Loading…
A Comparison of Subtyping Methods for Differentiating Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Isolates Obtained from Food and Human Sources
To evaluate the abilities of these subtyping methods, we distinguished Salmonella Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) isolated from food products and human clinical samples between 2009 and 2010 in Seoul using five subtyping methods. We determined the subtypes of 20 S. Enteritidis isolates from food and hu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Osong public health and research perspectives 2013-02, Vol.4 (1), p.27-33 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-48e049dcd0aa5c5131f7ac9546148e7b007e788f82ad7800ee47a8fd30e50d343 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-48e049dcd0aa5c5131f7ac9546148e7b007e788f82ad7800ee47a8fd30e50d343 |
container_end_page | 33 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 27 |
container_title | Osong public health and research perspectives |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Hyeon, Ji-Yeon Chon, Jung-Whan Park, Jun-Ho Kim, Moo-Sang Oh, Young-Hee Choi, In-Soo Seo, Kun-Ho |
description | To evaluate the abilities of these subtyping methods, we distinguished Salmonella Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) isolated from food products and human clinical samples between 2009 and 2010 in Seoul using five subtyping methods.
We determined the subtypes of 20 S. Enteritidis isolates from food and human sources using phage typing, antimicrobial susceptibility, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST).
A total of 20 tested isolates were differentiated into six antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, three different phage types, four different PFGE profiles, seven rep-PCR patterns, and one MLST type. Food isolates were considerably more susceptible to antibiotics than human isolates. We were best able to discriminate among S. Enteritidis isolates using rep-PCR, and obtained the highest Simpson's diversity index of 0.82, whereas other methods produced indices that were less than 0.71. PFGE pattern appeared to be more related to antimicrobial resistance and phage types of S. Enteritidis isolates than rep-PCR. MLST revealed identical alleles in all isolates at all seven loci examined, indicating no resolution.
The results of this study suggest that rep-PCR provided the best discriminatory power for phenotypically similar S. Enteritidis isolates of food and human origins, whereas the discriminatory ability of MLST may be problematic because of the high sequence conservation of the targeted genes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.phrp.2012.12.005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3747678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2210909912001014</els_id><sourcerecordid>1445916469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-48e049dcd0aa5c5131f7ac9546148e7b007e788f82ad7800ee47a8fd30e50d343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFq3DAQNaWlCWl-oIeiYy_eSrZk2VAKYZs0gZQctj2LWWmU1WJLrmQv5Bv605W7SWguFQMS8948zcwriveMrhhlzaf9atzFcVVRVq1yUCpeFadVVddlQ0X1enkzWna0606K85T2NJ-MNJ14W5xUnIlOVM1p8fuCrMMwQnQpeBIs2czb6WF0_p58x2kXTCI2RPLVWYsR_eRgWrAN9EPw2PdAchKj00A2GMMBIrn8m5iccYncpNDDhIncbSdwHg2xMQzkKgRDwBtyPQ_gySbMUWN6V7yx0Cc8f7zPip9Xlz_W1-Xt3beb9cVtqWtJRclbpLwz2lAAoQWrmZWgO8EbliG5pVSibFvbVmBkSykil9BaU1MU1NS8Piu-HHXHeTug0XmCCL0aoxsgPqgATr1EvNup-3BQteSykW0W-PgoEMOvGdOkBpf0sg2PYU6KcS461vCmy9TqSNUxpBTRPn_DqFqMVHu1GKkWI1WObGQu-vBvg88lT7ZlwucjAfOaDg6jStqh12hcRD0pE9z_9P8AQBOySQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1445916469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Subtyping Methods for Differentiating Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Isolates Obtained from Food and Human Sources</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hyeon, Ji-Yeon ; Chon, Jung-Whan ; Park, Jun-Ho ; Kim, Moo-Sang ; Oh, Young-Hee ; Choi, In-Soo ; Seo, Kun-Ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Hyeon, Ji-Yeon ; Chon, Jung-Whan ; Park, Jun-Ho ; Kim, Moo-Sang ; Oh, Young-Hee ; Choi, In-Soo ; Seo, Kun-Ho</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the abilities of these subtyping methods, we distinguished Salmonella Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) isolated from food products and human clinical samples between 2009 and 2010 in Seoul using five subtyping methods.
