Loading…

A Comparison of Subtyping Methods for Differentiating Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Isolates Obtained from Food and Human Sources

To evaluate the abilities of these subtyping methods, we distinguished Salmonella Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) isolated from food products and human clinical samples between 2009 and 2010 in Seoul using five subtyping methods. We determined the subtypes of 20 S. Enteritidis isolates from food and hu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Osong public health and research perspectives 2013-02, Vol.4 (1), p.27-33
Main Authors: Hyeon, Ji-Yeon, Chon, Jung-Whan, Park, Jun-Ho, Kim, Moo-Sang, Oh, Young-Hee, Choi, In-Soo, Seo, Kun-Ho
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-48e049dcd0aa5c5131f7ac9546148e7b007e788f82ad7800ee47a8fd30e50d343
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-48e049dcd0aa5c5131f7ac9546148e7b007e788f82ad7800ee47a8fd30e50d343
container_end_page 33
container_issue 1
container_start_page 27
container_title Osong public health and research perspectives
container_volume 4
creator Hyeon, Ji-Yeon
Chon, Jung-Whan
Park, Jun-Ho
Kim, Moo-Sang
Oh, Young-Hee
Choi, In-Soo
Seo, Kun-Ho
description To evaluate the abilities of these subtyping methods, we distinguished Salmonella Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) isolated from food products and human clinical samples between 2009 and 2010 in Seoul using five subtyping methods. We determined the subtypes of 20 S. Enteritidis isolates from food and human sources using phage typing, antimicrobial susceptibility, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). A total of 20 tested isolates were differentiated into six antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, three different phage types, four different PFGE profiles, seven rep-PCR patterns, and one MLST type. Food isolates were considerably more susceptible to antibiotics than human isolates. We were best able to discriminate among S. Enteritidis isolates using rep-PCR, and obtained the highest Simpson's diversity index of 0.82, whereas other methods produced indices that were less than 0.71. PFGE pattern appeared to be more related to antimicrobial resistance and phage types of S. Enteritidis isolates than rep-PCR. MLST revealed identical alleles in all isolates at all seven loci examined, indicating no resolution. The results of this study suggest that rep-PCR provided the best discriminatory power for phenotypically similar S. Enteritidis isolates of food and human origins, whereas the discriminatory ability of MLST may be problematic because of the high sequence conservation of the targeted genes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.phrp.2012.12.005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3747678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2210909912001014</els_id><sourcerecordid>1445916469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-48e049dcd0aa5c5131f7ac9546148e7b007e788f82ad7800ee47a8fd30e50d343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFq3DAQNaWlCWl-oIeiYy_eSrZk2VAKYZs0gZQctj2LWWmU1WJLrmQv5Bv605W7SWguFQMS8948zcwriveMrhhlzaf9atzFcVVRVq1yUCpeFadVVddlQ0X1enkzWna0606K85T2NJ-MNJ14W5xUnIlOVM1p8fuCrMMwQnQpeBIs2czb6WF0_p58x2kXTCI2RPLVWYsR_eRgWrAN9EPw2PdAchKj00A2GMMBIrn8m5iccYncpNDDhIncbSdwHg2xMQzkKgRDwBtyPQ_gySbMUWN6V7yx0Cc8f7zPip9Xlz_W1-Xt3beb9cVtqWtJRclbpLwz2lAAoQWrmZWgO8EbliG5pVSibFvbVmBkSykil9BaU1MU1NS8Piu-HHXHeTug0XmCCL0aoxsgPqgATr1EvNup-3BQteSykW0W-PgoEMOvGdOkBpf0sg2PYU6KcS461vCmy9TqSNUxpBTRPn_DqFqMVHu1GKkWI1WObGQu-vBvg88lT7ZlwucjAfOaDg6jStqh12hcRD0pE9z_9P8AQBOySQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1445916469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Subtyping Methods for Differentiating Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Isolates Obtained from Food and Human Sources</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hyeon, Ji-Yeon ; Chon, Jung-Whan ; Park, Jun-Ho ; Kim, Moo-Sang ; Oh, Young-Hee ; Choi, In-Soo ; Seo, Kun-Ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Hyeon, Ji-Yeon ; Chon, Jung-Whan ; Park, Jun-Ho ; Kim, Moo-Sang ; Oh, Young-Hee ; Choi, In-Soo ; Seo, Kun-Ho</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the abilities of these subtyping methods, we distinguished Salmonella Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) isolated from food products and human clinical samples between 2009 and 2010 in Seoul using five subtyping methods. We determined the subtypes of 20 S. Enteritidis isolates from food and human sources using phage typing, antimicrobial susceptibility, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). A total of 20 tested isolates were differentiated into six antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, three different phage types, four different PFGE profiles, seven rep-PCR patterns, and one MLST type. Food isolates were considerably more susceptible to antibiotics than human isolates. We were best able to discriminate among S. Enteritidis isolates using rep-PCR, and obtained