Loading…
Differences in neural activation for object-directed grasping in chimpanzees and humans
The human faculty for object-mediated action, including tool use and imitation, exceeds that of even our closest primate relatives and is a key foundation of human cognitive and cultural uniqueness. In humans and macaques, observing object-directed grasping actions activates a network of frontal, pa...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of neuroscience 2013-08, Vol.33 (35), p.14117-14134 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-ed6295e7f1651a0c92b87e6b02790dab430e6f363e0e0f9dd9b487171edc4d0b3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 14134 |
container_issue | 35 |
container_start_page | 14117 |
container_title | The Journal of neuroscience |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Hecht, Erin E Murphy, Lauren E Gutman, David A Votaw, John R Schuster, David M Preuss, Todd M Orban, Guy A Stout, Dietrich Parr, Lisa A |
description | The human faculty for object-mediated action, including tool use and imitation, exceeds that of even our closest primate relatives and is a key foundation of human cognitive and cultural uniqueness. In humans and macaques, observing object-directed grasping actions activates a network of frontal, parietal, and occipitotemporal brain regions, but differences in human and macaque activation suggest that this system has been a focus of selection in the primate lineage. To study the evolution of this system, we performed functional neuroimaging in humans' closest living relatives, chimpanzees. We compare activations during performance of an object-directed manual grasping action, observation of the same action, and observation of a mimed version of the action that consisted of only movements without results. Performance and observation of the same action activated a distributed frontoparietal network similar to that reported in macaques and humans. Like humans and unlike macaques, these regions were also activated by observing movements without results. However, in a direct chimpanzee/human comparison, we also identified unique aspects of human neural responses to observed grasping. Chimpanzee activation showed a prefrontal bias, including significantly more activity in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, whereas human activation was more evenly distributed across more posterior regions, including significantly more activation in ventral premotor cortex, inferior parietal cortex, and inferotemporal cortex. This indicates a more "bottom-up" representation of observed action in the human brain and suggests that the evolution of tool use, social learning, and cumulative culture may have involved modifications of frontoparietal interactions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1523/jneurosci.2172-13.2013 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3756757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1551625247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-ed6295e7f1651a0c92b87e6b02790dab430e6f363e0e0f9dd9b487171edc4d0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtPGzEUha2qqAToX0CzZDPBb8cbJJSGQoVAakFdWh77TuIo4wn2DFL76-sRD7Wrrq7ke86nc30QOiV4TgRl59sIY-qzC3NKFK0Jm1NM2Ac0K1tdU47JRzTDVOFacsUP0VHOW4yxwkR9QoeU6YWkXM3Qzy-hbSFBdJCrEKsJa3eVdUN4tkPoY9X2qeqbLbih9iGVAb5aJ5v3Ia4nh9uEbm_jbygAG321GTsb8wk6aO0uw-fXeYwer1YPy-v69v7rzfLytnZCyqEGL6kWoFoiBbHYadosFMimJNfY24YzDLJlkgEG3GrvdcMXiigC3nGPG3aMLl64-7HpyiPEoeQ3-xQ6m36Z3gbz7yaGjVn3z4YpIZVQBXD2Ckj90wh5MF3IDnY7G6EfsyFCEElF-az_SzlnbME01kUqX6SulJQTtO-JCDZTgebb3erx-_2P5Y2ZCjSEmanAYjz9-55321tj7A_FkZrS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443383909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in neural activation for object-directed grasping in chimpanzees and humans</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Hecht, Erin E ; Murphy, Lauren E ; Gutman, David A ; Votaw, John R ; Schuster, David M ; Preuss, Todd M ; Orban, Guy A ; Stout, Dietrich ; Parr, Lisa A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hecht, Erin E ; Murphy, Lauren E ; Gutman, David A ; Votaw, John R ; Schuster, David M ; Preuss, Todd M ; Orban, Guy A ; Stout, Dietrich ; Parr, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><description>The human faculty for object-mediated action, including tool use and imitation, exceeds that of even our closest primate relatives and is a key foundation of human cognitive and cultural uniqueness. In humans and macaques, observing object-directed grasping actions activates a network of frontal, parietal, and occipitotemporal brain regions, but differences in human and macaque activation suggest that this system has been a focus of selection in the primate lineage. To study the evolution of this system, we performed functional neuroimaging in humans' closest living relatives, chimpanzees. We compare activations during performance of an object-directed manual grasping action, observation of the same action, and observation of a mimed version of the action that consisted of only movements without results. Performance and observation of the same action activated a distributed frontoparietal network similar to that reported in macaques and humans. Like humans and unlike macaques, these