Motor Learning as Young Gymnast's Talent Indicator

Talent identification plans are designed to select young athletes with the ability to achieve future success in sports. The aim of the study was to verify the predictive value of coordination and precision in skill acquisition during motor learning, as indicators of talent. One hundred gymnasts, bot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of sports science & medicine 2014-12, Vol.13 (4), p.767-773
Main Authors: di Cagno, Alessandra, Battaglia, Claudia, Fiorilli, Giovanni, Piazza, Marina, Giombini, Arrigo, Fagnani, Federica, Borrione, Paolo, Calcagno, Giuseppe, Pigozzi, Fabio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Age
Analysis
Athletes
Employment
Gymnastics
Gymnasts
Health sciences
Identification
Medicine
Morphology
Motor ability
Motor learning
Puberty
Skills
Soccer
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Talent identification plans are designed to select young athletes with the ability to achieve future success in sports. The aim of the study was to verify the predictive value of coordination and precision in skill acquisition during motor learning, as indicators of talent. One hundred gymnasts, both cadets (aged 11.5 ± 0.5 yr.) and juniors (aged 13.3 ± 0.5 years), competing at the national level, were enrolled in the study. The assessment of motor coordination involved three tests of the validated Hirtz's battery (1985), and motor skill learning involved four technical tests, specific of rhythmic gymnastics. All the tests were correlated with ranking and performance scores reached by each gymnast in the 2011, 2012, and 2013 National Championships. Coordination tests were significantly correlated to 2013 Championships scores (p < 0.01) and ranking (p < 0.05) of elite cadet athletes. Precision, in skill acquisition test results, was positively and significantly associated with scores in 2013 (adj. R(2) = 0.26, p < 0.01). Gymnasts with the best results in coordination and motor learning tests went on to achieve better competition results in three- year time. Key pointsIn talent identification and selection procedures it is better to include the evaluation of coordination and motor learning ability.Motor learning assessment concerns performance improvement and the ability to develop it, rather than evaluating the athlete's current performance.In this manner talent identification processes should be focused on the future performance capabilities of athletes.
ISSN:1303-2968
1303-2968