The Educational Homogamy Gap Between Married and Cohabiting Couples in Latin America

The explosive expansion of non-marital cohabitation in Latin America since the 1970s has led to the narrowing of the gap in educational homogamy between married and cohabiting couples (what we call "homogamy gap") as shown by our analysis of 29 census samples encompassing eight countries:...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Population research and policy review 2013-02, Vol.32 (1), p.81-102
Main Authors: Esteve, Albert, McCaa, Robert, López, Luis Ángel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Argentina
Assortative mating
Brazil
Canada
Census
Censuses
Chile
Cohabitation
Colombia
Costa Rica
Countries
Couples
Demography
Developed countries
Developing Countries
Ecuador
Education policy
Educational attainment
Europe
Explosives
Historical account
Homogamy
Industrial Societies
Institutionalization
Latin America
LDCs
Level of education
Marriage
Mate selection
Mexico
Panama
Parametric models
Poor
Population Economics
Reviews
Single status
Social Sciences
Sociology
Studies
U.S.A
United States
Womens studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-f47e356479254f999a92a5f72cd613f89e167c4358a23bbebcb16557c07a6b873
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-f47e356479254f999a92a5f72cd613f89e167c4358a23bbebcb16557c07a6b873
container_end_page 102
container_issue 1
container_start_page 81
container_title Population research and policy review
container_volume 32
creator Esteve, Albert
McCaa, Robert
López, Luis Ángel
description The explosive expansion of non-marital cohabitation in Latin America since the 1970s has led to the narrowing of the gap in educational homogamy between married and cohabiting couples (what we call "homogamy gap") as shown by our analysis of 29 census samples encompassing eight countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, and Panama (N = 2,295,160 young couples). Most research on the homogamy gap is limited to a single decade and a small group of developed countries (the United States, Canada, and Europe). We take a historical and cross-national perspective and expand the research to a range of developing countries, where since early colonial times, traditional forms of cohabitation among the poor, uneducated sectors of society have coexisted with marriage, although to widely varying degrees from country to country. In recent decades, cohabitation is emerging in all sectors of society. We find that among married couples, educational homogamy continues to be higher than for those who cohabit, but in recent decades, the difference has narrowed substantially in all countries. We argue that assortative mating between cohabiting and married couples tends to be similar when the contexts in which they are formed are also increasingly similar.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11113-012-9263-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4261155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23360538</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23360538</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-f47e356479254f999a92a5f72cd613f89e167c4358a23bbebcb16557c07a6b873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkktvEzEUhS0EoqHwA1iALLFhM-D3Y4NUotIiBbEJa8vjeBJHM3awZ4r673E0pRQWBG9s6X7n-Pr6APASo3cYIfm-4LpogzBpNBG0YY_AAnNJG6mIfgwWCAvZcE3oGXhWyh6hqqL6KTgjnCOBMVqA9Xrn4eVmcnYMKdoeXqchbe1wC6_sAX704w_vI_xicw5-A23cwGXa2TaMIW7rcTr0vsAQ4arqI7wYfA7OPgdPOtsX_-JuPwffPl2ul9fN6uvV5-XFqnGCy7HpmPSUCyY14azTWltNLO8kcRuBaae0r_07RrmyhLatb12LBefSIWlFqyQ9Bx9m38PUDn7jfByz7c0hh8HmW5NsMH9WYtiZbboxjNTXc14N3t4Z5PR98mU0QyjO972NPk3FYEVEbUVgfRqVRNXmlMSnUcqkVAwreholGgskmPgfVHFBpFLHBt78he7TlOvvHilJCKdYkErhmXI5lZJ9dz84jMwxX2bOl6n5Msd8GVY1rx9O_F7xK1AVIDNQailufX5w9T9cX82ifRlT_m1KqUCcKvoTzjzhGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1272253162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Educational Homogamy Gap Between Married and Cohabiting Couples in Latin America</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Springer Link</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCO_EconLit with Full Text（美国经济学会全文数据库）</source><creator>Esteve, Albert ; McCaa, Robert ; López, Luis Ángel</creator><creatorcontrib>Esteve, Albert ; McCaa, Robert ; López, Luis Ángel</creatorcontrib><description>The explosive expansion of non-marital cohabitation in Latin America since the 1970s has led to the narrowing of the gap in educational homogamy between married and cohabiting couples (what we call "homogamy gap") as shown by our analysis of 29 census samples encompassing eight countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, and Panama (N = 2,295,160 young couples). Most research on the homogamy gap is limited to a single decade and a small group of developed countries (the United States, Canada, and Europe). We take a historical and cross-national perspective and expand the research to a range of developing countries, where since early colonial times, traditional forms of cohabitation among the poor, uneducated sectors of society have coexisted with marriage, although to widely varying degrees from country to country. In recent decades, cohabitation is emerging in all sectors of society. We find that among married couples, educational homogamy continues to be higher than for those who cohabit, but in recent decades, the difference has narrowed substantially in all countries. We argue that assortative mating between cohabiting and married couples tends to be similar when the contexts in which they are formed are also increasingly similar.