regions were also activated by observing movements without results. However, in a direct chimpanzee/human comparison, we also identified unique aspects of human neural responses to observed grasping. Chimpanzee activation showed a prefrontal bias, including significantly more activity in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, whereas human activation was more evenly distributed across more posterior regions, including significantly more activation in ventral premotor cortex, inferior parietal cortex, and inferotemporal cortex. This indicates a more "bottom-up" representation of observed action in the human brain and suggests that the evolution of tool use, social learning, and cumulative culture may have involved modifications of frontoparietal interactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-6474</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2172-13.2013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23986247</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society for Neuroscience</publisher><subject>Adult ; Animals ; Brain Mapping ; Cerebral Cortex - physiology ; Female ; Frontal Lobe - physiology ; Humans ; Macaca ; Male ; Movement ; Pan troglodytes ; Parietal Lobe - physiology ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Primates ; Psychomotor Performance</subject><ispartof>The Journal of neuroscience, 2013-08, Vol.33 (35), p.14117-14134</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 the authors 0270-6474/13/3314117-18$15.00/0 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-ed6295e7f1651a0c92b87e6b02790dab430e6f363e0e0f9dd9b487171edc4d0b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3756757/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3756757/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23986247$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hecht, Erin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Lauren E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutman, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Votaw, John R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preuss, Todd M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orban, Guy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stout, Dietrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in neural activation for object-directed grasping in chimpanzees and humans</title><title>The Journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><description>The human faculty for object-mediated action, including tool use and imitation, exceeds that of even our closest primate relatives and is a key foundation of human cognitive and cultural uniqueness. In humans and macaques, observing object-directed grasping actions activates a network of frontal, parietal, and occipitotemporal brain regions, but differences in human and macaque activation suggest that this system has been a focus of selection in the primate lineage. To study the evolution of this system, we performed functional neuroimaging in humans' closest living relatives, chimpanzees. We compare activations during performance of an object-directed manual grasping action, observation of the same action, and observation of a mimed version of the action that consisted of only movements without results. Performance and observation of the same action activated a distributed frontoparietal network similar to that reported in macaques and humans. Like humans and unlike macaques, these regions were also activated by observing movements without results. However, in a direct chimpanzee/human comparison, we also identified unique aspects of human neural responses to observed grasping. Chimpanzee activation showed a prefrontal bias, including significantly more activity in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, whereas human activation was more evenly distributed across more posterior regions, including significantly more activation in ventral premotor cortex, inferior parietal cortex, and inferotemporal cortex. This indicates a more "bottom-up" representation of observed action in the human brain and suggests that the evolution of tool use, social learning, and cumulative culture may have involved modifications of frontoparietal interactions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frontal Lobe - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Macaca</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Pan troglodytes</subject><subject>Parietal Lobe - physiology</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtPGzEUha2qqAToX0CzZDPBb8cbJJSGQoVAakFdWh77TuIo4wn2DFL76-sRD7Wrrq7ke86nc30QOiV4TgRl59sIY-qzC3NKFK0Jm1NM2Ac0K1tdU47JRzTDVOFacsUP0VHOW4yxwkR9QoeU6YWkXM3Qzy-hbSFBdJCrEKsJa3eVdUN4tkPoY9X2qeqbLbih9iGVAb5aJ5v3Ia4nh9uEbm_jbygAG321GTsb8wk6aO0uw-fXeYwer1YPy-v69v7rzfLytnZCyqEGL6kWoFoiBbHYadosFMimJNfY24YzDLJlkgEG3GrvdcMXiigC3nGPG3aMLl64-7HpyiPEoeQ3-xQ6m36Z3gbz7yaGjVn3z4YpIZVQBXD2Ckj90wh5MF3IDnY7G6EfsyFCEElF-az_SzlnbME01kUqX6SulJQTtO-JCDZTgebb3erx-_2P5Y2ZCjSEmanAYjz9-55321tj7A_FkZrS</recordid><startdate>20130828</startdate><enddate>20130828</enddate><creator>Hecht, Erin E</creator><creator>Murphy, Lauren E</creator><creator>Gutman, David A</creator><creator>Votaw, John R</creator><creator>Schuster, David M</creator><creator>Preuss, Todd