Loading…

Combination of Comfrey Root Extract Plus Methyl Nicotinate in Patients with Conditions of Acute Upper or Low Back Pain: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

This randomised, multicentre, double‐blind, three‐arm, placebo‐controlled trial compared a topical combination of 35% comfrey root extract plus 1.2% methyl nicotinate versus a single preparation of methyl nicotinate or placebo cream for relief of acute upper or low back pain. 379 patients were rando...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Phytotherapy research 2013-06, Vol.27 (6), p.811-817
Main Authors: Pabst, Helmut, Schaefer, Axel, Staiger, Christiane, Junker-Samek, Marc, Predel, Hans-Georg
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5010-9ba84e625685466b82b0249ae980fe433ba8108c981091f45abbffa3180271af3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5010-9ba84e625685466b82b0249ae980fe433ba8108c981091f45abbffa3180271af3
container_end_page 817
container_issue 6
container_start_page 811
container_title Phytotherapy research
container_volume 27
creator Pabst, Helmut
Schaefer, Axel
Staiger, Christiane
Junker-Samek, Marc
Predel, Hans-Georg
description This randomised, multicentre, double‐blind, three‐arm, placebo‐controlled trial compared a topical combination of 35% comfrey root extract plus 1.2% methyl nicotinate versus a single preparation of methyl nicotinate or placebo cream for relief of acute upper or low back pain. 379 patients were randomly assigned to three groups (combination, n = 163; methyl nicotinate, n = 164; placebo, n = 52). They applied a 12 cm layer of cream three times daily for 5 days. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve (AUC) of the visual analogue scale (VAS) on active standardised movement values at visits 1 to 4. Secondary measures included back pain at rest, pressure algometry, consumption of analgesic medication, functional impairment measured with Oswestry Disability Index, and global assessment of response. The AUC of the VAS on active standardised movement was markedly smaller in the combination treatment group than in the methyl nicotinate and in the placebo group (ANOVA: p 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ptr.4790
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3747459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2989678781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5010-9ba84e625685466b82b0249ae980fe433ba8108c981091f45abbffa3180271af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcuO0zAYRi0EYsqAxBMgS2zYZPAtsc0CqZRhQGpLVXUAsbGc1KGeSeNgO3T6OLwpDi0VLNj4Ip_v-Jc-AJ5idIERIi-76C8Yl-geGGEkZYZzTu-DEZI5zhgWX87AoxBuEEKSIPYQnBEiBOdcjMDPiduWttXRuha6GqZr7c0eLp2L8PIuel1FuGj6AGcmbvYNnNvKxSFgoG3hIgVNGwPc2bhJ4XZtB1MYVOOqT9B11xkPnYdTt4NvdHWbMrZ9Bcdw1jfRVintDVzqdu22Npj1IIneNU06rrzVzWPwoNZNME-O-zm4fne5mrzPph-vPkzG06zKEUaZLLVgpiB5IXJWFKUgJSJMaiMFqg2jNL1jJCqZVolrluuyrGtNsUCEY13Tc_D64O36cmvWvwfTjeq83Wq_V05b9e9Lazfqm_uhKGec5TIJnh8F3n3vTYjqxvW-TTMrTIu8IKIgJFEvDlTlXQje1KcfMFJDmSqVqYYyE_rs74lO4J_2EpAdgJ1tzP6_IrVYLY_CI29DNHcnXvtbVXDKc_V5fqVm869o8RZ_UlP6C2v3uoc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1365628622</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combination of Comfrey Root Extract Plus Methyl Nicotinate in Patients with Conditions of Acute Upper or Low Back Pain: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Pabst, Helmut ; Schaefer, Axel ; Staiger, Christiane ; Junker-Samek, Marc ; Predel, Hans-Georg</creator><creatorcontrib>Pabst, Helmut ; Schaefer, Axel ; Staiger, Christiane ; Junker-Samek, Marc ; Predel, Hans-Georg</creatorcontrib><description>This randomised, multicentre, double‐blind, three‐arm, placebo‐controlled trial compared a topical combination of 35% comfrey root extract plus 1.2% methyl nicotinate versus a single preparation of methyl nicotinate or placebo cream for relief of acute upper or low back pain. 379 patients were randomly assigned to three groups (combination, n = 163; methyl nicotinate, n = 164; placebo, n = 52). They applied a 12 cm layer of cream three times daily for 5 days. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve (AUC) of the visual analogue scale (VAS) on active standardised movement values at visits 1 to 4. Secondary measures included back pain at rest, pressure algometry, consumption of analgesic medication, functional impairment measured with Oswestry Disability Index, and global assessment of response. The AUC of the VAS on active standardised movement was markedly smaller in the combination treatment group than in the methyl nicotinate and in the placebo group (ANOVA: p &lt; 0.0001). The combination demonstrated superiority to the two other treatment arms, while methyl nicotinate displayed a considerable effect as well. