Loading…

Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial

Anonymous survey methods appear to promote greater disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information compared to non-anonymous methods. Higher disclosure rates have traditionally been interpreted as being more accurate than lower rates. We examined the impact of 3 increasingly private mailed surve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC medical research methodology 2014-07, Vol.14 (1), p.90-90, Article 90
Main Authors: Murdoch, Maureen, Simon, Alisha Baines, Polusny, Melissa Anderson, Bangerter, Ann Kay, Grill, Joseph Patrick, Noorbaloochi, Siamak, Partin, Melissa Ruth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-173c8c583217cffdf49ae8a7cd2221195391ce3631f2c9c7b7bea9ad04a4f1e13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-173c8c583217cffdf49ae8a7cd2221195391ce3631f2c9c7b7bea9ad04a4f1e13
container_end_page 90
container_issue 1
container_start_page 90
container_title BMC medical research methodology
container_volume 14
creator Murdoch, Maureen
Simon, Alisha Baines
Polusny, Melissa Anderson
Bangerter, Ann Kay
Grill, Joseph Patrick
Noorbaloochi, Siamak
Partin, Melissa Ruth
description Anonymous survey methods appear to promote greater disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information compared to non-anonymous methods. Higher disclosure rates have traditionally been interpreted as being more accurate than lower rates. We examined the impact of 3 increasingly private mailed survey conditions-ranging from potentially identifiable to completely anonymous-on survey response and on respondents' representativeness of the underlying sampling frame, completeness in answering sensitive survey items, and disclosure of sensitive information. We also examined the impact of 2 incentives ($10 versus $20) on these outcomes. A 3X2 factorial, randomized controlled trial of 324 representatively selected, male Gulf War I era veterans who had applied for United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability benefits. Men were asked about past sexual assault experiences, childhood abuse, combat, other traumas, mental health symptoms, and sexual orientation. We used a novel technique, the pre-merged questionnaire, to link anonymous responses to administrative data. Response rates ranged from 56.0% to 63.3% across privacy conditions (p = 0.49) and from 52.8% to 68.1% across incentives (p = 0.007). Respondents' characteristics differed by privacy and by incentive assignments, with completely anonymous respondents and $20 respondents appearing least different from their non-respondent counterparts. Survey completeness did not differ by privacy or by incentive. No clear pattern of disclosing sensitive information by privacy condition or by incentive emerged. For example, although all respondents came from the same sampling frame, estimates of sexual abuse ranged from 13.6% to 33.3% across privacy conditions, with the highest estimate coming from the intermediate privacy condition (p = 0.007). Greater privacy and larger incentives do not necessarily result in higher disclosure rates of sensitive information than lesser privacy and lower incentives. Furthermore, disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information under differing privacy conditions may have less to do with promoting or impeding participants' "honesty" or "accuracy" than with selectively recruiting or attracting subpopulations that are higher or lower in such experiences. Pre-merged questionnaires bypassed many historical limitations of anonymous surveys and hold promise for exploring non-response issues in future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1471-2288-14-90
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4112969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A539572056</galeid><sourcerecordid>A539572056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-173c8c583217cffdf49ae8a7cd2221195391ce3631f2c9c7b7bea9ad04a4f1e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5oYsceHQtLGdxDEHpKrio1IlLnC2vPa4uErsYCcrLf-L_8e4LastQj545HnedzyjqarXtDmjdOjPaStozdgw1LStZfOkOt6_PD2Ij6oXOd82DRUD759XR6xrmKCiPa5-X02zNguJjljvHCQIC5mT32qzIyYG6xcfQyY6WOKDwazfQiYxkLymLexIgjwjACTpBU7JrNPijZ812iSYMYsSXUQBcj6987E-mzGiHkpZBLIvAPq7mCZdCr4nGg2DjZP_BbZ8ZElxHDFcktfjy-qZ02OGVw_3SfX908dvl1_q66-fry4vrmvTDsNSU8HNYLqBMyqMc9a1UsOghbGMMUplxyU1wHtOHTPSiI3YgJbaNq1uHQXKT6oP977zupnAlvaTHhXOZ9Jpp6L26nEm-B_qJm5VSymTvUSDdw8GKf5cIS9qwuZhHHWAuGZFu1b2vGWsQ_TtP-htXFPA9u6ojnPRH1A3egRVJoZ1TTFVF9hOJ1jT9Uid_YfCY2HyOExwHt8fCc7vBSbFnBO4fY-0UWXTVNklVXYJIyUbVLw5HM2e_7ta_A-txNNk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1549533765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Murdoch, Maureen ; Simon, Alisha Baines ; Polusny, Melissa Anderson ; Bangerter, Ann Kay ; Grill, Joseph Patrick ; Noorbaloochi, Siamak ; Partin, Melissa Ruth</creator><creatorcontrib>Murdoch, Maureen ; Simon, Alisha Baines ; Polusny, Melissa Anderson ; Bangerter, Ann Kay ; Grill, Joseph Patrick ; Noorbaloochi, Siamak ; Partin, Melissa