Loading…
Most women diagnosed with cervical cancer by a visual screening program in Tanzania completed treatment: evidence from a retrospective cohort study
Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) to identify and treat pre-cancerous lesions is effective for cervical cancer prevention. Screening programs also facilitate screening and diagnosis of invasive cancers that must be referred for radiation therapy or chemotherapy. This study compared characteri...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC public health 2014-09, Vol.14 (1), p.910-910, Article 910 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-f1d2746fd1c2c1a4a20e34598bba6e680a17e5a395ef5b067b64493d1ac789633 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-f1d2746fd1c2c1a4a20e34598bba6e680a17e5a395ef5b067b64493d1ac789633 |
container_end_page | 910 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 910 |
container_title | BMC public health |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Gard, Andrew C Soliman, Amr S Ngoma, Twalib Mwaiselage, Julius Kahesa, Crispin Chamberlain, Robert M Harlow, Siobán D |
description | Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) to identify and treat pre-cancerous lesions is effective for cervical cancer prevention. Screening programs also facilitate screening and diagnosis of invasive cancers that must be referred for radiation therapy or chemotherapy. This study compared characteristics of women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer by a VIA screening program who did and did not follow up for treatment and who did and did not complete treatment at the Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ORCI screening referrals from the period November 2002 to June 2011. Women referred for treatment of invasive disease (n = 980) were identified from an existing database of all women attending the screening clinic during this period (n = 20,131) and matched to a dataset of all cervical cancer patients attending ORCI in this period (n = 8,240). Treatment information was abstracted from patient records of women who followed up. Records of a random sample (n = 333) of unscreened patients were reviewed for disease stage.
Of the 980 women referred women, 829 (84.6%) sought treatment. Most of those women (82.8%) completed their prescribed radiation. Lower disease stage, having a skilled occupation, residence in Dar es Salaam, and younger age were independently associated with loss to follow-up. Higher disease stage, residence in Dar es Salaam, older age, and later year of first treatment appointment were independently associated with incomplete treatment among those who followed up. Significantly more screened women had stage 1 disease (14.0%) than unscreened women (7.8%).
Most women referred from the screening clinic completed treatment for their cancer at ORCI. Some of those lost to follow-up may have sought treatment elsewhere. In most cases, the screening clinic appears to facilitate diagnosis and treatment, rather than screening, for women with invasive cervical cancer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-910 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4162936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A539682301</galeid><sourcerecordid>A539682301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-f1d2746fd1c2c1a4a20e34598bba6e680a17e5a395ef5b067b64493d1ac789633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw54QsceGSEsexk3BAqiq-pCIu5WxNnMmuq8RebGer5W_wh5loy9JFRT54NH7nmS9n2UtenHPeqLe8qnleVrLJeZW3vHiUnR5cj-_ZJ9mzGG-KgteNLJ9mJ6XkTS3K9jT79dXHxG79hI71FlbOR-zZrU1rZjBsrYGRGXBks27HgG1tnMkVTUB01q3YJvhVgIlZx67B_QRngRk_bUZMBEoBIRE7vWO4tT0SiA3BT0QKmIKPGzTJbpFC1j4kFtPc755nTwYYI764u8-y7x8_XF9-zq--ffpyeXGVd7KpUj7wvqwrNfTclIZDBWWBopJt03WgUDUF8BoliFbiILtC1Z2qqlb0HEzdtEqIs-z9nruZuwl7Q2UGGPUm2AnCTnuw-vjF2bVe-a2uuCpboQhwuQd01v8HcPxCg9HLUvSyFLI07Ywob-7KCP7HjDHpyUaD4wgO_Rw1l0o1QopySfj6H-mNn4OjIS0qTiVRZ39VKxhRWzd4Sm4WqL6QolVNKQpOqvMHVHR6nKzxDgdL_qOAYh9gaG8x4HBolBd6-Y4Ptfbq_oQPAX_-n_gNcindGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1561363789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Most women diagnosed with cervical cancer by a visual screening program in Tanzania completed treatment: evidence from a retrospective cohort study</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gard, Andrew C ; Soliman, Amr S ; Ngoma, Twalib ; Mwaiselage, Julius ; Kahesa, Crispin ; Chamberlain, Robert M ; Harlow, Siobán D</creator><creatorcontrib>Gard, Andrew C ; Soliman, Amr S ; Ngoma, Twalib ; Mwaiselage, Julius ; Kahesa, Crispin ; Chamberlain, Robert M ; Harlow, Siobán D</creatorcontrib><description>Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) to identify and treat pre-cancerous lesions is effective for cervical cancer prevention. Screening programs also facilitate screening and diagnosis of invasive cancers that must be referred for radiation therapy or chemotherapy. This study compared characteristics of women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer by a VIA screening program who did and did not follow up for treatment and who did and did not complete treatment at the Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ORCI screening referrals from the period November 2002 to June 2011. Women referred for treatment of invasive disease (n = 980) were identified from an existing database of all women attending the screening clinic during this period (n = 20,131) and matched to a dataset of all cervical cancer patients attending ORCI in this period (n = 8,240). Treatment information was abstracted from patient records of women who followed up. Records of a random sample (n = 333) of unscreened patients were reviewed for disease stage.
