Loading…
Detection of antenatal depression in rural HIV-affected populations with short and ultrashort versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
Risk of antenatal depression has been shown to be elevated in Southern Africa and can impact maternal and child outcomes, especially in the context of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Brief screening methods may optimize access to care during pregnancy, particularly where resources are scarce...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of women's mental health 2013-10, Vol.16 (5), p.401-410 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-9ff5f3d338d6641712679113fa7787b0b722aa6897206fe14c19e962792183f93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-9ff5f3d338d6641712679113fa7787b0b722aa6897206fe14c19e962792183f93 |
container_end_page | 410 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 401 |
container_title | Archives of women's mental health |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Rochat, Tamsen J. Tomlinson, Mark Newell, Marie -Louise Stein, Alan |
description | Risk of antenatal depression has been shown to be elevated in Southern Africa and can impact maternal and child outcomes, especially in the context of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Brief screening methods may optimize access to care during pregnancy, particularly where resources are scarce. This research evaluated shorter versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to detect antenatal depression. This cross-sectional study at a large primary health care (PHC) facility recruited a consecutive series of 109 antenatal attendees in rural South Africa. Women were in the second half of pregnancy and completed the EPDS and Structured Clinical Interview for Depression (SCID). The recommended EPDS cutoff (≥13) was used to determine probable depression. Four versions, including the 10-item scale, seven-item depression, and novel three- and five-item versions developed through regression analysis, were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. High numbers of women 51/109 (47 %) were depressed, most depression was chronic, and nearly half of the women were HIV positive 49/109 (45 %). The novel three-item version had improved positive predictive value (PPV) over the 10-item version and equivalent specificity to the seven-item depression subscale; the novel five-item provided the best overall performance in terms of ROC and Cronbach's reliability statistics and had improved specificity. The brevity, sensitivity, and reliability of the short and ultrashort versions could facilitate widespread community screening. The usefulness of the novel three- and five-item versions are underscored by the fact that sensitivity is important at first screening, while specificity becomes more important at higher levels of care. Replication in larger samples is required. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00737-013-0353-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3778840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A343945360</galeid><sourcerecordid>A343945360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-9ff5f3d338d6641712679113fa7787b0b722aa6897206fe14c19e962792183f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwA7hBkZDQdpHhj8SOb5CmtbBKk5gocGu5yXGTKbWL7Qy2f7J_i9OMrUUgTZHycfy873GO3yR5jdExRoi_9_FGeYYwzRAtaHbzJNnHOS0yjBF5unnPM1xitpe88P4SIVQIkT9P9ghluBCU7Ce3EwhQhdaa1OpUmQBGBdWlNawdeD_UW5O63sXa2ex7prSOONTp2q77Tg1Cn_5sQ5P6xroQHeq074JT4-cVOL9BonloIJ3WrVn0btmkF9aHsdXkodW8Uh2kh9OLyfzoZfJMq87Dq7vnQfLt4_Tr6Vl2_vnT7PTkPKsYK0MmtC40rSkta8ZyzDFhXGBMteK85Au04IQoxUrBCWIacF5hAYIRLgguqRb0IPkw-q77xQrqCkzcfSfXrl0pdy2tauXuimkbubRXksYGZY6iweGdgbM_evBBrlpfQdcpA7b3EheEUlEW4hFonpeEIFzgR6CUEp7nBY3o27_QS9s7E4e2oRAvCRMP1DLOWLZG2_g31WAqT2hORXRiww6P_0HFq4ZVW1kDuo31HcHRjiAyAX6Fpeq9l7P5l1323RbbgOpC423Xb1K0C-IRrJz13oG-Pw6M5BB9OUZfxujLIfryJmrebJ_jveJP1iNARsDHJbMEtzWm_7r-BkTeDF8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1433078269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of antenatal depression in rural HIV-affected populations with short and ultrashort versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Rochat, Tamsen J. ; Tomlinson, Mark ; Newell, Marie -Louise ; Stein, Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Rochat, Tamsen J. ; Tomlinson, Mark ; Newell, Marie -Louise ; Stein, Alan</creatorcontrib><description>Risk of antenatal depression has been shown to be elevated in Southern Africa and can impact maternal and child outcomes, especially in the context of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Brief screening methods may optimize access to care during pregnancy, particularly where resources are scarce. This research evaluated shorter versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to detect antenatal depression. This cross-sectional study at a large primary health care (PHC) facility recruited a consecutive series of 109 antenatal attendees in rural South Africa. Women were in the second half of pregnancy and completed the EPDS and Structured Clinical Interview for Depression (SCID). The recommended EPDS cutoff (≥13) was used to determine probable depression. Four versions, including the 10-item scale, seven-item depression, and novel three- and five-item versions developed through regression analysis, were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. High numbers of women 51/109 (47 %) were depressed, most depression was chronic, and nearly half of the women were HIV positive 49/109 (45 %). The novel three-item version had improved positive predictive value (PPV) over the 10-item version and equivalent specificity to the seven-item depression subscale; the novel five-item provided the best overall performance in terms of ROC and Cronbach's reliability statistics and had improved specificity. The brevity, sensitivity, and reliability of the short and ultrashort versions could facilitate widespread community screening. The usefulness of the novel three- and five-item versions are underscored by the fact that sensitivity is important at first screening, while specificity becomes more important at higher levels of care. Replication in larger samples is