Loading…
Replantation and Revascularization vs. Amputation in Injured Digits
Background The purpose of this study was to analyze factors associated with the decision to replant or revascularize rather than amputate an injured digit as well as factors associated with successful replantation or revascularization. Methods We reviewed 315 complete and subtotal amputations at or...
Saved in:
Published in: | Hand (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2013-09, Vol.8 (3), p.267-273 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396y-f34ddde04998b3e857face79f3af13dcd58623d5d32fa85d3fed15ada675d9003 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396y-f34ddde04998b3e857face79f3af13dcd58623d5d32fa85d3fed15ada675d9003 |
container_end_page | 273 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 267 |
container_title | Hand (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Mulders, Marjolein A. M. Neuhaus, Valentin Becker, Stéphanie J. E. Lee, Sang-Gil Ring, David C. |
description | Background
The purpose of this study was to analyze factors associated with the decision to replant or revascularize rather than amputate an injured digit as well as factors associated with successful replantation or revascularization.
Methods
We reviewed 315 complete and subtotal amputations at or proximal to the distal interphalangeal joint in 199 adult patients treated over 10 years. Ninety-three digits were replanted (30 %), 51 were revascularized (16 %), and 171 were amputated (54 %), including 5 attempted replantations. Bivariate and multivariable analyses sought factors associated with replantation vs. amputation, revascularization vs. amputation, and success of replantation or revascularization.
Results
Factors associated with replantation rather than amputation were injury to the left hand, thumb, middle digit, and ring digit, more than one digit affected, and surgeon. Factors associated with revascularization are surgeon and shorter ischemia time. Forty-five replantations (48 %) and 41 revascularizations (80 %) were successful. Successful replantation was associated with the side of injury (left side more likely to survive), zone of injury (distal interphalangeal and interphalangeal joint more likely to survive and proximal phalanx less likely to survive), and shorter ischemia time. Success of revascularization was associated with the mechanism of injury (saw and not crush injury), multiple digits involved, and the surgeon.
Conclusions
The decision to replant, revascularize, or amputate a nonviable digit and the success of replantation and revascularization are related to both injury factors, such as mechanism of injury, affected digit, and zone of injury, and the surgeon. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11552-013-9520-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3745241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1007_s11552-013-9520-y</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1490767754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396y-f34ddde04998b3e857face79f3af13dcd58623d5d32fa85d3fed15ada675d9003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF9LwzAUxYMoTqcfwBfpoy-dSZM0zYsw5r_BQBj6HLImrRldOpN2UD-9Ga1DX8Sne7n3nHMvPwCuEJwgCNmtR4jSJIYIx5wmMO6OwFmYZDEnlB4fesJG4Nz7NYQkzTJ-CkYJIUnKMT4Ds6XeVtI2sjG1jaRV0VLvpM_bSjrz2U93fhJNN9t2EBkbze26dVpF96Y0jb8AJ4WsvL4c6hi8PT68zp7jxcvTfDZdxDnmaRcXmCilNCScZyusM8oKmWvGCywLhFWuaJYmWFGFk0JmoRRaISqVTBlVHEI8Bnd97rZdbbTKtW2crMTWmY10nailEb831ryLst4JzAhNCAoBN0OAqz9a7RuxMT7XVQCg69YLRDhkKWOUBCnqpbmrvXe6OJxBUOzhix6-CPDFHr7oguf6538HxzftIEh6gQ8rW2on1nXrbGD2Z-pkMMlS_8fwBV3DoJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1490767754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Replantation and Revascularization vs. Amputation in Injured Digits</title><source>PubMed</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Mulders, Marjolein A. M. ; Neuhaus, Valentin ; Becker, Stéphanie J. E. ; Lee, Sang-Gil ; Ring, David C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mulders, Marjolein A. M. ; Neuhaus, Valentin ; Becker, Stéphanie J. E. ; Lee, Sang-Gil ; Ring, David C.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The purpose of this study was to analyze factors associated with the decision to replant or revascularize rather than amputate an injured digit as well as factors associated with successful replantation or revascularization.
