Loading…

Treatment of Early and Delayed Esophageal Perforation

Esophageal perforations are life threatening emergencies associated with high morbidity and mortality. We report on 22 consecutive patients (age 20–86; 13 female and 9 male) with an oesophageal perforation treated at the university hospital Duesseldorf. The patients' charts were reviewed and fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indian journal of surgery 2012-06, Vol.75 (6), p.469-472
Main Authors: Kroepil, F., Schauer, M., Raffel, A. M., Kröpil, P., Eisenberger, C. F., Knoefel, W. T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 472
container_issue 6
container_start_page 469
container_title Indian journal of surgery
container_volume 75
creator Kroepil, F.
Schauer, M.
Raffel, A. M.
Kröpil, P.
Eisenberger, C. F.
Knoefel, W. T.
description Esophageal perforations are life threatening emergencies associated with high morbidity and mortality. We report on 22 consecutive patients (age 20–86; 13 female and 9 male) with an oesophageal perforation treated at the university hospital Duesseldorf. The patients' charts were reviewed and follow-up was completed for all patients until demission, healed reconstruction or death. Patients' history, clinical presentation, time interval to surgical presentation, and treatment modality were recorded and correlated with patients' outcome. Six esophageal perforations were due to a Boerhaave-syndrome, eleven caused by endoscopic perforation, two after osteosynthesis of the cervical spine and three foreign body induced. In 7 patients a primary local suture was performed, in 4 cases a supplemental muscle flap was interposed, and 7 patients underwent an oesophageal resection. Four patients were treated without surgery (three esophageal stent implantations, one conservative treatment). Eleven patients (50 %) were presented within 24 h of perforation, and 11 patients (50 %) afterwards. Time delay correlates with survival. In 17 (80.9 %) cases a surgical sufficient reconstruction could be achieved. One (4.7 %) patient is waiting for reconstruction after esophagectomy. Four (18.2 %) patients died. A small subset of patients can be treated conservatively by stenting of the Esophagus, if the patient presents early. In the majority of patients a primary repair (muscle flap etc.) can be performed with good prognosis. If the patient presents delayed with extensive necrosis or mediastinitis, oesophagectomy and secondary repair is the only treatment option with high mortality.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12262-012-0539-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3900754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3900754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_39007543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlj8uKwjAYhYM4eJt5gNnlBaJ_Lm0nm9loxaUL9-HXptohbUpShc7TW8SNaxeHc-CDDw4h3xyWHCBbRS5EKhjwIYnU7H9EZqAzyXSm5fixBROQ_kzJPMY_AKFSKSdkKpRKEw5qRpJDsNjVtumoL2mOwfUUm4JurMPeFjSPvr3g2aKjextKH7CrfPNJPkp00X49e0F-t_lhvWPt9Vjb4jToAjrThqrG0BuPlXklTXUxZ38zUg8_EiXfFtwBbxJUaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of Early and Delayed Esophageal Perforation</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kroepil, F. ; Schauer, M. ; Raffel, A. M. ; Kröpil, P. ; Eisenberger, C. F. ; Knoefel, W. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kroepil, F. ; Schauer, M. ; Raffel, A. M. ; Kröpil, P. ; Eisenberger, C. F. ; Knoefel, W. T.</creatorcontrib><description>Esophageal perforations are life threatening emergencies associated with high morbidity and mortality. We report on 22 consecutive patients (age 20–86; 13 female and 9 male) with an oesophageal perforation treated at the university hospital Duesseldorf. The patients' charts were reviewed and follow-up was completed for all patients until demission, healed reconstruction or death. Patients' history, clinical presentation, time interval to surgical presentation, and treatment modality were recorded and correlated with patients' outcome. Six esophageal perforations were due to a Boerhaave-syndrome, eleven caused by endoscopic perforation, two after osteosynthesis of the cervical spine and three foreign body induced. In 7 patients a primary local suture was performed, in 4 cases a supplemental muscle flap was interposed, and 7 patients underwent an oesophageal resection. Four patients were treated without surgery (three esophageal stent implantations, one conservative treatment). Eleven patients (50 %) were presented within 24 h of perforation, and 11 patients (50 %) afterwards. Time delay correlates with survival. In 17 (80.9 %) cases a surgical sufficient reconstruction could be achieved. One (4.7 %) patient is waiting for reconstruction after esophagectomy. Four (18.2 %) patients died. A small subset of patients can be treated conservatively by stenting of the Esophagus, if the patient presents early. In the majority of patients a primary repair (muscle flap etc.) can be performed with good prognosis. If the patient presents delayed with extensive necrosis or mediastinitis, oesophagectomy and secondary repair is the only treatment option with high mortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-2068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-9793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12262-012-0539-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24465104</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24426651</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Springer India</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of surgery, 2012-06, Vol.75 (6), p.469-472</ispartof><rights>Association of Surgeons of India 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3900754/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3900754/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kroepil, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schauer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffel, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröpil, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberger, C. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knoefel, W. T.