What Do Patients Think About Year-End Resident Continuity Clinic Handoffs?: A Qualitative Study

• Published in: Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2013-08, Vol.28 (8), p.999-1007
• Main Authors: Pincavage, Amber T., Lee, Wei Wei, Beiting, Kimberly J., Arora, Vineet M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Continuity of Patient Care - standards; Health care delivery; Humans; Internal Medicine; Internship and Residency - methods; Internship and Residency - standards; Medical residencies; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Research; Outpatient care facilities; Patient Handoff - standards; Patient Safety - standards; Patient Satisfaction; Qualitative Research; Quality of care; Transitions
• ISSN: 0884-8734; 1525-1497
• DOI: 10.1007/s11606-013-2395-3

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Although Internal Medicine year-end resident clinic handoffs affect numerous patients, little research has described patients’ perspectives of the experience. OBJECTIVE To describe patients’ perceptions of positive and negative experiences pertaining to the year-end clinic handoff; to rate patient satisfaction with aspects of the clinic handoff and identify whether or not patients could name their new physicians. DESIGN Qualitative study design using semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS High-risk patients who underwent a year-end clinic handoff in July 2011. MEASUREMENTS Three months post-handoff, telephone interviews were conducted with patients to elicit their perceptions of positive and negative experiences. An initial coding classification was developed and applied to transcripts. Patients were also asked to name their primary care physician (PCP) and rate their satisfaction with the handoff. RESULTS In all, 103 telephone interviews were completed. Patient experiences regarding clinic handoffs were categorized into four themes: (1) doctor-patient relationships (i.e. difficulty building rapport); (2) clinic logistics (i.e. difficulty rescheduling appointments); (3) process of the care transition (i.e. patient unaware transition occurred); and (4) patient safety-related issues (i.e. missed tests). Only 59 % of patients could correctly name their new PCP. Patients who reported that they were informed of the clinic transition by letter or by telephone call from their new PCP were more likely to correctly name them (65 % vs. 32 % p  = 0.007), report that their new doctor assumed care for them immediately (81 % [68/84] vs. 53 % [10/19], p  = 0.009) and report satisfaction with communication between their old and new doctors (80 % [67/84] vs. 58 % [11/19], p  = 0.04). Patients reported positive experiences such as learning more about their new physician through personal sharing, which helped them build rapport. Patients who reported being aware of the medical education mission of the clinic tended to be more understanding of the handoff process. CONCLUSIONS Patients face unique challenges during year-end clinic handoffs and provide insights into areas of improvement for a patient-centered handoff.