Methods
We reviewed 315 complete and subtotal amputations at or proximal to the distal interphalangeal joint in 199 adult patients treated over 10 years. Ninety-three digits were replanted (30 %), 51 were revascularized (16 %), and 171 were amputated (54 %), including 5 attempted replantations. Bivariate and multivariable analyses sought factors associated with replantation vs. amputation, revascularization vs. amputation, and success of replantation or revascularization.
Results
Factors associated with replantation rather than amputation were injury to the left hand, thumb, middle digit, and ring digit, more than one digit affected, and surgeon. Factors associated with revascularization are surgeon and shorter ischemia time. Forty-five replantations (48 %) and 41 revascularizations (80 %) were successful. Successful replantation was associated with the side of injury (left side more likely to survive), zone of injury (distal interphalangeal and interphalangeal joint more likely to survive and proximal phalanx less likely to survive), and shorter ischemia time. Success of revascularization was associated with the mechanism of injury (saw and not crush injury), multiple digits involved, and the surgeon.
Conclusions
The decision to replant, revascularize, or amputate a nonviable digit and the success of replantation and revascularization are related to both injury factors, such as mechanism of injury, affected digit, and zone of injury, and the surgeon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1558-9447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11552-013-9520-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24426933</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Orthopedics ; Plastic Surgery ; Surgery ; Surgery Articles ; Surgical Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2013-09, Vol.8 (3), p.267-273</ispartof><rights>American Association for Hand Surgery 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396y-f34ddde04998b3e857face79f3af13dcd58623d5d32fa85d3fed15ada675d9003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396y-f34ddde04998b3e857face79f3af13dcd58623d5d32fa85d3fed15ada675d9003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3745241/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3745241/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24426933$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mulders, Marjolein A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuhaus, Valentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Stéphanie J. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang-Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ring, David C.</creatorcontrib><title>Replantation and Revascularization vs. Amputation in Injured Digits</title><title>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>HAND</addtitle><addtitle>Hand (N Y)</addtitle><description>Background
The purpose of this study was to analyze factors associated with the decision to replant or revascularize rather than amputate an injured digit as well as factors associated with successful replantation or revascularization.
Methods
We reviewed 315 complete and subtotal amputations at or proximal to the distal interphalangeal joint in 199 adult patients treated over 10 years. Ninety-three digits were replanted (30 %), 51 were revascularized (16 %), and 171 were amputated (54 %), including 5 attempted replantations. Bivariate and multivariable analyses sought factors associated with replantation vs. amputation, revascularization vs. amputation, and success of replantation or revascularization.
Results
Factors associated with replantation rather than amputation were injury to the left hand, thumb, middle digit, and ring digit, more than one digit affected, and surgeon. Factors associated with revascularization are surgeon and shorter ischemia time. Forty-five replantations (48 %) and 41 revascularizations (80 %) were successful. Successful replantation was associated with the side of injury (left side more likely to survive), zone of injury (distal interphalangeal and interphalangeal joint more likely to survive and proximal phalanx less likely to survive), and shorter ischemia time. Success of revascularization was associated with the mechanism of injury (saw and not crush injury), multiple digits involved, and the surgeon.
