Loading…
What supports do health system organizations have in place to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making? A qualitative study
Decisions regarding health systems are sometimes made without the input of timely and reliable evidence, leading to less than optimal health outcomes. Healthcare organizations can implement tools and infrastructures to support the use of research evidence to inform decision-making. The purpose of th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Implementation science : IS 2013-08, Vol.8 (1), p.84-84, Article 84 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-81fa4b1b923874e50ca6b448e46804d07f970b25e472b4f3242dfc3ba74f41f03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-81fa4b1b923874e50ca6b448e46804d07f970b25e472b4f3242dfc3ba74f41f03 |
container_end_page | 84 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 84 |
container_title | Implementation science : IS |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Ellen, Moriah E Léon, Gregory Bouchard, Gisèle Lavis, John N Ouimet, Mathieu Grimshaw, Jeremy M |
description | Decisions regarding health systems are sometimes made without the input of timely and reliable evidence, leading to less than optimal health outcomes. Healthcare organizations can implement tools and infrastructures to support the use of research evidence to inform decision-making.
The purpose of this study was to profile the supports and instruments (i.e., programs, interventions, instruments or tools) that healthcare organizations currently have in place and which ones were perceived to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making.
In-depth semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with individuals in three different types of positions (i.e., a senior management team member, a library manager, and a 'knowledge broker') in three types of healthcare organizations (i.e., regional health authorities, hospitals and primary care practices) in two Canadian provinces (i.e., Ontario and Quebec). The interviews were taped, transcribed, and then analyzed thematically using NVivo 9 qualitative data analysis software.
A total of 57 interviews were conducted in 25 organizations in Ontario and Quebec. The main findings suggest that, for the healthcare organizations that participated in this study, the following supports facilitate evidence-informed decision-making: facilitating roles that actively promote research use within the organization; establishing ties to researchers and opinion leaders outside the organization; a technical infrastructure that provides access to research evidence, such as databases; and provision and participation in training programs to enhance staff's capacity building.
This study identified the need for having a receptive climate, which laid the foundation for the implementation of other tangible initiatives and supported the use of research in decision-making. This study adds to the literature on organizational efforts that can increase the use of research evidence in decision-making. Some of the identified supports may increase the use of research evidence by decision-makers, which may then lead to more informed decisions, and hopefully to a strengthened health system and improved health. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-84 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3750753</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534711211</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534711211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-81fa4b1b923874e50ca6b448e46804d07f970b25e472b4f3242dfc3ba74f41f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5YgsceklxR-TOHsBrSq-pEpcQBwtxxlvXBI7jZ2Vlgt_HQfKUlA1B1vjZ97xjN6ieM7oBWNN_YpJaMpqQ5syBzwoTo-Jh3fuJ8WTGK8phQpq8bg44WLDKi6b0-LH114nEpdpCnOKpAukRz2knsRDTDiSMO-0d991csFH0us9EufJNGiDJAVitXGDSzohwb3r0BssnbdhHrEjHRoXc1056m_O796QLblZ9C_cZZ2Ylu7wtHhk9RDx2e15Vnx59_bz5Yfy6tP7j5fbq9JAU6WyYVZDy9oNF40ErKjRdQvQINQNhY5Ku5G05RWC5C1YwYF31ohWS7DALBVnxevfutPS5r8Z9GnWg5pmN-r5oIJ26t8X73q1C3slZEVlJbLA-a3AHG4WjEmNLhocBu0xLFEx4CA4l3xFX_6HXodl9nm8lapZDU1d_6V2ekC1Li33Nauo2lYCJGOcsUxd3EPl6HB0Jni0LufvKzBziHFGe5yRUbVaRq2uUKsrVA7IBS_ubuaI__GI-AnuorzJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1426164866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What supports do health system organizations have in place to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making? A qualitative study</title><source>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ellen, Moriah E ; Léon, Gregory ; Bouchard, Gisèle ; Lavis, John N ; Ouimet, Mathieu ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M</creator><creatorcontrib>Ellen, Moriah E ; Léon, Gregory ; Bouchard, Gisèle ; Lavis, John N ; Ouimet, Mathieu ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M</creatorcontrib><description>Decisions regarding health systems are sometimes made without the input of timely and reliable evidence, leading to less than optimal health outcomes. Healthcare organizations can implement tools and infrastructures to support the use of research evidence to inform decision-making.
The purpose of this study was to profile the supports and instruments (i.e., programs, interventions, instruments or tools) that healthcare organizations currently have in place and which ones were perceived to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making.