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-418X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ptr.4790</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22887778</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHYREH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>acute back pain ; Adult ; comfrey ; Comfrey - chemistry ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Low Back Pain - drug therapy ; Male ; methyl nicotinate ; Nicotinic Acids - therapeutic use ; Pain Measurement ; Phytotherapy ; Plant Extracts - therapeutic use ; RCT ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Phytotherapy research, 2013-06, Vol.27 (6), p.811-817</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5010-9ba84e625685466b82b0249ae980fe433ba8108c981091f45abbffa3180271af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5010-9ba84e625685466b82b0249ae980fe433ba8108c981091f45abbffa3180271af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22887778$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pabst, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staiger, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junker-Samek, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Predel, Hans-Georg</creatorcontrib><title>Combination of Comfrey Root Extract Plus Methyl Nicotinate in Patients with Conditions of Acute Upper or Low Back Pain: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial</title><title>Phytotherapy research</title><addtitle>Phytother. Res</addtitle><description>This randomised, multicentre, double‐blind, three‐arm, placebo‐controlled trial compared a topical combination of 35% comfrey root extract plus 1.2% methyl nicotinate versus a single preparation of methyl nicotinate or placebo cream for relief of acute upper or low back pain. 379 patients were randomly assigned to three groups (combination, n = 163; methyl nicotinate, n = 164; placebo, n = 52). They applied a 12 cm layer of cream three times daily for 5 days. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve (AUC) of the visual analogue scale (VAS) on active standardised movement values at visits 1 to 4. Secondary measures included back pain at rest, pressure algometry, consumption of analgesic medication, functional impairment measured with Oswestry Disability Index, and global assessment of response. The AUC of the VAS on active standardised movement was markedly smaller in the combination treatment group than in the methyl nicotinate and in the placebo group (ANOVA: p &lt; 0.0001). The combination demonstrated superiority to the two other treatment arms, while methyl nicotinate displayed a considerable effect as well. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>acute back pain</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>comfrey</subject><subject>Comfrey - chemistry</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>methyl nicotinate</subject><subject>Nicotinic Acids - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Phytotherapy</subject><subject>Plant Extracts - therapeutic use</subject><subject>RCT</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0951-418X</issn><issn>1099-1573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcuO0zAYRi0EYsqAxBMgS2zYZPAtsc0CqZRhQGpLVXUAsbGc1KGeSeNgO3T6OLwpDi0VLNj4Ip_v-Jc-AJ5idIERIi-76C8Yl-geGGEkZYZzTu-DEZI5zhgWX87AoxBuEEKSIPYQnBEiBOdcjMDPiduWttXRuha6GqZr7c0eLp2L8PIuel1FuGj6AGcmbvYNnNvKxSFgoG3hIgVNGwPc2bhJ4XZtB1MYVOOqT9B11xkPnYdTt4NvdHWbMrZ9Bcdw1jfRVintDVzqdu22Npj1IIneNU06rrzVzWPwoNZNME-O-zm4fne5mrzPph-vPkzG06zKEUaZLLVgpiB5IXJWFKUgJSJMaiMFqg2jNL1jJCqZVolrluuyrGtNsUCEY13Tc_D64O36cmvWvwfTjeq83Wq_V05b9e9Lazfqm_uhKGec5TIJnh8F3n3vTYjqxvW-TTMrTIu8IKIgJFEvDlTlXQje1KcfMFJDmSqVqYYyE_rs74lO4J_2EpAdgJ1tzP6_IrVYLY_CI29DNHcnXvtbVXDKc_V5fqVm869o8RZ_UlP6C2v3uoc</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Pabst, Helmut</creator><creator>Schaefer, Axel</creator><creator>Staiger, Christiane</creator><creator>Junker-Samek, Marc</creator><creator>Predel, Hans-Georg</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Combination of Comfrey Root Extract Plus Methyl Nicotinate in Patients with Conditions of Acute