Loading…

Detection of antenatal depression in rural HIV-affected populations with short and ultrashort versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)

Risk of antenatal depression has been shown to be elevated in Southern Africa and can impact maternal and child outcomes, especially in the context of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Brief screening methods may optimize access to care during pregnancy, particularly where resources are scarce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of women's mental health 2013-10, Vol.16 (5), p.401-410
Main Authors: Rochat, Tamsen J., Tomlinson, Mark, Newell, Marie -Louise, Stein, Alan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-9ff5f3d338d6641712679113fa7787b0b722aa6897206fe14c19e962792183f93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-9ff5f3d338d6641712679113fa7787b0b722aa6897206fe14c19e962792183f93
container_end_page 410
container_issue 5
container_start_page 401
container_title Archives of women's mental health
container_volume 16
creator Rochat, Tamsen J.
Tomlinson, Mark
Newell, Marie -Louise
Stein, Alan
description Risk of antenatal depression has been shown to be elevated in Southern Africa and can impact maternal and child outcomes, especially in the context of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Brief screening methods may optimize access to care during pregnancy, particularly where resources are scarce. This research evaluated shorter versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to detect antenatal depression. This cross-sectional study at a large primary health care (PHC) facility recruited a consecutive series of 109 antenatal attendees in rural South Africa. Women were in the second half of pregnancy and completed the EPDS and Structured Clinical Interview for Depression (SCID). The recommended EPDS cutoff (≥13) was used to determine probable depression. Four versions, including the 10-item scale, seven-item depression, and novel three- and five-item versions developed through regression analysis, were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. High numbers of women 51/109 (47 %) were depressed, most depression was chronic, and nearly half of the women were HIV positive 49/109 (45 %). The novel three-item version had improved positive predictive value (PPV) over the 10-item version and equivalent specificity to the seven-item depression subscale; the novel five-item provided the best overall performance in terms of ROC and Cronbach's reliability statistics and had improved specificity. The brevity, sensitivity, and reliability of the short and ultrashort versions could facilitate widespread community screening. The usefulness of the novel three- and five-item versions are underscored by the fact that sensitivity is important at first screening, while specificity becomes more important at higher levels of care. Replication in larger samples is required.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00737-013-0353-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3778840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A343945360</galeid><sourcerecordid>A343945360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-9ff5f3d338d6641712679113fa7787b0b722aa6897206fe14c19e962792183f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwA7hBkZDQdpHhj8SOb5CmtbBKk5gocGu5yXGTKbWL7Qy2f7J_i9OMrUUgTZHycfy873GO3yR5jdExRoi_9_FGeYYwzRAtaHbzJNnHOS0yjBF5unnPM1xitpe88P4SIVQIkT9P9ghluBCU7Ce3EwhQhdaa1OpUmQBGBdWlNawdeD_UW5O63sXa2ex7prSOONTp2q77Tg1Cn_5sQ5P6xroQHeq074JT4-cVOL9BonloIJ3WrVn0btmkF9aHsdXkodW8Uh2kh9OLyfzoZfJMq87Dq7vnQfLt4_Tr6Vl2_vnT7PTkPKsYK0MmtC40rSkta8ZyzDFhXGBMteK85Au04IQoxUrBCWIacF5hAYIRLgguqRb0IPkw-q77xQrqCkzcfSfXrl0pdy2tauXuimkbubRXksYGZY6iweGdgbM_evBBrlpfQdcpA7b3EheEUlEW4hFonpeEIFzgR6CUEp7nBY3o27_QS9s7E4e2oRAvCRMP1DLOWLZG2_g31WAqT2hORXRiww6P_0HFq4ZVW1kDuo31HcHRjiAyAX6Fpeq9l7P5l1323RbbgOpC423Xb1K0C-IRrJz13oG-Pw6M5BB9OUZfxujLIfryJmrebJ_jveJP1iNARsDHJbMEtzWm_7r-BkTeDF8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1433078269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of antenatal depression in rural HIV-affected populations with short and ultrashort versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Rochat, Tamsen J. ; Tomlinson, Mark ; Newell, Marie -Louise ; Stein, Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Rochat, Tamsen J. ; Tomlinson, Mark ; Newell, Marie -Louise ; Stein, Alan</creatorcontrib><description>Risk of antenatal depression has been shown to be elevated in Southern Africa and can impact maternal and child outcomes, especially in the context of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Brief screening methods may optimize access to care during pregnancy, particularly where resources are scarce. This research evaluated shorter versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to detect antenatal depression. This cross-sectional study at a large primary health care (PHC) facility recruited a consecutive series of 109 antenatal attendees in rural South Africa. Women were in the second half of pregnancy and completed the EPDS and Structured Clinical Interview for Depression (SCID). The recommended EPDS cutoff (≥13) was used to determine probable depression. Four versions, including the 10-item scale, seven-item depression, and novel three- and five-item versions developed through regression analysis, were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. High numbers of women 51/109 (47 %) were depressed, most depression was chronic, and nearly half of the women were HIV positive 49/109 (45 %). The novel three-item version had improved positive predictive value (PPV) over the 10-item version and equivalent specificity to the seven-item depression subscale; the novel five-item provided the best overall performance in terms of ROC and Cronbach's reliability statistics and had improved specificity. The brevity, sensitivity, and reliability of the short and ultrashort versions could facilitate widespread community screening. The usefulness of the novel three- and five-item versions are underscored by the fact that sensitivity is important at first screening, while specificity becomes more important at higher levels of care. Replication in larger samples is