Loading…

A comparative cytogenetic study of miscarriages after IVF and natural conception in women aged under and over 35 years

Purpose To compare the frequency and the spectrum of karyotype abnormality in the first trimester miscarriages in women aged under and over 35 years, who conceived naturally (NC) and who conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods Comparative analysis of cytogenetic data obtained by kary...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2014-02, Vol.31 (2), p.149-155
Main Authors: Pendina, Anna A., Efimova, Olga A., Chiryaeva, Olga G., Tikhonov, Andrei V., Petrova, Lubov’ I., Dudkina, Vera S., Sadik, Natalia A., Fedorova, Irina D., Galembo, Ilona A., Kuznetzova, Tatyana V., Gzgzyan, Alexander M., Baranov, Vladislav S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-7527f4e848ccc064b55a592fb60ad45df73b4d200f57fc9ce000c9286e3bfaaf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-7527f4e848ccc064b55a592fb60ad45df73b4d200f57fc9ce000c9286e3bfaaf3
container_end_page 155
container_issue 2
container_start_page 149
container_title Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
container_volume 31
creator Pendina, Anna A.
Efimova, Olga A.
Chiryaeva, Olga G.
Tikhonov, Andrei V.
Petrova, Lubov’ I.
Dudkina, Vera S.
Sadik, Natalia A.
Fedorova, Irina D.
Galembo, Ilona A.
Kuznetzova, Tatyana V.
Gzgzyan, Alexander M.
Baranov, Vladislav S.
description Purpose To compare the frequency and the spectrum of karyotype abnormality in the first trimester miscarriages in women aged under and over 35 years, who conceived naturally (NC) and who conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods Comparative analysis of cytogenetic data obtained by karyotyping of miscarriages in patients who conceived naturally, and who conceived through IVF. Patients were subcategorized by their age:
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10815-013-0148-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3933595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1502326394</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-7527f4e848ccc064b55a592fb60ad45df73b4d200f57fc9ce000c9286e3bfaaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt1qFTEQx4NY7Ic-gDcS8Mabtfnc7N4IpdhaKPRGvQ3Z7OSYcjY5JtlTztv0WXwys5xaqlDwImRgfvPPzOSP0FtKPlJC1GmmpKOyIZTXI7qGvkBHVCreKM7JyxoT2TVEtN0hOs75lhDSd4y_QodMcMa4EEfo7gzbOG1MMsVvAdtdiSsIULzFuczjDkeHJ5-tScmbFWRsXIGEr75fYBNGHEyZk1lXjWBhU3wM2Ad8FycIuOIjnsNY8QWN2xpw-et-Bybl1-jAmXWGNw_3Cfp28fnr-Zfm-uby6vzsurF1jtIoyZQT0InOWktaMUhpZM_c0BIzCjk6xQcxMkKcVM72FuqMtmddC3xwxjh-gj7tdTfzMMFoIZTar94kP5m009F4_Xcm-B96Fbea95zLXlaBDw8CKf6cIRe9rAPWaxMgzllTyUXHlCL8P1DCOGt5Lyr6_h_0Ns4p1E0sFJVC9a2qFN1TNsWcE7jHvinRiwP03gG6OkAvDtC01rx7OvBjxZ8vrwDbA7mmwgrSk6efVf0NlPC9qA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1501547967</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative cytogenetic study of miscarriages after IVF and natural conception in women aged under and over 35 years</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Pendina, Anna A. ; Efimova, Olga A. ; Chiryaeva, Olga G. ; Tikhonov, Andrei V. ; Petrova, Lubov’ I. ; Dudkina, Vera S. ; Sadik, Natalia A. ; Fedorova, Irina D. ; Galembo, Ilona A. ; Kuznetzova, Tatyana V. ; Gzgzyan, Alexander M. ; Baranov, Vladislav S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pendina, Anna A. ; Efimova, Olga A. ; Chiryaeva, Olga G. ; Tikhonov, Andrei V. ; Petrova, Lubov’ I. ; Dudkina, Vera S. ; Sadik, Natalia A. ; Fedorova, Irina D. ; Galembo, Ilona A. ; Kuznetzova, Tatyana V. ; Gzgzyan, Alexander M. ; Baranov, Vladislav S.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To compare the frequency and the spectrum of karyotype abnormality in the first trimester miscarriages in women aged under and over 35 years, who conceived naturally (NC) and who conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods Comparative analysis of cytogenetic data obtained by karyotyping of miscarriages in patients who conceived naturally, and who conceived through IVF. Patients were subcategorized by their age: &lt;35 years (NC, n  = 173; IVF, n  = 108) and ≥35 years (NC, n  = 107; IVF, n  = 111). Results A total of 499 miscarriage karyotypes was analyzed. The spectrum and the relative proportions of different cytogenetic categories in karyotypically abnormal miscarriages differed neither