Loading…
Comparing the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays in relation to different surface conditioning and curing techniques
ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that different surface conditioning (etch and rinse and self-etch) and curing techniques (light cure/dual cure) had no effect on the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays. Materials and Methods: A total o...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of dentistry 2013-10, Vol.7 (4), p.436-441 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-3633671ccc96cf80200961d770afc82025b9e9fe8482aaa11938c9ea48aa3d663 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 441 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 436 |
container_title | European journal of dentistry |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Zorba, Yahya Orcun Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya Demirbuga, Sezer |
description | ABSTRACT
Objective:
The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that different surface conditioning (etch and rinse and self-etch) and curing techniques (light cure/dual cure) had no effect on the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays.
Materials and Methods:
A total of 112 extracted human molar teeth were horizontally sectioned and randomly divided into two groups according to restoration technique (direct and indirect restorations). Each group was further subdivided into seven subgroups (
n
= 8) according to bonding agent (etch and rinse adhesives Scotchbond multi-purpose plus, All-Bond 3, Adper Single Bond and Prime Bond NT; and self-etch adhesives Clearfil Liner Bond, Futurabond DC and G bond). Indirect composites were cemented to dentin surfaces using dual-curing luting cement. Shear bond strength of specimens was tested using a Universal Testing Machine. Two samples from each subgroup were evaluated under Scanning electron microscopy to see the failing modes. Data was analyzed using independent sample
t
-tests and Tukey′s tests.
Results:
Surface conditioning and curing of bonding agents were all found to have significant effects on shear bond strength (
P
< 0.05) of both direct and indirect composite inlays. With direct restoration, etch and rinse systems and dual-cured bonding agents yielded higher bond strengths than indirect restoration, self-etch systems and light-cured bonding agents.
Conclusions:
The results of the present study indicated that direct restoration to be a more reliable method than indirect restoration. Although etch and rinse bonding systems showed higher shear bond strength to dentin than self-etch systems, both systems can be safely used for the adhesion of direct as well as indirect restorations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/1305-7456.120679 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4053668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A348486600</galeid><sourcerecordid>A348486600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-3633671ccc96cf80200961d770afc82025b9e9fe8482aaa11938c9ea48aa3d663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kl-L1DAUxYso7rr67pMEBPFlZpMmzTQvwjL4DxZ80eeQSW-mWdpkTNKF_RB-Z2_tOOyA0oe0N79zcntzquo1o2vBKL9mnDarjWjkmtVUbtST6vJYkuLp6b2RF9WLnO8olVwq9by6qIXiNWPtZfVrG8eDST7sSemB5B5MIrsYOpJLgrAvPYmOdD6BLcRg2Yfjh0VhzL4AlgbzkHEhCQZTfAykRNQ4B2hRSJ6SMxZQgdp5ez5t9rLTcjDYPvifE-SX1TNnhgyvjutV9ePTx-_bL6vbb5-_bm9uV1YIpVZcci43zFqrpHUtrSlVknWbDTXOtjWtm50C5aAVbW2MYUzx1iowojWGd1Lyq-rD4nuYdiN0FrtMZtCH5EeTHnQ0Xp_vBN_rfbzXgjZcyhYN3h8NUpwbL3r02cIwmABxypr9wRraNoi-XdC9GUD74CI62hnXN1xgi1JSitT6HxQ-HYweBwfOY_1M8O6RAK9tKH2OwzTPN5-DdAFtijkncKffZFTPKdJzTPQcE72kCCVvHo_nJPgbGwSuF6D0HkbQd3FKAS_s_5a_ARdh0cY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1536685085</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays in relation to different surface conditioning and curing techniques</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</source><creator>Zorba, Yahya Orcun ; Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar ; Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya ; Demirbuga, Sezer</creator><creatorcontrib>Zorba, Yahya Orcun ; Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar ; Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya ; Demirbuga, Sezer</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Objective:
The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that different surface conditioning (etch and rinse and self-etch) and curing techniques (light cure/dual cure) had no effect on the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays.
