Loading…

Novel serological neo‐epitope markers of extracellular matrix proteins for the detection of portal hypertension

Summary Background The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is an invasive, but important diagnostic and prognostic marker in cirrhosis with portal hypertension (PHT). During cirrhosis, remodelling of fibrotic tissue by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) is a permanent process generating small frag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2013-11, Vol.38 (9), p.1086-1096
Main Authors: Leeming, D. J., Karsdal, M. A., Byrjalsen, I., Bendtsen, F., Trebicka, J., Nielsen, M. J., Christiansen, C., Møller, S., Krag, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Background The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is an invasive, but important diagnostic and prognostic marker in cirrhosis with portal hypertension (PHT). During cirrhosis, remodelling of fibrotic tissue by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) is a permanent process generating small fragments of degraded extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins known as neoepitopes, which are then released into the circulation. Aim To investigate their potential as plasma markers for detection of PHT. Methods Ninety‐four patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and 20 liver‐healthy controls were included. Clinical and laboratory data of the patients were collected. All patients received HVPG measurement with blood sampling. In these samples, the following degradation or formation markers were measured: C1M (type I‐collagen), C3M and PRO‐C3 (type III collagen), C4M and P4NP 7S (type IV collagen), C5M (type V collagen), C6M (type VI collagen), BGM (biglycan), ELM (elastin), CRPM (CRP). Results All ECM markers except for CRPM correlated significantly with HVPG. Interestingly, C4M, C5M and ELM levels were significantly higher in patients with HVPG >10 mmHg. Multiple regression analysis identified PRO‐C3, C6M and ELM as significant determinants, while the models A and B including PRO‐C3, ELM, C6M and model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) provided better description of PHT (r = 0.75, P 100 for having clinical significant PHT. Conclusions These novel non‐invasive extracellular matrix markers reflect the degree of liver dysfunction. The different degrees of portal hypertension correlated with these circulating neoepitopes. Using a single blood sample, these neoepitopes in combination with MELD detect the level of portal hypertension.
ISSN:0269-2813
1365-2036
DOI:10.1111/apt.12484