Loading…
Validation of the Fatigue Severity Scale in chronic hepatitis C
Fatigue is a common symptom of chronic hepatitis C virus (cHCV) infection and a common side effect of interferon-based treatment for cHCV. This study provides confirmatory evidence of the reliability and validity of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) to document fatigue in cHCV research and identifies...
Saved in:
Published in: | Health and quality of life outcomes 2014-06, Vol.12 (1), p.90-90, Article 90 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b684t-c999f533a4df0854ce035813dca542857a502dfe1587fe56586516d06112606f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b684t-c999f533a4df0854ce035813dca542857a502dfe1587fe56586516d06112606f3 |
container_end_page | 90 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 90 |
container_title | Health and quality of life outcomes |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Rosa, Kathleen Fu, Min Gilles, Leen Cerri, Karin Peeters, Monika Bubb, Jeffrey Scott, Jane |
description | Fatigue is a common symptom of chronic hepatitis C virus (cHCV) infection and a common side effect of interferon-based treatment for cHCV. This study provides confirmatory evidence of the reliability and validity of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) to document fatigue in cHCV research and identifies values that indicate clinically important differences in FSS to aid in interpreting fatigue in cHCV clinical trials.
The study used data from two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase IIb trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of simeprevir plus peginterferon-α/ribavirin in treatment-naïve (PILLAR, n = 386) and treatment-experienced patients (ASPIRE, n = 462) with cHCV infection. Patients completed the FSS and EuroQoL 5 dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) at baseline and at regular intervals throughout both trials. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's coefficient α at Week 24 (internal consistency reliability) and intraclass correlation (ICC) between FSS at Weeks 12 and 24 in stable patients ( |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1477-7525-12-90 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4094687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A539661938</galeid><sourcerecordid>A539661938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b684t-c999f533a4df0854ce035813dca542857a502dfe1587fe56586516d06112606f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoh9w5oYicaGHtLbjcewLqKwoVKqExAJXy-uMd10l8TZOKvrvcbRlaVCRkA-2Z555NXpnsuwVJaeUSnFGeVUVFTAoKCsUeZId7iNPH7wPsqMYrwlhJWPwPDtgXFGoJD3M3v8wja_N4EOXB5cPG8wv0m89Yr7EW-z9cJcvrWkw911uN33ovM03uE3M4GO-eJE9c6aJ-PL-Ps6-X3z8tvhcXH35dLk4vypWQvKhsEopB2VpeO2IBG6RlCBpWVsDnEmoDBBWO6QgK4cgQAqgoiaCUiaIcOVx9m6nux1XLdYWu6E3jd72vjX9nQ7G63mm8xu9DreaE8WFrJLAh53Ayod_CMwzNrR6MlBPBmrKtCJJ5O19F324GTEOuvXRYtOYDsMYNYXUdSqi8B8oByoVyEn1zV_odRj7Ltk5UbwiTEr4Q63TNLTvXEht2klUn0OphKCqlIk6fYRKp8bW29Ch8yk-KziZFSRmwJ_D2owx6svl1zl7tmNtH2Ls0e3to0RP-_iIYa8fjm3P_17A8hcpE9aV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1544702885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Fatigue Severity Scale in chronic hepatitis C</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Rosa, Kathleen ; Fu, Min ; Gilles, Leen ; Cerri, Karin ; Peeters, Monika ; Bubb, Jeffrey ; Scott, Jane</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Kathleen ; Fu, Min ; Gilles, Leen ; Cerri, Karin ; Peeters, Monika ; Bubb, Jeffrey ; Scott, Jane</creatorcontrib><description>Fatigue is a common symptom of chronic hepatitis C virus (cHCV) infection and a common side effect of interferon-based treatment for cHCV. This study provides confirmatory evidence of the reliability and validity of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) to document fatigue in cHCV research and identifies values that indicate clinically important differences in FSS to aid in interpreting fatigue in cHCV clinical trials.
The study used data from two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase IIb trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of simeprevir plus peginterferon-α/ribavirin in treatment-naïve (PILLAR, n = 386) and treatment-experienced patients (ASPIRE, n = 462) with cHCV infection. Patients completed the FSS and EuroQoL 5 dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) at baseline and at regular intervals throughout both trials. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's coefficient α at Week 24 (internal consistency reliability) and intraclass correlation (ICC) between FSS at Weeks 12 and 24 in stable patients (<0.5 g/dL hemoglobin [Hb] change between Weeks 12/24). Correlation with the EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) and "Usual Activity" domain score was used to assess concurrent validity. Clinical validity was evaluated using a case-control method to link spontaneously reported fatigue and anemia adverse events (AEs) during the study to FSS scores.
FSS total scores demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's α: 0.95, 0.96; ICC: 0.74, 0.86 for PILLAR and ASPIRE, respectively) and concurrent validity (correlation with EQ-5D VAS: -0.63, -0.66) with a monotonic relationship between the EQ-5D "Usual Activities" item response and FSS. Clinical validity was confirmed by a significant difference between cases and controls for fatigue AEs (p < 0.05); however, anemia defined by AE or Hb abnormalities was only weakly related to FSS score. Analyses indicate that a change of 0.33-0.82 in mean FSS scores represents a meaningful improvement in fatigue, and a one-point change is a conservative indicator of an important change in individual FSS scores.
