Loading…
Treatment of Early and Delayed Esophageal Perforation
Esophageal perforations are life threatening emergencies associated with high morbidity and mortality. We report on 22 consecutive patients (age 20–86; 13 female and 9 male) with an oesophageal perforation treated at the university hospital Duesseldorf. The patients' charts were reviewed and fo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Indian journal of surgery 2012-06, Vol.75 (6), p.469-472 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 472 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 469 |
container_title | Indian journal of surgery |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Kroepil, F. Schauer, M. Raffel, A. M. Kröpil, P. Eisenberger, C. F. Knoefel, W. T. |
description | Esophageal perforations are life threatening emergencies associated with high morbidity and mortality. We report on 22 consecutive patients (age 20–86; 13 female and 9 male) with an oesophageal perforation treated at the university hospital Duesseldorf. The patients' charts were reviewed and follow-up was completed for all patients until demission, healed reconstruction or death. Patients' history, clinical presentation, time interval to surgical presentation, and treatment modality were recorded and correlated with patients' outcome. Six esophageal perforations were due to a Boerhaave-syndrome, eleven caused by endoscopic perforation, two after osteosynthesis of the cervical spine and three foreign body induced. In 7 patients a primary local suture was performed, in 4 cases a supplemental muscle flap was interposed, and 7 patients underwent an oesophageal resection. Four patients were treated without surgery (three esophageal stent implantations, one conservative treatment). Eleven patients (50 %) were presented within 24 h of perforation, and 11 patients (50 %) afterwards. Time delay correlates with survival. In 17 (80.9 %) cases a surgical sufficient reconstruction could be achieved. One (4.7 %) patient is waiting for reconstruction after esophagectomy. Four (18.2 %) patients died. A small subset of patients can be treated conservatively by stenting of the Esophagus, if the patient presents early. In the majority of patients a primary repair (muscle flap etc.) can be performed with good prognosis. If the patient presents delayed with extensive necrosis or mediastinitis, oesophagectomy and secondary repair is the only treatment option with high mortality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12262-012-0539-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3900754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3900754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_39007543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlj8uKwjAYhYM4eJt5gNnlBaJ_Lm0nm9loxaUL9-HXptohbUpShc7TW8SNaxeHc-CDDw4h3xyWHCBbRS5EKhjwIYnU7H9EZqAzyXSm5fixBROQ_kzJPMY_AKFSKSdkKpRKEw5qRpJDsNjVtumoL2mOwfUUm4JurMPeFjSPvr3g2aKjextKH7CrfPNJPkp00X49e0F-t_lhvWPt9Vjb4jToAjrThqrG0BuPlXklTXUxZ38zUg8_EiXfFtwBbxJUaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of Early and Delayed Esophageal Perforation</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kroepil, F. ; Schauer, M. ; Raffel, A. M. ; Kröpil, P. ; Eisenberger, C. F. ; Knoefel, W. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kroepil, F. ; Schauer, M. ; Raffel, A. M. ; Kröpil, P. ; Eisenberger, C. F. ; Knoefel, W. T.</creatorcontrib><description>Esophageal perforations are life threatening emergencies associated with high morbidity and mortality. We report on 22 consecutive patients (age 20–86; 13 female and 9 male) with an oesophageal perforation treated at the university hospital Duesseldorf. The patients' charts were reviewed and follow-up was completed for all patients until demission, healed reconstruction or death. Patients' history, clinical presentation, time interval to surgical presentation, and treatment modality were recorded and correlated with patients' outcome. Six esophageal perforations were due to a Boerhaave-syndrome, eleven caused by endoscopic perforation, two after osteosynthesis of the cervical spine and three foreign body induced. In 7 patients a primary local suture was performed, in 4 cases a supplemental muscle flap was interposed, and 7 patients underwent an oesophageal resection. Four patients were treated without surgery (three esophageal stent implantations, one conservative treatment). Eleven patients (50 %) were presented within 24 h of perforation, and 11 patients (50 %) afterwards. Time delay correlates with survival. In 17 (80.9 %) cases a surgical sufficient reconstruction could be achieved. One (4.7 %) patient is waiting for reconstruction after esophagectomy. Four (18.2 %) patients died. A small subset of patients can be treated conservatively by stenting of the Esophagus, if the patient presents early. In the majority of patients a primary repair (muscle flap etc.) can be performed with good prognosis. If the patient presents delayed with extensive necrosis or mediastinitis, oesophagectomy and secondary repair is the only treatment option with high mortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-2068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-9793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12262-012-0539-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24465104</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24426651</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Springer India</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of surgery, 2012-06, Vol.75 (6), p.469-472</ispartof><rights>Association of Surgeons of India 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3900754/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3900754/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kroepil, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schauer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffel, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröpil, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberger, C. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knoefel, W. T.