required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-1816</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-1102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00737-013-0353-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23615932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Depression - diagnosis ; Depression - epidemiology ; Depression - psychology ; Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis ; Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology ; Depression, Postpartum - psychology ; Diagnosis ; Female ; HIV ; HIV Infections - epidemiology ; HIV Infections - psychology ; HIV patients ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological ; Mass Screening ; Medical examination ; Medical screening ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mental depression ; Mothers - psychology ; Original ; Original Article ; Postpartum depression ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Care ; Prevalence ; Primary Health Care - organization &amp; administration ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychiatry ; Psychological aspects ; Psychotherapy ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk factors ; Rural Population ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Social aspects ; Socioeconomic Factors ; South Africa - epidemiology ; Stress, Psychological - epidemiology ; Stress, Psychological - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Archives of women's mental health, 2013-10, Vol.16 (5), p.401-410</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Wien 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-9ff5f3d338d6641712679113fa7787b0b722aa6897206fe14c19e962792183f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-9ff5f3d338d6641712679113fa7787b0b722aa6897206fe14c19e962792183f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23615932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rochat, Tamsen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomlinson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Marie -Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of antenatal depression in rural HIV-affected populations with short and ultrashort versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)</title><title>Archives of women's mental health</title><addtitle>Arch Womens Ment Health</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Womens Ment Health</addtitle><description>Risk of antenatal depression has been shown to be elevated in Southern Africa and can impact maternal and child outcomes, especially in the context of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Brief screening methods may optimize access to care during pregnancy, particularly where resources are scarce. This research evaluated shorter versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to detect antenatal depression. This cross-sectional study at a large primary health care (PHC) facility recruited a consecutive series of 109 antenatal attendees in rural South Africa. Women were in the second half of pregnancy and completed the EPDS and Structured Clinical Interview for Depression (SCID). The recommended EPDS cutoff (≥13) was used to determine probable depression. Four versions, including the 10-item scale, seven-item depression, and novel three- and five-item versions developed through regression analysis, were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. High numbers of women 51/109 (47 %) were depressed, most depression was chronic, and nearly half of the women were HIV positive 49/109 (45 %). The novel three-item version had improved positive predictive value (PPV) over the 10-item version and equivalent specificity to the seven-item depression subscale; the novel five-item provided the best overall performance in terms of ROC and Cronbach's reliability statistics and had improved specificity. The brevity, sensitivity, and reliability of the short and ultrashort versions could facilitate widespread community screening. The usefulness of the novel three- and five-item versions are underscored by the fact that sensitivity is important at first screening, while specificity becomes more important at higher levels of care. Replication in larger samples is required.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression - epidemiology</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology</subject><subject>Depression, Postpartum - psychology</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>HIV Infections - psychology</subject><subject>HIV patients</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Medical examination</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mothers - psychology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Postpartum depression</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal Care</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>South Africa - epidemiology</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - epidemiology</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1434-1816</issn><issn>1435-1102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwA7hBkZDQdpHhj8SOb5CmtbBKk5gocGu5yXGTKbWL7Qy2f7J_i9OMrUUgTZHycfy873GO3yR5jdExRoi_9_FGeYYwzRAtaHbzJNnHOS0yjBF5unnPM1xitpe88P4SIVQIkT9P9ghluBCU7Ce3EwhQhdaa1OpUmQBGBdWlNawdeD_UW5O63sXa2ex7prSOONTp2q77Tg1Cn_5sQ5P6xroQHeq074JT4-cVOL9BonloIJ3WrVn0btmkF9aHsdXkodW8Uh2kh9OLyfzoZfJMq87Dq7vnQfLt4_Tr6Vl2_vnT7PTkPKsYK0MmtC40rSkta8ZyzDFhXGBMteK85Au04IQoxUrBCWIacF5hAYIRLgguqRb0IPkw-q77xQrqCkzcfSfXrl0pdy2tauXuimkbubRXksYGZY6iweGdgbM_evBBrlpfQdcpA7b3EheEUlEW4hFonpeEIFzgR6CUEp7nBY3o27_QS9s7E4e2oRAvCRMP1DLOWLZG2_g31WAqT2hORXRiww6P_0HFq4ZVW1kDuo31HcHRjiAyAX6Fpeq9l7P5l1323RbbgOpC423Xb1K0C-IRrJz13oG-Pw6M5BB9OUZfxujLIfryJmrebJ_jveJP1iNARsDHJbMEtzWm_7r-BkTeDF8</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Rochat, Tamsen J.