Loading…
Reconstruction of periorbital region defects: A retrospective study
Although the periorbital region forms less than 1% of the total body surface, it has a very complex anatomy; therefore, it requires a detailed approach. In this work, we aim to present the clinical applications and related literature for the algorithm of the technique which will be applied, accordin...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of maxillofacial surgery 2014-01, Vol.4 (1), p.45-50 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3007-83c5cdcb294f3d8edfa2e93126cc27b14f9f8471417bf9655c9964dbfba0c5743 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 50 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 45 |
container_title | Annals of maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Yüce, Serdar Demir, Zühtü Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar Celebioğlu, Selim |
description | Although the periorbital region forms less than 1% of the total body surface, it has a very complex anatomy; therefore, it requires a detailed approach. In this work, we aim to present the clinical applications and related literature for the algorithm of the technique which will be applied, according to the location of the defect, in choosing the surgery treatment method. Factors affecting the results and different treatment methods of the anatomical region, including its difficult reconstruction, will also be included.
A review of 177 periorbital region defect reconstructions was performed.
As a treatment method, in 76 (43%) patients primary closure was chosen, 39 (22%) patients had grafts and in 62 (35%) patients a flap was chosen as a treatment alternative. With respect to postoperative complications, there were a total of 6 (3.38%) patients observed with venous congestion. In 11 (6.21%) patients ectropion developed, in 1 (0.56%) patient minimal space between the eyelids while monitoring recovery was observed and in 1 (0.56%) patient, flap loss was observed due to a circulatory disorder.
The aim of reconstruction is to repair the defect suitable to normal physiological and anatomical values. As a result, before the surgical treatments in this difficult anatomical region, the defect width and anatomical localization must be evaluated. The most suitable reconstruction method must be identified, using an evaluation of the algorithm and the required functional and esthetical results can be obtained with intraoperative flexible behavior and a change of method, when necessary. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/2231-0746.133077 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4073462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A369397288</galeid><sourcerecordid>A369397288</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3007-83c5cdcb294f3d8edfa2e93126cc27b14f9f8471417bf9655c9964dbfba0c5743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtr3DAUhUVpaEKSfVfFECjZONXLenRRGIa-IBAI7VrI8tWMiseaSHIg_z4yMw2JNpLu-e5BugehjwTfcILZF0oZabHk4oYwhqV8h84o5bplioj3y_kon6LLnP_huqqgGP2ATiumZKfVGVrfg4tTLml2JcSpib7ZQwox9aHYsUmwWaoDeHAlf21WtVJSzPt6DY_Q5DIPTxfoxNsxw-VxP0d_f3z_s_7V3t79_L1e3baOYSxbxVznBtdTzT0bFAzeUtCMUOEclT3hXnvFJeFE9l6LrnNaCz70vrfYdZKzc_Tt4Luf-x0MDqaS7Gj2KexsejLRBvNWmcLWbOKj4VgyLmg1uD4apPgwQy5mF7KDcbQTxDkb0nEqOkyFrOjVAd3YEUyYfKyObsHNignNtKRKVerzK2oLdizbHMd5GWV-C-ID6OrwcgL_8mqCzZKmWeIyS1zmkGZt-fT6ty8N_7NjzydomYM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1542650267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconstruction of periorbital region defects: A retrospective study</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Yüce, Serdar ; Demir, Zühtü ; Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar ; Celebioğlu, Selim</creator><creatorcontrib>Yüce, Serdar ; Demir, Zühtü ; Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar ; Celebioğlu, Selim</creatorcontrib><description>Although the periorbital region forms less than 1% of the total body surface, it has a very complex anatomy; therefore, it requires a detailed approach. In this work, we aim to present the clinical applications and related literature for the algorithm of the technique which will be applied, according to the location of the defect, in choosing the surgery treatment method. Factors affecting the results and different treatment methods of the anatomical region, including its difficult reconstruction, will also be included.
A review of 177 periorbital region defect reconstructions was performed.
As a treatment method, in 76 (43%) patients primary closure was chosen, 39 (22%) patients had grafts and in 62 (35%) patients a flap was chosen as a treatment alternative. With respect to postoperative complications, there were a total of 6 (3.38%) patients observed with venous congestion. In 11 (6.21%) patients ectropion developed, in 1 (0.56%) patient minimal space between the eyelids while monitoring recovery was observed and in 1 (0.56%) patient, flap loss was observed due to a circulatory disorder.
The aim of reconstruction is to repair the defect suitable to normal physiological and anatomical values. As a result, before the surgical treatments in this difficult anatomical region, the defect width and anatomical localization must be evaluated. The most suitable reconstruction method must be identified, using an evaluation of the algorithm and the required functional and esthetical results can be obtained with intraoperative flexible behavior and a change of method, when necessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2231-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2249-3816</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/2231-0746.133077</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24987598</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Analysis ; Birth defects ; Care and treatment ; Face ; Injuries ; Methods ; Original articles - Retrospective Study ; Surgery, Plastic</subject><ispartof>Annals of maxillofacial surgery, 2014-01, Vol.4 (1), p.45-50</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: © Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3007-83c5cdcb294f3d8edfa2e93126cc27b14f9f8471417bf9655c9964dbfba0c5743</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073462/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073462/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,4009,27902,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987598$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yüce, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, Zühtü</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celebioğlu, Selim</creatorcontrib><title>Reconstruction of periorbital region defects: A retrospective study</title><title>Annals of maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Although the periorbital region forms less than 1% of the total body surface, it has a very complex anatomy; therefore, it requires a detailed approach. In this work, we aim to present the clinical applications and related literature for the algorithm of the technique which will be applied, according to the location of the defect, in choosing the surgery treatment method. Factors affecting the results and different treatment methods of the anatomical region, including its difficult reconstruction, will also be included.
