Loading…

Can Ki-67 Play a Role in Prediction of Breast Cancer Patients' Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

Background. Currently the choice of breast cancer therapy is based on prognostic factors. The proliferation marker Ki-67 is used increasingly to determine the method of therapy. The current study analyses the predictive value of Ki-67 in foreseeing breast cancer patients’ responses to neoadjuvant ch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BioMed research international 2014-01, Vol.2014 (2014), p.1-7
Main Authors: Ingolf, Juhasz-Böss, Russalina, Mavrova, Simona, Moga, Julia, Radosa, Gilda, Schmidt, Bohle, Rainer M., Andrea, Hasenfus, Erich, Solomayer, Daniel, Herr
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-16c5d2a6a27a65c76463aba6219850b773514d8ab273daf680a32dfdcf8a2a463
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-16c5d2a6a27a65c76463aba6219850b773514d8ab273daf680a32dfdcf8a2a463
container_end_page 7
container_issue 2014
container_start_page 1
container_title BioMed research international
container_volume 2014
creator Ingolf, Juhasz-Böss
Russalina, Mavrova
Simona, Moga
Julia, Radosa
Gilda, Schmidt
Bohle, Rainer M.
Andrea, Hasenfus
Erich, Solomayer
Daniel, Herr
description Background. Currently the choice of breast cancer therapy is based on prognostic factors. The proliferation marker Ki-67 is used increasingly to determine the method of therapy. The current study analyses the predictive value of Ki-67 in foreseeing breast cancer patients’ responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods. This study includes patients with invasive breast cancer treated between 2008 and 2013. The clinical response was assessed by correlating Ki-67 to histological examination, mammography, and ultrasonography findings. Results. The average Ki-67 value in our patients collectively (n=77) is 34.9 ± 24.6%. The average Ki-67 value is the highest with 37.4 ± 24.0% in patients with a pCR. The Ki-67 values do not differ significantly among the 3 groups: pCR versus partial pathological response versus stable disease/progress (P=0.896). However, Ki-67 values of patients with luminal, Her2 enriched, and basal-like cancers differed significantly from each other. Furthermore, within the group of luminal tumors Ki-67 values of patients with versus without pCR also differed significantly. Conclusion. Our data shows that the Ki-67 value predicts the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a function of the molecular subtype, reflecting the daily routine concerning Ki-67 and its impressing potential and limitation as a predictive marker for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2014/628217
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3982412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A427023829</galeid><sourcerecordid>A427023829</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-16c5d2a6a27a65c76463aba6219850b773514d8ab273daf680a32dfdcf8a2a463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0s9v0zAUB_AIgdg0duIMssQBBArzb7sX0Kj4JSaoJjhbr7azukrtzk6G-t_jKqP8uIAvsZRPvn55fk3zkOCXhAhxRjHhZ5JqStSd5pgywltJOLl72DN21JyWssZ1aSLxTN5vjihXmtVPjhs3h4g-hVYqtOhhhwBdpt6jENEiexfsEFJEqUNvsocyoKqtz2gBQ_BxKE_RpS_bFItHQ0KffQK3Hm8gVrjymzSsfIbt7vWD5l4HffGnt8-T5tu7t1_nH9qLL-8_zs8vWiuoGloirXAUJFAFUlgluWSwBEnJTAu8VIoJwp2GJVXMQSc1BkZd52yngULFJ82rKXc7Ljfe2Vpiht5sc9hA3pkEwfz5JoaVuUo3hs005YTWgGe3ATldj74MZhOK9X0P0aexGCIo55hjyv6HYsaFlPuynvxF12nMsXaiKlJvojL6S11B702IXaol2n2oOedU1TM1nVX1YlI2p1Ky7w5_R7DZT4TZT4SZJqLqx7835GB_3n8FzyewCtHB9_CPtEcT9pX4Dg6Ya8mkYD8AeRDDsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1517834562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Ki-67 Play a Role in Prediction of Breast Cancer Patients' Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?</title><source>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Ingolf, Juhasz-Böss ; Russalina, Mavrova ; Simona, Moga ; Julia, Radosa ; Gilda, Schmidt ; Bohle, Rainer M. ; Andrea, Hasenfus ; Erich, Solomayer ; Daniel, Herr</creator><contributor>Fasching, Peter A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ingolf, Juhasz-Böss ; Russalina, Mavrova ; Simona, Moga ; Julia, Radosa ; Gilda, Schmidt ; Bohle, Rainer M. ; Andrea, Hasenfus ; Erich, Solomayer ; Daniel, Herr ; Fasching, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Currently the choice of breast cancer therapy is based on prognostic factors. The proliferation marker Ki-67 is used increasingly to determine the method of therapy. The current study analyses the predictive value of Ki-67 in foreseeing breast cancer patients’ responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods. This study includes patients with invasive breast cancer treated between 2008 and 2013. The clinical response was assessed by correlating Ki-67 to histological examination, mammography, and ultrasonography findings. Results. The average Ki-67 value in our patients collectively (n=77) is 34.9 ± 24.6%. The average Ki-67 value is the highest with 37.4 ± 24.0% in patients with a pCR. The Ki-67 values do not differ significantly among the 3 groups: pCR versus partial pathological response versus stable disease/progress (P=0.896). However, Ki-67 values of patients with luminal, Her2 enriched, and basal-like cancers differed significantly