Differentiation between low- and high-efficacy CB1 receptor agonists using a drug discrimination protocol for rats

• Published in: Psychopharmacology 2014-02, Vol.231 (3), p.489-500
• Main Authors: Järbe, Torbjörn U. C., LeMay, Brian J., Halikhedkar, Aneetha, Wood, JodiAnne, Vadivel, Subramanian K., Zvonok, Alexander, Makriyannis, Alexandros
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Arachidonic Acids - pharmacology; Benzoxazines - pharmacology; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Cyclic AMP - chemistry; Cyclohexanols - chemistry; Cyclohexanols - pharmacology; Discrimination, Psychological - drug effects; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dronabinol - chemistry; Dronabinol - pharmacology; Indoles - chemistry; Indoles - pharmacology; Isomerism; Male; Molecular Structure; Morpholines - pharmacology; Naphthalenes - pharmacology; Neurosciences; Original Investigation; Pharmacology/Toxicology; Piperidines - chemistry; Piperidines - pharmacology; Psychiatry; Pyrazoles - pharmacology; Random Allocation; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1 - agonists; Rimonabant
• ISSN: 0033-3158; 1432-2072
• DOI: 10.1007/s00213-013-3257-8

Rationale The “subjective high” from marijuana ingestion is likely due to Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) activating the central cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB 1 R) of the endocannabinoid signaling system. THC is a weak partial agonist according to in vitro assays, yet THC mimics the behavioral effects induced by more efficacious cannabinergics. This distinction may be important for understanding similarities and differences in the dose–effect spectra produced by marijuana/THC and designer cannabimimetics (“synthetic marijuana”). Objective We evaluated if drug discrimination is able to functionally detect/differentiate between a full, high-efficacy CB 1 R agonist [(±)AM5983] and the low-efficacy agonist THC in vivo. Materials and methods Rats were trained to discriminate between four different doses of AM5983 (0.10 to 0.56 mg/kg), and vehicle and dose generalization curves were determined for both ligands at all four training doses of AM5983. The high-efficacy WIN55,212-2 and the lower-efficacy ( R )-(+)-methanandamide were examined at some AM5983 training conditions. Antagonism tests involved rimonabant and WIN55,212-2 and AM5983. The separate ( S )- and ( R )-isomers of (±)AM5983 were tested at one AM5983 training dose (0.30 mg/kg). The in vitro cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) assay examined AM5983 and the known CB 1 R agonist CP55,940. Results Dose generalization ed 50 values increased as a function of the training dose of AM5983, but more so for the partial agonists. The order of potency was ( R )-isomer > (±)AM5983 > ( S )-isomer and AM5983 > WIN55,212-2 ≥ THC > ( R )-(+)-methanandamide. Surmountable antagonism of AM5983 and WIN55,212-2 occurred with rimonabant. The cAMP assay confirmed the cannabinergic nature of AM5983 and CP55,940. Conclusions Drug discrimination using different training doses of a high-efficacy, full CB 1 R agonist differentiated between low- and high-efficacy CB 1 R agonists.