Ruth</creatorcontrib><description>Anonymous survey methods appear to promote greater disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information compared to non-anonymous methods. Higher disclosure rates have traditionally been interpreted as being more accurate than lower rates. We examined the impact of 3 increasingly private mailed survey conditions-ranging from potentially identifiable to completely anonymous-on survey response and on respondents' representativeness of the underlying sampling frame, completeness in answering sensitive survey items, and disclosure of sensitive information. We also examined the impact of 2 incentives ($10 versus $20) on these outcomes. A 3X2 factorial, randomized controlled trial of 324 representatively selected, male Gulf War I era veterans who had applied for United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability benefits. Men were asked about past sexual assault experiences, childhood abuse, combat, other traumas, mental health symptoms, and sexual orientation. We used a novel technique, the pre-merged questionnaire, to link anonymous responses to administrative data. Response rates ranged from 56.0% to 63.3% across privacy conditions (p = 0.49) and from 52.8% to 68.1% across incentives (p = 0.007). Respondents' characteristics differed by privacy and by incentive assignments, with completely anonymous respondents and $20 respondents appearing least different from their non-respondent counterparts. Survey completeness did not differ by privacy or by incentive. No clear pattern of disclosing sensitive information by privacy condition or by incentive emerged. For example, although all respondents came from the same sampling frame, estimates of sexual abuse ranged from 13.6% to 33.3% across privacy conditions, with the highest estimate coming from the intermediate privacy condition (p = 0.007). Greater privacy and larger incentives do not necessarily result in higher disclosure rates of sensitive information than lesser privacy and lower incentives. Furthermore, disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information under differing privacy conditions may have less to do with promoting or impeding participants' "honesty" or "accuracy" than with selectively recruiting or attracting subpopulations that are higher or lower in such experiences. Pre-merged questionnaires bypassed many historical limitations of anonymous surveys and hold promise for exploring non-response issues in future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-90</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25027174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Bias ; Chronic illnesses ; Comparative analysis ; Confidentiality ; Data Collection - methods ; Disclosure ; Disclosure of information ; Estimates ; Gulf War ; Health Care Surveys ; Health surveys ; Humans ; Incentives ; Internal medicine ; Male ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Mental disorders ; Mental health care ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Motivation ; Patient Compliance ; Patient satisfaction ; Persian Gulf War veterans ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Privacy ; Psychic trauma ; Public health ; Questionnaires ; Response rates ; Reward ; Sex crimes ; Sexual abuse ; Studies ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States ; Veterans</subject><ispartof>BMC medical research methodology, 2014-07, Vol.14 (1), p.90-90, Article 90</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 Murdoch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Murdoch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 Murdoch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-173c8c583217cffdf49ae8a7cd2221195391ce3631f2c9c7b7bea9ad04a4f1e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-173c8c583217cffdf49ae8a7cd2221195391ce3631f2c9c7b7bea9ad04a4f1e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4112969/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1549533765?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25751,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25027174$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murdoch, Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Alisha Baines</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polusny, Melissa Anderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bangerter, Ann Kay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grill, Joseph Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noorbaloochi, Siamak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partin, Melissa Ruth</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial</title><title>BMC medical research methodology</title><addtitle>BMC Med Res Methodol</addtitle><description>Anonymous survey methods appear to promote greater disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information compared to non-anonymous methods. Higher disclosure rates have traditionally been interpreted as being more accurate than lower rates. We examined the impact of 3 increasingly