Evaluation of Antibody Response to Various Developmental Stage Specific Somatic Antigens of Paramphistomum epiclitum in Goats

Electrophoretic analysis of various developmental stage specific somatic antigens of Paramphistomum epiclitum (Digenea: Paramphistomidae), namely, metacercariae (McAg), immature intestinal flukes (ImIAg), immature ruminal flukes (ImRAg), and adult flukes (AAg), was done by native polyacrylamide gel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BioMed research international 2014-01, Vol.2014 (2014), p.1-6
Main Authors: Jyoti, Prasad, A., Singh, Nirbhay Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agricultural research
Animals
Antibodies
Antibodies, Helminth - immunology
Antigens
Antigens, Helminth - immunology
Antigens, Helminth - isolation & purification
Digenea
Disease
Eggs
Goats
Goats - immunology
Goats - parasitology
Immunoassay
Laboratories
Mollusks
Paramphistomatidae - immunology
Paramphistomatidae - pathogenicity
Paramphistomidae
Paramphistomum epiclitum
Parasites
Small intestine
Trematoda
Trematode Infections - immunology
Trematode Infections - pathology
Viral antibodies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-8d4fb4b0efe5994c6240816c1a26f2fe215c14453368d6c757f9f9b5c181d6e63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-8d4fb4b0efe5994c6240816c1a26f2fe215c14453368d6c757f9f9b5c181d6e63
container_end_page 6
container_issue 2014
container_start_page 1
container_title BioMed research international
container_volume 2014
creator Jyoti
Prasad, A.
Singh, Nirbhay Kumar
description Electrophoretic analysis of various developmental stage specific somatic antigens of Paramphistomum epiclitum (Digenea: Paramphistomidae), namely, metacercariae (McAg), immature intestinal flukes (ImIAg), immature ruminal flukes (ImRAg), and adult flukes (AAg), was done by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Result revealed presence of 3 (range 15.2–40.3 kDa), 13 (9.3–121.2 kDa), 14 (9.3–169.3 kDa), and 15 (8.0–169.3 kDa) polypeptides in McAg, ImIAg, ImRAg, and AAg, respectively. With an aim to identify a suitable immunodiagnostic antigen for early diagnosis of amphistomosis, the IgG antibody response to various developmental stage antigens in goats experimentally infected with metacercariae of P. epiclitum was evaluated by ELISA. The highest OD values were recorded with ImIAg which ranged between 0.23 and 0.55 with a significant increase from the 2nd week till 8th week of infection with a peak at 6th week. The analysis of statistical significance using a one-way analysis of variance with multiple pair wise comparisons revealed that IgG response was significantly higher with all antigens (P0.05) with a maximum mean difference of 0.1838 in comparison to control with ImIAg, thus, indicating that ImIAg which could be further exploited for its potential is a candidate for immunodiagnostic antigen for early diagnosis of amphistomosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2014/505484
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4065726</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A427023344</galeid><sourcerecordid>A427023344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-8d4fb4b0efe5994c6240816c1a26f2fe215c14453368d6c757f9f9b5c181d6e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1rFDEYhwdRbFl78qwEvIiyNt8zuQhLrVUoKK56DdnMm92UmWSczKz04P9uprMu6qW5JCQPT_L-8hbFU4LfECLEOcWEnwsseMUfFKeUEb6UhJOHxzVjJ8VZSjc4j4pIrOTj4oRypQTD7LT4dbk3zWgGHwOKDq3C4DexvkVfIHUxJEBDRN9N7-OY0DvYQxO7FsJgGrQezBbQugPrnbdoHdtssXeGLYQ02T6b3rTdzqchtmOLoPO28UNe-YCuohnSk-KRM02Cs8O8KL69v_x68WF5_enq48Xqemm5wsOyqrnb8A0GB0IpbiXlUy2WGCoddUCJsIRzwZisamlLUTrl1CZvVqSWINmieDt7u3HTQm1zBb1pdNf71vS3Ohqv_z0Jfqe3ca85lqKkk-DlQdDHHyOkQbc-WWgaEyBHo4nMV4kcb3U_KjiTpWL5axbFi__Qmzj2IScxUaWinN4JD9TWNKB9cDE_0U5SveK0xJQxzjP1eqZsH1PqwR2rI1hPraKnVtFzq2T6-d-BHNk_jZGBVzOw86E2P_09tmczDBkBZ44wL6UqGfsNierPKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1547924208</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Antibody Response to Various Developmental Stage Specific Somatic Antigens of Paramphistomum epiclitum in Goats</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Jyoti ; Prasad, A. ; Singh, Nirbhay Kumar</creator><contributor>Landa-Piedra, Abraham</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jyoti ; Prasad, A. ; Singh, Nirbhay Kumar ; Landa-Piedra, Abraham</creatorcontrib><description>Electrophoretic analysis of various developmental stage specific somatic antigens of Paramphistomum epiclitum (Digenea: Paramphistomidae), namely, metacercariae (McAg), immature intestinal flukes (ImIAg), immature ruminal flukes (ImRAg), and adult flukes (AAg), was done by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Result revealed presence of 3 (range 15.2–40.3 kDa), 13 (9.3–121.2 kDa), 14 (9.3–169.3 kDa), and 15 (8.0–169.3 kDa) polypeptides in McAg, ImIAg, ImRAg, and AAg, respectively. With an aim to identify a suitable immunodiagnostic antigen for early diagnosis of amphistomosis, the IgG antibody response to various developmental stage antigens in goats experimentally infected with metacercariae of P. epiclitum was evaluated by ELISA. The highest OD values were recorded with ImIAg which ranged between 0.23 and 0.55 with a significant increase from the 2nd week till 8th week of infection with a peak at 6th week. The analysis