Loading…

Comparing the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays in relation to different surface conditioning and curing techniques

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that different surface conditioning (etch and rinse and self-etch) and curing techniques (light cure/dual cure) had no effect on the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays. Materials and Methods: A total o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of dentistry 2013-10, Vol.7 (4), p.436-441
Main Authors: Zorba, Yahya Orcun, Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar, Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya, Demirbuga, Sezer
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-3633671ccc96cf80200961d770afc82025b9e9fe8482aaa11938c9ea48aa3d663
cites
container_end_page 441
container_issue 4
container_start_page 436
container_title European journal of dentistry
container_volume 7
creator Zorba, Yahya Orcun
Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar
Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya
Demirbuga, Sezer
description ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that different surface conditioning (etch and rinse and self-etch) and curing techniques (light cure/dual cure) had no effect on the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays. Materials and Methods: A total of 112 extracted human molar teeth were horizontally sectioned and randomly divided into two groups according to restoration technique (direct and indirect restorations). Each group was further subdivided into seven subgroups ( n = 8) according to bonding agent (etch and rinse adhesives Scotchbond multi-purpose plus, All-Bond 3, Adper Single Bond and Prime Bond NT; and self-etch adhesives Clearfil Liner Bond, Futurabond DC and G bond). Indirect composites were cemented to dentin surfaces using dual-curing luting cement. Shear bond strength of specimens was tested using a Universal Testing Machine. Two samples from each subgroup were evaluated under Scanning electron microscopy to see the failing modes. Data was analyzed using independent sample t -tests and Tukey′s tests. Results: Surface conditioning and curing of bonding agents were all found to have significant effects on shear bond strength ( P < 0.05) of both direct and indirect composite inlays. With direct restoration, etch and rinse systems and dual-cured bonding agents yielded higher bond strengths than indirect restoration, self-etch systems and light-cured bonding agents. Conclusions: The results of the present study indicated that direct restoration to be a more reliable method than indirect restoration. Although etch and rinse bonding systems showed higher shear bond strength to dentin than self-etch systems, both systems can be safely used for the adhesion of direct as well as indirect restorations.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/1305-7456.120679
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4053668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A348486600</galeid><sourcerecordid>A348486600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-3633671ccc96cf80200961d770afc82025b9e9fe8482aaa11938c9ea48aa3d663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kl-L1DAUxYso7rr67pMEBPFlZpMmzTQvwjL4DxZ80eeQSW-mWdpkTNKF_RB-Z2_tOOyA0oe0N79zcntzquo1o2vBKL9mnDarjWjkmtVUbtST6vJYkuLp6b2RF9WLnO8olVwq9by6qIXiNWPtZfVrG8eDST7sSemB5B5MIrsYOpJLgrAvPYmOdD6BLcRg2Yfjh0VhzL4AlgbzkHEhCQZTfAykRNQ4B2hRSJ6SMxZQgdp5ez5t9rLTcjDYPvifE-SX1TNnhgyvjutV9ePTx-_bL6vbb5-_bm9uV1YIpVZcci43zFqrpHUtrSlVknWbDTXOtjWtm50C5aAVbW2MYUzx1iowojWGd1Lyq-rD4nuYdiN0FrtMZtCH5EeTHnQ0Xp_vBN_rfbzXgjZcyhYN3h8NUpwbL3r02cIwmABxypr9wRraNoi-XdC9GUD74CI62hnXN1xgi1JSitT6HxQ-HYweBwfOY_1M8O6RAK9tKH2OwzTPN5-DdAFtijkncKffZFTPKdJzTPQcE72kCCVvHo_nJPgbGwSuF6D0HkbQd3FKAS_s_5a_ARdh0cY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1536685085</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays in relation to different surface conditioning and curing techniques</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</source><creator>Zorba, Yahya Orcun ; Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar ; Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya ; Demirbuga, Sezer</creator><creatorcontrib>Zorba, Yahya Orcun ; Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar ; Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya ; Demirbuga, Sezer</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that different surface conditioning (etch and rinse and self-etch) and curing techniques (light cure/dual cure) had no effect on the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays. Materials and Methods: A total of 112 extracted human molar teeth were horizontally sectioned and randomly divided into two groups according to restoration technique (direct and indirect restorations). Each group was further subdivided into seven subgroups ( n = 8) according to bonding agent (etch