private mailed survey conditions-ranging from potentially identifiable to completely anonymous-on survey response and on respondents' representativeness of the underlying sampling frame, completeness in answering sensitive survey items, and disclosure of sensitive information. We also examined the impact of 2 incentives ($10 versus $20) on these outcomes. A 3X2 factorial, randomized controlled trial of 324 representatively selected, male Gulf War I era veterans who had applied for United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability benefits. Men were asked about past sexual assault experiences, childhood abuse, combat, other traumas, mental health symptoms, and sexual orientation. We used a novel technique, the pre-merged questionnaire, to link anonymous responses to administrative data. Response rates ranged from 56.0% to 63.3% across privacy conditions (p = 0.49) and from 52.8% to 68.1% across incentives (p = 0.007). Respondents' characteristics differed by privacy and by incentive assignments, with completely anonymous respondents and $20 respondents appearing least different from their non-respondent counterparts. Survey completeness did not differ by privacy or by incentive. No clear pattern of disclosing sensitive information by privacy condition or by incentive emerged. For example, although all respondents came from the same sampling frame, estimates of sexual abuse ranged from 13.6% to 33.3% across privacy conditions, with the highest estimate coming from the intermediate privacy condition (p = 0.007). Greater privacy and larger incentives do not necessarily result in higher disclosure rates of sensitive information than lesser privacy and lower incentives. Furthermore, disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information under differing privacy conditions may have less to do with promoting or impeding participants' "honesty" or "accuracy" than with selectively recruiting or attracting subpopulations that are higher or lower in such experiences. Pre-merged questionnaires bypassed many historical limitations of anonymous surveys and hold promise for exploring non-response issues in future research.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Data Collection - methods</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Disclosure of information</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Gulf War</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health care</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Persian Gulf War veterans</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Psychic trauma</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sexual abuse</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Veterans</subject><issn>1471-2288</issn><issn>1471-2288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5oYsceHQtLGdxDEHpKrio1IlLnC2vPa4uErsYCcrLf-L_8e4LastQj545HnedzyjqarXtDmjdOjPaStozdgw1LStZfOkOt6_PD2Ij6oXOd82DRUD759XR6xrmKCiPa5-X02zNguJjljvHCQIC5mT32qzIyYG6xcfQyY6WOKDwazfQiYxkLymLexIgjwjACTpBU7JrNPijZ812iSYMYsSXUQBcj6987E-mzGiHkpZBLIvAPq7mCZdCr4nGg2DjZP_BbZ8ZElxHDFcktfjy-qZ02OGVw_3SfX908dvl1_q66-fry4vrmvTDsNSU8HNYLqBMyqMc9a1UsOghbGMMUplxyU1wHtOHTPSiI3YgJbaNq1uHQXKT6oP977zupnAlvaTHhXOZ9Jpp6L26nEm-B_qJm5VSymTvUSDdw8GKf5cIS9qwuZhHHWAuGZFu1b2vGWsQ_TtP-htXFPA9u6ojnPRH1A3egRVJoZ1TTFVF9hOJ1jT9Uid_YfCY2HyOExwHt8fCc7vBSbFnBO4fY-0UWXTVNklVXYJIyUbVLw5HM2e_7ta_A-txNNk</recordid><startdate>20140716</startdate><enddate>20140716</enddate><creator>Murdoch, Maureen</creator><creator>Simon, Alisha Baines</creator><creator>Polusny, Melissa Anderson</creator><creator>Bangerter, Ann Kay</creator><creator>Grill, Joseph Patrick</creator><creator>Noorbaloochi, Siamak</creator><creator>Partin, Melissa Ruth</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140716</creationdate><title>Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Murdoch, Maureen ; Simon, Alisha Baines ; Polusny, Melissa Anderson ; Bangerter, Ann Kay ; Grill, Joseph Patrick ; Noorbaloochi, Siamak ; Partin, Melissa Ruth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-173c8c583217cffdf49ae8a7cd2221195391ce3631f2c9c7b7bea9ad04a4f1e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Data Collection - methods</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Disclosure of information</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Gulf War</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health care</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Persian Gulf War veterans</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Psychic trauma</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sexual abuse</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Veterans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murdoch, Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Alisha Baines</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polusny, Melissa Anderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bangerter, Ann Kay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grill, Joseph Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noorbaloochi, Siamak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partin, Melissa