A difference of ≥0.7 in mean FSS scores can be considered a clinically important difference within groups over time or between groups. A one-point change or less in individual FSS scores indicates a clinically relevant change in fatigue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-7525</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-7525</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-90</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24915781</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Analysis ; Care and treatment ; Clinical trials ; Double-Blind Method ; Fatigue ; Fatigue - classification ; Fatigue - diagnosis ; Female ; Health aspects ; Hepatitis ; Hepatitis C ; Hepatitis C virus ; Hepatitis C, Chronic - drug therapy ; Hepatitis C, Chronic - physiopathology ; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Infections ; Male ; Measurement ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Quality of Life ; Questionnaires ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Reproducibility of Results ; Simeprevir ; Studies ; Sulfonamides - therapeutic use ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Health and quality of life outcomes, 2014-06, Vol.12 (1), p.90-90, Article 90</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 Rosa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Rosa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 Rosa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b684t-c999f533a4df0854ce035813dca542857a502dfe1587fe56586516d06112606f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b684t-c999f533a4df0854ce035813dca542857a502dfe1587fe56586516d06112606f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4094687/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1544702885?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24915781$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilles, Leen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerri, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeters, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bubb, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Jane</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Fatigue Severity Scale in chronic hepatitis C</title><title>Health and quality of life outcomes</title><addtitle>Health Qual Life Outcomes</addtitle><description>Fatigue is a common symptom of chronic hepatitis C virus (cHCV) infection and a common side effect of interferon-based treatment for cHCV. This study provides confirmatory evidence of the reliability and validity of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) to document fatigue in cHCV research and identifies values that indicate clinically important differences in FSS to aid in interpreting fatigue in cHCV clinical trials.
The study used data from two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase IIb trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of simeprevir plus peginterferon-α/ribavirin in treatment-naïve (PILLAR, n = 386) and treatment-experienced patients (ASPIRE, n = 462) with cHCV infection. Patients completed the FSS and EuroQoL 5 dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) at baseline and at regular intervals throughout both trials. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's coefficient α at Week 24 (internal consistency reliability) and intraclass correlation (ICC) between FSS at Weeks 12 and 24 in stable patients (<0.5 g/dL hemoglobin [Hb] change between Weeks 12/24). Correlation with the EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) and "Usual Activity" domain score was used to assess concurrent validity. Clinical validity was evaluated using a case-control method to link spontaneously reported fatigue and anemia adverse events (AEs) during the study to FSS scores.
FSS total scores demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's α: 0.95, 0.96; ICC: 0.74, 0.86 for PILLAR and ASPIRE, respectively) and concurrent validity (correlation with EQ-5D VAS: -0.63, -0.66) with a monotonic relationship between the EQ-5D "Usual Activities" item response and FSS. Clinical validity was confirmed by a significant difference between cases and controls for fatigue AEs (p < 0.05); however, anemia defined by AE or Hb abnormalities was only weakly related to FSS score. Analyses indicate that a change of 0.33-0.82 in mean FSS scores represents a meaningful improvement in fatigue, and a one-point change is a conservative indicator of an important change in individual FSS scores.
A difference of ≥0.7 in mean FSS scores can be considered a clinically important difference within groups over time or between groups. A one-point change or less in individual FSS scores indicates a clinically relevant change in fatigue.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Fatigue - classification</subject><subject>Fatigue - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hepatitis</subject><subject>Hepatitis C</subject><subject>Hepatitis C virus</subject><subject>Hepatitis C, Chronic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hepatitis C, Chronic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Simeprevir</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sulfonamides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1477-7525</issn><issn>1477-7525</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoh9w5oYicaGHtLbjcewLqKwoVKqExAJXy-uMd10l8TZOKvrvcbRlaVCRkA-2Z555NXpnsuwVJaeUSnFGeVUVFTAoKCsUeZId7iNPH7wPsqMYrwlhJWPwPDtgXFGoJD3M3v8wja_N4EOXB5cPG8wv0m89Yr7EW-z9cJcvrWkw911uN33ovM03uE3M4GO-eJE9c6aJ-PL-Ps6-X3z8tvhcXH35dLk4vypWQvKhsEopB2VpeO2IBG6RlCBpWVsDnEmoDBBWO6QgK4cgQAqgoiaCUiaIcOVx9m6nux1XLdYWu6E3jd72vjX9nQ7G63mm8xu9DreaE8WFrJLAh53Ayod_CMwzNrR6MlBPBmrKtCJJ5O19F324GTEOuvXRYtOYDsMYNYXUdSqi8B8oByoVyEn1zV_odRj7Ltk5UbwiTEr4Q63TNLTvXEht2klUn0OphKCqlIk6fYRKp8bW29Ch8yk-KziZFSRmwJ_D2owx6svl1zl7tmNtH2Ls0e3to0RP-_iIYa8fjm3P_17A8hcpE9aV</recordid><startdate>20140611</startdate><enddate>20140611</enddate><creator>Rosa, Kathleen</creator><creator>Fu, Min</creator><creator>Gilles, Leen</creator><creator>Cerri, Karin</creator><creator>Peeters, Monika</creator><creator>Bubb, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Scott, Jane</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140611</creationdate><title>Validation