Liver angulometry: a simple method to estimate liver volume and ratios

• Published in: HPB (Oxford, England) England), 2013-12, Vol.15 (12), p.976-984
• Main Authors: Kianmanesh, Reza, Piardi, Tullio, Tamby, Esther, Parvanescu, Alina, Bruno, Onorina, Palladino, Elisa, Bouché, Olivier, Msika, Simon, Sommacale, Daniele
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Anthropometry - methods; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use; Catheter Ablation; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology; Contrast Media; Female; Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Humans; Hypertrophy; Laparoscopy; Ligation; Liver - diagnostic imaging; Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Liver Neoplasms - secondary; Liver Neoplasms - therapy; Male; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Organ Size; Original; Portal Vein - diagnostic imaging; Portal Vein - surgery; Predictive Value of Tests; Reference Values; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
• ISSN: 1365-182X; 1477-2574
• DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12079

Abstract Objectives Volumetry is standard method for evaluating the volumes of the right liver (RL), left liver (LL), left lateral segments (LLS), total liver (TL) and future liver remnant (FLR). The aim of this study was to report a simple technique based on measurements of liver angles (angulometry) that can be used to predict liver ratios. Methods Fifty computed tomography (CT) scans obtained in subjects with normal liver were studied. Four CT scan levels were preselected: level 1 passed by the upper part of the hepatic veins; level 2 passed by the left portal vein branch division; level 3 passed by the right portal vein branch division, and level 4 passed by the gallbladder bed. Left and right tangent lines passing the liver edges were drawn and joined to the centre of the vertebra defining the TL angle. Two lines through, respectively, the plane of the middle hepatic vein and the left portal branches determined the angles of the RL, LL and LLS. Volumetric and angulometric data obtained on levels 2 and 3 in 50 different subjects were compared. Results Level 2 CT scans represented the most accurate way of obtaining angulometric measurements. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) angles of the TL and LL were 134 ± 12 ° and 55 ± 12 °, respectively. The mean ± SD percentages of the TL represented by the LL in angulometry and volumetry were 38 ± 7% and 36 ± 6%, respectively (non-significant difference). The mean ± SD percentages of the TL represented by the LLS in angulometry and volumetry were 25 ± 4% and 20 ± 3%, respectively ( P < 0.05). The mean ± SD overestimation of the percentage of the TL represented by the LLS in angulometry was 2.7 ± 7.0%. Conclusions Angulometry is a simple and accurate technique that can be used to estimate the ratio of the FLR to TL volume on one or two CT (or magnetic resonance imaging) slices. It can be helpful for clinicians, especially before right or extended right hepatectomy and after right portal vein occlusion techniques.