the highest Simpson's diversity index of 0.82, whereas other methods produced indices that were less than 0.71. PFGE pattern appeared to be more related to antimicrobial resistance and phage types of S. Enteritidis isolates than rep-PCR. MLST revealed identical alleles in all isolates at all seven loci examined, indicating no resolution. The results of this study suggest that rep-PCR provided the best discriminatory power for phenotypically similar S. Enteritidis isolates of food and human origins, whereas the discriminatory ability of MLST may be problematic because of the high sequence conservation of the targeted genes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2210-9099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2233-6052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.phrp.2012.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24159526</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South): Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>multilocus sequence typing ; Original ; pulsed-field gel electrophoresis ; repetitive sequence-based PCR ; Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis ; subtyping</subject><ispartof>Osong public health and research perspectives, 2013-02, Vol.4 (1), p.27-33</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>Copyright ©2013, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-48e049dcd0aa5c5131f7ac9546148e7b007e788f82ad7800ee47a8fd30e50d343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-48e049dcd0aa5c5131f7ac9546148e7b007e788f82ad7800ee47a8fd30e50d343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3747678/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210909912001014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3536,27901,27902,45756,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24159526$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hyeon, Ji-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chon, Jung-Whan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jun-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Moo-Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Young-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, In-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Kun-Ho</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Subtyping Methods for Differentiating Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Isolates Obtained from Food and Human Sources</title><title>Osong public health and research perspectives</title><addtitle>Osong Public Health Res Perspect</addtitle><description>To evaluate the abilities of these subtyping methods, we distinguished Salmonella Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) isolated from food products and human clinical samples between 2009 and 2010 in Seoul using five subtyping methods. We determined the subtypes of 20 S. Enteritidis isolates from food and human sources using phage typing, antimicrobial susceptibility, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). A total of 20 tested isolates were differentiated into six antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, three different phage types, four different PFGE profiles, seven rep-PCR patterns, and one MLST type. Food isolates were considerably more susceptible to antibiotics than human isolates. We were best able to discriminate among S. Enteritidis isolates using rep-PCR, and obtained the highest Simpson's diversity index of 0.82, whereas other methods produced indices that were less than 0.71. PFGE pattern appeared to be more related to antimicrobial resistance and phage types of S. Enteritidis isolates than rep-PCR. MLST revealed identical alleles in all isolates at all seven loci examined, indicating no resolution. The results of this study suggest that rep-PCR provided the best discriminatory power for phenotypically similar S. Enteritidis isolates of food and human origins, whereas the discriminatory ability of MLST may be problematic because of the high sequence conservation of the targeted genes.</description><subject>multilocus sequence typing</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>pulsed-field gel electrophoresis</subject><subject>repetitive sequence-based PCR</subject><subject>Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis</subject><subject>subtyping</subject><issn>2210-9099</issn><issn>2233-6052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcFq3DAQNaWlCWl-oIeiYy_eSrZk2VAKYZs0gZQctj2LWWmU1WJLrmQv5Bv605W7SWguFQMS8948zcwriveMrhhlzaf9atzFcVVRVq1yUCpeFadVVddlQ0X1enkzWna0606K85T2NJ-MNJ14W5xUnIlOVM1p8fuCrMMwQnQpeBIs2czb6WF0_p58x2kXTCI2RPLVWYsR_eRgWrAN9EPw2PdAchKj00A2GMMBIrn8m5iccYncpNDDhIncbSdwHg2xMQzkKgRDwBtyPQ_gySbMUWN6V7yx0Cc8f7zPip9Xlz_W1-Xt3beb9cVtqWtJRclbpLwz2lAAoQWrmZWgO8EbliG5pVSibFvbVmBkSykil9BaU1MU1NS8Piu-HHXHeTug0XmCCL0aoxsgPqgATr1EvNup-3BQteSykW0W-PgoEMOvGdOkBpf0sg2PYU6KcS461vCmy9TqSNUxpBTRPn_DqFqMVHu1GKkWI1WObGQu-vBvg88lT7ZlwucjAfOaDg6jStqh12hcRD0pE9z_9P8AQBOySQ</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Hyeon, Ji-Yeon</creator><creator>Chon, Jung-Whan</creator><creator>Park, Jun-Ho</creator><creator>Kim, Moo-Sang</creator><creator>Oh, Young-Hee</creator><creator>Choi, In-Soo</creator><creator>Seo, Kun-Ho</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Subtyping