of statistical significance using a one-way analysis of variance with multiple pair wise comparisons revealed that IgG response was significantly higher with all antigens (P&lt;0.01) except McAg (P&gt;0.05) with a maximum mean difference of 0.1838 in comparison to control with ImIAg, thus, indicating that ImIAg which could be further exploited for its potential is a candidate for immunodiagnostic antigen for early diagnosis of amphistomosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2314-6133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2314-6141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2014/505484</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24995303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Agricultural research ; Animals ; Antibodies ; Antibodies, Helminth - immunology ; Antigens ; Antigens, Helminth - immunology ; Antigens, Helminth - isolation &amp; purification ; Digenea ; Disease ; Eggs ; Goats ; Goats - immunology ; Goats - parasitology ; Immunoassay ; Laboratories ; Mollusks ; Paramphistomatidae - immunology ; Paramphistomatidae - pathogenicity ; Paramphistomidae ; Paramphistomum epiclitum ; Parasites ; Small intestine ; Trematoda ; Trematode Infections - immunology ; Trematode Infections - pathology ; Viral antibodies</subject><ispartof>BioMed research international, 2014-01, Vol.2014 (2014), p.1-6</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 Jyoti et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Jyoti et al. Jyoti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Jyoti et al. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-8d4fb4b0efe5994c6240816c1a26f2fe215c14453368d6c757f9f9b5c181d6e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-8d4fb4b0efe5994c6240816c1a26f2fe215c14453368d6c757f9f9b5c181d6e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1547924208/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1547924208?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995303$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Landa-Piedra, Abraham</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jyoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Nirbhay Kumar</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Antibody Response to Various Developmental Stage Specific Somatic Antigens of Paramphistomum epiclitum in Goats</title><title>BioMed research international</title><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><description>Electrophoretic analysis of various developmental stage specific somatic antigens of Paramphistomum epiclitum (Digenea: Paramphistomidae), namely, metacercariae (McAg), immature intestinal flukes (ImIAg), immature ruminal flukes (ImRAg), and adult flukes (AAg), was done by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Result revealed presence of 3 (range 15.2–40.3 kDa), 13 (9.3–121.2 kDa), 14 (9.3–169.3 kDa), and 15 (8.0–169.3 kDa) polypeptides in McAg, ImIAg, ImRAg, and AAg, respectively. With an aim to identify a suitable immunodiagnostic antigen for early diagnosis of amphistomosis, the IgG antibody response to various developmental stage antigens in goats experimentally infected with metacercariae of P. epiclitum was evaluated by ELISA. The highest OD values were recorded with ImIAg which ranged between 0.23 and 0.55 with a significant increase from the 2nd week till 8th week of infection with a peak at 6th week. The analysis of statistical significance using a one-way analysis of variance with multiple pair wise comparisons revealed that IgG response was significantly higher with all antigens (P&lt;0.01) except McAg (P&gt;0.05) with a maximum mean difference of 0.1838 in comparison to control with ImIAg, thus, indicating that ImIAg which could be further exploited for its potential is a candidate for immunodiagnostic antigen for early diagnosis of amphistomosis.</description><subject>Agricultural research</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Antibodies, Helminth - immunology</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Antigens, Helminth - immunology</subject><subject>Antigens, Helminth - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Digenea</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Goats</subject><subject>Goats - immunology</subject><subject>Goats - parasitology</subject><subject>Immunoassay</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Paramphistomatidae - immunology</subject><subject>Paramphistomatidae - pathogenicity</subject><subject>Paramphistomidae</subject><subject>Paramphistomum epiclitum</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Small intestine</subject><subject>Trematoda</subject><subject>Trematode Infections - immunology</subject><subject>Trematode Infections - pathology</subject><subject>Viral antibodies</subject><issn>2314-6133</issn><issn>2314-6141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1rFDEYhwdRbFl78qwEvIiyNt8zuQhLrVUoKK56DdnMm92UmWSczKz04P9uprMu6qW5JCQPT_L-8hbFU4LfECLEOcWEnwsseMUfFKeUEb6UhJOHxzVjJ8VZSjc4j4pIrOTj4oRypQTD7LT4dbk3zWgGHwOKDq3C4DexvkVfIHUxJEBDRN9N7-OY0DvYQxO7FsJgGrQezBbQugPrnbdoHdtssXeGLYQ02T6b3rTdzqchtmOLoPO28UNe-YCuohnSk-KRM02Cs8O8KL69v_x68WF5_enq48Xqemm5wsOyqrnb8A0GB0IpbiXlUy2WGCoddUCJsIRzwZisamlLUTrl1CZvVqSWINmieDt7u3HTQm1zBb1pdNf71vS3Ohqv_z0Jfqe3ca85lqKkk-DlQdDHHyOkQbc-WWgaEyBHo4nMV4kcb3U_KjiTpWL5axbFi__Qmzj2IScxUaWinN4JD9TWNKB9cDE_0U5SveK0xJQxzjP1eqZsH1PqwR2rI1hPraKnVtFzq2T6-d-BHNk_jZGBVzOw86E2P_09tmczDBkBZ44wL6UqGfsNierPKA</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Jyoti</creator><creator>Prasad, A.