Loading…
Can a questionnaire predict vitamin D status in postmenopausal women?
Our objective was to determine whether a questionnaire can identify individuals with vitamin D insufficiency (VDI). Women completed the Vitamin D & Sun (VIDSUN) questionnaire and we measured their serum 25-hydrocyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the ques...
Saved in:
Published in: | Public health nutrition 2014-04, Vol.17 (4), p.739-746 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-a32ae3528cb4c0b667f6128e33caf6926cd83d904484f254395637447159f9663 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-a32ae3528cb4c0b667f6128e33caf6926cd83d904484f254395637447159f9663 |
container_end_page | 746 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 739 |
container_title | Public health nutrition |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Nabak, Andrea C Johnson, Rachael Erin Keuler, Nicholas S Hansen, Karen E |
description | Our objective was to determine whether a questionnaire can identify individuals with vitamin D insufficiency (VDI).
Women completed the Vitamin D & Sun (VIDSUN) questionnaire and we measured their serum 25-hydrocyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire to identify VDI (25(OH)D level |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1368980013001973 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3976225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1368980013001973</cupid><sourcerecordid>1534842531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-a32ae3528cb4c0b667f6128e33caf6926cd83d904484f254395637447159f9663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVtrFTEQx0NR7M0P0BdZkEJftuZ-ebGUY7VCwQfb5zAnm60pu8ma7Fb89qb2tFZF8CFkhvnNf24IHRB8TDBRbz4TJrXRGBNWn1FsC-0QrkRLFVXPql3D7V18G-2WcoMxFkqpF2ibMq2wwGwHna0gNtB8XXyZQ4oRQvbNlH0X3NzchhnGEJt3TZlhXkpT7SmVefQxTbAUGJpvqTon--h5D0PxLzf_Hrp6f3a5Om8vPn34uDq9aJ3EeG6BUfBMUO3W3OG1lKqXhGrPmINeGipdp1lnMOea91RwZoRkinNFhOmNlGwPvb3XnZb16Dvn45xhsFMOI-TvNkGwv0di-GKv061lRklKRRU42gjk9HNmO4bi_DBA9GkplghWa1eQ_AeKORFEGl3R13-gN2nJsW6iUpQQYrBmlSL3lMuplOz7x74Jtnf3tH_ds-a8ejrwY8bDAStwuAGgOBj6DNGF8ovTvG5eqsqxTXEY1zl01_5Jj_8s_wNxGbUY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1521119083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can a questionnaire predict vitamin D status in postmenopausal women?</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Nabak, Andrea C ; Johnson, Rachael Erin ; Keuler, Nicholas S ; Hansen, Karen E</creator><creatorcontrib>Nabak, Andrea C ; Johnson, Rachael Erin ; Keuler, Nicholas S ; Hansen, Karen E</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Our objective was to determine whether a questionnaire can identify individuals with vitamin D insufficiency (VDI).
Women completed the Vitamin D & Sun (VIDSUN) questionnaire and we measured their serum 25-hydrocyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire to identify VDI (25(OH)D level <50 nmol/l).
Clinical Research Unit, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Postmenopausal women.
We recruited 609 postmenopausal women with a mean age of 61 (sd 6 years), of whom 113 (19%) had VDI. Women with VDI were more likely to be black (17% v. 2%, P < 0.001), heavier (BMI 33.0 (sd 7) kg/m2 v. 29.0 (sd 7) kg/m2, P < 0.001) and less likely to tan in the past year (49% v. 72%, P < 0.001), use sunscreen (57% v. 72%, P < 0.001) or report sun exposure in the last 3 months. They consumed less vitamin D from supplements (2.15 (sd 5.24) μg/d (86 (sd 210) IU/d) v. 4.55 (sd 8.48) μg/d (188 (sd 344) IU/d), P = 0.003). In logistic regression models, black race, BMI, suntan within the past year, sun exposure in the past 3 months, sunscreen use and supplemental vitamin D intake were the most useful questions to identify VDI. From these six items, a composite score of ≤ 2.25 demonstrated ≥89% sensitivity but ≤35% specificity for VDI.