Ruth</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC medical research methodology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murdoch, Maureen</au><au>Simon, Alisha Baines</au><au>Polusny, Melissa Anderson</au><au>Bangerter, Ann Kay</au><au>Grill, Joseph Patrick</au><au>Noorbaloochi, Siamak</au><au>Partin, Melissa Ruth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>BMC medical research methodology</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Med Res Methodol</addtitle><date>2014-07-16</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>90-90</pages><artnum>90</artnum><issn>1471-2288</issn><eissn>1471-2288</eissn><abstract>Anonymous survey methods appear to promote greater disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information compared to non-anonymous methods. Higher disclosure rates have traditionally been interpreted as being more accurate than lower rates. We examined the impact of 3 increasingly private mailed survey conditions-ranging from potentially identifiable to completely anonymous-on survey response and on respondents' representativeness of the underlying sampling frame, completeness in answering sensitive survey items, and disclosure of sensitive information. We also examined the impact of 2 incentives ($10 versus $20) on these outcomes. A 3X2 factorial, randomized controlled trial of 324 representatively selected, male Gulf War I era veterans who had applied for United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability benefits. Men were asked about past sexual assault experiences, childhood abuse, combat, other traumas, mental health symptoms, and sexual orientation. We used a novel technique, the pre-merged questionnaire, to link anonymous responses to administrative data. Response rates ranged from 56.0% to 63.3% across privacy conditions (p = 0.49) and from 52.8% to 68.1% across incentives (p = 0.007). Respondents' characteristics differed by privacy and by incentive assignments, with completely anonymous respondents and $20 respondents appearing least different from their non-respondent counterparts. Survey completeness did not differ by privacy or by incentive. No clear pattern of disclosing sensitive information by privacy condition or by incentive emerged. For example, although all respondents came from the same sampling frame, estimates of sexual abuse ranged from 13.6% to 33.3% across privacy conditions, with the highest estimate coming from the intermediate privacy condition (p = 0.007). Greater privacy and larger incentives do not necessarily result in higher disclosure rates of sensitive information than lesser privacy and lower incentives. Furthermore, disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information under differing privacy conditions may have less to do with promoting or impeding participants' "honesty" or "accuracy" than with selectively recruiting or attracting subpopulations that are higher or lower in such experiences. Pre-merged questionnaires bypassed many historical limitations of anonymous surveys and hold promise for exploring non-response issues in future research.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25027174</pmid><doi>10.1186/1471-2288-14-90</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2288
ispartof BMC medical research methodology, 2014-07, Vol.14 (1), p.90-90, Article 90
issn 1471-2288
1471-2288
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4112969
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Bias
Chronic illnesses
Comparative analysis
Confidentiality
Data Collection - methods
Disclosure
Disclosure of information
Estimates
Gulf War
Health Care Surveys
Health surveys
Humans
Incentives
Internal medicine
Male
Medical research
Medicine
Mental disorders
Mental health care
Methods
Middle Aged
Motivation
Patient Compliance
Patient satisfaction
Persian Gulf War veterans
Polls & surveys
Privacy
Psychic trauma
Public health
Questionnaires
Response rates
Reward
Sex crimes
Sexual abuse
Studies
Surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
Veterans
title Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A06%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20different%20privacy%20conditions%20and%20incentives%20on%20survey%20response%20rate,%20participant%20representativeness,%20and%20disclosure%20of%20sensitive%20information:%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=BMC%20medical%20research%20methodology&rft.au=Murdoch,%20Maureen&rft.date=2014-07-16&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=90-90&rft.artnum=90&rft.issn=1471-2288&rft.eissn=1471-2288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2288-14-90&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA539572056%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-173c8c583217cffdf49ae8a7cd2221195391ce3631f2c9c7b7bea9ad04a4f1e13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1549533765&rft_id=info:pmid/25027174&rft_galeid=A539572056&rfr_iscdi=true