Loading…
The effects of stimulus-driven competition and task set on involuntary attention
It is well established that involuntary attention—the exogenous capture of attention by salient but task-irrelevant stimuli—can strongly modulate target detection and discrimination performance. There is an ongoing debate, however, about how involuntary attention affects target performance. Some stu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2014-06, Vol.14 (7), p.14-14 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-9a46212b276283717fa4e62995e385f12292cccfe18921831975db96087f7bc3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 14 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 14 |
container_title | Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Han, Suk Won Marois, René |
description | It is well established that involuntary attention—the exogenous capture of attention by salient but task-irrelevant stimuli—can strongly modulate target detection and discrimination performance. There is an ongoing debate, however, about how involuntary attention affects target performance. Some studies suggest that it results from enhanced perception of the target, whereas others indicate instead that it affects decisional stages of information processing. From a review of these studies, we hypothesized that the presence of distractors and task sets are key factors in determining the effect of involuntary attention on target perception. Consistent with this hypothesis, here we found that noninformative cues summoning involuntary attention affected perceptual identification of a target when distractors were present. This cuing effect could not be attributed to reduced target location uncertainty or decision bias. The only condition under which involuntary attention improved target perception in the absence of distractors occurred when observers did not adopt a task set to focus attention on the target location. We conclude that the perceptual effects of involuntary attention depend on distractor interference and the adoption of a task set to resolve such stimulus competition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1167/14.7.14 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4073619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1541374346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-9a46212b276283717fa4e62995e385f12292cccfe18921831975db96087f7bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtLAzEUhYMotlbxH0h2upmam2Qmk40gxRcUdNF9yKSJjc5M6iRT8N87pVrq5j64H-ceDkKXQKYAhbgFPhVT4EdoDDnjmWAFPT6YR-gsxg9CKMkJnKIR5VIQSWGM3hYri61z1qSIg8Mx-aav-5gtO7-xLTahWdvkkw8t1u0SJx0_cbQJD7tvN6Hu26S7b6xTsu2WOkcnTtfRXvz2CVo8Pixmz9n89elldj_PDCtkyqTmBQVaUVHQkgkQTnNbUClzy8rcAaWSGmOchXLwWTKQIl9WsiClcKIybILudrLrvmrs0gzPO12rdeebwY4K2qv_l9av1HvYKE6GQEAOAje_Al346m1MqvHR2LrWrQ19VJBzYIIzXgzo9Q41XYixs27_Bojaxq-Aq20ZyKtDV3vuL2_2A1L1gBc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1541374346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of stimulus-driven competition and task set on involuntary attention</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Han, Suk Won ; Marois, René</creator><creatorcontrib>Han, Suk Won ; Marois, René</creatorcontrib><description>It is well established that involuntary attention—the exogenous capture of attention by salient but task-irrelevant stimuli—can strongly modulate target detection and discrimination performance. There is an ongoing debate, however, about how involuntary attention affects target performance. Some studies suggest that it results from enhanced perception of the target, whereas others indicate instead that it affects decisional stages of information processing. From a review of these studies, we hypothesized that the presence of distractors and task sets are key factors in determining the effect of involuntary attention on target perception. Consistent with this hypothesis, here we found that noninformative cues summoning involuntary attention affected perceptual identification of a target when distractors were present. This cuing effect could not be attributed to reduced target location uncertainty or decision bias. The only condition under which involuntary attention improved target perception in the absence of distractors occurred when observers did not adopt a task set to focus attention on the target location. We conclude that the perceptual effects of involuntary attention depend on distractor interference and the adoption of a task set to resolve such stimulus competition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/14.7.14</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24970921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention - physiology ; Cues ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Photic Stimulation ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2014-06, Vol.14 (7), p.14-14</ispartof><rights>2014 ARVO.