Loading…

Replantation and Revascularization vs. Amputation in Injured Digits

Background The purpose of this study was to analyze factors associated with the decision to replant or revascularize rather than amputate an injured digit as well as factors associated with successful replantation or revascularization. Methods We reviewed 315 complete and subtotal amputations at or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hand (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2013-09, Vol.8 (3), p.267-273
Main Authors: Mulders, Marjolein A. M., Neuhaus, Valentin, Becker, Stéphanie J. E., Lee, Sang-Gil, Ring, David C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396y-f34ddde04998b3e857face79f3af13dcd58623d5d32fa85d3fed15ada675d9003
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396y-f34ddde04998b3e857face79f3af13dcd58623d5d32fa85d3fed15ada675d9003
container_end_page 273
container_issue 3
container_start_page 267
container_title Hand (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 8
creator Mulders, Marjolein A. M.
Neuhaus, Valentin
Becker, Stéphanie J. E.
Lee, Sang-Gil
Ring, David C.
description Background The purpose of this study was to analyze factors associated with the decision to replant or revascularize rather than amputate an injured digit as well as factors associated with successful replantation or revascularization. Methods We reviewed 315 complete and subtotal amputations at or proximal to the distal interphalangeal joint in 199 adult patients treated over 10 years. Ninety-three digits were replanted (30 %), 51 were revascularized (16 %), and 171 were amputated (54 %), including 5 attempted replantations. Bivariate and multivariable analyses sought factors associated with replantation vs. amputation, revascularization vs. amputation, and success of replantation or revascularization. Results Factors associated with replantation rather than amputation were injury to the left hand, thumb, middle digit, and ring digit, more than one digit affected, and surgeon. Factors associated with revascularization are surgeon and shorter ischemia time. Forty-five replantations (48 %) and 41 revascularizations (80 %) were successful. Successful replantation was associated with the side of injury (left side more likely to survive), zone of injury (distal interphalangeal and interphalangeal joint more likely to survive and proximal phalanx less likely to survive), and shorter ischemia time. Success of revascularization was associated with the mechanism of injury (saw and not crush injury), multiple digits involved, and the surgeon. Conclusions The decision to replant, revascularize, or amputate a nonviable digit and the success of replantation and revascularization are related to both injury factors, such as mechanism of injury, affected digit, and zone of injury, and the surgeon.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11552-013-9520-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3745241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1007_s11552-013-9520-y</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1490767754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396y-f34ddde04998b3e857face79f3af13dcd58623d5d32fa85d3fed15ada675d9003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF9LwzAUxYMoTqcfwBfpoy-dSZM0zYsw5r_BQBj6HLImrRldOpN2UD-9Ga1DX8Sne7n3nHMvPwCuEJwgCNmtR4jSJIYIx5wmMO6OwFmYZDEnlB4fesJG4Nz7NYQkzTJ-CkYJIUnKMT4Ds6XeVtI2sjG1jaRV0VLvpM_bSjrz2U93fhJNN9t2EBkbze26dVpF96Y0jb8AJ4WsvL4c6hi8PT68zp7jxcvTfDZdxDnmaRcXmCilNCScZyusM8oKmWvGCywLhFWuaJYmWFGFk0JmoRRaISqVTBlVHEI8Bnd97rZdbbTKtW2crMTWmY10nailEb831ryLst4JzAhNCAoBN0OAqz9a7RuxMT7XVQCg69YLRDhkKWOUBCnqpbmrvXe6OJxBUOzhix6-CPDFHr7oguf6538HxzftIEh6gQ8rW2on1nXrbGD2Z-pkMMlS_8fwBV3DoJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1490767754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Replantation and Revascularization vs. Amputation in Injured Digits</title><source>PubMed</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Mulders, Marjolein A. M. ; Neuhaus, Valentin ; Becker, Stéphanie J. E. ; Lee, Sang-Gil ; Ring, David C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mulders, Marjolein A. M. ; Neuhaus, Valentin ; Becker, Stéphanie J. E. ; Lee, Sang-Gil ; Ring, David C.