</creator><creator>Singh, Nirbhay Kumar</creator><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Antibody Response to Various Developmental Stage Specific Somatic Antigens of Paramphistomum epiclitum in Goats</title><author>Jyoti ; Prasad, A. ; Singh, Nirbhay Kumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-8d4fb4b0efe5994c6240816c1a26f2fe215c14453368d6c757f9f9b5c181d6e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agricultural research</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Antibodies, Helminth - immunology</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Antigens, Helminth - immunology</topic><topic>Antigens, Helminth - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Digenea</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Goats</topic><topic>Goats - immunology</topic><topic>Goats - parasitology</topic><topic>Immunoassay</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Paramphistomatidae - immunology</topic><topic>Paramphistomatidae - pathogenicity</topic><topic>Paramphistomidae</topic><topic>Paramphistomum epiclitum</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Small intestine</topic><topic>Trematoda</topic><topic>Trematode Infections - immunology</topic><topic>Trematode Infections - pathology</topic><topic>Viral antibodies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jyoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Nirbhay Kumar</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jyoti</au><au>Prasad, A.</au><au>Singh, Nirbhay Kumar</au><au>Landa-Piedra, Abraham</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Antibody Response to Various Developmental Stage Specific Somatic Antigens of Paramphistomum epiclitum in Goats</atitle><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>2014</volume><issue>2014</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>2314-6133</issn><eissn>2314-6141</eissn><abstract>Electrophoretic analysis of various developmental stage specific somatic antigens of Paramphistomum epiclitum (Digenea: Paramphistomidae), namely, metacercariae (McAg), immature intestinal flukes (ImIAg), immature ruminal flukes (ImRAg), and adult flukes (AAg), was done by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Result revealed presence of 3 (range 15.2–40.3 kDa), 13 (9.3–121.2 kDa), 14 (9.3–169.3 kDa), and 15 (8.0–169.3 kDa) polypeptides in McAg, ImIAg, ImRAg, and AAg, respectively. With an aim to identify a suitable immunodiagnostic antigen for early diagnosis of amphistomosis, the IgG antibody response to various developmental stage antigens in goats experimentally infected with metacercariae of P. epiclitum was evaluated by ELISA. The highest OD values were recorded with ImIAg which ranged between 0.23 and 0.55 with a significant increase from the 2nd week till 8th week of infection with a peak at 6th week. The analysis of statistical significance using a one-way analysis of variance with multiple pair wise comparisons revealed that IgG response was significantly higher with all antigens (P&lt;0.01) except McAg (P&gt;0.05) with a maximum mean difference of 0.1838 in comparison to control with ImIAg, thus, indicating that ImIAg which could be further exploited for its potential is a candidate for immunodiagnostic antigen for early diagnosis of amphistomosis.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</pub><pmid>24995303</pmid><doi>10.1155/2014/505484</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2314-6133
ispartof BioMed research international, 2014-01, Vol.2014 (2014), p.1-6
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4065726
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Agricultural research
Animals
Antibodies
Antibodies, Helminth - immunology
Antigens
Antigens, Helminth - immunology
Antigens, Helminth - isolation & purification
Digenea
Disease
Eggs
Goats
Goats - immunology
Goats - parasitology
Immunoassay
Laboratories
Mollusks
Paramphistomatidae - immunology
Paramphistomatidae - pathogenicity
Paramphistomidae
Paramphistomum epiclitum
Parasites
Small intestine
Trematoda
Trematode Infections - immunology
Trematode Infections - pathology
Viral antibodies
title Evaluation of Antibody Response to Various Developmental Stage Specific Somatic Antigens of Paramphistomum epiclitum in Goats
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T10%3A11%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Antibody%20Response%20to%20Various%20Developmental%20Stage%20Specific%20Somatic%20Antigens%20of%20Paramphistomum%20epiclitum%20in%20Goats&rft.jtitle=BioMed%20research%20international&rft.au=Jyoti&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=2014&rft.issue=2014&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=2314-6133&rft.eissn=2314-6141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2014/505484&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA427023344%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-8d4fb4b0efe5994c6240816c1a26f2fe215c14453368d6c757f9f9b5c181d6e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1547924208&rft_id=info:pmid/24995303&rft_galeid=A427023344&rfr_iscdi=true