The VIDSUN questionnaire provides an initial tool to identify postmenopausal women at high or low risk of VDI. Existing studies suggest that inclusion of physical activity and TAG levels might improve the performance of the VIDSUN questionnaire.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-9800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1368980013001973</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23870503</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Mass Index ; Bone density ; Dietary Supplements ; Disease ; Environment. Living conditions ; Female ; Health care ; HOT TOPIC – Public health nutrition aspects of vitamin D ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nutrition research ; Nutritional Status ; Oophorectomy ; Postmenopause - blood ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sunburn & sun tanning ; Sunlight ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Variables ; Vitamin D ; Vitamin D - administration & dosage ; Vitamin D - blood ; Vitamin D Deficiency - blood ; Vitamin deficiency ; Womens health ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Public health nutrition, 2014-04, Vol.17 (4), p.739-746</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Authors 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-a32ae3528cb4c0b667f6128e33caf6926cd83d904484f254395637447159f9663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-a32ae3528cb4c0b667f6128e33caf6926cd83d904484f254395637447159f9663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3976225/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1368980013001973/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772,72707</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28460067$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23870503$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nabak, Andrea C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Rachael Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keuler, Nicholas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Karen E</creatorcontrib><title>Can a questionnaire predict vitamin D status in postmenopausal women?</title><title>Public health nutrition</title><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Our objective was to determine whether a questionnaire can identify individuals with vitamin D insufficiency (VDI).
Women completed the Vitamin D & Sun (VIDSUN) questionnaire and we measured their serum 25-hydrocyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire to identify VDI (25(OH)D level <50 nmol/l).
Clinical Research Unit, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Postmenopausal women.
We recruited 609 postmenopausal women with a mean age of 61 (sd 6 years), of whom 113 (19%) had VDI. Women with VDI were more likely to be black (17% v. 2%, P < 0.001), heavier (BMI 33.0 (sd 7) kg/m2 v. 29.0 (sd 7) kg/m2, P < 0.001) and less likely to tan in the past year (49% v. 72%, P < 0.001), use sunscreen (57% v. 72%, P < 0.001) or report sun exposure in the last 3 months. They consumed less vitamin D from supplements (2.15 (sd 5.24) μg/d (86 (sd 210) IU/d) v. 4.55 (sd 8.48) μg/d (188 (sd 344) IU/d), P = 0.003). In logistic regression models, black race, BMI, suntan within the past year, sun exposure in the past 3 months, sunscreen use and supplemental vitamin D intake were the most useful questions to identify VDI. From these six items, a composite score of ≤ 2.25 demonstrated ≥89% sensitivity but ≤35% specificity for VDI.
The VIDSUN questionnaire provides an initial tool to identify postmenopausal women at high or low risk of VDI. Existing studies suggest that inclusion of physical activity and TAG levels might improve the performance of the VIDSUN questionnaire.]]></description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Environment. Living conditions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>HOT TOPIC – Public health nutrition aspects of vitamin D</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nutrition research</subject><subject>Nutritional Status</subject><subject>Oophorectomy</subject><subject>Postmenopause - blood</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sunburn & sun tanning</subject><subject>Sunlight</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Vitamin D</subject><subject>Vitamin D - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Vitamin D - blood</subject><subject>Vitamin D Deficiency - blood</subject><subject>Vitamin deficiency</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>1368-9800</issn><issn>1475-2727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkVtrFTEQx0NR7M0P0BdZkEJftuZ-ebGUY7VCwQfb5zAnm60pu8ma7Fb89qb2tFZF8CFkhvnNf24IHRB8TDBRbz4TJrXRGBNWn1FsC-0QrkRLFVXPql3D7V18G-2WcoMxFkqpF2ibMq2wwGwHna0gNtB8XXyZQ4oRQvbNlH0X3NzchhnGEJt3TZlhXkpT7SmVefQxTbAUGJpvqTon--h5D0PxLzf_Hrp6f3a5Om8vPn34uDq9aJ3EeG6BUfBMUO3W3OG1lKqXhGrPmINeGipdp1lnMOea91RwZoRkinNFhOmNlGwPvb3XnZb16Dvn45xhsFMOI-TvNkGwv0di-GKv061lRklKRRU42gjk9HNmO4bi_DBA9GkplghWa1eQ_AeKORFEGl3R13-gN2nJsW6iUpQQYrBmlSL3lMuplOz7x74Jtnf3tH_ds-a8ejrwY8bDAStwuAGgOBj6DNGF8ovTvG5eqsqxTXEY1zl01_5Jj_8s_wNxGbUY</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Nabak, Andrea C</creator><creator>Johnson, Rachael Erin</creator><creator>Keuler, Nicholas S</creator><creator>Hansen, Karen E</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Can a questionnaire predict vitamin D status in postmenopausal women?