Of the 980 women referred women, 829 (84.6%) sought treatment. Most of those women (82.8%) completed their prescribed radiation. Lower disease stage, having a skilled occupation, residence in Dar es Salaam, and younger age were independently associated with loss to follow-up. Higher disease stage, residence in Dar es Salaam, older age, and later year of first treatment appointment were independently associated with incomplete treatment among those who followed up. Significantly more screened women had stage 1 disease (14.0%) than unscreened women (7.8%).
Most women referred from the screening clinic completed treatment for their cancer at ORCI. Some of those lost to follow-up may have sought treatment elsewhere. In most cases, the screening clinic appears to facilitate diagnosis and treatment, rather than screening, for women with invasive cervical cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-910</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25187329</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Age Factors ; Biopsy ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Cervical cancer ; Cohort Studies ; Developing countries ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data ; Education ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Histopathology ; Humans ; LDCs ; Lost to Follow-Up ; Medical records ; Medical screening ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Oncology, Experimental ; Patient compliance ; Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data ; Public health ; Radiation ; Radiotherapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Studies ; Tanzania - epidemiology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>BMC public health, 2014-09, Vol.14 (1), p.910-910, Article 910</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 Gard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.</rights><rights>Gard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-f1d2746fd1c2c1a4a20e34598bba6e680a17e5a395ef5b067b64493d1ac789633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-f1d2746fd1c2c1a4a20e34598bba6e680a17e5a395ef5b067b64493d1ac789633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4162936/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1561363789?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25187329$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gard, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soliman, Amr S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngoma, Twalib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mwaiselage, Julius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahesa, Crispin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, Robert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harlow, Siobán D</creatorcontrib><title>Most women diagnosed with cervical cancer by a visual screening program in Tanzania completed treatment: evidence from a retrospective cohort study</title><title>BMC public health</title><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><description>Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) to identify and treat pre-cancerous lesions is effective for cervical cancer prevention. Screening programs also facilitate screening and diagnosis of invasive cancers that must be referred for radiation therapy or chemotherapy. This study compared characteristics of women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer by a VIA screening program who did and did not follow up for treatment and who did and did not complete treatment at the Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ORCI screening referrals from the period November 2002 to June 2011. Women referred for treatment of invasive disease (n = 980) were identified from an existing database of all women attending the screening clinic during this period (n = 20,131) and matched to a dataset of all cervical cancer patients attending ORCI in this period (n = 8,240). Treatment information was abstracted from patient records of women who followed up. Records of a random sample (n = 333) of unscreened patients were reviewed for disease stage.
Of the 980 women referred women, 829 (84.6%) sought treatment. Most of those women (82.8%) completed their prescribed radiation. Lower disease stage, having a skilled occupation, residence in Dar es Salaam, and younger age were independently associated with loss to follow-up. Higher disease stage, residence in Dar es Salaam, older age, and later year of first treatment appointment were independently associated with incomplete treatment among those who followed up. Significantly more screened women had stage 1 disease (14.0%) than unscreened women (7.8%).
Most women referred from the screening clinic completed treatment for their cancer at ORCI. Some of those lost to follow-up may have sought treatment elsewhere. In most cases, the screening clinic appears to facilitate diagnosis and treatment, rather than screening, for women with invasive cervical cancer.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Histopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Lost to Follow-Up</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Patient compliance</subject><subject>Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tanzania - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1471-2458</issn><issn>1471-2458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw54QsceGSEsexk3BAqiq-pCIu5WxNnMmuq8RebGer5W_wh5loy9JFRT54NH7nmS9n2UtenHPeqLe8qnleVrLJeZW3vHiUnR5cj-_ZJ9mzGG-KgteNLJ9mJ6XkTS3K9jT79dXHxG79hI71FlbOR-zZrU1rZjBsrYGRGXBks27HgG1tnMkVTUB01q3YJvhVgIlZx67B_QRngRk_bUZMBEoBIRE7vWO4tT0SiA3BT0QKmIKPGzTJbpFC1j4kFtPc755nTwYYI764u8-y7x8_XF9-zq--ffpyeXGVd7KpUj7wvqwrNfTclIZDBWWBopJt03WgUDUF8BoliFbiILtC1Z2qqlb0HEzdtEqIs-z9nruZuwl7Q2UGGPUm2AnCTnuw-vjF2bVe-a2uuCpboQhwuQd01v8HcPxCg9HLUvSyFLI07Ywob-7KCP7HjDHpyUaD4wgO_Rw1l0o1QopySfj6H-mNn4OjIS0qTiVRZ39VKxhRWzd4Sm4WqL6QolVNKQpOqvMHVHR6nKzxDgdL_qOAYh9gaG8x4HBolBd6-Y4Ptfbq_oQPAX_-n_gNcindGg</recordid><startdate>20140903</startdate><enddate>20140903</enddate><creator>Gard, Andrew