M</creator><creator>Orban, Guy A</creator><creator>Stout, Dietrich</creator><creator>Parr, Lisa A</creator><general>Society for Neuroscience</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130828</creationdate><title>Differences in neural activation for object-directed grasping in chimpanzees and humans</title><author>Hecht, Erin E ; Murphy, Lauren E ; Gutman, David A ; Votaw, John R ; Schuster, David M ; Preuss, Todd M ; Orban, Guy A ; Stout, Dietrich ; Parr, Lisa A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-ed6295e7f1651a0c92b87e6b02790dab430e6f363e0e0f9dd9b487171edc4d0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frontal Lobe - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Macaca</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Pan troglodytes</topic><topic>Parietal Lobe - physiology</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hecht, Erin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Lauren E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutman, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Votaw, John R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preuss, Todd M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orban, Guy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stout, Dietrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hecht, Erin E</au><au>Murphy, Lauren E</au><au>Gutman, David A</au><au>Votaw, John R</au><au>Schuster, David M</au><au>Preuss, Todd M</au><au>Orban, Guy A</au><au>Stout, Dietrich</au><au>Parr, Lisa A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in neural activation for object-directed grasping in chimpanzees and humans</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><date>2013-08-28</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>35</issue><spage>14117</spage><epage>14134</epage><pages>14117-14134</pages><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><eissn>1529-2401</eissn><abstract>The human faculty for object-mediated action, including tool use and imitation, exceeds that of even our closest primate relatives and is a key foundation of human cognitive and cultural uniqueness. In humans and macaques, observing object-directed grasping actions activates a network of frontal, parietal, and occipitotemporal brain regions, but differences in human and macaque activation suggest that this system has been a focus of selection in the primate lineage. To study the evolution of this system, we performed functional neuroimaging in humans' closest living relatives, chimpanzees. We compare activations during performance of an object-directed manual grasping action, observation of the same action, and observation of a mimed version of the action that consisted of only movements without results. Performance and observation of the same action activated a distributed frontoparietal network similar to that reported in macaques and humans. Like humans and unlike macaques, these regions were also activated by observing movements without results. However, in a direct chimpanzee/human comparison, we also identified unique aspects of human neural responses to observed grasping. Chimpanzee activation showed a prefrontal bias, including significantly more activity in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, whereas human activation was more evenly distributed across more posterior regions, including significantly more activation in ventral premotor cortex, inferior parietal cortex, and inferotemporal cortex. This indicates a more "bottom-up" representation of observed action in the human brain and suggests that the evolution of tool use, social learning, and cumulative culture may have involved modifications of frontoparietal interactions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society for Neuroscience</pub><pmid>23986247</pmid><doi>10.1523/jneurosci.2172-13.2013</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-6474 |
ispartof | The Journal of neuroscience, 2013-08, Vol.33 (35), p.14117-14134 |
issn | 0270-6474 1529-2401 1529-2401 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3756757 |
source | PubMed Central Free |
subjects | Adult Animals Brain Mapping Cerebral Cortex - physiology Female Frontal Lobe - physiology Humans Macaca Male Movement Pan troglodytes Parietal Lobe - physiology Positron-Emission Tomography Primates Psychomotor Performance |
title | Differences in neural activation for object-directed grasping in chimpanzees and humans |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T07%3A14%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20neural%20activation%20for%20object-directed%20grasping%20in%20chimpanzees%20and%20humans&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Hecht,%20Erin%20E&rft.date=2013-08-28&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=35&rft.spage=14117&rft.epage=14134&rft.pages=14117-14134&rft.issn=0270-6474&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523/jneurosci.2172-13.2013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1551625247%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-ed6295e7f1651a0c92b87e6b02790dab430e6f363e0e0f9dd9b487171edc4d0b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443383909&rft_id=info:pmid/23986247&rfr_iscdi=true |