Loading…

A Comparative Evaluation of Application Techniques of a Paint-On Die Spacer in Grooves: An In Vitro Study

The use of paint-on die spacer to improve the seating of casting has become quite popular in the recent years. The generally accepted range of paint-on die spacer is approximately 20–40 μm, which suggests a range of tolerance. The painting of the retentive grooves with die spacer has always been a s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2013-12, Vol.13 (4), p.520-524
Main Authors: Vaishali, K., Prasad, D. Krishna, Shetty, Manoj
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The use of paint-on die spacer to improve the seating of casting has become quite popular in the recent years. The generally accepted range of paint-on die spacer is approximately 20–40 μm, which suggests a range of tolerance. The painting of the retentive grooves with die spacer has always been a subject of debate. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if there was a tendency for the paint-on die spacer to accumulate in grooves of tooth preparation in sufficient thickness to exceed this accepted range of tolerance when applied using two different techniques. Eight die stone blocks with three grooves each were prepared. Half the samples were painted in unidirectional method and the other halves were painted using the haphazard method of application. The thickness of the die spacer was measured at different positions using 200× magnification and the mean and standard deviations were calculated. On analysis it was seen that the thickness of the paint-on die spacer in grooves was in the range of 20–40 μm for unidirectional method of application, whereas in haphazard method of application the thickness of the paint-on die spacer was in the range of 28–132 μm. From the above study it was concluded that the method of application influenced the thickness of the paint-on die spacer. The recommended thickness of the die spacer was achieved on unidirectional method of application.
ISSN:0972-4052
1998-4057
DOI:10.1007/s13191-012-0180-3