Materials and Methods:
A total of 112 extracted human molar teeth were horizontally sectioned and randomly divided into two groups according to restoration technique (direct and indirect restorations). Each group was further subdivided into seven subgroups (
n
= 8) according to bonding agent (etch and rinse adhesives Scotchbond multi-purpose plus, All-Bond 3, Adper Single Bond and Prime Bond NT; and self-etch adhesives Clearfil Liner Bond, Futurabond DC and G bond). Indirect composites were cemented to dentin surfaces using dual-curing luting cement. Shear bond strength of specimens was tested using a Universal Testing Machine. Two samples from each subgroup were evaluated under Scanning electron microscopy to see the failing modes. Data was analyzed using independent sample
t
-tests and Tukey′s tests.
Results:
Surface conditioning and curing of bonding agents were all found to have significant effects on shear bond strength (
P
< 0.05) of both direct and indirect composite inlays. With direct restoration, etch and rinse systems and dual-cured bonding agents yielded higher bond strengths than indirect restoration, self-etch systems and light-cured bonding agents.
Conclusions:
The results of the present study indicated that direct restoration to be a more reliable method than indirect restoration. Although etch and rinse bonding systems showed higher shear bond strength to dentin than self-etch systems, both systems can be safely used for the adhesion of direct as well as indirect restorations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1305-7456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1305-7464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.120679</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24932118</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd</publisher><subject>Dental metallurgy ; Dental technology ; Original ; Original Article</subject><ispartof>European journal of dentistry, 2013-10, Vol.7 (4), p.436-441</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-3633671ccc96cf80200961d770afc82025b9e9fe8482aaa11938c9ea48aa3d663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053668/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053668/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,20891,27924,27925,53791,53793,54587</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24932118$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zorba, Yahya Orcun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirbuga, Sezer</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays in relation to different surface conditioning and curing techniques</title><title>European journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Objective:
The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that different surface conditioning (etch and rinse and self-etch) and curing techniques (light cure/dual cure) had no effect on the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays.
Materials and Methods:
A total of 112 extracted human molar teeth were horizontally sectioned and randomly divided into two groups according to restoration technique (direct and indirect restorations). Each group was further subdivided into seven subgroups (
n
= 8) according to bonding agent (etch and rinse adhesives Scotchbond multi-purpose plus, All-Bond 3, Adper Single Bond and Prime Bond NT; and self-etch adhesives Clearfil Liner Bond, Futurabond DC and G bond). Indirect composites were cemented to dentin surfaces using dual-curing luting cement. Shear bond strength of specimens was tested using a Universal Testing Machine. Two samples from each subgroup were evaluated under Scanning electron microscopy to see the failing modes. Data was analyzed using independent sample
t
-tests and Tukey′s tests.
Results:
Surface conditioning and curing of bonding agents were all found to have significant effects on shear bond strength (
P
< 0.05) of both direct and indirect composite inlays. With direct restoration, etch and rinse systems and dual-cured bonding agents yielded higher bond strengths than indirect restoration, self-etch systems and light-cured bonding agents.