We determined the subtypes of 20 S. Enteritidis isolates from food and human sources using phage typing, antimicrobial susceptibility, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST).
A total of 20 tested isolates were differentiated into six antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, three different phage types, four different PFGE profiles, seven rep-PCR patterns, and one MLST type. Food isolates were considerably more susceptible to antibiotics than human isolates. We were best able to discriminate among S. Enteritidis isolates using rep-PCR, and obtained the highest Simpson's diversity index of 0.82, whereas other methods produced indices that were less than 0.71. PFGE pattern appeared to be more related to antimicrobial resistance and phage types of S. Enteritidis isolates than rep-PCR. MLST revealed identical alleles in all isolates at all seven loci examined, indicating no resolution.
The results of this study suggest that rep-PCR provided the best discriminatory power for phenotypically similar S. Enteritidis isolates of food and human origins, whereas the discriminatory ability of MLST may be problematic because of the high sequence conservation of the targeted genes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2210-9099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2233-6052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.phrp.2012.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24159526</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>multilocus sequence typing ; Original ; pulsed-field gel electrophoresis ; repetitive sequence-based PCR ; Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis ; subtyping</subject><ispartof>Osong public health and research perspectives, 2013-02, Vol.4 (1), p.27-33</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>Copyright ©2013, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-48e049dcd0aa5c5131f7ac9546148e7b007e788f82ad7800ee47a8fd30e50d343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-48e049dcd0aa5c5131f7ac9546148e7b007e788f82ad7800ee47a8fd30e50d343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3747678/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210909912001014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3536,27901,27902,45756,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24159526$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hyeon, Ji-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chon, Jung-Whan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jun-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Moo-Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Young-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, In-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Kun-Ho</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Subtyping Methods for Differentiating Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Isolates Obtained from Food and Human Sources</title><title>Osong public health and research perspectives</title><addtitle>Osong Public Health Res Perspect</addtitle><description>To evaluate the abilities of these subtyping methods, we distinguished Salmonella Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) isolated from food products and human clinical samples between 2009 and 2010 in Seoul using five subtyping methods.
We determined the subtypes of 20 S. Enteritidis isolates from food and human sources using phage typing, antimicrobial susceptibility, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST).
A total of 20 tested isolates were differentiated into six antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, three different phage types, four different PFGE profiles, seven rep-PCR patterns, and one MLST type. Food isolates were considerably more susceptible to antibiotics than human isolates. We were best able to discriminate among S. Enteritidis isolates using rep-PCR, and obtained the highest Simpson's diversity index of 0.82, whereas other methods produced indices that were less than 0.71. PFGE pattern appeared to be more related to antimicrobial resistance and phage types of S. Enteritidis isolates than rep-PCR. MLST revealed identical alleles in all isolates at all seven loci examined, indicating no resolution.
The results of this study suggest that rep-PCR provided the best discriminatory power for phenotypically similar S. Enteritidis isolates of food and human origins, whereas the discriminatory ability of MLST may be problematic because of the high sequence conservation of the targeted genes.