from each other. Furthermore, within the group of luminal tumors Ki-67 values of patients with versus without pCR also differed significantly. Conclusion. Our data shows that the Ki-67 value predicts the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a function of the molecular subtype, reflecting the daily routine concerning Ki-67 and its impressing potential and limitation as a predictive marker for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2314-6133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2314-6141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2014/628217</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24783217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Adjuvant treatment ; Adult ; Biomedical research ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Breast Neoplasms - metabolism ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Cancer ; Cancer patients ; Chemotherapy ; Female ; Humans ; Ki-67 Antigen - metabolism ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism ; Retrospective Studies ; Tumors ; Ultrasound imaging</subject><ispartof>BioMed research international, 2014-01, Vol.2014 (2014), p.1-7</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 Juhasz-Böss Ingolf et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Juhasz-Böss Ingolf et al. Juhasz-Böss Ingolf et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Juhasz-Böss Ingolf et al. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-16c5d2a6a27a65c76463aba6219850b773514d8ab273daf680a32dfdcf8a2a463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-16c5d2a6a27a65c76463aba6219850b773514d8ab273daf680a32dfdcf8a2a463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1517834562/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1517834562?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,74897</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24783217$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Fasching, Peter A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ingolf, Juhasz-Böss</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russalina, Mavrova</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simona, Moga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Julia, Radosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilda, Schmidt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohle, Rainer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrea, Hasenfus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erich, Solomayer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniel, Herr</creatorcontrib><title>Can Ki-67 Play a Role in Prediction of Breast Cancer Patients' Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?</title><title>BioMed research international</title><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><description>Background. Currently the choice of breast cancer therapy is based on prognostic factors. The proliferation marker Ki-67 is used increasingly to determine the method of therapy. The current study analyses the predictive value of Ki-67 in foreseeing breast cancer patients’ responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods. This study includes patients with invasive breast cancer treated between 2008 and 2013. The clinical response was assessed by correlating Ki-67 to histological examination, mammography, and ultrasonography findings. Results. The average Ki-67 value in our patients collectively (n=77) is 34.9 ± 24.6%. The average Ki-67 value is the highest with 37.4 ± 24.0% in patients with a pCR. The Ki-67 values do not differ significantly among the 3 groups: pCR versus partial pathological response versus stable disease/progress (P=0.896). However, Ki-67 values of patients with luminal, Her2 enriched, and basal-like cancers differed significantly from each other. Furthermore, within the group of luminal tumors Ki-67 values of patients with versus without pCR also differed significantly. Conclusion. Our data shows that the Ki-67 value predicts the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a function of the molecular subtype, reflecting the daily routine concerning Ki-67 and its impressing potential and limitation as a predictive marker for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.</description><subject>Adjuvant treatment</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ki-67 Antigen - metabolism</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasound imaging</subject><issn>2314-6133</issn><issn>2314-6141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0s9v0zAUB_AIgdg0duIMssQBBArzb7sX0Kj4JSaoJjhbr7azukrtzk6G-t_jKqP8uIAvsZRPvn55fk3zkOCXhAhxRjHhZ5JqStSd5pgywltJOLl72DN21JyWssZ1aSLxTN5vjihXmtVPjhs3h4g-hVYqtOhhhwBdpt6jENEiexfsEFJEqUNvsocyoKqtz2gBQ_BxKE_RpS_bFItHQ0KffQK3Hm8gVrjymzSsfIbt7vWD5l4HffGnt8-T5tu7t1_nH9qLL-8_zs8vWiuoGloirXAUJFAFUlgluWSwBEnJTAu8VIoJwp2GJVXMQSc1BkZd52yngULFJ82rKXc7Ljfe2Vpiht5sc9hA3pkEwfz5JoaVuUo3hs005YTWgGe3ATldj74MZhOK9X0P0aexGCIo55hjyv6HYsaFlPuynvxF12nMsXaiKlJvojL6S11B702IXaol2n2oOedU1TM1nVX1YlI2p1Ky7w5_R7DZT4TZT4SZJqLqx7835GB_3n8FzyewCtHB9_CPtEcT9pX4Dg6Ya8mkYD8AeRDDsg</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Ingolf, Juhasz-Böss</creator><creator>Russalina, Mavrova</creator><creator>Simona, Moga</creator><creator>Julia, Radosa</creator><creator>Gilda, Schmidt</creator><creator>Bohle, Rainer M.