Preference
Psychotherapy, Group - methods
Psychotherapy, Group - standards
Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods
Research Design
Residential Treatment - methods
Residential Treatment - standards
Self-Help Groups - standards
Substance abuse
Substance-Related Disorders - psychology
Substance-Related Disorders - therapy
Therapeutic Community
Treatment methods
title Adaptation of the Patient Feedback Survey at a Community Treatment Setting
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T16%3A11%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adaptation%20of%20the%20Patient%20Feedback%20Survey%20at%20a%20Community%20Treatment%20Setting&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20on%20addictions&rft.au=Kolodziej,%20Monika%20E.&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=63-71&rft.issn=1055-0496&rft.eissn=1521-0391&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00197.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E964269639%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5437-56d5b3f17d042a3eb559b492b8f98d72e3acd45150b87ca3b524fa9cc08d0bb23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=964269639&rft_id=info:pmid/22211348&rfr_iscdi=true