Loading…

Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study

ABSTRACT Introduction The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) in patients suffering from retinal artery occlusion (RAO). Methods Twelve patients with central and one patient with branch RAO (age 25–84 years, median 74 years) w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ophthalmology and therapy 2013-06, Vol.2 (1), p.25-39
Main Authors: Naycheva, Lubka, Schatz, Andreas, Willmann, Gabriel, Bartz-Schmidt, Karl Ulrich, Zrenner, Eberhart, Röck, Tobias, Gekeler, Florian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Introduction The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) in patients suffering from retinal artery occlusion (RAO). Methods Twelve patients with central and one patient with branch RAO (age 25–84 years, median 74 years) were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, sham-controlled study. RAO was diagnosed 10 days to 17 months prior to study participation. Patients were treated with TES (5 ms positive followed by 5 ms negative biphasic pulses at 20 Hz; applied with DTL electrodes) for 30 min once a week for 6 consecutive weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to TES with 0 mA (sham, n  = 3), 66% ( n  = 5) or 150% ( n  = 5) of the patient’s individual electrical phosphene threshold (EPT) at 20 Hz. Best corrected visual acuity, ophthalmology examination and EPT (at 3, 6, 9, 20, 40, 60, and 80 Hz) were determined at baseline and at eight follow-up visits over 17 weeks. During four visits (week 1, 5, 9, and 17) kinetic and static visual fields as well as full-field and multifocal electroretinography were measured. The method of restricted maximum likelihood ( P  
ISSN:2193-8245
2193-6528
DOI:10.1007/s40123-013-0012-5