In-depth semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with individuals in three different types of positions (i.e., a senior management team member, a library manager, and a 'knowledge broker') in three types of healthcare organizations (i.e., regional health authorities, hospitals and primary care practices) in two Canadian provinces (i.e., Ontario and Quebec). The interviews were taped, transcribed, and then analyzed thematically using NVivo 9 qualitative data analysis software.
A total of 57 interviews were conducted in 25 organizations in Ontario and Quebec. The main findings suggest that, for the healthcare organizations that participated in this study, the following supports facilitate evidence-informed decision-making: facilitating roles that actively promote research use within the organization; establishing ties to researchers and opinion leaders outside the organization; a technical infrastructure that provides access to research evidence, such as databases; and provision and participation in training programs to enhance staff's capacity building.
This study identified the need for having a receptive climate, which laid the foundation for the implementation of other tangible initiatives and supported the use of research in decision-making. This study adds to the literature on organizational efforts that can increase the use of research evidence in decision-making. Some of the identified supports may increase the use of research evidence by decision-makers, which may then lead to more informed decisions, and hopefully to a strengthened health system and improved health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-5908</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-5908</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-84</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23915278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Brokers ; Decision Making ; Decision Support Techniques ; Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Family medicine ; Health aspects ; Health care industry ; Health care reform ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Medical care ; Medical research ; Ontario ; Organizations - organization & administration ; Qualitative research ; Quebec ; Regional Health Planning - organization & administration</subject><ispartof>Implementation science : IS, 2013-08, Vol.8 (1), p.84-84, Article 84</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2013 Ellen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Ellen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 Ellen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-81fa4b1b923874e50ca6b448e46804d07f970b25e472b4f3242dfc3ba74f41f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-81fa4b1b923874e50ca6b448e46804d07f970b25e472b4f3242dfc3ba74f41f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750753/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1426164866?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ellen, Moriah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Léon, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouchard, Gisèle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavis, John N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouimet, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimshaw, Jeremy M</creatorcontrib><title>What supports do health system organizations have in place to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making? A qualitative study</title><title>Implementation science : IS</title><addtitle>Implement Sci</addtitle><description>Decisions regarding health systems are sometimes made without the input of timely and reliable evidence, leading to less than optimal health outcomes. Healthcare organizations can implement tools and infrastructures to support the use of research evidence to inform decision-making.
The purpose of this study was to profile the supports and instruments (i.e., programs, interventions, instruments or tools) that healthcare organizations currently have in place and which ones were perceived to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making.
In-depth semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with individuals in three different types of positions (i.e., a senior management team member, a library manager, and a 'knowledge broker') in three types of healthcare organizations (i.e., regional health authorities, hospitals and primary care practices) in two Canadian provinces (i.e., Ontario and Quebec). The interviews were taped, transcribed, and then analyzed thematically using NVivo 9 qualitative data analysis software.
A total of 57 interviews were conducted in 25 organizations in Ontario and Quebec. The main findings suggest that, for the healthcare organizations that participated in this study, the following supports facilitate evidence-informed decision-making: facilitating roles that actively promote research use within the organization; establishing ties to researchers and opinion leaders outside the organization; a technical infrastructure that provides access to research evidence, such as databases; and provision and participation in training programs to enhance staff's capacity building.
This study identified the need for having a receptive climate, which laid the foundation for the implementation of other tangible initiatives and supported the use of research in decision-making. This study adds to the literature on organizational efforts that can increase the use of research evidence in decision-making. Some of the identified supports may increase the use of research evidence by decision-makers, which may then lead to more informed decisions, and hopefully to a strengthened health system and improved health.