</creator><creator>Tomlinson, Mark</creator><creator>Newell, Marie -Louise</creator><creator>Stein, Alan</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Detection of antenatal depression in rural HIV-affected populations with short and ultrashort versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)</title><author>Rochat, Tamsen J. ; Tomlinson, Mark ; Newell, Marie -Louise ; Stein, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-9ff5f3d338d6641712679113fa7787b0b722aa6897206fe14c19e962792183f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression - epidemiology</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology</topic><topic>Depression, Postpartum - psychology</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>HIV Infections - psychology</topic><topic>HIV patients</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Medical examination</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mothers - psychology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Postpartum depression</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal Care</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>South Africa - epidemiology</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - epidemiology</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rochat, Tamsen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomlinson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Marie -Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Alan</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Science In Context</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (ProQuest Medical &amp; Health Databases)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Proquest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's &amp; Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Archives of women's mental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rochat, Tamsen J.</au><au>Tomlinson, Mark</au><au>Newell, Marie -Louise</au><au>Stein, Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of antenatal depression in rural HIV-affected populations with short and ultrashort versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)</atitle><jtitle>Archives of women's mental health</jtitle><stitle>Arch Womens Ment Health</stitle><addtitle>Arch Womens Ment Health</addtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>401</spage><epage>410</epage><pages>401-410</pages><issn>1434-1816</issn><eissn>1435-1102</eissn><abstract>Risk of antenatal depression has been shown to be elevated in Southern Africa and can impact maternal and child outcomes, especially in the context of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Brief screening methods may optimize access to care during pregnancy, particularly where resources are scarce. This research evaluated shorter versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to detect antenatal depression. This cross-sectional study at a large primary health care (PHC) facility recruited a consecutive series of 109 antenatal attendees in rural South Africa. Women were in the second half of pregnancy and completed the EPDS and Structured Clinical Interview for Depression (SCID). The recommended EPDS cutoff (≥13) was used to determine probable depression. Four versions, including the 10-item scale, seven-item depression, and novel three- and five-item versions developed through regression analysis, were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. High numbers of women 51/109 (47 %) were depressed, most depression was chronic, and nearly half of the women were HIV positive 49/109 (45 %). The novel three-item version had improved positive predictive value (PPV) over the 10-item version and equivalent specificity to the seven-item depression subscale; the novel five-item provided the best overall performance in terms of ROC and Cronbach's reliability statistics and had improved specificity. The brevity, sensitivity, and reliability of the short and ultrashort versions could facilitate widespread community screening. The usefulness of the novel three- and five-item versions are underscored by the fact that sensitivity is important at first screening, while specificity becomes more important at higher levels of care. Replication in larger samples is required.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><pmid>23615932</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00737-013-0353-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1434-1816
ispartof Archives of women's mental health, 2013-10, Vol.16 (5), p.401-410
issn 1434-1816
1435-1102
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3778840
source Springer Link
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Depression - diagnosis
Depression - epidemiology
Depression - psychology
Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis
Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology
Depression, Postpartum - psychology
Diagnosis
Female
HIV
HIV Infections - epidemiology
HIV Infections - psychology
HIV patients
Human immunodeficiency virus
Humans
Interview, Psychological
Mass Screening
Medical examination
Medical screening
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mental depression
Mothers - psychology
Original
Original Article
Postpartum depression
Pregnancy
Prenatal Care
Prevalence
Primary Health Care - organization & administration
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychiatry
Psychological aspects
Psychotherapy
Reproducibility of Results
Risk factors
Rural Population
Sensitivity and Specificity
Social aspects
Socioeconomic Factors
South Africa - epidemiology
Stress, Psychological - epidemiology
Stress, Psychological - psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
title Detection of antenatal depression in rural HIV-affected populations with short and ultrashort versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A17%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20antenatal%20depression%20in%20rural%20HIV-affected%20populations%20with%20short%20and%20ultrashort%20versions%20of%20the%20Edinburgh%20Postnatal%20Depression%20Scale%20(EPDS)&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20women's%20mental%20health&rft.au=Rochat,%20Tamsen%20J.&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=410&rft.pages=401-410&rft.issn=1434-1816&rft.eissn=1435-1102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00737-013-0353-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA343945360%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-9ff5f3d338d6641712679113fa7787b0b722aa6897206fe14c19e962792183f93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1433078269&rft_id=info:pmid/23615932&rft_galeid=A343945360&rfr_iscdi=true