</creatorcontrib><description>Background The purpose of this study was to analyze factors associated with the decision to replant or revascularize rather than amputate an injured digit as well as factors associated with successful replantation or revascularization. Methods We reviewed 315 complete and subtotal amputations at or proximal to the distal interphalangeal joint in 199 adult patients treated over 10 years. Ninety-three digits were replanted (30 %), 51 were revascularized (16 %), and 171 were amputated (54 %), including 5 attempted replantations. Bivariate and multivariable analyses sought factors associated with replantation vs. amputation, revascularization vs. amputation, and success of replantation or revascularization. Results Factors associated with replantation rather than amputation were injury to the left hand, thumb, middle digit, and ring digit, more than one digit affected, and surgeon. Factors associated with revascularization are surgeon and shorter ischemia time. Forty-five replantations (48 %) and 41 revascularizations (80 %) were successful. Successful replantation was associated with the side of injury (left side more likely to survive), zone of injury (distal interphalangeal and interphalangeal joint more likely to survive and proximal phalanx less likely to survive), and shorter ischemia time. Success of revascularization was associated with the mechanism of injury (saw and not crush injury), multiple digits involved, and the surgeon. Conclusions The decision to replant, revascularize, or amputate a nonviable digit and the success of replantation and revascularization are related to both injury factors, such as mechanism of injury, affected digit, and zone of injury, and the surgeon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1558-9447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11552-013-9520-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24426933</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Orthopedics ; Plastic Surgery ; Surgery ; Surgery Articles ; Surgical Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2013-09, Vol.8 (3), p.267-273</ispartof><rights>American Association for Hand Surgery 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396y-f34ddde04998b3e857face79f3af13dcd58623d5d32fa85d3fed15ada675d9003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396y-f34ddde04998b3e857face79f3af13dcd58623d5d32fa85d3fed15ada675d9003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3745241/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3745241/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24426933$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mulders, Marjolein A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuhaus, Valentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Stéphanie J. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang-Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ring, David C.</creatorcontrib><title>Replantation and Revascularization vs. Amputation in Injured Digits</title><title>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>HAND</addtitle><addtitle>Hand (N Y)</addtitle><description>Background The purpose of this study was to analyze factors associated with the decision to replant or revascularize rather than amputate an injured digit as well as factors associated with successful replantation or revascularization. Methods We reviewed 315 complete and subtotal amputations at or proximal to the distal interphalangeal joint in 199 adult patients treated over 10 years. Ninety-three digits were replanted (30 %), 51 were revascularized (16 %), and 171 were amputated (54 %), including 5 attempted replantations. Bivariate and multivariable analyses sought factors associated with replantation vs. amputation, revascularization vs. amputation, and success of replantation or revascularization. Results Factors associated with replantation rather than amputation were injury to the left hand, thumb, middle digit, and ring digit, more than one digit affected, and surgeon. Factors associated with revascularization are surgeon and shorter ischemia time. Forty-five replantations (48 %) and 41 revascularizations (80 %) were successful. Successful replantation was associated with the side of injury (left side more likely to survive), zone of injury (distal interphalangeal and interphalangeal joint more likely to survive and proximal phalanx less likely to survive), and shorter ischemia time. Success of revascularization was associated with the mechanism of injury (saw and not crush injury), multiple digits involved, and the surgeon. Conclusions The decision to replant, revascularize, or amputate a nonviable digit and the success of replantation and revascularization are related to both injury factors, such as mechanism of injury, affected digit, and zone of injury, and the surgeon.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery Articles</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><issn>1558-9447</issn><issn>1558-9455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF9LwzAUxYMoTqcfwBfpoy-dSZM0zYsw5r_BQBj6HLImrRldOpN2UD-9Ga1DX8Sne7n3nHMvPwCuEJwgCNmtR4jSJIYIx5wmMO6OwFmYZDEnlB4fesJG4Nz7NYQkzTJ-CkYJIUnKMT4Ds6XeVtI2sjG1jaRV0VLvpM_bSjrz2U93fhJNN9t2EBkbze26dVpF96Y0jb8AJ4WsvL4c6hi8PT68zp7jxcvTfDZdxDnmaRcXmCilNCScZyusM8oKmWvGCywLhFWuaJYmWFGFk0JmoRRaISqVTBlVHEI8Bnd97rZdbbTKtW2crMTWmY10nailEb831ryLst4JzAhNCAoBN0OAqz9a7RuxMT7XVQCg69YLRDhkKWOUBCnqpbmrvXe6OJxBUOzhix6-CPDFHr7oguf6538HxzftIEh6gQ8rW2on1nXrbGD2Z-pkMMlS_8fwBV3DoJw</recordid><startdate>201309</startdate><enddate>201309</enddate><creator>Mulders, Marjolein A. M.