Methods for Differentiating Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Isolates Obtained from Food and Human Sources</title><author>Hyeon, Ji-Yeon ; Chon, Jung-Whan ; Park, Jun-Ho ; Kim, Moo-Sang ; Oh, Young-Hee ; Choi, In-Soo ; Seo, Kun-Ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-48e049dcd0aa5c5131f7ac9546148e7b007e788f82ad7800ee47a8fd30e50d343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>multilocus sequence typing</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>pulsed-field gel electrophoresis</topic><topic>repetitive sequence-based PCR</topic><topic>Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis</topic><topic>subtyping</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hyeon, Ji-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chon, Jung-Whan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jun-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Moo-Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Young-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, In-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Kun-Ho</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Osong public health and research perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hyeon, Ji-Yeon</au><au>Chon, Jung-Whan</au><au>Park, Jun-Ho</au><au>Kim, Moo-Sang</au><au>Oh, Young-Hee</au><au>Choi, In-Soo</au><au>Seo, Kun-Ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Subtyping Methods for Differentiating Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Isolates Obtained from Food and Human Sources</atitle><jtitle>Osong public health and research perspectives</jtitle><addtitle>Osong Public Health Res Perspect</addtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>27-33</pages><issn>2210-9099</issn><eissn>2233-6052</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the abilities of these subtyping methods, we distinguished Salmonella Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) isolated from food products and human clinical samples between 2009 and 2010 in Seoul using five subtyping methods. We determined the subtypes of 20 S. Enteritidis isolates from food and human sources using phage typing, antimicrobial susceptibility, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). A total of 20 tested isolates were differentiated into six antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, three different phage types, four different PFGE profiles, seven rep-PCR patterns, and one MLST type. Food isolates were considerably more susceptible to antibiotics than human isolates. We were best able to discriminate among S. Enteritidis isolates using rep-PCR, and obtained the highest Simpson's diversity index of 0.82, whereas other methods produced indices that were less than 0.71. PFGE pattern appeared to be more related to antimicrobial resistance and phage types of S. Enteritidis isolates than rep-PCR. MLST revealed identical alleles in all isolates at all seven loci examined, indicating no resolution. The results of this study suggest that rep-PCR provided the best discriminatory power for phenotypically similar S. Enteritidis isolates of food and human origins, whereas the discriminatory ability of MLST may be problematic because of the high sequence conservation of the targeted genes.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24159526</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.phrp.2012.12.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2210-9099
ispartof Osong public health and research perspectives, 2013-02, Vol.4 (1), p.27-33
issn 2210-9099
2233-6052
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3747678
source PubMed Central; ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects multilocus sequence typing
Original
pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
repetitive sequence-based PCR
Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis
subtyping
title A Comparison of Subtyping Methods for Differentiating Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Isolates Obtained from Food and Human Sources
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T17%3A36%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Subtyping%20Methods%20for%20Differentiating%20Salmonella%20enterica%20Serovar%20Enteritidis%20Isolates%20Obtained%20from%20Food%20and%20Human%20Sources&rft.jtitle=Osong%20public%20health%20and%20research%20perspectives&rft.au=Hyeon,%20Ji-Yeon&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=27-33&rft.issn=2210-9099&rft.eissn=2233-6052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.phrp.2012.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1445916469%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-48e049dcd0aa5c5131f7ac9546148e7b007e788f82ad7800ee47a8fd30e50d343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1445916469&rft_id=info:pmid/24159526&rfr_iscdi=true