required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-1816</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-1102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00737-013-0353-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23615932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Depression - diagnosis ; Depression - epidemiology ; Depression - psychology ; Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis ; Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology ; Depression, Postpartum - psychology ; Diagnosis ; Female ; HIV ; HIV Infections - epidemiology ; HIV Infections - psychology ; HIV patients ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological ; Mass Screening ; Medical examination ; Medical screening ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mental depression ; Mothers - psychology ; Original ; Original Article ; Postpartum depression ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Care ; Prevalence ; Primary Health Care - organization & administration ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychiatry ; Psychological aspects ; Psychotherapy ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk factors ; Rural Population ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Social aspects ; Socioeconomic Factors ; South Africa - epidemiology ; Stress, Psychological - epidemiology ; Stress, Psychological - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Archives of women's mental health, 2013-10, Vol.16 (5), p.401-410</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Wien 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-9ff5f3d338d6641712679113fa7787b0b722aa6897206fe14c19e962792183f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-9ff5f3d338d6641712679113fa7787b0b722aa6897206fe14c19e962792183f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23615932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rochat, Tamsen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomlinson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Marie -Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of antenatal depression in rural HIV-affected populations with short and ultrashort versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)</title><title>Archives of women's mental health</title><addtitle>Arch Womens Ment Health</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Womens Ment Health</addtitle><description>Risk of antenatal depression has been shown to be elevated in Southern Africa and can impact maternal and child outcomes, especially in the context of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Brief screening methods may optimize access to care during pregnancy, particularly where resources are scarce. This research evaluated shorter versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to detect antenatal depression. This cross-sectional study at a large primary health care (PHC) facility recruited a consecutive series of 109 antenatal attendees in rural South Africa. Women were in the second half of pregnancy and completed the EPDS and Structured Clinical Interview for Depression (SCID). The recommended EPDS cutoff (≥13) was used to determine probable depression. Four versions, including the 10-item scale, seven-item depression, and novel three- and five-item versions developed through regression analysis, were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. High numbers of women 51/109 (47 %) were depressed, most depression was chronic, and nearly half of the women were HIV positive 49/109 (45 %). The novel three-item version had improved positive predictive value (PPV) over the 10-item version and equivalent specificity to the seven-item depression subscale; the novel five-item provided the best overall performance in terms of ROC and Cronbach's reliability statistics and had improved specificity. The brevity, sensitivity, and reliability of the short and ultrashort versions could facilitate widespread community screening. The usefulness of the novel three- and five-item versions are underscored by the fact that sensitivity is important at first screening, while specificity becomes more important at higher levels of care. Replication in larger samples is required.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression - epidemiology</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology</subject><subject>Depression, Postpartum - psychology</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>HIV Infections - psychology</subject><subject>HIV patients</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Medical examination</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mothers - psychology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Postpartum depression</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal Care</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>South Africa - epidemiology</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - epidemiology</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1434-1816</issn><issn>1435-1102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwA7hBkZDQdpHhj8SOb5CmtbBKk5gocGu5yXGTKbWL7Qy2f7J_i9OMrUUgTZHycfy873GO3yR5jdExRoi_9_FGeYYwzRAtaHbzJNnHOS0yjBF5unnPM1xitpe88P4SIVQIkT9P9ghluBCU7Ce3EwhQhdaa1OpUmQBGBdWlNawdeD_UW5O63sXa2ex7prSOONTp2q77Tg1Cn_5sQ5P6xroQHeq074JT4-cVOL9BonloIJ3WrVn0btmkF9aHsdXkodW8Uh2kh9OLyfzoZfJMq87Dq7vnQfLt4_Tr6Vl2_vnT7PTkPKsYK0MmtC40rSkta8ZyzDFhXGBMteK85Au04IQoxUrBCWIacF5hAYIRLgguqRb0IPkw-q77xQrqCkzcfSfXrl0pdy2tauXuimkbubRXksYGZY6iweGdgbM_evBBrlpfQdcpA7b3EheEUlEW4hFonpeEIFzgR6CUEp7nBY3o27_QS9s7E4e2oRAvCRMP1DLOWLZG2_g31WAqT2hORXRiww6P_0HFq4ZVW1kDuo31HcHRjiAyAX6Fpeq9l7P5l1323RbbgOpC423Xb1K0C-IRrJz13oG-Pw6M5BB9OUZfxujLIfryJmrebJ_jveJP1iNARsDHJbMEtzWm_7r-BkTeDF8</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Rochat, Tamsen J.