Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Light Intensities and Curing Cycles of QTH, and LED Lights on Microleakage of Class V Composite Restorations

• Published in: Journal of clinical and diagnostic research 2014-03, Vol.8 (3), p.221-224
• Main Authors: Chandurkar, Anshu M, Metgud, Sandeep S, Yakub, Shaikh Shoeb, Kalburge, Vaishali J, Biradar, Basawaraj C
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Dentistry
• ISSN: 2249-782X; 0973-709X
• DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7463.4167

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of light intensity and curing cycles of QTH and LED lights on the microleakage of Class V composite restorations. Materials and Methods: Eighty freshly extracted human maxillary premolars were used for this study. Standardized Class V cavities were prepared and they were restored with microhybrid resin composite. According to the curing protocol, the teeth were then divided into 4 groups (n=20): QTH curing (standard and soft start modes), and LED (standard and soft start modes) irradiations. Microleakage was evaluated by immersion of the samples in 50% silver nitrate solution. The samples were then sectioned, evaluated under a stereomicroscope, and scored for microleakage. Results: The results of the present in-vitro study showed mean dye leakage scores of 1.9, 1.2, 1.45 and 0.90 for Group I (QTH-Standard mode), Group II (QTH-Soft Start mode), Group III (LED-Standard mode) and Group IV (LED-Soft Start mode) respectively. Conclusion: It was thus concluded that the soft start polymerization showed a highly significant difference as compared to the standard curing modes of QTH and LED lights, respectively.