between the NC and IVF patients aged &lt;35 years, nor between the NC and IVF patients aged ≥35 years. In the patients aged &lt;35 years, the incidence of abnormal miscarriage karyotype was lower in the IVF group (37.04 % vs 62.43 %). In the patients aged ≥35 years, the incidence of miscarriages with cytogenetic pathology did not differ between the NC and the IVF group (75.70 % vs 58.56 %). The lowest frequency of karyotypically abnormal miscarriages (29.82 %) was detected in the young IVF-treated patients at &lt;7 weeks of gestation. Conclusions IVF does not increase the risk of a pregnancy loss because of abnormal embryonic karyotype, nor does it increase the preponderance for any specific type of cytogenetic abnormality in both patients aged under and over 35 years. In young IVF-treated women early pregnancy loss is generally caused by non-cytogenetic factors. Identification of a cytogenetically normal spontaneous abortion is clinically significant and reinforces the importance of developing an appropriate diagnosis and treatment strategies for IVF patients in order to reduce the risk of euploid pregnancy loss.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-0148-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24322344</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - genetics ; Adult ; Age ; Chromosomes ; Cytogenetic Analysis ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - adverse effects ; Genetics ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; In vitro fertilization ; Karyotyping ; Maternal Age ; Medical diagnosis ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Miscarriage ; Obstetrics ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; Reproductive Medicine ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2014-02, Vol.31 (2), p.149-155</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-7527f4e848ccc064b55a592fb60ad45df73b4d200f57fc9ce000c9286e3bfaaf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-7527f4e848ccc064b55a592fb60ad45df73b4d200f57fc9ce000c9286e3bfaaf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933595/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933595/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24322344$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pendina, Anna A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Efimova, Olga A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiryaeva, Olga G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tikhonov, Andrei V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrova, Lubov’ I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudkina, Vera S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadik, Natalia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedorova, Irina D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galembo, Ilona A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuznetzova, Tatyana V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gzgzyan, Alexander M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranov, Vladislav S.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative cytogenetic study of miscarriages after IVF and natural conception in women aged under and over 35 years</title><title>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</title><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><description>Purpose To compare the frequency and the spectrum of karyotype abnormality in the first trimester miscarriages in women aged under and over 35 years, who conceived naturally (NC) and who conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods Comparative analysis of cytogenetic data obtained by karyotyping of miscarriages in patients who conceived naturally, and who conceived through IVF. Patients were subcategorized by their age: &lt;35 years (NC, n  = 173; IVF, n  = 108) and ≥35 years (NC, n  = 107; IVF, n  = 111). Results A total of 499 miscarriage karyotypes was analyzed. The spectrum and the relative proportions of different cytogenetic categories in karyotypically abnormal miscarriages differed neither between the NC and IVF patients aged &lt;35 years, nor between the NC and IVF patients aged ≥35 years. In the patients aged &lt;35 years, the incidence of abnormal miscarriage karyotype was lower in the IVF group (37.04 % vs 62.43 %). In the patients aged ≥35 years, the