</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of Early and Delayed Esophageal Perforation</title><title>Indian journal of surgery</title><description>Esophageal perforations are life threatening emergencies associated with high morbidity and mortality. We report on 22 consecutive patients (age 20–86; 13 female and 9 male) with an oesophageal perforation treated at the university hospital Duesseldorf. The patients' charts were reviewed and follow-up was completed for all patients until demission, healed reconstruction or death. Patients' history, clinical presentation, time interval to surgical presentation, and treatment modality were recorded and correlated with patients' outcome. Six esophageal perforations were due to a Boerhaave-syndrome, eleven caused by endoscopic perforation, two after osteosynthesis of the cervical spine and three foreign body induced. In 7 patients a primary local suture was performed, in 4 cases a supplemental muscle flap was interposed, and 7 patients underwent an oesophageal resection. Four patients were treated without surgery (three esophageal stent implantations, one conservative treatment). Eleven patients (50 %) were presented within 24 h of perforation, and 11 patients (50 %) afterwards. Time delay correlates with survival. In 17 (80.9 %) cases a surgical sufficient reconstruction could be achieved. One (4.7 %) patient is waiting for reconstruction after esophagectomy. Four (18.2 %) patients died. A small subset of patients can be treated conservatively by stenting of the Esophagus, if the patient presents early. In the majority of patients a primary repair (muscle flap etc.) can be performed with good prognosis. If the patient presents delayed with extensive necrosis or mediastinitis, oesophagectomy and secondary repair is the only treatment option with high mortality.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>0972-2068</issn><issn>0973-9793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqlj8uKwjAYhYM4eJt5gNnlBaJ_Lm0nm9loxaUL9-HXptohbUpShc7TW8SNaxeHc-CDDw4h3xyWHCBbRS5EKhjwIYnU7H9EZqAzyXSm5fixBROQ_kzJPMY_AKFSKSdkKpRKEw5qRpJDsNjVtumoL2mOwfUUm4JurMPeFjSPvr3g2aKjextKH7CrfPNJPkp00X49e0F-t_lhvWPt9Vjb4jToAjrThqrG0BuPlXklTXUxZ38zUg8_EiXfFtwBbxJUaQ</recordid><startdate>20120612</startdate><enddate>20120612</enddate><creator>Kroepil, F.</creator><creator>Schauer, M.</creator><creator>Raffel, A. M.</creator><creator>Kröpil, P.</creator><creator>Eisenberger, C. F.</creator><creator>Knoefel, W. T.</creator><general>Springer India</general><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120612</creationdate><title>Treatment of Early and Delayed Esophageal Perforation</title><author>Kroepil, F. ; Schauer, M. ; Raffel, A. M. ; Kröpil, P. ; Eisenberger, C. F. ; Knoefel, W. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_39007543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kroepil, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schauer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffel, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröpil, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberger, C. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knoefel, W. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kroepil, F.</au><au>Schauer, M.</au><au>Raffel, A. M.</au><au>Kröpil, P.</au><au>Eisenberger, C. F.</au><au>Knoefel, W. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of Early and Delayed Esophageal Perforation</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of surgery</jtitle><date>2012-06-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>469</spage><epage>472</epage><pages>469-472</pages><issn>0972-2068</issn><eissn>0973-9793</eissn><abstract>Esophageal perforations are life threatening emergencies associated with high morbidity and mortality. We report on 22 consecutive patients (age 20–86; 13 female and 9 male) with an oesophageal perforation treated at the university hospital Duesseldorf. The patients' charts were reviewed and follow-up was completed for all patients until demission, healed reconstruction or death. Patients' history, clinical presentation, time interval to surgical presentation, and treatment modality were recorded and correlated with patients' outcome. Six esophageal perforations were due to a Boerhaave-syndrome, eleven caused by endoscopic perforation, two after osteosynthesis of the cervical spine and three foreign body induced. In 7 patients a primary local suture was performed, in 4 cases a supplemental muscle flap was interposed, and 7 patients underwent an oesophageal resection. Four patients were treated without surgery (three esophageal stent implantations, one conservative treatment). Eleven patients (50 %) were presented within 24 h of perforation, and 11 patients (50 %) afterwards. Time delay correlates with survival. In 17 (80.9 %) cases a surgical sufficient reconstruction could be achieved. One (4.7 %) patient is waiting for reconstruction after esophagectomy. Four (18.2 %) patients died. A small subset of patients can be treated conservatively by stenting of the Esophagus, if the patient presents early. In the majority of patients a primary repair (muscle flap etc.) can be performed with good prognosis. If the patient presents delayed with extensive necrosis or mediastinitis, oesophagectomy and secondary repair is the only treatment option with high mortality.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>24465104</pmid><pmid>24426651</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12262-012-0539-z</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0972-2068 |
ispartof | Indian journal of surgery, 2012-06, Vol.75 (6), p.469-472 |
issn | 0972-2068 0973-9793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3900754 |
source | Springer Nature; PubMed Central |
subjects | Original |
title | Treatment of Early and Delayed Esophageal Perforation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T03%3A48%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20Early%20and%20Delayed%20Esophageal%20Perforation&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Kroepil,%20F.&rft.date=2012-06-12&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=469&rft.epage=472&rft.pages=469-472&rft.issn=0972-2068&rft.eissn=0973-9793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12262-012-0539-z&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3900754%3C/pubmedcentral%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_39007543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/24465104&rfr_iscdi=true |