Evaluation of Dentaport ZX and Raypex 6 electronic apex locators: an in vivo study

• Published in: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2014-03, Vol.19 (2), p.e202-e205
• Main Authors: Moscoso, S, Pineda, K, Basilio, J, Alvarado, C, Roig, M, Duran-Sindreu, F
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Dentistry; Humans; Root Canal Therapy - instrumentation; Tooth Apex - anatomy & histology
• ISSN: 1698-6946; 1698-4447; 1698-6946
• DOI: 10.4317/medoral.19114

Raypex 6 is an electronic apex locator (EAL) that has not yet been tested in vivo. The purpose of this in vivo study was to compare the accuracy of two EALs: the Dentaport ZX and the Raypex 6. The study involved 36 straight single-rooted teeth. A 10-K file was advanced until the EAL detected the major foramen. The file was fixed in a replaceable pattern of light-cured composite. The apical part of each canal was trimmed to expose the file tip. The distances from the file tips to the major foramen were measured. Wilcoxon's signed Rank test found no significant differences between the Dentaport ZX and Raypex 6 in terms of their abilities to detect the major foramen (P = .52) The Dentaport ZX was accurate 82.35% of the time to ± 0.5 mm and 97.05% of the time to ± 1 mm, whereas the Raypex 6 was accurate 88.22% of the time to ± 0.5 mm and 100% of the time to ± 1 mm. No statistically significant differences were observed between the performance of the Dentaport ZX and Raypex 6 EALs under the in vivo clinical conditions used in this study.