Loading…

A Retrospective Trial Comparing the Effects of Different Anesthetic Techniques on Phantom Pain After Lower Limb Amputation

Abstract Background Pain and other sensations from an amputated or absent limb, called phantom pain and phantom sensations, are well-known phenomena. Objective The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effects of anesthetic techniques on phantom pain, phantom sensations, and stump pain...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current therapeutic research 2011-06, Vol.72 (3), p.127-137
Main Authors: Sahin, Sevtap Hekimoglu, MD, Colak, Alkin, MD, Arar, Cavidan, MD, Tutunculer, Ebru, MD, Sut, Necdet, PhD, Yılmaz, Barış, MD, Birtane, Murat, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Pain and other sensations from an amputated or absent limb, called phantom pain and phantom sensations, are well-known phenomena. Objective The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effects of anesthetic techniques on phantom pain, phantom sensations, and stump pain after lower limb amputation. Methods Ninety-two patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to III were analyzed for 1 to 24 months after lower limb amputation in this retrospective study. Patients received general, spinal, or epidural anesthesia or peripheral nerve block for their amputations. Standardized questions were used to assess phantom limb pain, phantom sensation, and stump pain postoperatively. Pain intensity was assessed on a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10. Patients' medical histories were determined from hospital records. Results Patients who received epidural anesthesia and peripheral nerve block perceived significantly less pain in the week after surgery compared with patients who received general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia (NRS [SD] values, 2.68 [1.0] and 2.70 [1.0], respectively). After approximately 14 to 17 months, there was no difference in phantom limb pain, phantom sensation, or stump pain among the anesthetic techniques for amputation. Conclusions In patients undergoing lower limb amputation, performing epidural anesthesia or peripheral nerve block, instead of general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia, might attenuate phantom and stump pain in the first week after operation. Anesthetic technique might not have an effect on phantom limb pain, phantom sensation, or stump pain at 14 to 17 months after lower limb amputation.
ISSN:0011-393X
1879-0313
DOI:10.1016/j.curtheres.2011.06.001