Loading…

Differences in neural activation for object-directed grasping in chimpanzees and humans

The human faculty for object-mediated action, including tool use and imitation, exceeds that of even our closest primate relatives and is a key foundation of human cognitive and cultural uniqueness. In humans and macaques, observing object-directed grasping actions activates a network of frontal, pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of neuroscience 2013-08, Vol.33 (35), p.14117-14134
Main Authors: Hecht, Erin E, Murphy, Lauren E, Gutman, David A, Votaw, John R, Schuster, David M, Preuss, Todd M, Orban, Guy A, Stout, Dietrich, Parr, Lisa A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-ed6295e7f1651a0c92b87e6b02790dab430e6f363e0e0f9dd9b487171edc4d0b3
cites
container_end_page 14134
container_issue 35
container_start_page 14117
container_title The Journal of neuroscience
container_volume 33
creator Hecht, Erin E
Murphy, Lauren E
Gutman, David A
Votaw, John R
Schuster, David M
Preuss, Todd M
Orban, Guy A
Stout, Dietrich
Parr, Lisa A
description The human faculty for object-mediated action, including tool use and imitation, exceeds that of even our closest primate relatives and is a key foundation of human cognitive and cultural uniqueness. In humans and macaques, observing object-directed grasping actions activates a network of frontal, parietal, and occipitotemporal brain regions, but differences in human and macaque activation suggest that this system has been a focus of selection in the primate lineage. To study the evolution of this system, we performed functional neuroimaging in humans' closest living relatives, chimpanzees. We compare activations during performance of an object-directed manual grasping action, observation of the same action, and observation of a mimed version of the action that consisted of only movements without results. Performance and observation of the same action activated a distributed frontoparietal network similar to that reported in macaques and humans. Like humans and unlike macaques, these regions were also activated by observing movements without results. However, in a direct chimpanzee/human comparison, we also identified unique aspects of human neural responses to observed grasping. Chimpanzee activation showed a prefrontal bias, including significantly more activity in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, whereas human activation was more evenly distributed across more posterior regions, including significantly more activation in ventral premotor cortex, inferior parietal cortex, and inferotemporal cortex. This indicates a more "bottom-up" representation of observed action in the human brain and suggests that the evolution of tool use, social learning, and cumulative culture may have involved modifications of frontoparietal interactions.
doi_str_mv 10.1523/jneurosci.2172-13.2013
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3756757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1551625247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-ed6295e7f1651a0c92b87e6b02790dab430e6f363e0e0f9dd9b487171edc4d0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtPGzEUha2qqAToX0CzZDPBb8cbJJSGQoVAakFdWh77TuIo4wn2DFL76-sRD7Wrrq7ke86nc30QOiV4TgRl59sIY-qzC3NKFK0Jm1NM2Ac0K1tdU47JRzTDVOFacsUP0VHOW4yxwkR9QoeU6YWkXM3Qzy-hbSFBdJCrEKsJa3eVdUN4tkPoY9X2qeqbLbih9iGVAb5aJ5v3Ia4nh9uEbm_jbygAG321GTsb8wk6aO0uw-fXeYwer1YPy-v69v7rzfLytnZCyqEGL6kWoFoiBbHYadosFMimJNfY24YzDLJlkgEG3GrvdcMXiigC3nGPG3aMLl64-7HpyiPEoeQ3-xQ6m36Z3gbz7yaGjVn3z4YpIZVQBXD2Ckj90wh5MF3IDnY7G6EfsyFCEElF-az_SzlnbME01kUqX6SulJQTtO-JCDZTgebb3erx-_2P5Y2ZCjSEmanAYjz9-55321tj7A_FkZrS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443383909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in neural activation for object-directed grasping in chimpanzees and humans</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Hecht, Erin E ; Murphy, Lauren E ; Gutman, David A ; Votaw, John R ; Schuster, David M ; Preuss, Todd M ; Orban, Guy A ; Stout, Dietrich ; Parr, Lisa A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hecht, Erin E ; Murphy, Lauren E ; Gutman, David A ; Votaw, John R ; Schuster, David M ; Preuss, Todd M ; Orban, Guy A ; Stout, Dietrich ; Parr, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><description>The human faculty for object-mediated action, including tool use and imitation, exceeds that of even our closest primate relatives and is a key foundation of human cognitive and cultural uniqueness. In humans and macaques, observing object-directed grasping actions activates a network of frontal, parietal, and occipitotemporal brain regions, but differences in human and macaque activation suggest that this system has been a focus of selection in the primate lineage. To study the evolution of this system, we performed functional neuroimaging in humans' closest living relatives, chimpanzees. We compare activations during performance of an object-directed manual grasping action, observation of the same action, and observation of a mimed version of the action that consisted of only movements without results. Performance and observation of the same action activated a distributed frontoparietal network similar to that reported in macaques and humans. Like