Loading…

Access to nutritious food, socioeconomic individualism and public health ethics in the USA: a common good approach

Good nutrition plays an important role in the optimal growth, development, health and well-being of individuals in all stages of life. Healthy eating can reduce the risk of chronic diseases, such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes and some types of cancer. However, the capitalist mindset that shapes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2013-10, Vol.8 (1), p.16-16
Main Authors: Azétsop, Jacquineau, Joy, Tisha R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b610t-e0a50d6ad43f92c7c80fbe3e5c2bfc1f671f014c47b079702e1a18c164f0cd8d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b610t-e0a50d6ad43f92c7c80fbe3e5c2bfc1f671f014c47b079702e1a18c164f0cd8d3
container_end_page 16
container_issue 1
container_start_page 16
container_title Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM
container_volume 8
creator Azétsop, Jacquineau
Joy, Tisha R
description Good nutrition plays an important role in the optimal growth, development, health and well-being of individuals in all stages of life. Healthy eating can reduce the risk of chronic diseases, such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes and some types of cancer. However, the capitalist mindset that shapes the food environment has led to the commoditization of food. Food is not just a marketable commodity like any other commodity. Food is different from other commodities on the market in that it is explicitly and intrinsically linked to our human existence. While possessing another commodity allows for social benefits, food ensures survival. Millions of people in United States of America are either malnourished or food insecure. The purpose of this paper is to present a critique of the current food system using four meanings of the common good--as a framework, rhetorical device, ethical concept and practical tool for social justice. The first section of this paper provides a general overview of the notion of the common good. The second section outlines how each of the four meanings of the common good helps us understand public practices, social policies and market values that shape the distal causal factors of nutritious food inaccessibility. We then outline policy and empowerment initiatives for nutritious food access.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1747-5341-8-16
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4231366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534711566</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534711566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b610t-e0a50d6ad43f92c7c80fbe3e5c2bfc1f671f014c47b079702e1a18c164f0cd8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt1r1jAUxosobk5vvZSANwp25rRp0nohlOHHYCA4dx3SfLzNaJPXJB3635u6-bpXJ0guEs75nYdznpyieAr4GKClr4ERVjY1gbItgd4rDneB-7feB8WjGC8xJg1h-GFxUBGgTcPYYRF6KXWMKHnklhRssn6JyHivXqHopfVaeudnK5F1yl5ZtYjJxhkJp9B2GaacGLWY0oh0Gq2MGUNp1OjivH-DBJJ-nr1Dm6yHxHYbvJDj4-KBEVPUT27uo-Li_bsvJx_Ls08fTk_6s3KggFOpsWiwokKR2nSVZLLFZtC1bmQ1GAmGMjAYiCRswKxjuNIgoJVAicFStao-Kt5e6-Y-Z62kdimIiW-DnUX4zr2wfD_j7Mg3_oqTqoaa0izQXwsM1v9DYD-Tp-Wr53z1nLccVo0XN00E_3XRMfHZRqmnSTidneZAuopWHdDuP1BKSMdYBxl9_gd66ZfgspsrVdG2hqr-TW3EpLl1xucu5SrK-9whA2h-Tnl8B5WP0vnbvdPG5vhewcu9gswk_S1txBIjPz3_fKe4DD7GoM3OPcB8XeC__Xp2-9N2-K-NrX8AObDqfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1462683123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Access to nutritious food, socioeconomic individualism and public health ethics in the USA: a common good approach</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Azétsop, Jacquineau ; Joy, Tisha R</creator><creatorcontrib>Azétsop, Jacquineau ; Joy, Tisha R</creatorcontrib><description>Good nutrition plays an important role in the optimal growth, development, health and well-being of individuals in all stages of life. Healthy eating can reduce the risk of chronic diseases, such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes and some types of cancer. However, the capitalist mindset that shapes the food environment has led to the commoditization of food. Food is not just a marketable commodity like any other commodity. Food is different from other commodities on the market in that it is explicitly and intrinsically linked to our human existence. While possessing another commodity allows for social benefits, food ensures survival. Millions of people in United States of America are either malnourished or food insecure. The purpose of this paper is to present a critique of the current food system using four meanings of the common good--as a framework, rhetorical device, ethical concept and practical tool for social justice. The first section of this paper provides a general overview of the notion of the common good. The second section outlines how each of the four meanings of the common good helps us understand public practices, social policies and market values that shape the distal causal factors of nutritious food inaccessibility. We then outline policy and empowerment initiatives for nutritious food access.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-5341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-5341</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1747-5341-8-16</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24165577</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Cancer ; Chronic diseases ; Common good ; Food Supply ; Heart diseases ; Humans ; Nutrition ; Nutritive Value ; Policy Making ; Public health ; Public Health - ethics ; Risk factors ; Social aspects ; Social Class ; Social economics ; Social Justice ; Social networks ; United States</subject><ispartof>Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2013-10, Vol.8 (1), p.16-16</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2013 Azétsop and Joy; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Azétsop and Joy; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 Azétsop and Joy; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b610t-e0a50d6ad43f92c7c80fbe3e5c2bfc1f671f014c47b079702e1a18c164f0cd8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b610t-e0a50d6ad43f92c7c80fbe3e5c2bfc1f671f014c47b079702e1a18c164f0cd8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231366/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1462683123?