Tecidual reaction of calcium hydroxide front chronic stress histological study in rats

• Published in: Journal of international oral health 2014-07, Vol.6 (4), p.4-8
• Main Authors: Semenoff, Tereza Aparecida Delle Vedove, Vieira, Evanice Menezes Marçal, Borges, Alvaro Henrique, Bandeca, Matheus Coelho, Dos Santos, Reidson Stanley Soares, Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda, da Silva, Natalino Francisco, Semenoff-Segundo, Alex
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Biocompatibility; Calcium; Dentistry; Disease; Mineralization; Original Research; Polyethylene; Polyvinyl chloride; Rodents; Standard scores; Studies
• ISSN: 0976-7428; 0976-1799

The Calcium Hydroxide has been widely used as an intracanal dressing and in combination with restorative and endodontic materials and its main goal is the tissue reparation. However, when the patient has chronic stress, the immunological response and tissue repair decreases in both the epithelial and connective tissue. Therefore, the aim was to analyze the effect of chronic stress on the tissue response in rats exposed to calcium hydroxide (CH). A total of 60 wistar rats were anesthetized, and a polyethylene tube containing CH was inserted under the skin. After 24 h, they were divided into two groups: Calcium hydroxide + stress (CHSG) n = 30 and calcium hydroxide (CHG) n = 30. They were stressed by physical restraint, for 12 h each day for periods of 7, 15 and 30 days when 10 animals from each group were euthanized. The tissues surrounding the polyethylene tubes were removed, and slides were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The analysis was performed with an optical microscope with magnification of 4-400 times by a blinded senior examiner. The sample slides were classified according to the following scores 0 - absent/1 - present/2 - infiltrate to: Inflammatory infiltrate containing fibrous condensation, lymphocytes, plasmacytes, macrophages, neutrophils, and eosinophils. The data were statistically analyzed using the Student's t-test (P < 0.05) for paired samples. The exposure time of 7 days elicited no statistical difference between groups (P > 0.05). The 15 days exposure group had higher averages for CHG to eosinophils and inflammatory infiltrate (P < 0.05). In 30 days, CHG showed higher averages to inflammatory infiltrate and lower averages to FC (P < 0.05). Some modified patterns of responses in the CHSG were observed at 15 days and 30 days.