humans and unlike macaques, these regions were also activated by observing movements without results. However, in a direct chimpanzee/human comparison, we also identified unique aspects of human neural responses to observed grasping. Chimpanzee activation showed a prefrontal bias, including significantly more activity in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, whereas human activation was more evenly distributed across more posterior regions, including significantly more activation in ventral premotor cortex, inferior parietal cortex, and inferotemporal cortex. This indicates a more "bottom-up" representation of observed action in the human brain and suggests that the evolution of tool use, social learning, and cumulative culture may have involved modifications of frontoparietal interactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-6474</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2172-13.2013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23986247</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society for Neuroscience</publisher><subject>Adult ; Animals ; Brain Mapping ; Cerebral Cortex - physiology ; Female ; Frontal Lobe - physiology ; Humans ; Macaca ; Male ; Movement ; Pan troglodytes ; Parietal Lobe - physiology ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Primates ; Psychomotor Performance</subject><ispartof>The Journal of neuroscience, 2013-08, Vol.33 (35), p.14117-14134</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 the authors 0270-6474/13/3314117-18$15.00/0 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-ed6295e7f1651a0c92b87e6b02790dab430e6f363e0e0f9dd9b487171edc4d0b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3756757/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3756757/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23986247$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hecht, Erin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Lauren E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutman, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Votaw, John R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preuss, Todd M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orban, Guy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stout, Dietrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in neural activation for object-directed grasping in chimpanzees and humans</title><title>The Journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><description>The human faculty for object-mediated action, including tool use and imitation, exceeds that of even our closest primate relatives and is a key foundation of human cognitive and cultural uniqueness. In humans and macaques, observing object-directed grasping actions activates a network of frontal, parietal, and occipitotemporal brain regions, but differences in human and macaque activation suggest that this system has been a focus of selection in the primate lineage. To study the evolution of this system, we performed functional neuroimaging in humans' closest living relatives, chimpanzees. We compare activations during performance of an object-directed manual grasping action, observation of the same action, and observation of a mimed version of the action that consisted of only movements without results. Performance and observation of the same action activated a distributed frontoparietal network similar to that reported in macaques and humans. Like humans and unlike macaques, these regions were also activated by observing movements without results. However, in a direct chimpanzee/human comparison, we also identified unique aspects of human neural responses to observed grasping. Chimpanzee activation showed a prefrontal bias, including significantly more activity in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, whereas human activation was more evenly distributed across more posterior regions, including significantly more activation in ventral premotor cortex, inferior parietal cortex, and inferotemporal cortex. This indicates a more "bottom-up" representation of observed action in the human brain and suggests that the evolution of tool use, social learning, and cumulative culture may have involved modifications of frontoparietal interactions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frontal Lobe - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Macaca</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Pan troglodytes</subject><subject>Parietal Lobe - physiology</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtPGzEUha2qqAToX0CzZDPBb8cbJJSGQoVAakFdWh77TuIo4wn2DFL76-sRD7Wrrq7ke86nc30QOiV4TgRl59sIY-qzC3NKFK0Jm1NM2Ac0K1tdU47JRzTDVOFacsUP0VHOW4yxwkR9QoeU6YWkXM3Qzy-hbSFBdJCrEKsJa3eVdUN4tkPoY9X2qeqbLbih9iGVAb5aJ5v3Ia4nh9uEbm_jbygAG321GTsb8wk6aO0uw-fXeYwer1YPy-v69v7rzfLytnZCyqEGL6kWoFoiBbHYadosFMimJNfY24YzDLJlkgEG3GrvdcMXiigC3nGPG3aMLl64-7HpyiPEoeQ3-xQ6m36Z3gbz7yaGjVn3z4YpIZVQBXD2Ckj90wh5MF3IDnY7G6EfsyFCEElF-az_SzlnbME01kUqX6SulJQTtO-JCDZTgebb3erx-_2P5Y2ZCjSEmanAYjz9-55321tj7A_FkZrS</recordid><startdate>20130828</startdate><enddate>20130828</enddate><creator>Hecht, Erin E</creator><creator>Murphy, Lauren E</creator><creator>Gutman, David A</creator><creator>Votaw, John R</creator><creator>Schuster, David