</creator><creator>Neuhaus, Valentin</creator><creator>Becker, Stéphanie J. E.</creator><creator>Lee, Sang-Gil</creator><creator>Ring, David C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Springer US</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201309</creationdate><title>Replantation and Revascularization vs. Amputation in Injured Digits</title><author>Mulders, Marjolein A. M. ; Neuhaus, Valentin ; Becker, Stéphanie J. E. ; Lee, Sang-Gil ; Ring, David C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396y-f34ddde04998b3e857face79f3af13dcd58623d5d32fa85d3fed15ada675d9003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery Articles</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mulders, Marjolein A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuhaus, Valentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Stéphanie J. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang-Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ring, David C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mulders, Marjolein A. M.</au><au>Neuhaus, Valentin</au><au>Becker, Stéphanie J. E.</au><au>Lee, Sang-Gil</au><au>Ring, David C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Replantation and Revascularization vs. Amputation in Injured Digits</atitle><jtitle>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><stitle>HAND</stitle><addtitle>Hand (N Y)</addtitle><date>2013-09</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>273</epage><pages>267-273</pages><issn>1558-9447</issn><eissn>1558-9455</eissn><abstract>Background The purpose of this study was to analyze factors associated with the decision to replant or revascularize rather than amputate an injured digit as well as factors associated with successful replantation or revascularization. Methods We reviewed 315 complete and subtotal amputations at or proximal to the distal interphalangeal joint in 199 adult patients treated over 10 years. Ninety-three digits were replanted (30 %), 51 were revascularized (16 %), and 171 were amputated (54 %), including 5 attempted replantations. Bivariate and multivariable analyses sought factors associated with replantation vs. amputation, revascularization vs. amputation, and success of replantation or revascularization. Results Factors associated with replantation rather than amputation were injury to the left hand, thumb, middle digit, and ring digit, more than one digit affected, and surgeon. Factors associated with revascularization are surgeon and shorter ischemia time. Forty-five replantations (48 %) and 41 revascularizations (80 %) were successful. Successful replantation was associated with the side of injury (left side more likely to survive), zone of injury (distal interphalangeal and interphalangeal joint more likely to survive and proximal phalanx less likely to survive), and shorter ischemia time. Success of revascularization was associated with the mechanism of injury (saw and not crush injury), multiple digits involved, and the surgeon. Conclusions The decision to replant, revascularize, or amputate a nonviable digit and the success of replantation and revascularization are related to both injury factors, such as mechanism of injury, affected digit, and zone of injury, and the surgeon.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>24426933</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11552-013-9520-y</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1558-9447
ispartof Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2013-09, Vol.8 (3), p.267-273
issn 1558-9447
1558-9455
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3745241
source PubMed; Sage Journals Online
subjects Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Orthopedics
Plastic Surgery
Surgery
Surgery Articles
Surgical Orthopedics
title Replantation and Revascularization vs. Amputation in Injured Digits
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A07%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Replantation%20and%20Revascularization%20vs.%20Amputation%20in%20Injured%20Digits&rft.jtitle=Hand%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Mulders,%20Marjolein%20A.%20M.&rft.date=2013-09&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=273&rft.pages=267-273&rft.issn=1558-9447&rft.eissn=1558-9455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11552-013-9520-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1490767754%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396y-f34ddde04998b3e857face79f3af13dcd58623d5d32fa85d3fed15ada675d9003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1490767754&rft_id=info:pmid/24426933&rft_sage_id=10.1007_s11552-013-9520-y&rfr_iscdi=true