Loading…
Combination of Comfrey Root Extract Plus Methyl Nicotinate in Patients with Conditions of Acute Upper or Low Back Pain: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
This randomised, multicentre, double‐blind, three‐arm, placebo‐controlled trial compared a topical combination of 35% comfrey root extract plus 1.2% methyl nicotinate versus a single preparation of methyl nicotinate or placebo cream for relief of acute upper or low back pain. 379 patients were rando...
Saved in:
Published in: | Phytotherapy research 2013-06, Vol.27 (6), p.811-817 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5010-9ba84e625685466b82b0249ae980fe433ba8108c981091f45abbffa3180271af3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5010-9ba84e625685466b82b0249ae980fe433ba8108c981091f45abbffa3180271af3 |
container_end_page | 817 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 811 |
container_title | Phytotherapy research |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Pabst, Helmut Schaefer, Axel Staiger, Christiane Junker-Samek, Marc Predel, Hans-Georg |
description | This randomised, multicentre, double‐blind, three‐arm, placebo‐controlled trial compared a topical combination of 35% comfrey root extract plus 1.2% methyl nicotinate versus a single preparation of methyl nicotinate or placebo cream for relief of acute upper or low back pain. 379 patients were randomly assigned to three groups (combination, n = 163; methyl nicotinate, n = 164; placebo, n = 52). They applied a 12 cm layer of cream three times daily for 5 days. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve (AUC) of the visual analogue scale (VAS) on active standardised movement values at visits 1 to 4. Secondary measures included back pain at rest, pressure algometry, consumption of analgesic medication, functional impairment measured with Oswestry Disability Index, and global assessment of response. The AUC of the VAS on active standardised movement was markedly smaller in the combination treatment group than in the methyl nicotinate and in the placebo group (ANOVA: p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ptr.4790 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3747459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2989678781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5010-9ba84e625685466b82b0249ae980fe433ba8108c981091f45abbffa3180271af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcuO0zAYRi0EYsqAxBMgS2zYZPAtsc0CqZRhQGpLVXUAsbGc1KGeSeNgO3T6OLwpDi0VLNj4Ip_v-Jc-AJ5idIERIi-76C8Yl-geGGEkZYZzTu-DEZI5zhgWX87AoxBuEEKSIPYQnBEiBOdcjMDPiduWttXRuha6GqZr7c0eLp2L8PIuel1FuGj6AGcmbvYNnNvKxSFgoG3hIgVNGwPc2bhJ4XZtB1MYVOOqT9B11xkPnYdTt4NvdHWbMrZ9Bcdw1jfRVintDVzqdu22Npj1IIneNU06rrzVzWPwoNZNME-O-zm4fne5mrzPph-vPkzG06zKEUaZLLVgpiB5IXJWFKUgJSJMaiMFqg2jNL1jJCqZVolrluuyrGtNsUCEY13Tc_D64O36cmvWvwfTjeq83Wq_V05b9e9Lazfqm_uhKGec5TIJnh8F3n3vTYjqxvW-TTMrTIu8IKIgJFEvDlTlXQje1KcfMFJDmSqVqYYyE_rs74lO4J_2EpAdgJ1tzP6_IrVYLY_CI29DNHcnXvtbVXDKc_V5fqVm869o8RZ_UlP6C2v3uoc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1365628622</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combination of Comfrey Root Extract Plus Methyl Nicotinate in Patients with Conditions of Acute Upper or Low Back Pain: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Pabst, Helmut ; Schaefer, Axel ; Staiger, Christiane ; Junker-Samek, Marc ; Predel, Hans-Georg</creator><creatorcontrib>Pabst, Helmut ; Schaefer, Axel ; Staiger, Christiane ; Junker-Samek, Marc ; Predel, Hans-Georg</creatorcontrib><description>This randomised, multicentre, double‐blind, three‐arm, placebo‐controlled trial compared a topical combination of 35% comfrey root extract plus 1.2% methyl nicotinate versus a single preparation of methyl nicotinate or placebo cream for relief of acute upper or low back pain. 379 patients were randomly assigned to three groups (combination, n = 163; methyl nicotinate, n = 164; placebo, n = 52). They applied a 12 cm layer of cream three times daily for 5 days. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve (AUC) of the visual analogue scale (VAS) on active standardised movement values at visits 1 to 4. Secondary measures included back pain at rest, pressure algometry, consumption of analgesic medication, functional impairment measured with Oswestry Disability Index, and global assessment of response. The AUC of the VAS on active standardised movement was markedly smaller in the combination treatment group than in the methyl nicotinate and in the placebo group (ANOVA: p < 0.0001). The combination demonstrated superiority to the two other treatment arms, while methyl nicotinate displayed a considerable effect as well. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-418X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ptr.4790</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22887778</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHYREH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>acute back pain ; Adult ; comfrey ; Comfrey - chemistry ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Low Back Pain - drug therapy ; Male ; methyl nicotinate ; Nicotinic Acids - therapeutic use ; Pain Measurement ; Phytotherapy ; Plant Extracts - therapeutic use ; RCT ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Phytotherapy research, 2013-06, Vol.27 (6), p.811-817</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5010-9ba84e625685466b82b0249ae980fe433ba8108c981091f45abbffa3180271af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5010-9ba84e625685466b82b0249ae980fe433ba8108c981091f45abbffa3180271af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22887778$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pabst, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staiger, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junker-Samek, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Predel, Hans-Georg</creatorcontrib><title>Combination of Comfrey Root Extract Plus Methyl Nicotinate in Patients with Conditions of Acute Upper or Low Back Pain: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial</title><title>Phytotherapy research</title><addtitle>Phytother. Res</addtitle><description>This randomised, multicentre, double‐blind, three‐arm, placebo‐controlled trial compared a topical combination of 35% comfrey root extract plus 1.2% methyl nicotinate versus a single preparation of methyl nicotinate or placebo cream for relief of acute upper or low back pain. 379 patients were randomly assigned to three groups (combination, n = 163; methyl nicotinate, n = 164; placebo, n = 52). They applied a 12 cm layer of cream three times daily for 5 days. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve (AUC) of the visual analogue scale (VAS) on active standardised movement values at visits 1 to 4. Secondary measures included back pain at rest, pressure algometry, consumption of analgesic medication, functional impairment measured with Oswestry Disability Index, and global assessment of response. The AUC of the VAS on active standardised movement was markedly smaller in the combination treatment group than in the methyl nicotinate and in the placebo group (ANOVA: p < 0.0001). The combination demonstrated superiority to the two other treatment arms, while methyl nicotinate displayed a considerable effect as well. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>acute back pain</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>comfrey</subject><subject>Comfrey - chemistry</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>methyl nicotinate</subject><subject>Nicotinic Acids - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Phytotherapy</subject><subject>Plant Extracts - therapeutic use</subject><subject>RCT</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0951-418X</issn><issn>1099-1573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcuO0zAYRi0EYsqAxBMgS2zYZPAtsc0CqZRhQGpLVXUAsbGc1KGeSeNgO3T6OLwpDi0VLNj4Ip_v-Jc-AJ5idIERIi-76C8Yl-geGGEkZYZzTu-DEZI5zhgWX87AoxBuEEKSIPYQnBEiBOdcjMDPiduWttXRuha6GqZr7c0eLp2L8PIuel1FuGj6AGcmbvYNnNvKxSFgoG3hIgVNGwPc2bhJ4XZtB1MYVOOqT9B11xkPnYdTt4NvdHWbMrZ9Bcdw1jfRVintDVzqdu22Npj1IIneNU06rrzVzWPwoNZNME-O-zm4fne5mrzPph-vPkzG06zKEUaZLLVgpiB5IXJWFKUgJSJMaiMFqg2jNL1jJCqZVolrluuyrGtNsUCEY13Tc_D64O36cmvWvwfTjeq83Wq_V05b9e9Lazfqm_uhKGec5TIJnh8F3n3vTYjqxvW-TTMrTIu8IKIgJFEvDlTlXQje1KcfMFJDmSqVqYYyE_rs74lO4J_2EpAdgJ1tzP6_IrVYLY_CI29DNHcnXvtbVXDKc_V5fqVm869o8RZ_UlP6C2v3uoc</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Pabst, Helmut</creator><creator>Schaefer, Axel</creator><creator>Staiger, Christiane</creator><creator>Junker-Samek, Marc</creator><creator>Predel, Hans-Georg</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Combination of Comfrey Root Extract Plus Methyl Nicotinate in Patients with Conditions of Acute Upper or Low Back