Conclusions
The decision to replant, revascularize, or amputate a nonviable digit and the success of replantation and revascularization are related to both injury factors, such as mechanism of injury, affected digit, and zone of injury, and the surgeon.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery Articles</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><issn>1558-9447</issn><issn>1558-9455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF9LwzAUxYMoTqcfwBfpoy-dSZM0zYsw5r_BQBj6HLImrRldOpN2UD-9Ga1DX8Sne7n3nHMvPwCuEJwgCNmtR4jSJIYIx5wmMO6OwFmYZDEnlB4fesJG4Nz7NYQkzTJ-CkYJIUnKMT4Ds6XeVtI2sjG1jaRV0VLvpM_bSjrz2U93fhJNN9t2EBkbze26dVpF96Y0jb8AJ4WsvL4c6hi8PT68zp7jxcvTfDZdxDnmaRcXmCilNCScZyusM8oKmWvGCywLhFWuaJYmWFGFk0JmoRRaISqVTBlVHEI8Bnd97rZdbbTKtW2crMTWmY10nailEb831ryLst4JzAhNCAoBN0OAqz9a7RuxMT7XVQCg69YLRDhkKWOUBCnqpbmrvXe6OJxBUOzhix6-CPDFHr7oguf6538HxzftIEh6gQ8rW2on1nXrbGD2Z-pkMMlS_8fwBV3DoJw</recordid><startdate>201309</startdate><enddate>201309</enddate><creator>Mulders, Marjolein A. M.</creator><creator>Neuhaus, Valentin</creator><creator>Becker, Stéphanie J. E.</creator><creator>Lee, Sang-Gil</creator><creator>Ring, David C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Springer US</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201309</creationdate><title>Replantation and Revascularization vs. Amputation in Injured Digits</title><author>Mulders, Marjolein A. M. ; Neuhaus, Valentin ; Becker, Stéphanie J. E. ; Lee, Sang-Gil ; Ring, David C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396y-f34ddde04998b3e857face79f3af13dcd58623d5d32fa85d3fed15ada675d9003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery Articles</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mulders, Marjolein A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuhaus, Valentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Stéphanie J. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang-Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ring, David C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mulders, Marjolein A. M.</au><au>Neuhaus, Valentin</au><au>Becker, Stéphanie J. E.</au><au>Lee, Sang-Gil</au><au>Ring, David C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Replantation and Revascularization vs. Amputation in Injured Digits</atitle><jtitle>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><stitle>HAND</stitle><addtitle>Hand (N Y)</addtitle><date>2013-09</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>273</epage><pages>267-273</pages><issn>1558-9447</issn><eissn>1558-9455</eissn><abstract>Background
The purpose of this study was to analyze factors associated with the decision to replant or revascularize rather than amputate an injured digit as well as factors associated with successful replantation or revascularization.
Methods
We reviewed 315 complete and subtotal amputations at or proximal to the distal interphalangeal joint in 199 adult patients treated over 10 years. Ninety-three digits were replanted (30 %), 51 were revascularized (16 %), and 171 were amputated (54 %), including 5 attempted replantations. Bivariate and multivariable analyses sought factors associated with replantation vs. amputation, revascularization vs. amputation, and success of replantation or revascularization.
Results
Factors associated with replantation rather than amputation were injury to the left hand, thumb, middle digit, and ring digit, more than one digit affected, and surgeon. Factors associated with revascularization are surgeon and shorter ischemia time. Forty-five replantations (48 %) and 41 revascularizations (80 %) were successful. Successful replantation was associated with the side of injury (left side more likely to survive), zone of injury (distal interphalangeal and interphalangeal joint more likely to survive and proximal phalanx less likely to survive), and shorter ischemia time. Success of revascularization was associated with the mechanism of injury (saw and not crush injury), multiple digits involved, and the surgeon.
Conclusions
The decision to replant, revascularize, or amputate a nonviable digit and the success of replantation and revascularization are related to both injury factors, such as mechanism of injury, affected digit, and zone of injury, and the surgeon.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>24426933</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11552-013-9520-y</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1558-9447 |
ispartof | Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2013-09, Vol.8 (3), p.267-273 |
issn | 1558-9447 1558-9455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3745241 |
source | PubMed; Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Medicine Medicine & Public Health Orthopedics Plastic Surgery Surgery Surgery Articles Surgical Orthopedics |
title | Replantation and Revascularization vs. Amputation in Injured Digits |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A07%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Replantation%20and%20Revascularization%20vs.%20Amputation%20in%20Injured%20Digits&rft.jtitle=Hand%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Mulders,%20Marjolein%20A.%20M.&rft.date=2013-09&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=273&rft.pages=267-273&rft.issn=1558-9447&rft.eissn=1558-9455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11552-013-9520-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1490767754%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396y-f34ddde04998b3e857face79f3af13dcd58623d5d32fa85d3fed15ada675d9003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1490767754&rft_id=info:pmid/24426933&rft_sage_id=10.1007_s11552-013-9520-y&rfr_iscdi=true |