C</creator><creator>Soliman, Amr S</creator><creator>Ngoma, Twalib</creator><creator>Mwaiselage, Julius</creator><creator>Kahesa, Crispin</creator><creator>Chamberlain, Robert M</creator><creator>Harlow, Siobán D</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140903</creationdate><title>Most women diagnosed with cervical cancer by a visual screening program in Tanzania completed treatment: evidence from a retrospective cohort study</title><author>Gard, Andrew C ; Soliman, Amr S ; Ngoma, Twalib ; Mwaiselage, Julius ; Kahesa, Crispin ; Chamberlain, Robert M ; Harlow, Siobán D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-f1d2746fd1c2c1a4a20e34598bba6e680a17e5a395ef5b067b64493d1ac789633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Histopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Lost to Follow-Up</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Patient compliance</topic><topic>Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tanzania - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gard, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soliman, Amr S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngoma, Twalib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mwaiselage, Julius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahesa, Crispin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, Robert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harlow, Siobán D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gard, Andrew C</au><au>Soliman, Amr S</au><au>Ngoma, Twalib</au><au>Mwaiselage, Julius</au><au>Kahesa, Crispin</au><au>Chamberlain, Robert M</au><au>Harlow, Siobán D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Most women diagnosed with cervical cancer by a visual screening program in Tanzania completed treatment: evidence from a retrospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><date>2014-09-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>910</spage><epage>910</epage><pages>910-910</pages><artnum>910</artnum><issn>1471-2458</issn><eissn>1471-2458</eissn><abstract>Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) to identify and treat pre-cancerous lesions is effective for cervical cancer prevention. Screening programs also facilitate screening and diagnosis of invasive cancers that must be referred for radiation therapy or chemotherapy. This study compared characteristics of women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer by a VIA screening program who did and did not follow up for treatment and who did and did not complete treatment at the Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ORCI screening referrals from the period November 2002 to June 2011. Women referred for treatment of invasive disease (n = 980) were identified from an existing database of all women attending the screening clinic during this period (n = 20,131) and matched to a dataset of all cervical cancer patients attending ORCI in this period (n = 8,240). Treatment information was abstracted from patient records of women who followed up. Records of a random sample (n = 333) of unscreened patients were reviewed for disease stage.
Of the 980 women referred women, 829 (84.6%) sought treatment. Most of those women (82.8%) completed their prescribed radiation. Lower disease stage, having a skilled occupation, residence in Dar es Salaam, and younger age were independently associated with loss to follow-up. Higher disease stage, residence in Dar es Salaam, older age, and later year of first treatment appointment were independently associated with incomplete treatment among those who followed up. Significantly more screened women had stage 1 disease (14.0%) than unscreened women (7.8%).
Most women referred from the screening clinic completed treatment for their cancer at ORCI. Some of those lost to follow-up may have sought treatment elsewhere. In most cases, the screening clinic appears to facilitate diagnosis and treatment, rather than screening, for women with invasive cervical cancer.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25187329</pmid><doi>10.1186/1471-2458-14-910</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2458 |
ispartof | BMC public health, 2014-09, Vol.14 (1), p.910-910, Article 910 |
issn | 1471-2458 1471-2458 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4162936 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Age Age Factors Biopsy Cancer Cancer therapies Cervical cancer Cohort Studies Developing countries Early Detection of Cancer - methods Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data Education Epidemiology Female Follow-Up Studies Histopathology Humans LDCs Lost to Follow-Up Medical records Medical screening Middle Aged Mortality Oncology, Experimental Patient compliance Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data Public health Radiation Radiotherapy Retrospective Studies Studies Tanzania - epidemiology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy Womens health |
title | Most women diagnosed with cervical cancer by a visual screening program in Tanzania completed treatment: evidence from a retrospective cohort study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A09%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Most%20women%20diagnosed%20with%20cervical%20cancer%20by%20a%20visual%20screening%20program%20in%20Tanzania%20completed%20treatment:%20evidence%20from%20a%20retrospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=BMC%20public%20health&rft.au=Gard,%20Andrew%20C&rft.date=2014-09-03&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=910&rft.epage=910&rft.pages=910-910&rft.artnum=910&rft.issn=1471-2458&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2458-14-910&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA539682301%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b584t-f1d2746fd1c2c1a4a20e34598bba6e680a17e5a395ef5b067b64493d1ac789633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1561363789&rft_id=info:pmid/25187329&rft_galeid=A539682301&rfr_iscdi=true |