incidence of miscarriages with cytogenetic pathology did not differ between the NC and the IVF group (75.70 % vs 58.56 %). The lowest frequency of karyotypically abnormal miscarriages (29.82 %) was detected in the young IVF-treated patients at &lt;7 weeks of gestation. Conclusions IVF does not increase the risk of a pregnancy loss because of abnormal embryonic karyotype, nor does it increase the preponderance for any specific type of cytogenetic abnormality in both patients aged under and over 35 years. In young IVF-treated women early pregnancy loss is generally caused by non-cytogenetic factors. Identification of a cytogenetically normal spontaneous abortion is clinically significant and reinforces the importance of developing an appropriate diagnosis and treatment strategies for IVF patients in order to reduce the risk of euploid pregnancy loss.</description><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - genetics</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Cytogenetic Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - adverse effects</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In vitro fertilization</subject><subject>Karyotyping</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscarriage</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, First</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1058-0468</issn><issn>1573-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkt1qFTEQx4NY7Ic-gDcS8Mabtfnc7N4IpdhaKPRGvQ3Z7OSYcjY5JtlTztv0WXwys5xaqlDwImRgfvPPzOSP0FtKPlJC1GmmpKOyIZTXI7qGvkBHVCreKM7JyxoT2TVEtN0hOs75lhDSd4y_QodMcMa4EEfo7gzbOG1MMsVvAdtdiSsIULzFuczjDkeHJ5-tScmbFWRsXIGEr75fYBNGHEyZk1lXjWBhU3wM2Ad8FycIuOIjnsNY8QWN2xpw-et-Bybl1-jAmXWGNw_3Cfp28fnr-Zfm-uby6vzsurF1jtIoyZQT0InOWktaMUhpZM_c0BIzCjk6xQcxMkKcVM72FuqMtmddC3xwxjh-gj7tdTfzMMFoIZTar94kP5m009F4_Xcm-B96Fbea95zLXlaBDw8CKf6cIRe9rAPWaxMgzllTyUXHlCL8P1DCOGt5Lyr6_h_0Ns4p1E0sFJVC9a2qFN1TNsWcE7jHvinRiwP03gG6OkAvDtC01rx7OvBjxZ8vrwDbA7mmwgrSk6efVf0NlPC9qA</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Pendina, Anna A.</creator><creator>Efimova, Olga A.</creator><creator>Chiryaeva, Olga G.</creator><creator>Tikhonov, Andrei V.</creator><creator>Petrova, Lubov’ I.</creator><creator>Dudkina, Vera S.</creator><creator>Sadik, Natalia A.</creator><creator>Fedorova, Irina D.</creator><creator>Galembo, Ilona A.</creator><creator>Kuznetzova, Tatyana V.</creator><creator>Gzgzyan, Alexander M.</creator><creator>Baranov, Vladislav S.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>A comparative cytogenetic study of miscarriages after IVF and natural conception in women aged under and over 35 years</title><author>Pendina, Anna A. ; Efimova, Olga A. ; Chiryaeva, Olga G. ; Tikhonov, Andrei V. ; Petrova, Lubov’ I. ; Dudkina, Vera S. ; Sadik, Natalia A. ; Fedorova, Irina D. ; Galembo, Ilona A. ; Kuznetzova, Tatyana V. ; Gzgzyan, Alexander M. ; Baranov, Vladislav S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-7527f4e848ccc064b55a592fb60ad45df73b4d200f57fc9ce000c9286e3bfaaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Spontaneous - genetics</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Cytogenetic Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - adverse effects</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In vitro fertilization</topic><topic>Karyotyping</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscarriage</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, First</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pendina, Anna A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Efimova, Olga A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiryaeva, Olga G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tikhonov, Andrei V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrova, Lubov’ I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudkina, Vera S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadik, Natalia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedorova, Irina D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galembo, Ilona A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuznetzova, Tatyana V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gzgzyan, Alexander M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranov, Vladislav S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pendina, Anna A.