and rinse adhesives Scotchbond multi-purpose plus, All-Bond 3, Adper Single Bond and Prime Bond NT; and self-etch adhesives Clearfil Liner Bond, Futurabond DC and G bond). Indirect composites were cemented to dentin surfaces using dual-curing luting cement. Shear bond strength of specimens was tested using a Universal Testing Machine. Two samples from each subgroup were evaluated under Scanning electron microscopy to see the failing modes. Data was analyzed using independent sample t -tests and Tukey′s tests. Results: Surface conditioning and curing of bonding agents were all found to have significant effects on shear bond strength ( P &lt; 0.05) of both direct and indirect composite inlays. With direct restoration, etch and rinse systems and dual-cured bonding agents yielded higher bond strengths than indirect restoration, self-etch systems and light-cured bonding agents. Conclusions: The results of the present study indicated that direct restoration to be a more reliable method than indirect restoration. Although etch and rinse bonding systems showed higher shear bond strength to dentin than self-etch systems, both systems can be safely used for the adhesion of direct as well as indirect restorations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1305-7456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1305-7464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.120679</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24932118</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd</publisher><subject>Dental metallurgy ; Dental technology ; Original ; Original Article</subject><ispartof>European journal of dentistry, 2013-10, Vol.7 (4), p.436-441</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-3633671ccc96cf80200961d770afc82025b9e9fe8482aaa11938c9ea48aa3d663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053668/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053668/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,20891,27924,27925,53791,53793,54587</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24932118$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zorba, Yahya Orcun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirbuga, Sezer</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays in relation to different surface conditioning and curing techniques</title><title>European journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that different surface conditioning (etch and rinse and self-etch) and curing techniques (light cure/dual cure) had no effect on the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays. Materials and Methods: A total of 112 extracted human molar teeth were horizontally sectioned and randomly divided into two groups according to restoration technique (direct and indirect restorations). Each group was further subdivided into seven subgroups ( n = 8) according to bonding agent (etch and rinse adhesives Scotchbond multi-purpose plus, All-Bond 3, Adper Single Bond and Prime Bond NT; and self-etch adhesives Clearfil Liner Bond, Futurabond DC and G bond). Indirect composites were cemented to dentin surfaces using dual-curing luting cement. Shear bond strength of specimens was tested using a Universal Testing Machine. Two samples from each subgroup were evaluated under Scanning electron microscopy to see the failing modes. Data was analyzed using independent sample t -tests and Tukey′s tests. Results: Surface conditioning and curing of bonding agents were all found to have significant effects on shear bond strength ( P &lt; 0.05) of both direct and indirect composite inlays. With direct restoration, etch and rinse systems and dual-cured bonding agents yielded higher bond strengths than indirect restoration, self-etch systems and light-cured bonding agents. Conclusions: The results of the present study indicated that direct restoration to be a more reliable method than indirect restoration. Although etch and rinse bonding systems showed higher shear bond strength to dentin than self-etch systems, both systems can be safely used for the adhesion of direct as well as indirect restorations.</description><subject>Dental metallurgy</subject><subject>Dental technology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>1305-7456</issn><issn>1305-7464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0U6</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kl-L1DAUxYso7rr67pMEBPFlZpMmzTQvwjL4DxZ80eeQSW-mWdpkTNKF_RB-Z2_tOOyA0oe0N79zcntzquo1o2vBKL9mnDarjWjkmtVUbtST6vJYkuLp6b2RF9WLnO8olVwq9by6qIXiNWPtZfVrG8eDST7sSemB5B5MIrsYOpJLgrAvPYmOdD6BLcRg2Yfjh0VhzL4AlgbzkHEhCQZTfAykRNQ4B2hRSJ6SMxZQgdp5ez5t9rLTcjDYPvifE-SX1TNnhgyvjutV9ePTx-_bL6vbb5-_bm9uV1YIpVZcci43zFqrpHUtrSlVknWbDTXOtjWtm50C5aAVbW2MYUzx1iowojWGd1Lyq-rD4nuYdiN0FrtMZtCH5EeTHnQ0Xp_vBN_rfbzXgjZcyhYN3h8NUpwbL3r02cIwmABxypr9wRraNoi-XdC9GUD74CI62hnXN1xgi1JSitT6HxQ-HYweBwfOY_1M8O6RAK9tKH2OwzTPN5-DdAFtijkncKffZFTPKdJzTPQcE72kCCVvHo_nJPgbGwSuF6D0HkbQd3FKAS_s_5a_ARdh0cY</recordid><startdate>201310</startdate><enddate>201310</enddate><creator>Zorba, Yahya