</creator><creator>Andrea, Hasenfus</creator><creator>Erich, Solomayer</creator><creator>Daniel, Herr</creator><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AFFIF</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Can Ki-67 Play a Role in Prediction of Breast Cancer Patients' Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?</title><author>Ingolf, Juhasz-Böss ; Russalina, Mavrova ; Simona, Moga ; Julia, Radosa ; Gilda, Schmidt ; Bohle, Rainer M. ; Andrea, Hasenfus ; Erich, Solomayer ; Daniel, Herr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-16c5d2a6a27a65c76463aba6219850b773514d8ab273daf680a32dfdcf8a2a463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adjuvant treatment</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ki-67 Antigen - metabolism</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasound imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ingolf, Juhasz-Böss</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russalina, Mavrova</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simona, Moga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Julia, Radosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilda, Schmidt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohle, Rainer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrea, Hasenfus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erich, Solomayer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniel, Herr</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>قاعدة دراسات المرأة - e-Marefa Women Studies</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ingolf, Juhasz-Böss</au><au>Russalina, Mavrova</au><au>Simona, Moga</au><au>Julia, Radosa</au><au>Gilda, Schmidt</au><au>Bohle, Rainer M.</au><au>Andrea, Hasenfus</au><au>Erich, Solomayer</au><au>Daniel, Herr</au><au>Fasching, Peter A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Ki-67 Play a Role in Prediction of Breast Cancer Patients' Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?</atitle><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>2014</volume><issue>2014</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>2314-6133</issn><eissn>2314-6141</eissn><abstract>Background. Currently the choice of breast cancer therapy is based on prognostic factors. The proliferation marker Ki-67 is used increasingly to determine the method of therapy. The current study analyses the predictive value of Ki-67 in foreseeing breast cancer patients’ responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods. This study includes patients with invasive breast cancer treated between 2008 and 2013. The clinical response was assessed by correlating Ki-67 to histological examination, mammography, and ultrasonography findings. Results. The average Ki-67 value in our patients collectively (n=77) is 34.9 ± 24.6%. The average Ki-67 value is the highest with 37.4 ± 24.0% in patients with a pCR. The Ki-67 values do not differ significantly among the 3 groups: pCR versus partial pathological response versus stable disease/progress (P=0.896). However, Ki-67 values of patients with luminal, Her2 enriched, and basal-like cancers differed significantly from each other. Furthermore, within the group of luminal tumors Ki-67 values of patients with versus without pCR also differed significantly. Conclusion. Our data shows that the Ki-67 value predicts the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a function of the molecular subtype, reflecting the daily routine concerning Ki-67 and its impressing potential and limitation as a predictive marker for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</pub><pmid>24783217</pmid><doi>10.1155/2014/628217</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2314-6133
ispartof BioMed research international, 2014-01, Vol.2014 (2014), p.1-7
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3982412
source Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Adjuvant treatment
Adult
Biomedical research
Biopsy
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy
Breast Neoplasms - metabolism
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Cancer
Cancer patients
Chemotherapy
Female
Humans
Ki-67 Antigen - metabolism
Middle Aged
Mortality
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism
Retrospective Studies
Tumors
Ultrasound imaging
title Can Ki-67 Play a Role in Prediction of Breast Cancer Patients' Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A23%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Ki-67%20Play%20a%20Role%20in%20Prediction%20of%20Breast%20Cancer%20Patients'%20Response%20to%20Neoadjuvant%20Chemotherapy?&rft.jtitle=BioMed%20research%20international&rft.au=Ingolf,%20Juhasz-B%C3%B6ss&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=2014&rft.issue=2014&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=2314-6133&rft.eissn=2314-6141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2014/628217&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA427023829%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-16c5d2a6a27a65c76463aba6219850b773514d8ab273daf680a32dfdcf8a2a463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1517834562&rft_id=info:pmid/24783217&rft_galeid=A427023829&rfr_iscdi=true