</rights><rights>2014 ARVO 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-9a46212b276283717fa4e62995e385f12292cccfe18921831975db96087f7bc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073619/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073619/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24970921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Han, Suk Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marois, René</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of stimulus-driven competition and task set on involuntary attention</title><title>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><description>It is well established that involuntary attention—the exogenous capture of attention by salient but task-irrelevant stimuli—can strongly modulate target detection and discrimination performance. There is an ongoing debate, however, about how involuntary attention affects target performance. Some studies suggest that it results from enhanced perception of the target, whereas others indicate instead that it affects decisional stages of information processing. From a review of these studies, we hypothesized that the presence of distractors and task sets are key factors in determining the effect of involuntary attention on target perception. Consistent with this hypothesis, here we found that noninformative cues summoning involuntary attention affected perceptual identification of a target when distractors were present. This cuing effect could not be attributed to reduced target location uncertainty or decision bias. The only condition under which involuntary attention improved target perception in the absence of distractors occurred when observers did not adopt a task set to focus attention on the target location. We conclude that the perceptual effects of involuntary attention depend on distractor interference and the adoption of a task set to resolve such stimulus competition.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1534-7362</issn><issn>1534-7362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtLAzEUhYMotlbxH0h2upmam2Qmk40gxRcUdNF9yKSJjc5M6iRT8N87pVrq5j64H-ceDkKXQKYAhbgFPhVT4EdoDDnjmWAFPT6YR-gsxg9CKMkJnKIR5VIQSWGM3hYri61z1qSIg8Mx-aav-5gtO7-xLTahWdvkkw8t1u0SJx0_cbQJD7tvN6Hu26S7b6xTsu2WOkcnTtfRXvz2CVo8Pixmz9n89elldj_PDCtkyqTmBQVaUVHQkgkQTnNbUClzy8rcAaWSGmOchXLwWTKQIl9WsiClcKIybILudrLrvmrs0gzPO12rdeebwY4K2qv_l9av1HvYKE6GQEAOAje_Al346m1MqvHR2LrWrQ19VJBzYIIzXgzo9Q41XYixs27_Bojaxq-Aq20ZyKtDV3vuL2_2A1L1gBc</recordid><startdate>20140626</startdate><enddate>20140626</enddate><creator>Han, Suk Won</creator><creator>Marois, René</creator><general>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140626</creationdate><title>The effects of stimulus-driven competition and task set on involuntary attention</title><author>Han, Suk Won ; Marois, René</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-9a46212b276283717fa4e62995e385f12292cccfe18921831975db96087f7bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Suk Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marois, René</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Suk Won</au><au>Marois, René</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of stimulus-driven competition and task set on involuntary attention</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><date>2014-06-26</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>14</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>14-14</pages><issn>1534-7362</issn><eissn>1534-7362</eissn><abstract>It is well established that involuntary attention—the exogenous capture of attention by salient but task-irrelevant stimuli—can strongly modulate target detection and discrimination performance. There is an ongoing debate, however, about how involuntary attention affects target performance. Some studies suggest that it results from enhanced perception of the target, whereas others indicate instead that it affects decisional stages of information processing. From a review of these studies, we hypothesized that the presence of distractors and task sets are key factors in determining the effect of involuntary attention on target perception. Consistent with this hypothesis, here we found that noninformative cues summoning involuntary attention affected perceptual identification of a target when distractors were present. This cuing effect could not be attributed to reduced target location uncertainty or decision bias. The only condition under which involuntary attention improved target perception in the absence of distractors occurred when observers did not adopt a task set to focus attention on the target location. We conclude that the perceptual effects of involuntary attention depend on distractor interference and the adoption of a task set to resolve such stimulus competition.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</pub><pmid>24970921</pmid><doi>10.1167/14.7.14</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1534-7362 |
ispartof | Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2014-06, Vol.14 (7), p.14-14 |
issn | 1534-7362 1534-7362 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4073619 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Attention - physiology Cues Female Humans Male Photic Stimulation Visual Perception - physiology Young Adult |
title | The effects of stimulus-driven competition and task set on involuntary attention |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T21%3A18%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20stimulus-driven%20competition%20and%20task%20set%20on%20involuntary%20attention&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vision%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Han,%20Suk%20Won&rft.date=2014-06-26&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=14-14&rft.issn=1534-7362&rft.eissn=1534-7362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/14.7.14&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1541374346%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-9a46212b276283717fa4e62995e385f12292cccfe18921831975db96087f7bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1541374346&rft_id=info:pmid/24970921&rfr_iscdi=true |