A review of 177 periorbital region defect reconstructions was performed.
As a treatment method, in 76 (43%) patients primary closure was chosen, 39 (22%) patients had grafts and in 62 (35%) patients a flap was chosen as a treatment alternative. With respect to postoperative complications, there were a total of 6 (3.38%) patients observed with venous congestion. In 11 (6.21%) patients ectropion developed, in 1 (0.56%) patient minimal space between the eyelids while monitoring recovery was observed and in 1 (0.56%) patient, flap loss was observed due to a circulatory disorder.
The aim of reconstruction is to repair the defect suitable to normal physiological and anatomical values. As a result, before the surgical treatments in this difficult anatomical region, the defect width and anatomical localization must be evaluated. The most suitable reconstruction method must be identified, using an evaluation of the algorithm and the required functional and esthetical results can be obtained with intraoperative flexible behavior and a change of method, when necessary.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Birth defects</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Original articles - Retrospective Study</subject><subject>Surgery, Plastic</subject><issn>2231-0746</issn><issn>2249-3816</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUtr3DAUhUVpaEKSfVfFECjZONXLenRRGIa-IBAI7VrI8tWMiseaSHIg_z4yMw2JNpLu-e5BugehjwTfcILZF0oZabHk4oYwhqV8h84o5bplioj3y_kon6LLnP_huqqgGP2ATiumZKfVGVrfg4tTLml2JcSpib7ZQwox9aHYsUmwWaoDeHAlf21WtVJSzPt6DY_Q5DIPTxfoxNsxw-VxP0d_f3z_s_7V3t79_L1e3baOYSxbxVznBtdTzT0bFAzeUtCMUOEclT3hXnvFJeFE9l6LrnNaCz70vrfYdZKzc_Tt4Luf-x0MDqaS7Gj2KexsejLRBvNWmcLWbOKj4VgyLmg1uD4apPgwQy5mF7KDcbQTxDkb0nEqOkyFrOjVAd3YEUyYfKyObsHNignNtKRKVerzK2oLdizbHMd5GWV-C-ID6OrwcgL_8mqCzZKmWeIyS1zmkGZt-fT6ty8N_7NjzydomYM</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Yüce, Serdar</creator><creator>Demir, Zühtü</creator><creator>Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar</creator><creator>Celebioğlu, Selim</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>Reconstruction of periorbital region defects: A retrospective study</title><author>Yüce, Serdar ; Demir, Zühtü ; Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar ; Celebioğlu, Selim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3007-83c5cdcb294f3d8edfa2e93126cc27b14f9f8471417bf9655c9964dbfba0c5743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Birth defects</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Original articles - Retrospective Study</topic><topic>Surgery, Plastic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yüce, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, Zühtü</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celebioğlu, Selim</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yüce, Serdar</au><au>Demir, Zühtü</au><au>Selçuk, Caferi Tayyar</au><au>Celebioğlu, Selim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconstruction of periorbital region defects: A retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>Annals of maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>45-50</pages><issn>2231-0746</issn><eissn>2249-3816</eissn><abstract>Although the periorbital region forms less than 1% of the total body surface, it has a very complex anatomy; therefore, it requires a detailed approach. In this work, we aim to present the clinical applications and related literature for the algorithm of the technique which will be applied, according to the location of the defect, in choosing the surgery treatment method. Factors affecting the results and different treatment methods of the anatomical region, including its difficult reconstruction, will also be included.
A review of 177 periorbital region defect reconstructions was performed.
As a treatment method, in 76 (43%) patients primary closure was chosen, 39 (22%) patients had grafts and in 62 (35%) patients a flap was chosen as a treatment alternative. With respect to postoperative complications, there were a total of 6 (3.38%) patients observed with venous congestion. In 11 (6.21%) patients ectropion developed, in 1 (0.56%) patient minimal space between the eyelids while monitoring recovery was observed and in 1 (0.56%) patient, flap loss was observed due to a circulatory disorder.
The aim of reconstruction is to repair the defect suitable to normal physiological and anatomical values. As a result, before the surgical treatments in this difficult anatomical region, the defect width and anatomical localization must be evaluated. The most suitable reconstruction method must be identified, using an evaluation of the algorithm and the required functional and esthetical results can be obtained with intraoperative flexible behavior and a change of method, when necessary.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>24987598</pmid><doi>10.4103/2231-0746.133077</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2231-0746 |
ispartof | Annals of maxillofacial surgery, 2014-01, Vol.4 (1), p.45-50 |
issn | 2231-0746 2249-3816 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4073462 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Algorithms Analysis Birth defects Care and treatment Face Injuries Methods Original articles - Retrospective Study Surgery, Plastic |
title | Reconstruction of periorbital region defects: A retrospective study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A57%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconstruction%20of%20periorbital%20region%20defects:%20A%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Y%C3%BCce,%20Serdar&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=45-50&rft.issn=2231-0746&rft.eissn=2249-3816&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/2231-0746.133077&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA369397288%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3007-83c5cdcb294f3d8edfa2e93126cc27b14f9f8471417bf9655c9964dbfba0c5743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1542650267&rft_id=info:pmid/24987598&rft_galeid=A369397288&rfr_iscdi=true |