</title><author>Nabak, Andrea C ; Johnson, Rachael Erin ; Keuler, Nicholas S ; Hansen, Karen E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-a32ae3528cb4c0b667f6128e33caf6926cd83d904484f254395637447159f9663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Environment. Living conditions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>HOT TOPIC – Public health nutrition aspects of vitamin D</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nutrition research</topic><topic>Nutritional Status</topic><topic>Oophorectomy</topic><topic>Postmenopause - blood</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sunburn & sun tanning</topic><topic>Sunlight</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Vitamin D</topic><topic>Vitamin D - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Vitamin D - blood</topic><topic>Vitamin D Deficiency - blood</topic><topic>Vitamin deficiency</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nabak, Andrea C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Rachael Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keuler, Nicholas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Karen E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nabak, Andrea C</au><au>Johnson, Rachael Erin</au><au>Keuler, Nicholas S</au><au>Hansen, Karen E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can a questionnaire predict vitamin D status in postmenopausal women?</atitle><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>739</spage><epage>746</epage><pages>739-746</pages><issn>1368-9800</issn><eissn>1475-2727</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Our objective was to determine whether a questionnaire can identify individuals with vitamin D insufficiency (VDI).
Women completed the Vitamin D & Sun (VIDSUN) questionnaire and we measured their serum 25-hydrocyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire to identify VDI (25(OH)D level <50 nmol/l).
Clinical Research Unit, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Postmenopausal women.
We recruited 609 postmenopausal women with a mean age of 61 (sd 6 years), of whom 113 (19%) had VDI. Women with VDI were more likely to be black (17% v. 2%, P < 0.001), heavier (BMI 33.0 (sd 7) kg/m2 v. 29.0 (sd 7) kg/m2, P < 0.001) and less likely to tan in the past year (49% v. 72%, P < 0.001), use sunscreen (57% v. 72%, P < 0.001) or report sun exposure in the last 3 months. They consumed less vitamin D from supplements (2.15 (sd 5.24) μg/d (86 (sd 210) IU/d) v. 4.55 (sd 8.48) μg/d (188 (sd 344) IU/d), P = 0.003). In logistic regression models, black race, BMI, suntan within the past year, sun exposure in the past 3 months, sunscreen use and supplemental vitamin D intake were the most useful questions to identify VDI. From these six items, a composite score of ≤ 2.25 demonstrated ≥89% sensitivity but ≤35% specificity for VDI.
The VIDSUN questionnaire provides an initial tool to identify postmenopausal women at high or low risk of VDI. Existing studies suggest that inclusion of physical activity and TAG levels might improve the performance of the VIDSUN questionnaire.]]></abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>23870503</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1368980013001973</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1368-9800 |
ispartof | Public health nutrition, 2014-04, Vol.17 (4), p.739-746 |
issn | 1368-9800 1475-2727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3976225 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Cambridge University Press |
subjects | Aged Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding Biological and medical sciences Body Mass Index Bone density Dietary Supplements Disease Environment. Living conditions Female Health care HOT TOPIC – Public health nutrition aspects of vitamin D Humans Logistic Models Medical sciences Middle Aged Nutrition research Nutritional Status Oophorectomy Postmenopause - blood Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Questionnaires Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Sunburn & sun tanning Sunlight Surveys and Questionnaires Variables Vitamin D Vitamin D - administration & dosage Vitamin D - blood Vitamin D Deficiency - blood Vitamin deficiency Womens health Young adults |
title | Can a questionnaire predict vitamin D status in postmenopausal women? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T20%3A31%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20a%20questionnaire%20predict%20vitamin%20D%20status%20in%20postmenopausal%20women?&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20nutrition&rft.au=Nabak,%20Andrea%20C&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=739&rft.epage=746&rft.pages=739-746&rft.issn=1368-9800&rft.eissn=1475-2727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1368980013001973&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1534842531%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-a32ae3528cb4c0b667f6128e33caf6926cd83d904484f254395637447159f9663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1521119083&rft_id=info:pmid/23870503&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1368980013001973&rfr_iscdi=true |