</description><subject>multilocus sequence typing</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>pulsed-field gel electrophoresis</subject><subject>repetitive sequence-based PCR</subject><subject>Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis</subject><subject>subtyping</subject><issn>2210-9099</issn><issn>2233-6052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcFq3DAQNaWlCWl-oIeiYy_eSrZk2VAKYZs0gZQctj2LWWmU1WJLrmQv5Bv605W7SWguFQMS8948zcwriveMrhhlzaf9atzFcVVRVq1yUCpeFadVVddlQ0X1enkzWna0606K85T2NJ-MNJ14W5xUnIlOVM1p8fuCrMMwQnQpeBIs2czb6WF0_p58x2kXTCI2RPLVWYsR_eRgWrAN9EPw2PdAchKj00A2GMMBIrn8m5iccYncpNDDhIncbSdwHg2xMQzkKgRDwBtyPQ_gySbMUWN6V7yx0Cc8f7zPip9Xlz_W1-Xt3beb9cVtqWtJRclbpLwz2lAAoQWrmZWgO8EbliG5pVSibFvbVmBkSykil9BaU1MU1NS8Piu-HHXHeTug0XmCCL0aoxsgPqgATr1EvNup-3BQteSykW0W-PgoEMOvGdOkBpf0sg2PYU6KcS461vCmy9TqSNUxpBTRPn_DqFqMVHu1GKkWI1WObGQu-vBvg88lT7ZlwucjAfOaDg6jStqh12hcRD0pE9z_9P8AQBOySQ</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Hyeon, Ji-Yeon</creator><creator>Chon, Jung-Whan</creator><creator>Park, Jun-Ho</creator><creator>Kim, Moo-Sang</creator><creator>Oh, Young-Hee</creator><creator>Choi, In-Soo</creator><creator>Seo, Kun-Ho</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Subtyping Methods for Differentiating Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Isolates Obtained from Food and Human Sources</title><author>Hyeon, Ji-Yeon ; Chon, Jung-Whan ; Park, Jun-Ho ; Kim, Moo-Sang ; Oh, Young-Hee ; Choi, In-Soo ; Seo, Kun-Ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-48e049dcd0aa5c5131f7ac9546148e7b007e788f82ad7800ee47a8fd30e50d343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>multilocus sequence typing</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>pulsed-field gel electrophoresis</topic><topic>repetitive sequence-based PCR</topic><topic>Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis</topic><topic>subtyping</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hyeon, Ji-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chon, Jung-Whan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jun-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Moo-Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Young-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, In-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Kun-Ho</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Osong public health and research perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hyeon, Ji-Yeon</au><au>Chon, Jung-Whan</au><au>Park, Jun-Ho</au><au>Kim, Moo-Sang</au><au>Oh, Young-Hee</au><au>Choi, In-Soo</au><au>Seo, Kun-Ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Subtyping Methods for Differentiating Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Isolates Obtained from Food and Human Sources</atitle><jtitle>Osong public health and research perspectives</jtitle><addtitle>Osong Public Health Res Perspect</addtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>27-33</pages><issn>2210-9099</issn><eissn>2233-6052</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the abilities of these subtyping methods, we distinguished Salmonella Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) isolated from food products and human clinical samples between 2009 and 2010 in Seoul using five subtyping methods.
We determined the subtypes of 20 S. Enteritidis isolates from food and human sources using phage typing, antimicrobial susceptibility, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST).
A total of 20 tested isolates were differentiated into six antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, three different phage types, four different PFGE profiles, seven rep-PCR patterns, and one MLST type. Food isolates were considerably more susceptible to antibiotics than human isolates. We were best able to discriminate among S. Enteritidis isolates using rep-PCR, and obtained the highest Simpson's diversity index of 0.82, whereas other methods produced indices that were less than 0.71. PFGE pattern appeared to be more related to antimicrobial resistance and phage types of S. Enteritidis isolates than rep-PCR. MLST revealed identical alleles in all isolates at all seven loci examined, indicating no resolution.
The results of this study suggest that rep-PCR provided the best discriminatory power for phenotypically similar S. Enteritidis isolates of food and human origins, whereas the discriminatory ability of MLST may be problematic because of the high sequence conservation of the targeted genes.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24159526</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.phrp.2012.12.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2210-9099 |
ispartof | Osong public health and research perspectives, 2013-02, Vol.4 (1), p.27-33 |
issn | 2210-9099 2233-6052 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3747678 |
source | PubMed Central; ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | multilocus sequence typing Original pulsed-field gel electrophoresis repetitive sequence-based PCR Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis subtyping |
title | A Comparison of Subtyping Methods for Differentiating Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Isolates Obtained from Food and Human Sources |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T17%3A36%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Subtyping%20Methods%20for%20Differentiating%20Salmonella%20enterica%20Serovar%20Enteritidis%20Isolates%20Obtained%20from%20Food%20and%20Human%20Sources&rft.jtitle=Osong%20public%20health%20and%20research%20perspectives&rft.au=Hyeon,%20Ji-Yeon&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=27-33&rft.issn=2210-9099&rft.eissn=2233-6052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.phrp.2012.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1445916469%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-48e049dcd0aa5c5131f7ac9546148e7b007e788f82ad7800ee47a8fd30e50d343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1445916469&rft_id=info:pmid/24159526&rfr_iscdi=true |