Upper or Low Back Pain: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial</title><author>Pabst, Helmut ; Schaefer, Axel ; Staiger, Christiane ; Junker-Samek, Marc ; Predel, Hans-Georg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5010-9ba84e625685466b82b0249ae980fe433ba8108c981091f45abbffa3180271af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>acute back pain</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>comfrey</topic><topic>Comfrey - chemistry</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>methyl nicotinate</topic><topic>Nicotinic Acids - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Phytotherapy</topic><topic>Plant Extracts - therapeutic use</topic><topic>RCT</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pabst, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staiger, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junker-Samek, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Predel, Hans-Georg</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Phytotherapy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pabst, Helmut</au><au>Schaefer, Axel</au><au>Staiger, Christiane</au><au>Junker-Samek, Marc</au><au>Predel, Hans-Georg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combination of Comfrey Root Extract Plus Methyl Nicotinate in Patients with Conditions of Acute Upper or Low Back Pain: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Phytotherapy research</jtitle><addtitle>Phytother. Res</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>811</spage><epage>817</epage><pages>811-817</pages><issn>0951-418X</issn><eissn>1099-1573</eissn><coden>PHYREH</coden><abstract>This randomised, multicentre, double‐blind, three‐arm, placebo‐controlled trial compared a topical combination of 35% comfrey root extract plus 1.2% methyl nicotinate versus a single preparation of methyl nicotinate or placebo cream for relief of acute upper or low back pain. 379 patients were randomly assigned to three groups (combination, n = 163; methyl nicotinate, n = 164; placebo, n = 52). They applied a 12 cm layer of cream three times daily for 5 days. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve (AUC) of the visual analogue scale (VAS) on active standardised movement values at visits 1 to 4. Secondary measures included back pain at rest, pressure algometry, consumption of analgesic medication, functional impairment measured with Oswestry Disability Index, and global assessment of response. The AUC of the VAS on active standardised movement was markedly smaller in the combination treatment group than in the methyl nicotinate and in the placebo group (ANOVA: p &lt; 0.0001). The combination demonstrated superiority to the two other treatment arms, while methyl nicotinate displayed a considerable effect as well. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22887778</pmid><doi>10.1002/ptr.4790</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-418X
ispartof Phytotherapy research, 2013-06, Vol.27 (6), p.811-817
issn 0951-418X
1099-1573
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3747459
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects acute back pain
Adult
comfrey
Comfrey - chemistry
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Low Back Pain - drug therapy
Male
methyl nicotinate
Nicotinic Acids - therapeutic use
Pain Measurement
Phytotherapy
Plant Extracts - therapeutic use
RCT
Young Adult
title Combination of Comfrey Root Extract Plus Methyl Nicotinate in Patients with Conditions of Acute Upper or Low Back Pain: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A34%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combination%20of%20Comfrey%20Root%20Extract%20Plus%20Methyl%20Nicotinate%20in%20Patients%20with%20Conditions%20of%20Acute%20Upper%20or%20Low%20Back%20Pain:%20A%20Multicentre%20Randomised%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Phytotherapy%20research&rft.au=Pabst,%20Helmut&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=811&rft.epage=817&rft.pages=811-817&rft.issn=0951-418X&rft.eissn=1099-1573&rft.coden=PHYREH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ptr.4790&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2989678781%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5010-9ba84e625685466b82b0249ae980fe433ba8108c981091f45abbffa3180271af3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1365628622&rft_id=info:pmid/22887778&rfr_iscdi=true