</au><au>Efimova, Olga A.</au><au>Chiryaeva, Olga G.</au><au>Tikhonov, Andrei V.</au><au>Petrova, Lubov’ I.</au><au>Dudkina, Vera S.</au><au>Sadik, Natalia A.</au><au>Fedorova, Irina D.</au><au>Galembo, Ilona A.</au><au>Kuznetzova, Tatyana V.</au><au>Gzgzyan, Alexander M.</au><au>Baranov, Vladislav S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative cytogenetic study of miscarriages after IVF and natural conception in women aged under and over 35 years</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle><stitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</stitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>149-155</pages><issn>1058-0468</issn><eissn>1573-7330</eissn><abstract>Purpose To compare the frequency and the spectrum of karyotype abnormality in the first trimester miscarriages in women aged under and over 35 years, who conceived naturally (NC) and who conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods Comparative analysis of cytogenetic data obtained by karyotyping of miscarriages in patients who conceived naturally, and who conceived through IVF. Patients were subcategorized by their age: &lt;35 years (NC, n  = 173; IVF, n  = 108) and ≥35 years (NC, n  = 107; IVF, n  = 111). Results A total of 499 miscarriage karyotypes was analyzed. The spectrum and the relative proportions of different cytogenetic categories in karyotypically abnormal miscarriages differed neither between the NC and IVF patients aged &lt;35 years, nor between the NC and IVF patients aged ≥35 years. In the patients aged &lt;35 years, the incidence of abnormal miscarriage karyotype was lower in the IVF group (37.04 % vs 62.43 %). In the patients aged ≥35 years, the incidence of miscarriages with cytogenetic pathology did not differ between the NC and the IVF group (75.70 % vs 58.56 %). The lowest frequency of karyotypically abnormal miscarriages (29.82 %) was detected in the young IVF-treated patients at &lt;7 weeks of gestation. Conclusions IVF does not increase the risk of a pregnancy loss because of abnormal embryonic karyotype, nor does it increase the preponderance for any specific type of cytogenetic abnormality in both patients aged under and over 35 years. In young IVF-treated women early pregnancy loss is generally caused by non-cytogenetic factors. Identification of a cytogenetically normal spontaneous abortion is clinically significant and reinforces the importance of developing an appropriate diagnosis and treatment strategies for IVF patients in order to reduce the risk of euploid pregnancy loss.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>24322344</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10815-013-0148-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-0468
ispartof Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2014-02, Vol.31 (2), p.149-155
issn 1058-0468
1573-7330
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3933595
source PubMed Central Free; Springer Nature
subjects Abortion, Spontaneous - genetics
Adult
Age
Chromosomes
Cytogenetic Analysis
Female
Fertilization in Vitro - adverse effects
Genetics
Gynecology
Human Genetics
Humans
In vitro fertilization
Karyotyping
Maternal Age
Medical diagnosis
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Miscarriage
Obstetrics
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, First
Reproductive Medicine
Ultrasonic imaging
Womens health
Young Adult
title A comparative cytogenetic study of miscarriages after IVF and natural conception in women aged under and over 35 years
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A40%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20cytogenetic%20study%20of%20miscarriages%20after%20IVF%20and%20natural%20conception%20in%20women%20aged%20under%20and%20over%2035%C2%A0years&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assisted%20reproduction%20and%20genetics&rft.au=Pendina,%20Anna%20A.&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=149-155&rft.issn=1058-0468&rft.eissn=1573-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10815-013-0148-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1502326394%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-7527f4e848ccc064b55a592fb60ad45df73b4d200f57fc9ce000c9286e3bfaaf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1501547967&rft_id=info:pmid/24322344&rfr_iscdi=true