</creator><creator>Tomlinson, Mark</creator><creator>Newell, Marie -Louise</creator><creator>Stein, Alan</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Detection of antenatal depression in rural HIV-affected populations with short and ultrashort versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)</title><author>Rochat, Tamsen J. ; Tomlinson, Mark ; Newell, Marie -Louise ; Stein, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-9ff5f3d338d6641712679113fa7787b0b722aa6897206fe14c19e962792183f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression - epidemiology</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology</topic><topic>Depression, Postpartum - psychology</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>HIV Infections - psychology</topic><topic>HIV patients</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Medical examination</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mothers - psychology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Postpartum depression</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal Care</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>South Africa - epidemiology</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - epidemiology</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rochat, Tamsen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomlinson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Marie -Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Alan</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Science In Context</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest Medical & Health Databases)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Proquest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Archives of women's mental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rochat, Tamsen J.</au><au>Tomlinson, Mark</au><au>Newell, Marie -Louise</au><au>Stein, Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of antenatal depression in rural HIV-affected populations with short and ultrashort versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)</atitle><jtitle>Archives of women's mental health</jtitle><stitle>Arch Womens Ment Health</stitle><addtitle>Arch Womens Ment Health</addtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>401</spage><epage>410</epage><pages>401-410</pages><issn>1434-1816</issn><eissn>1435-1102</eissn><abstract>Risk of antenatal depression has been shown to be elevated in Southern Africa and can impact maternal and child outcomes, especially in the context of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Brief screening methods may optimize access to care during pregnancy, particularly where resources are scarce. This research evaluated shorter versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to detect antenatal depression. This cross-sectional study at a large primary health care (PHC) facility recruited a consecutive series of 109 antenatal attendees in rural South Africa. Women were in the second half of pregnancy and completed the EPDS and Structured Clinical Interview for Depression (SCID). The recommended EPDS cutoff (≥13) was used to determine probable depression. Four versions, including the 10-item scale, seven-item depression, and novel three- and five-item versions developed through regression analysis, were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. High numbers of women 51/109 (47 %) were depressed, most depression was chronic, and nearly half of the women were HIV positive 49/109 (45 %). The novel three-item version had improved positive predictive value (PPV) over the 10-item version and equivalent specificity to the seven-item depression subscale; the novel five-item provided the best overall performance in terms of ROC and Cronbach's reliability statistics and had improved specificity. The brevity, sensitivity, and reliability of the short and ultrashort versions could facilitate widespread community screening. The usefulness of the novel three- and five-item versions are underscored by the fact that sensitivity is important at first screening, while specificity becomes more important at higher levels of care. Replication in larger samples is required.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><pmid>23615932</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00737-013-0353-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1434-1816 |
ispartof | Archives of women's mental health, 2013-10, Vol.16 (5), p.401-410 |
issn | 1434-1816 1435-1102 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3778840 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Cross-Sectional Studies Depression - diagnosis Depression - epidemiology Depression - psychology Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology Depression, Postpartum - psychology Diagnosis Female HIV HIV Infections - epidemiology HIV Infections - psychology HIV patients Human immunodeficiency virus Humans Interview, Psychological Mass Screening Medical examination Medical screening Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mental depression Mothers - psychology Original Original Article Postpartum depression Pregnancy Prenatal Care Prevalence Primary Health Care - organization & administration Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychiatry Psychological aspects Psychotherapy Reproducibility of Results Risk factors Rural Population Sensitivity and Specificity Social aspects Socioeconomic Factors South Africa - epidemiology Stress, Psychological - epidemiology Stress, Psychological - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires Young Adult |
title | Detection of antenatal depression in rural HIV-affected populations with short and ultrashort versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A17%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20antenatal%20depression%20in%20rural%20HIV-affected%20populations%20with%20short%20and%20ultrashort%20versions%20of%20the%20Edinburgh%20Postnatal%20Depression%20Scale%20(EPDS)&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20women's%20mental%20health&rft.au=Rochat,%20Tamsen%20J.&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=410&rft.pages=401-410&rft.issn=1434-1816&rft.eissn=1435-1102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00737-013-0353-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA343945360%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-9ff5f3d338d6641712679113fa7787b0b722aa6897206fe14c19e962792183f93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1433078269&rft_id=info:pmid/23615932&rft_galeid=A343945360&rfr_iscdi=true |