Pain: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial</title><author>Pabst, Helmut ; Schaefer, Axel ; Staiger, Christiane ; Junker-Samek, Marc ; Predel, Hans-Georg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5010-9ba84e625685466b82b0249ae980fe433ba8108c981091f45abbffa3180271af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>acute back pain</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>comfrey</topic><topic>Comfrey - chemistry</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>methyl nicotinate</topic><topic>Nicotinic Acids - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Phytotherapy</topic><topic>Plant Extracts - therapeutic use</topic><topic>RCT</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pabst, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staiger, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junker-Samek, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Predel, Hans-Georg</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Phytotherapy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pabst, Helmut</au><au>Schaefer, Axel</au><au>Staiger, Christiane</au><au>Junker-Samek, Marc</au><au>Predel, Hans-Georg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combination of Comfrey Root Extract Plus Methyl Nicotinate in Patients with Conditions of Acute Upper or Low Back Pain: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Phytotherapy research</jtitle><addtitle>Phytother. Res</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>811</spage><epage>817</epage><pages>811-817</pages><issn>0951-418X</issn><eissn>1099-1573</eissn><coden>PHYREH</coden><abstract>This randomised, multicentre, double‐blind, three‐arm, placebo‐controlled trial compared a topical combination of 35% comfrey root extract plus 1.2% methyl nicotinate versus a single preparation of methyl nicotinate or placebo cream for relief of acute upper or low back pain. 379 patients were randomly assigned to three groups (combination, n = 163; methyl nicotinate, n = 164; placebo, n = 52). They applied a 12 cm layer of cream three times daily for 5 days. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve (AUC) of the visual analogue scale (VAS) on active standardised movement values at visits 1 to 4. Secondary measures included back pain at rest, pressure algometry, consumption of analgesic medication, functional impairment measured with Oswestry Disability Index, and global assessment of response. The AUC of the VAS on active standardised movement was markedly smaller in the combination treatment group than in the methyl nicotinate and in the placebo group (ANOVA: p < 0.0001). The combination demonstrated superiority to the two other treatment arms, while methyl nicotinate displayed a considerable effect as well. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22887778</pmid><doi>10.1002/ptr.4790</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-418X |
ispartof | Phytotherapy research, 2013-06, Vol.27 (6), p.811-817 |
issn | 0951-418X 1099-1573 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3747459 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | acute back pain Adult comfrey Comfrey - chemistry Double-Blind Method Female Humans Low Back Pain - drug therapy Male methyl nicotinate Nicotinic Acids - therapeutic use Pain Measurement Phytotherapy Plant Extracts - therapeutic use RCT Young Adult |
title | Combination of Comfrey Root Extract Plus Methyl Nicotinate in Patients with Conditions of Acute Upper or Low Back Pain: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A34%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combination%20of%20Comfrey%20Root%20Extract%20Plus%20Methyl%20Nicotinate%20in%20Patients%20with%20Conditions%20of%20Acute%20Upper%20or%20Low%20Back%20Pain:%20A%20Multicentre%20Randomised%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Phytotherapy%20research&rft.au=Pabst,%20Helmut&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=811&rft.epage=817&rft.pages=811-817&rft.issn=0951-418X&rft.eissn=1099-1573&rft.coden=PHYREH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ptr.4790&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2989678781%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5010-9ba84e625685466b82b0249ae980fe433ba8108c981091f45abbffa3180271af3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1365628622&rft_id=info:pmid/22887778&rfr_iscdi=true |