Orcun</creator><creator>Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar</creator><creator>Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya</creator><creator>Demirbuga, Sezer</creator><general>Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>0U6</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201310</creationdate><title>Comparing the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays in relation to different surface conditioning and curing techniques</title><author>Zorba, Yahya Orcun ; Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar ; Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya ; Demirbuga, Sezer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-3633671ccc96cf80200961d770afc82025b9e9fe8482aaa11938c9ea48aa3d663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Dental metallurgy</topic><topic>Dental technology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zorba, Yahya Orcun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirbuga, Sezer</creatorcontrib><collection>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zorba, Yahya Orcun</au><au>Ilday, Nurcan Ozakar</au><au>Bayındır, Yusuf Ziya</au><au>Demirbuga, Sezer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays in relation to different surface conditioning and curing techniques</atitle><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><date>2013-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>436</spage><epage>441</epage><pages>436-441</pages><issn>1305-7456</issn><eissn>1305-7464</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that different surface conditioning (etch and rinse and self-etch) and curing techniques (light cure/dual cure) had no effect on the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays. Materials and Methods: A total of 112 extracted human molar teeth were horizontally sectioned and randomly divided into two groups according to restoration technique (direct and indirect restorations). Each group was further subdivided into seven subgroups ( n = 8) according to bonding agent (etch and rinse adhesives Scotchbond multi-purpose plus, All-Bond 3, Adper Single Bond and Prime Bond NT; and self-etch adhesives Clearfil Liner Bond, Futurabond DC and G bond). Indirect composites were cemented to dentin surfaces using dual-curing luting cement. Shear bond strength of specimens was tested using a Universal Testing Machine. Two samples from each subgroup were evaluated under Scanning electron microscopy to see the failing modes. Data was analyzed using independent sample t -tests and Tukey′s tests. Results: Surface conditioning and curing of bonding agents were all found to have significant effects on shear bond strength ( P &lt; 0.05) of both direct and indirect composite inlays. With direct restoration, etch and rinse systems and dual-cured bonding agents yielded higher bond strengths than indirect restoration, self-etch systems and light-cured bonding agents. Conclusions: The results of the present study indicated that direct restoration to be a more reliable method than indirect restoration. Although etch and rinse bonding systems showed higher shear bond strength to dentin than self-etch systems, both systems can be safely used for the adhesion of direct as well as indirect restorations.</abstract><cop>A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India</cop><pub>Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd</pub><pmid>24932118</pmid><doi>10.4103/1305-7456.120679</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1305-7456
ispartof European journal of dentistry, 2013-10, Vol.7 (4), p.436-441
issn 1305-7456
1305-7464
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4053668
source PubMed Central; Thieme Connect Journals Open Access
subjects Dental metallurgy
Dental technology
Original
Original Article
title Comparing the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays in relation to different surface conditioning and curing techniques
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A46%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20shear%20bond%20strength%20of%20direct%20and%20indirect%20composite%20inlays%20in%20relation%20to%20different%20surface%20conditioning%20and%20curing%20techniques&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Zorba,%20Yahya%20Orcun&rft.date=2013-10&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=436&rft.epage=441&rft.pages=436-441&rft.issn=1305-7456&rft.eissn=1305-7464&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/1305-7456.120679&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA348486600%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-3633671ccc96cf80200961d770afc82025b9e9fe8482aaa11938c9ea48aa3d663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1536685085&rft_id=info:pmid/24932118&rft_galeid=A348486600&rfr_iscdi=true