Examining the Influence of Price and Accessibility on Willingness to Shop at Farmers' Markets Among Low-income Eastern North Carolina Women

• Published in: Journal of nutrition education and behavior 2014-01, Vol.46 (1), p.26-33
• Main Authors: McGuirt, Jared T., MPH, Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie B., PhD, Ward, Rachel, MPH, Crawford, Thomas W., PhD, Keyserling, Thomas C., MD, MPH, Ammerman, Alice S., DrPH, RD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Agricultural Occupations; Agriculture; Choice Behavior; Correlation analysis; Employment; Employment Level; Family Planning; Farmers; farmers' markets; Feeding Behavior; Female; Females; Food Supply - economics; Food Supply - statistics & numerical data; Fruit - economics; fruit and vegetable consumption; Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Humans; Internal Medicine; Low Income; Low income groups; North Carolina; Planning; Poverty; Poverty Areas; price savings; Spatial Behavior; Vegetables - economics; Women; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1499-4046; 1878-2620; 1708-8259
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2013.06.001

Abstract Objective To examine the influence of farmers' market pricing and accessibility on willingness to shop at farmers' markets, among low-income women. Design Qualitative interviews using scenarios with quantitative assessment of willingness to shop at farmers' markets given certain pricing and accessibility scenarios. Setting Eastern North Carolina. Participants A total of 37 low-income women of childbearing age (18–44 years) receiving family planning services at the health department. Phenomenon of Interest Willingness to shop at a farmers' market. Analysis Fisher's exact test was used to examine associations between willingness to shop at farmers' markets by urban/rural residence, race, and employment status. Direct quotations relevant to participants' use of farmers' markets were extracted based on a positive deviance framework. Results Participants were increasingly willing to shop at the farmers' market when price savings increased and when the market was incrementally closer to their residence. Willingness was highest when there was at least a 20% price savings. Participants seemed to be influenced more by a visual representation of a greater quantity of produce received with the price savings rather than a quantitative representation of the money saved by the reduced price. Conclusions and Implications Future farmers' market interventions should take into account these consumer level preferences.