</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of Early and Delayed Esophageal Perforation</title><title>Indian journal of surgery</title><description>Esophageal perforations are life threatening emergencies associated with high morbidity and mortality. We report on 22 consecutive patients (age 20–86; 13 female and 9 male) with an oesophageal perforation treated at the university hospital Duesseldorf. The patients' charts were reviewed and follow-up was completed for all patients until demission, healed reconstruction or death. Patients' history, clinical presentation, time interval to surgical presentation, and treatment modality were recorded and correlated with patients' outcome. Six esophageal perforations were due to a Boerhaave-syndrome, eleven caused by endoscopic perforation, two after osteosynthesis of the cervical spine and three foreign body induced. In 7 patients a primary local suture was performed, in 4 cases a supplemental muscle flap was interposed, and 7 patients underwent an oesophageal resection. Four patients were treated without surgery (three esophageal stent implantations, one conservative treatment). Eleven patients (50 %) were presented within 24 h of perforation, and 11 patients (50 %) afterwards. Time delay correlates with survival. In 17 (80.9 %) cases a surgical sufficient reconstruction could be achieved. One (4.7 %) patient is waiting for reconstruction after esophagectomy. Four (18.2 %) patients died. A small subset of patients can be treated conservatively by stenting of the Esophagus, if the patient presents early. In the majority of patients a primary repair (muscle flap etc.) can be performed with good prognosis. If the patient presents delayed with extensive necrosis or mediastinitis, oesophagectomy and secondary repair is the only treatment option with high mortality.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>0972-2068</issn><issn>0973-9793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqlj8uKwjAYhYM4eJt5gNnlBaJ_Lm0nm9loxaUL9-HXptohbUpShc7TW8SNaxeHc-CDDw4h3xyWHCBbRS5EKhjwIYnU7H9EZqAzyXSm5fixBROQ_kzJPMY_AKFSKSdkKpRKEw5qRpJDsNjVtumoL2mOwfUUm4JurMPeFjSPvr3g2aKjextKH7CrfPNJPkp00X49e0F-t_lhvWPt9Vjb4jToAjrThqrG0BuPlXklTXUxZ38zUg8_EiXfFtwBbxJUaQ</recordid><startdate>20120612</startdate><enddate>20120612</enddate><creator>Kroepil, F.</creator><creator>Schauer, M.</creator><creator>Raffel, A. M.</creator><creator>Kröpil, P.</creator><creator>Eisenberger, C. F.</creator><creator>Knoefel, W. T.</creator><general>Springer India</general><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120612</creationdate><title>Treatment of Early and Delayed Esophageal Perforation</title><author>Kroepil, F. ; Schauer, M. ; Raffel, A. M. ; Kröpil, P. ; Eisenberger, C. F. ; Knoefel, W. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_39007543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kroepil, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schauer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffel, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröpil, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberger, C. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knoefel, W. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kroepil, F.</au><au>Schauer, M.</au><au>Raffel, A. M.</au><au>Kröpil, P.</au><au>Eisenberger, C. F.</au><au>Knoefel, W. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of Early and Delayed Esophageal Perforation</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of surgery</jtitle><date>2012-06-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>469</spage><epage>472</epage><pages>469-472</pages><issn>0972-2068</issn><eissn>0973-9793</eissn><abstract>Esophageal perforations are life threatening emergencies associated with high morbidity and mortality. We report on 22 consecutive patients (age 20–86; 13 female and 9 male) with an oesophageal perforation treated at the university hospital Duesseldorf. The patients' charts were reviewed and follow-up was completed for all patients until demission, healed reconstruction or death. Patients' history, clinical presentation, time interval to surgical presentation, and treatment modality were recorded and correlated with patients' outcome. Six esophageal perforations were due to a Boerhaave-syndrome, eleven caused by endoscopic perforation, two after osteosynthesis of the cervical spine and three foreign body induced. In 7 patients a primary local suture was performed, in 4 cases a supplemental muscle flap was interposed, and 7 patients underwent an oesophageal resection. Four patients were treated without surgery (three esophageal stent implantations, one conservative treatment). Eleven patients (50 %) were presented within 24 h of perforation, and 11 patients (50 %) afterwards. Time delay correlates with survival. In 17 (80.9 %) cases a surgical sufficient reconstruction could be achieved. One (4.7 %) patient is waiting for reconstruction after esophagectomy. Four (18.2 %) patients died. A small subset of patients can be treated conservatively by stenting of the Esophagus, if the patient presents early. In the majority of patients a primary repair (muscle flap etc.) can be performed with good prognosis. If the patient presents delayed with extensive necrosis or mediastinitis, oesophagectomy and secondary repair is the only treatment option with high mortality.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>24465104</pmid><pmid>24426651</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12262-012-0539-z</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-2068
ispartof Indian journal of surgery, 2012-06, Vol.75 (6), p.469-472
issn 0972-2068
0973-9793
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3900754
source Springer Nature; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Treatment of Early and Delayed Esophageal Perforation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T03%3A48%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20Early%20and%20Delayed%20Esophageal%20Perforation&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Kroepil,%20F.&rft.date=2012-06-12&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=469&rft.epage=472&rft.pages=469-472&rft.issn=0972-2068&rft.eissn=0973-9793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12262-012-0539-z&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3900754%3C/pubmedcentral%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_39007543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/24465104&rfr_iscdi=true