Loading…

Reconstruction of periorbital region defects: A retrospective study

Although the periorbital region forms less than 1% of the total body surface, it has a very complex anatomy; therefore, it requires a detailed approach. In this work, we aim to present the clinical applications and related literature for the algorithm of the technique which will be applied, accordin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of maxillofacial surgery 2014-01, Vol.4 (1), p.45-50
Main Authors: Yüce, Serdar, Demir, Zühtü, Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar, Celebioğlu, Selim
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3007-83c5cdcb294f3d8edfa2e93126cc27b14f9f8471417bf9655c9964dbfba0c5743
cites
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 45
container_title Annals of maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 4
creator Yüce, Serdar
Demir, Zühtü
Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar
Celebioğlu, Selim
description Although the periorbital region forms less than 1% of the total body surface, it has a very complex anatomy; therefore, it requires a detailed approach. In this work, we aim to present the clinical applications and related literature for the algorithm of the technique which will be applied, according to the location of the defect, in choosing the surgery treatment method. Factors affecting the results and different treatment methods of the anatomical region, including its difficult reconstruction, will also be included. A review of 177 periorbital region defect reconstructions was performed. As a treatment method, in 76 (43%) patients primary closure was chosen, 39 (22%) patients had grafts and in 62 (35%) patients a flap was chosen as a treatment alternative. With respect to postoperative complications, there were a total of 6 (3.38%) patients observed with venous congestion. In 11 (6.21%) patients ectropion developed, in 1 (0.56%) patient minimal space between the eyelids while monitoring recovery was observed and in 1 (0.56%) patient, flap loss was observed due to a circulatory disorder. The aim of reconstruction is to repair the defect suitable to normal physiological and anatomical values. As a result, before the surgical treatments in this difficult anatomical region, the defect width and anatomical localization must be evaluated. The most suitable reconstruction method must be identified, using an evaluation of the algorithm and the required functional and esthetical results can be obtained with intraoperative flexible behavior and a change of method, when necessary.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/2231-0746.133077
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4073462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A369397288</galeid><sourcerecordid>A369397288</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3007-83c5cdcb294f3d8edfa2e93126cc27b14f9f8471417bf9655c9964dbfba0c5743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtr3DAUhUVpaEKSfVfFECjZONXLenRRGIa-IBAI7VrI8tWMiseaSHIg_z4yMw2JNpLu-e5BugehjwTfcILZF0oZabHk4oYwhqV8h84o5bplioj3y_kon6LLnP_huqqgGP2ATiumZKfVGVrfg4tTLml2JcSpib7ZQwox9aHYsUmwWaoDeHAlf21WtVJSzPt6DY_Q5DIPTxfoxNsxw-VxP0d_f3z_s_7V3t79_L1e3baOYSxbxVznBtdTzT0bFAzeUtCMUOEclT3hXnvFJeFE9l6LrnNaCz70vrfYdZKzc_Tt4Luf-x0MDqaS7Gj2KexsejLRBvNWmcLWbOKj4VgyLmg1uD4apPgwQy5mF7KDcbQTxDkb0nEqOkyFrOjVAd3YEUyYfKyObsHNignNtKRKVerzK2oLdizbHMd5GWV-C-ID6OrwcgL_8mqCzZKmWeIyS1zmkGZt-fT6ty8N_7NjzydomYM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1542650267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconstruction of periorbital region defects: A retrospective study</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Yüce, Serdar ; Demir, Zühtü ; Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar ; Celebioğlu, Selim</creator><creatorcontrib>Yüce, Serdar ; Demir, Zühtü ; Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar ; Celebioğlu, Selim</creatorcontrib><description>Although the periorbital region forms less than 1% of the total body surface, it has a very complex anatomy; therefore, it requires a detailed approach. In this work, we aim to present the clinical applications and related literature for the algorithm of the technique which will be applied, according to the location of the defect, in choosing the surgery treatment method. Factors affecting the results and different treatment methods of the anatomical region, including its difficult reconstruction, will also be included. A review of 177 periorbital region defect reconstructions was performed. As a treatment method, in 76 (43%) patients primary closure was chosen, 39 (22%) patients had grafts and in 62 (35%) patients a flap was chosen as a treatment alternative. With respect to postoperative complications, there were a total of 6 (3.38%) patients observed with venous congestion. In 11 (6.21%) patients ectropion developed, in 1 (0.56%) patient minimal space between the eyelids while monitoring recovery was observed and in 1 (0.56%) patient, flap loss was observed due to a circulatory disorder. The aim of reconstruction is to repair the defect suitable to normal physiological and anatomical values. As a result, before the surgical treatments in this difficult anatomical region, the defect width and anatomical localization must be evaluated. The most suitable reconstruction method must be identified, using an evaluation of the algorithm and the required functional and esthetical results can be obtained with intraoperative flexible behavior and a change of method, when necessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2231-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2249-3816</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/2231-0746.133077</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24987598</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Analysis ; Birth defects ; Care and treatment ; Face ; Injuries ; Methods ; Original articles - Retrospective Study ; Surgery, Plastic</subject><ispartof>Annals of maxillofacial surgery, 2014-01, Vol.4 (1), p.45-50</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: © Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3007-83c5cdcb294f3d8edfa2e93126cc27b14f9f8471417bf9655c9964dbfba0c5743</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073462/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073462/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,4009,27902,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987598$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yüce, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, Zühtü</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celebioğlu, Selim</creatorcontrib><title>Reconstruction of periorbital region defects: A retrospective study</title><title>Annals of maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Although the periorbital region forms less than 1% of the total body surface, it has a very complex anatomy; therefore, it requires a detailed approach. In this work, we aim to present the clinical applications and related literature for the algorithm of the technique which will be applied, according to the location of the defect, in choosing the surgery treatment method. Factors affecting the results and different treatment methods of the anatomical region, including its difficult reconstruction, will also be included. A review of 177 periorbital region defect reconstructions was performed. As a treatment method, in 76 (43%) patients primary closure was chosen, 39 (22%) patients had grafts and in 62 (35%) patients a flap was chosen as a treatment alternative. With respect to postoperative complications, there were a total of 6 (3.38%) patients observed with venous congestion. In 11 (6.21%) patients ectropion developed, in 1 (0.56%) patient minimal space between the eyelids while monitoring recovery was observed and in 1 (0.56%) patient, flap loss was observed due to a circulatory disorder. The aim of reconstruction is to repair the defect suitable to normal physiological and anatomical values. As a result, before the surgical treatments in this difficult anatomical region, the defect width and anatomical localization must be evaluated. The most suitable reconstruction method must be identified, using an evaluation of the algorithm and the required functional and esthetical results can be obtained with intraoperative flexible behavior and a change of method, when necessary.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Birth defects</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Original articles - Retrospective Study</subject><subject>Surgery, Plastic</subject><issn>2231-0746</issn><issn>2249-3816</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUtr3DAUhUVpaEKSfVfFECjZONXLenRRGIa-IBAI7VrI8tWMiseaSHIg_z4yMw2JNpLu-e5BugehjwTfcILZF0oZabHk4oYwhqV8h84o5bplioj3y_kon6LLnP_huqqgGP2ATiumZKfVGVrfg4tTLml2JcSpib7ZQwox9aHYsUmwWaoDeHAlf21WtVJSzPt6DY_Q5DIPTxfoxNsxw-VxP0d_f3z_s_7V3t79_L1e3baOYSxbxVznBtdTzT0bFAzeUtCMUOEclT3hXnvFJeFE9l6LrnNaCz70vrfYdZKzc_Tt4Luf-x0MDqaS7Gj2KexsejLRBvNWmcLWbOKj4VgyLmg1uD4apPgwQy5mF7KDcbQTxDkb0nEqOkyFrOjVAd3YEUyYfKyObsHNignNtKRKVerzK2oLdizbHMd5GWV-C-ID6OrwcgL_8mqCzZKmWeIyS1zmkGZt-fT6ty8N_7NjzydomYM</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Yüce, Serdar</creator><creator>Demir, Zühtü</creator><creator>Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar</creator><creator>Celebioğlu, Selim</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>Reconstruction of periorbital region defects: A retrospective study</title><author>Yüce, Serdar ; Demir, Zühtü ; Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar ; Celebioğlu, Selim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3007-83c5cdcb294f3d8edfa2e93126cc27b14f9f8471417bf9655c9964dbfba0c5743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Birth defects</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Original articles - Retrospective Study</topic><topic>Surgery, Plastic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yüce, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, Zühtü</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celebioğlu, Selim</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yüce, Serdar</au><au>Demir, Zühtü</au><au>Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar</au><au>Celebioğlu, Selim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconstruction of periorbital region defects: A retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>Annals of maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>45-50</pages><issn>2231-0746</issn><eissn>2249-3816</eissn><abstract>Although the periorbital region forms less than 1% of the total body surface, it has a very complex anatomy; therefore, it requires a detailed approach. In this work, we aim to present the clinical applications and related literature for the algorithm of the technique which will be applied, according to the location of the defect, in choosing the surgery treatment method. Factors affecting the results and different treatment methods of the anatomical region, including its difficult reconstruction, will also be included. A review of 177 periorbital region defect reconstructions was performed. As a treatment method, in 76 (43%) patients primary closure was chosen, 39 (22%) patients had grafts and in 62 (35%) patients a flap was chosen as a treatment alternative. With respect to postoperative complications, there were a total of 6 (3.38%) patients observed with venous congestion. In 11 (6.21%) patients ectropion developed, in 1 (0.56%) patient minimal space between the eyelids while monitoring recovery was observed and in 1 (0.56%) patient, flap loss was observed due to a circulatory disorder. The aim of reconstruction is to repair the defect suitable to normal physiological and anatomical values. As a result, before the surgical treatments in this difficult anatomical region, the defect width and anatomical localization must be evaluated. The most suitable reconstruction method must be identified, using an evaluation of the algorithm and the required functional and esthetical results can be obtained with intraoperative flexible behavior and a change of method, when necessary.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>24987598</pmid><doi>10.4103/2231-0746.133077</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2231-0746
ispartof Annals of maxillofacial surgery, 2014-01, Vol.4 (1), p.45-50
issn 2231-0746
2249-3816
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4073462
source PubMed Central
subjects Algorithms
Analysis
Birth defects
Care and treatment
Face
Injuries
Methods
Original articles - Retrospective Study
Surgery, Plastic
title Reconstruction of periorbital region defects: A retrospective study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A57%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconstruction%20of%20periorbital%20region%20defects:%20A%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Y%C3%BCce,%20Serdar&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=45-50&rft.issn=2231-0746&rft.eissn=2249-3816&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/2231-0746.133077&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA369397288%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3007-83c5cdcb294f3d8edfa2e93126cc27b14f9f8471417bf9655c9964dbfba0c5743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1542650267&rft_id=info:pmid/24987598&rft_galeid=A369397288&rfr_iscdi=true