Conclusions:
The results of the present study indicated that direct restoration to be a more reliable method than indirect restoration. Although etch and rinse bonding systems showed higher shear bond strength to dentin than self-etch systems, both systems can be safely used for the adhesion of direct as well as indirect restorations.</description><subject>Dental metallurgy</subject><subject>Dental technology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>1305-7456</issn><issn>1305-7464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0U6</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kl-L1DAUxYso7rr67pMEBPFlZpMmzTQvwjL4DxZ80eeQSW-mWdpkTNKF_RB-Z2_tOOyA0oe0N79zcntzquo1o2vBKL9mnDarjWjkmtVUbtST6vJYkuLp6b2RF9WLnO8olVwq9by6qIXiNWPtZfVrG8eDST7sSemB5B5MIrsYOpJLgrAvPYmOdD6BLcRg2Yfjh0VhzL4AlgbzkHEhCQZTfAykRNQ4B2hRSJ6SMxZQgdp5ez5t9rLTcjDYPvifE-SX1TNnhgyvjutV9ePTx-_bL6vbb5-_bm9uV1YIpVZcci43zFqrpHUtrSlVknWbDTXOtjWtm50C5aAVbW2MYUzx1iowojWGd1Lyq-rD4nuYdiN0FrtMZtCH5EeTHnQ0Xp_vBN_rfbzXgjZcyhYN3h8NUpwbL3r02cIwmABxypr9wRraNoi-XdC9GUD74CI62hnXN1xgi1JSitT6HxQ-HYweBwfOY_1M8O6RAK9tKH2OwzTPN5-DdAFtijkncKffZFTPKdJzTPQcE72kCCVvHo_nJPgbGwSuF6D0HkbQd3FKAS_s_5a_ARdh0cY</recordid><startdate>201310</startdate><enddate>201310</enddate><creator>Zorba, Yahya Orcun</creator><creator>Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar</creator><creator>Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya</creator><creator>Demirbuga, Sezer</creator><general>Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>0U6</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201310</creationdate><title>Comparing the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays in relation to different surface conditioning and curing techniques</title><author>Zorba, Yahya Orcun ; Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar ; Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya ; Demirbuga, Sezer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-3633671ccc96cf80200961d770afc82025b9e9fe8482aaa11938c9ea48aa3d663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Dental metallurgy</topic><topic>Dental technology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zorba, Yahya Orcun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirbuga, Sezer</creatorcontrib><collection>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zorba, Yahya Orcun</au><au>Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar</au><au>Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya</au><au>Demirbuga, Sezer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays in relation to different surface conditioning and curing techniques</atitle><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><date>2013-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>436</spage><epage>441</epage><pages>436-441</pages><issn>1305-7456</issn><eissn>1305-7464</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Objective:
The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that different surface conditioning (etch and rinse and self-etch) and curing techniques (light cure/dual cure) had no effect on the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays.
Materials and Methods:
A total of 112 extracted human molar teeth were horizontally sectioned and randomly divided into two groups according to restoration technique (direct and indirect restorations). Each group was further subdivided into seven subgroups (
n
= 8) according to bonding agent (etch and rinse adhesives Scotchbond multi-purpose plus, All-Bond 3, Adper Single Bond and Prime Bond NT; and self-etch adhesives Clearfil Liner Bond, Futurabond DC and G bond). Indirect composites were cemented to dentin surfaces using dual-curing luting cement. Shear bond strength of specimens was tested using a Universal Testing Machine. Two samples from each subgroup were evaluated under Scanning electron microscopy to see the failing modes. Data was analyzed using independent sample
t
-tests and Tukey′s tests.
Results:
Surface conditioning and curing of bonding agents were all found to have significant effects on shear bond strength (
P
< 0.05) of both direct and indirect composite inlays. With direct restoration, etch and rinse systems and dual-cured bonding agents yielded higher bond strengths than indirect restoration, self-etch systems and light-cured bonding agents.
Conclusions:
The results of the present study indicated that direct restoration to be a more reliable method than indirect restoration. Although etch and rinse bonding systems showed higher shear bond strength to dentin than self-etch systems, both systems can be safely used for the adhesion of direct as well as indirect restorations.</abstract><cop>A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India</cop><pub>Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd</pub><pmid>24932118</pmid><doi>10.4103/1305-7456.120679</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1305-7456 |
ispartof | European journal of dentistry, 2013-10, Vol.7 (4), p.436-441 |
issn | 1305-7456 1305-7464 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4053668 |
source | PubMed Central; Thieme Connect Journals Open Access |
subjects | Dental metallurgy Dental technology Original Original Article |
title | Comparing the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays in relation to different surface conditioning and curing techniques |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A46%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20shear%20bond%20strength%20of%20direct%20and%20indirect%20composite%20inlays%20in%20relation%20to%20different%20surface%20conditioning%20and%20curing%20techniques&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Zorba,%20Yahya%20Orcun&rft.date=2013-10&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=436&rft.epage=441&rft.pages=436-441&rft.issn=1305-7456&rft.eissn=1305-7464&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/1305-7456.120679&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA348486600%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-3633671ccc96cf80200961d770afc82025b9e9fe8482aaa11938c9ea48aa3d663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1536685085&rft_id=info:pmid/24932118&rft_galeid=A348486600&rfr_iscdi=true |