of the Fatigue Severity Scale in chronic hepatitis C</title><author>Rosa, Kathleen ; Fu, Min ; Gilles, Leen ; Cerri, Karin ; Peeters, Monika ; Bubb, Jeffrey ; Scott, Jane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b684t-c999f533a4df0854ce035813dca542857a502dfe1587fe56586516d06112606f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Fatigue - classification</topic><topic>Fatigue - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hepatitis</topic><topic>Hepatitis C</topic><topic>Hepatitis C virus</topic><topic>Hepatitis C, Chronic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hepatitis C, Chronic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Simeprevir</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sulfonamides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilles, Leen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerri, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeters, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bubb, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Jane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health and quality of life outcomes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosa, Kathleen</au><au>Fu, Min</au><au>Gilles, Leen</au><au>Cerri, Karin</au><au>Peeters, Monika</au><au>Bubb, Jeffrey</au><au>Scott, Jane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the Fatigue Severity Scale in chronic hepatitis C</atitle><jtitle>Health and quality of life outcomes</jtitle><addtitle>Health Qual Life Outcomes</addtitle><date>2014-06-11</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>90-90</pages><artnum>90</artnum><issn>1477-7525</issn><eissn>1477-7525</eissn><abstract>Fatigue is a common symptom of chronic hepatitis C virus (cHCV) infection and a common side effect of interferon-based treatment for cHCV. This study provides confirmatory evidence of the reliability and validity of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) to document fatigue in cHCV research and identifies values that indicate clinically important differences in FSS to aid in interpreting fatigue in cHCV clinical trials.
The study used data from two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase IIb trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of simeprevir plus peginterferon-α/ribavirin in treatment-naïve (PILLAR, n = 386) and treatment-experienced patients (ASPIRE, n = 462) with cHCV infection. Patients completed the FSS and EuroQoL 5 dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) at baseline and at regular intervals throughout both trials. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's coefficient α at Week 24 (internal consistency reliability) and intraclass correlation (ICC) between FSS at Weeks 12 and 24 in stable patients (<0.5 g/dL hemoglobin [Hb] change between Weeks 12/24). Correlation with the EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) and "Usual Activity" domain score was used to assess concurrent validity. Clinical validity was evaluated using a case-control method to link spontaneously reported fatigue and anemia adverse events (AEs) during the study to FSS scores.
FSS total scores demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's α: 0.95, 0.96; ICC: 0.74, 0.86 for PILLAR and ASPIRE, respectively) and concurrent validity (correlation with EQ-5D VAS: -0.63, -0.66) with a monotonic relationship between the EQ-5D "Usual Activities" item response and FSS. Clinical validity was confirmed by a significant difference between cases and controls for fatigue AEs (p < 0.05); however, anemia defined by AE or Hb abnormalities was only weakly related to FSS score. Analyses indicate that a change of 0.33-0.82 in mean FSS scores represents a meaningful improvement in fatigue, and a one-point change is a conservative indicator of an important change in individual FSS scores.
A difference of ≥0.7 in mean FSS scores can be considered a clinically important difference within groups over time or between groups. A one-point change or less in individual FSS scores indicates a clinically relevant change in fatigue.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>24915781</pmid><doi>10.1186/1477-7525-12-90</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1477-7525 |
ispartof | Health and quality of life outcomes, 2014-06, Vol.12 (1), p.90-90, Article 90 |
issn | 1477-7525 1477-7525 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4094687 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Adult Aged Analysis Care and treatment Clinical trials Double-Blind Method Fatigue Fatigue - classification Fatigue - diagnosis Female Health aspects Hepatitis Hepatitis C Hepatitis C virus Hepatitis C, Chronic - drug therapy Hepatitis C, Chronic - physiopathology Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring - therapeutic use Humans Infections Male Measurement Middle Aged Patients Psychometrics - instrumentation Quality of Life Questionnaires Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Reproducibility of Results Simeprevir Studies Sulfonamides - therapeutic use Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Validation of the Fatigue Severity Scale in chronic hepatitis C |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T04%3A49%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Fatigue%20Severity%20Scale%20in%20chronic%20hepatitis%20C&rft.jtitle=Health%20and%20quality%20of%20life%20outcomes&rft.au=Rosa,%20Kathleen&rft.date=2014-06-11&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=90-90&rft.artnum=90&rft.issn=1477-7525&rft.eissn=1477-7525&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1477-7525-12-90&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA539661938%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b684t-c999f533a4df0854ce035813dca542857a502dfe1587fe56586516d06112606f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1544702885&rft_id=info:pmid/24915781&rft_galeid=A539661938&rfr_iscdi=true |