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24165577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Azétsop, Jacquineau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joy, Tisha R</creatorcontrib><title>Access to nutritious food, socioeconomic individualism and public health ethics in the USA: a common good approach</title><title>Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM</title><addtitle>Philos Ethics Humanit Med</addtitle><description>Good nutrition plays an important role in the optimal growth, development, health and well-being of individuals in all stages of life. Healthy eating can reduce the risk of chronic diseases, such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes and some types of cancer. However, the capitalist mindset that shapes the food environment has led to the commoditization of food. Food is not just a marketable commodity like any other commodity. Food is different from other commodities on the market in that it is explicitly and intrinsically linked to our human existence. While possessing another commodity allows for social benefits, food ensures survival. Millions of people in United States of America are either malnourished or food insecure. The purpose of this paper is to present a critique of the current food system using four meanings of the common good--as a framework, rhetorical device, ethical concept and practical tool for social justice. The first section of this paper provides a general overview of the notion of the common good. The second section outlines how each of the four meanings of the common good helps us understand public practices, social policies and market values that shape the distal causal factors of nutritious food inaccessibility. We then outline policy and empowerment initiatives for nutritious food access.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chronic diseases</subject><subject>Common good</subject><subject>Food Supply</subject><subject>Heart diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutritive Value</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public Health - ethics</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Social economics</subject><subject>Social Justice</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1747-5341</issn><issn>1747-5341</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt1r1jAUxosobk5vvZSANwp25rRp0nohlOHHYCA4dx3SfLzNaJPXJB3635u6-bpXJ0guEs75nYdznpyieAr4GKClr4ERVjY1gbItgd4rDneB-7feB8WjGC8xJg1h-GFxUBGgTcPYYRF6KXWMKHnklhRssn6JyHivXqHopfVaeudnK5F1yl5ZtYjJxhkJp9B2GaacGLWY0oh0Gq2MGUNp1OjivH-DBJJ-nr1Dm6yHxHYbvJDj4-KBEVPUT27uo-Li_bsvJx_Ls08fTk_6s3KggFOpsWiwokKR2nSVZLLFZtC1bmQ1GAmGMjAYiCRswKxjuNIgoJVAicFStao-Kt5e6-Y-Z62kdimIiW-DnUX4zr2wfD_j7Mg3_oqTqoaa0izQXwsM1v9DYD-Tp-Wr53z1nLccVo0XN00E_3XRMfHZRqmnSTidneZAuopWHdDuP1BKSMdYBxl9_gd66ZfgspsrVdG2hqr-TW3EpLl1xucu5SrK-9whA2h-Tnl8B5WP0vnbvdPG5vhewcu9gswk_S1txBIjPz3_fKe4DD7GoM3OPcB8XeC__Xp2-9N2-K-NrX8AObDqfg</recordid><startdate>20131029</startdate><enddate>20131029</enddate><creator>Azétsop, Jacquineau</creator><creator>Joy, Tisha R</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131029</creationdate><title>Access to nutritious food, socioeconomic individualism and public health ethics in the USA: a common good approach</title><author>Azétsop, Jacquineau ; Joy, Tisha R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b610t-e0a50d6ad43f92c7c80fbe3e5c2bfc1f671f014c47b079702e1a18c164f0cd8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chronic diseases</topic><topic>Common good</topic><topic>Food Supply</topic><topic>Heart diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutritive Value</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public Health - ethics</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Social economics</topic><topic>Social Justice</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Azétsop, Jacquineau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joy, Tisha R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Azétsop, Jacquineau</au><au>Joy, Tisha R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Access to nutritious food, socioeconomic individualism and public health ethics in the USA: a common good approach</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM</jtitle><addtitle>Philos Ethics Humanit Med</addtitle><date>2013-10-29</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>16-16</pages><issn>1747-5341</issn><eissn>1747-5341</eissn><abstract>Good nutrition plays an important role in the optimal growth, development, health and well-being of individuals in all stages of life. Healthy eating can reduce the risk of chronic diseases, such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes and some types of cancer. However, the capitalist mindset that shapes the food environment has led to the commoditization of food. Food is not just a marketable commodity like any other commodity. Food is different from other commodities on the market in that it is explicitly and intrinsically linked to our human existence. While possessing another commodity allows for social benefits, food ensures survival. Millions of people in United States of America are either malnourished or food insecure. The purpose of this paper is to present a critique of the current food system using four meanings of the common good--as a framework, rhetorical device, ethical concept and practical tool for social justice. The first section of this paper provides a general overview of the notion of the common good. The second section outlines how each of the four meanings of the common good helps us understand public practices, social policies and market values that shape the distal causal factors of nutritious food inaccessibility. We then outline policy and empowerment initiatives for nutritious food access.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>24165577</pmid><doi>10.1186/1747-5341-8-16</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1747-5341
ispartof Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2013-10, Vol.8 (1), p.16-16
issn 1747-5341
1747-5341
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4231366
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Analysis
Cancer
Chronic diseases
Common good
Food Supply
Heart diseases
Humans
Nutrition
Nutritive Value
Policy Making
Public health
Public Health - ethics
Risk factors
Social aspects
Social Class
Social economics
Social Justice
Social networks
United States
title Access to nutritious food, socioeconomic individualism and public health ethics in the USA: a common good approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A03%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Access%20to%20nutritious%20food,%20socioeconomic%20individualism%20and%20public%20health%20ethics%20in%20the%20USA:%20a%20common%20good%20approach&rft.jtitle=Philosophy,%20ethics,%20and%20humanities%20in%20medicine%20:%20PEHM&rft.au=Az%C3%A9tsop,%20Jacquineau&rft.date=2013-10-29&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=16-16&rft.issn=1747-5341&rft.eissn=1747-5341&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1747-5341-8-16&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA534711566%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b610t-e0a50d6ad43f92c7c80fbe3e5c2bfc1f671f014c47b079702e1a18c164f0cd8d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1462683123&rft_id=info:pmid/24165577&rft_galeid=A534711566&rfr_iscdi=true