M</creator><creator>Preuss, Todd M</creator><creator>Orban, Guy A</creator><creator>Stout, Dietrich</creator><creator>Parr, Lisa A</creator><general>Society for Neuroscience</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130828</creationdate><title>Differences in neural activation for object-directed grasping in chimpanzees and humans</title><author>Hecht, Erin E ; Murphy, Lauren E ; Gutman, David A ; Votaw, John R ; Schuster, David M ; Preuss, Todd M ; Orban, Guy A ; Stout, Dietrich ; Parr, Lisa A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-ed6295e7f1651a0c92b87e6b02790dab430e6f363e0e0f9dd9b487171edc4d0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frontal Lobe - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Macaca</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Pan troglodytes</topic><topic>Parietal Lobe - physiology</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hecht, Erin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Lauren E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutman, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Votaw, John R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preuss, Todd M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orban, Guy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stout, Dietrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hecht, Erin E</au><au>Murphy, Lauren E</au><au>Gutman, David A</au><au>Votaw, John R</au><au>Schuster, David M</au><au>Preuss, Todd M</au><au>Orban, Guy A</au><au>Stout, Dietrich</au><au>Parr, Lisa A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in neural activation for object-directed grasping in chimpanzees and humans</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><date>2013-08-28</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>35</issue><spage>14117</spage><epage>14134</epage><pages>14117-14134</pages><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><eissn>1529-2401</eissn><abstract>The human faculty for object-mediated action, including tool use and imitation, exceeds that of even our closest primate relatives and is a key foundation of human cognitive and cultural uniqueness. In humans and macaques, observing object-directed grasping actions activates a network of frontal, parietal, and occipitotemporal brain regions, but differences in human and macaque activation suggest that this system has been a focus of selection in the primate lineage. To study the evolution of this system, we performed functional neuroimaging in humans' closest living relatives, chimpanzees. We compare activations during performance of an object-directed manual grasping action, observation of the same action, and observation of a mimed version of the action that consisted of only movements without results. Performance and observation of the same action activated a distributed frontoparietal network similar to that reported in macaques and humans. Like humans and unlike macaques, these regions were also activated by observing movements without results. However, in a direct chimpanzee/human comparison, we also identified unique aspects of human neural responses to observed grasping. Chimpanzee activation showed a prefrontal bias, including significantly more activity in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, whereas human activation was more evenly distributed across more posterior regions, including significantly more activation in ventral premotor cortex, inferior parietal cortex, and inferotemporal cortex. This indicates a more "bottom-up" representation of observed action in the human brain and suggests that the evolution of tool use, social learning, and cumulative culture may have involved modifications of frontoparietal interactions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society for Neuroscience</pub><pmid>23986247</pmid><doi>10.1523/jneurosci.2172-13.2013</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-6474
ispartof The Journal of neuroscience, 2013-08, Vol.33 (35), p.14117-14134
issn 0270-6474
1529-2401
1529-2401
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3756757
source PubMed Central Free
subjects Adult
Animals
Brain Mapping
Cerebral Cortex - physiology
Female
Frontal Lobe - physiology
Humans
Macaca
Male
Movement
Pan troglodytes
Parietal Lobe - physiology
Positron-Emission Tomography
Primates
Psychomotor Performance
title Differences in neural activation for object-directed grasping in chimpanzees and humans
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T07%3A14%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20neural%20activation%20for%20object-directed%20grasping%20in%20chimpanzees%20and%20humans&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Hecht,%20Erin%20E&rft.date=2013-08-28&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=35&rft.spage=14117&rft.epage=14134&rft.pages=14117-14134&rft.issn=0270-6474&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523/jneurosci.2172-13.2013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1551625247%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-ed6295e7f1651a0c92b87e6b02790dab430e6f363e0e0f9dd9b487171edc4d0b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443383909&rft_id=info:pmid/23986247&rfr_iscdi=true