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Brokers</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Family medicine</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health care reform</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Organizations - organization & administration</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Quebec</subject><subject>Regional Health Planning - organization & administration</subject><issn>1748-5908</issn><issn>1748-5908</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5YgsceklxR-TOHsBrSq-pEpcQBwtxxlvXBI7jZ2Vlgt_HQfKUlA1B1vjZ97xjN6ieM7oBWNN_YpJaMpqQ5syBzwoTo-Jh3fuJ8WTGK8phQpq8bg44WLDKi6b0-LH114nEpdpCnOKpAukRz2knsRDTDiSMO-0d991csFH0us9EufJNGiDJAVitXGDSzohwb3r0BssnbdhHrEjHRoXc1056m_O796QLblZ9C_cZZ2Ylu7wtHhk9RDx2e15Vnx59_bz5Yfy6tP7j5fbq9JAU6WyYVZDy9oNF40ErKjRdQvQINQNhY5Ku5G05RWC5C1YwYF31ohWS7DALBVnxevfutPS5r8Z9GnWg5pmN-r5oIJ26t8X73q1C3slZEVlJbLA-a3AHG4WjEmNLhocBu0xLFEx4CA4l3xFX_6HXodl9nm8lapZDU1d_6V2ekC1Li33Nauo2lYCJGOcsUxd3EPl6HB0Jni0LufvKzBziHFGe5yRUbVaRq2uUKsrVA7IBS_ubuaI__GI-AnuorzJ</recordid><startdate>20130806</startdate><enddate>20130806</enddate><creator>Ellen, Moriah E</creator><creator>Léon, Gregory</creator><creator>Bouchard, Gisèle</creator><creator>Lavis, John N</creator><creator>Ouimet, Mathieu</creator><creator>Grimshaw, Jeremy M</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130806</creationdate><title>What supports do health system organizations have in place to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making? A qualitative study</title><author>Ellen, Moriah E ; Léon, Gregory ; Bouchard, Gisèle ; Lavis, John N ; Ouimet, Mathieu ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-81fa4b1b923874e50ca6b448e46804d07f970b25e472b4f3242dfc3ba74f41f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Brokers</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Family medicine</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health care reform</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Organizations - organization & administration</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Quebec</topic><topic>Regional Health Planning - organization & administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ellen, Moriah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Léon, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouchard, Gisèle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavis, John N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouimet, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimshaw, Jeremy M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Implementation science : IS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ellen, Moriah E</au><au>Léon, Gregory</au><au>Bouchard, Gisèle</au><au>Lavis, John N</au><au>Ouimet, Mathieu</au><au>Grimshaw, Jeremy M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What supports do health system organizations have in place to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making? A qualitative study</atitle><jtitle>Implementation science : IS</jtitle><addtitle>Implement Sci</addtitle><date>2013-08-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>84-84</pages><artnum>84</artnum><issn>1748-5908</issn><eissn>1748-5908</eissn><abstract>Decisions regarding health systems are sometimes made without the input of timely and reliable evidence, leading to less than optimal health outcomes. Healthcare organizations can implement tools and infrastructures to support the use of research evidence to inform decision-making.
The purpose of this study was to profile the supports and instruments (i.e., programs, interventions, instruments or tools) that healthcare organizations currently have in place and which ones were perceived to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making.
In-depth semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with individuals in three different types of positions (i.e., a senior management team member, a library manager, and a 'knowledge broker') in three types of healthcare organizations (i.e., regional health authorities, hospitals and primary care practices) in two Canadian provinces (i.e., Ontario and Quebec). The interviews were taped, transcribed, and then analyzed thematically using NVivo 9 qualitative data analysis software.
A total of 57 interviews were conducted in 25 organizations in Ontario and Quebec. The main findings suggest that, for the healthcare organizations that participated in this study, the following supports facilitate evidence-informed decision-making: facilitating roles that actively promote research use within the organization; establishing ties to researchers and opinion leaders outside the organization; a technical infrastructure that provides access to research evidence, such as databases; and provision and participation in training programs to enhance staff's capacity building.
This study identified the need for having a receptive climate, which laid the foundation for the implementation of other tangible initiatives and supported the use of research in decision-making. This study adds to the literature on organizational efforts that can increase the use of research evidence in decision-making. Some of the identified supports may increase the use of research evidence by decision-makers, which may then lead to more informed decisions, and hopefully to a strengthened health system and improved health.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>23915278</pmid><doi>10.1186/1748-5908-8-84</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-5908 |
ispartof | Implementation science : IS, 2013-08, Vol.8 (1), p.84-84, Article 84 |
issn | 1748-5908 1748-5908 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3750753 |
source | Access via ProQuest (Open Access); PubMed Central |
subjects | Analysis Brokers Decision Making Decision Support Techniques Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration Evidence-Based Medicine Family medicine Health aspects Health care industry Health care reform Hospitals Humans Medical care Medical research Ontario Organizations - organization & administration Qualitative research Quebec Regional Health Planning - organization & administration |
title | What supports do health system organizations have in place to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making? A qualitative study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A04%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20supports%20do%20health%20system%20organizations%20have%20in%20place%20to%20facilitate%20evidence-informed%20decision-making?%20A%20qualitative%20study&rft.jtitle=Implementation%20science%20:%20IS&rft.au=Ellen,%20Moriah%20E&rft.date=2013-08-06&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=84-84&rft.artnum=84&rft.issn=1748-5908&rft.eissn=1748-5908&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1748-5908-8-84&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA534711211%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-81fa4b1b923874e50ca6b448e46804d07f970b25e472b4f3242dfc3ba74f41f03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1426164866&rft_id=info:pmid/23915278&rft_galeid=A534711211&rfr_iscdi=true |