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7829</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11113-012-9263-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25506110</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PRPRE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Argentina ; Assortative mating ; Brazil ; Canada ; Census ; Censuses ; Chile ; Cohabitation ; Colombia ; Costa Rica ; Countries ; Couples ; Demography ; Developed countries ; Developing Countries ; Ecuador ; Education policy ; Educational attainment ; Europe ; Explosives ; Historical account ; Homogamy ; Industrial Societies ; Institutionalization ; Latin America ; LDCs ; Level of education ; Marriage ; Mate selection ; Mexico ; Panama ; Parametric models ; Poor ; Population Economics ; Reviews ; Single status ; Social Sciences ; Sociology ; Studies ; U.S.A ; United States ; Womens studies</subject><ispartof>Population research and policy review, 2013-02, Vol.32 (1), p.81-102</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-f47e356479254f999a92a5f72cd613f89e167c4358a23bbebcb16557c07a6b873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-f47e356479254f999a92a5f72cd613f89e167c4358a23bbebcb16557c07a6b873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1272253162/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1272253162?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,11686,12845,21385,21392,21393,27342,27863,27864,27922,27923,33221,33222,33609,33610,33772,33773,33983,33984,34528,34529,36058,36059,43731,43946,44113,44361,58236,58469,73991,74238,74409,74665</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25506110$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Esteve, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCaa, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, Luis Ángel</creatorcontrib><title>The Educational Homogamy Gap Between Married and Cohabiting Couples in Latin America</title><title>Population research and policy review</title><addtitle>Popul Res Policy Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Popul Res Policy Rev</addtitle><description>The explosive expansion of non-marital cohabitation in Latin America since the 1970s has led to the narrowing of the gap in educational homogamy between married and cohabiting couples (what we call "homogamy gap") as shown by our analysis of 29 census samples encompassing eight countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, and Panama (N = 2,295,160 young couples). Most research on the homogamy gap is limited to a single decade and a small group of developed countries (the United States, Canada, and Europe). We take a historical and cross-national perspective and expand the research to a range of developing countries, where since early colonial times, traditional forms of cohabitation among the poor, uneducated sectors of society have coexisted with marriage, although to widely varying degrees from country to country. In recent decades, cohabitation is emerging in all sectors of society. We find that among married couples, educational homogamy continues to be higher than for those who cohabit, but in recent decades, the difference has narrowed substantially in all countries. We argue that assortative mating between cohabiting and married couples tends to be similar when the contexts in which they are formed are also increasingly similar.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Argentina</subject><subject>Assortative mating</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Census</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Chile</subject><subject>Cohabitation</subject><subject>Colombia</subject><subject>Costa Rica</subject><subject>Countries</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Ecuador</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Explosives</subject><subject>Historical account</subject><subject>Homogamy</subject><subject>Industrial Societies</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>Latin America</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Level of education</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Mate selection</subject><subject>Mexico</subject><subject>Panama</subject><subject>Parametric models</subject><subject>Poor</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Single status</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Womens studies</subject><issn>0167-5923</issn><issn>1573-7829</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkktvEzEUhS0EoqHwA1iALLFhM-D3Y4NUotIiBbEJa8vjeBJHM3awZ4r673E0pRQWBG9s6X7n-Pr6APASo3cYIfm-4LpogzBpNBG0YY_AAnNJG6mIfgwWCAvZcE3oGXhWyh6hqqL6KTgjnCOBMVqA9Xrn4eVmcnYMKdoeXqchbe1wC6_sAX704w_vI_xicw5-A23cwGXa2TaMIW7rcTr0vsAQ4arqI7wYfA7OPgdPOtsX_-JuPwffPl2ul9fN6uvV5-XFqnGCy7HpmPSUCyY14azTWltNLO8kcRuBaae0r_07RrmyhLatb12LBefSIWlFqyQ9Bx9m38PUDn7jfByz7c0hh8HmW5NsMH9WYtiZbboxjNTXc14N3t4Z5PR98mU0QyjO972NPk3FYEVEbUVgfRqVRNXmlMSnUcqkVAwreholGgskmPgfVHFBpFLHBt78he7TlOvvHilJCKdYkErhmXI5lZJ9dz84jMwxX2bOl6n5Msd8GVY1rx9O_F7xK1AVIDNQailufX5w9T9cX82ifRlT_m1KqUCcKvoTzjzhGg</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Esteve, Albert</creator><creator>McCaa, Robert</creator><creator>López, Luis Ángel</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>The Educational Homogamy Gap Between Married and Cohabiting Couples in Latin America</title><author>Esteve, Albert ; McCaa, Robert ; López, Luis Ángel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-f47e356479254f999a92a5f72cd613f89e167c4358a23bbebcb16557c07a6b873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Argentina</topic><topic>Assortative mating</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Census</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Chile</topic><topic>Cohabitation</topic><topic>Colombia</topic><topic>Costa Rica</topic><topic>Countries</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Ecuador</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Explosives</topic><topic>Historical account</topic><topic>Homogamy</topic><topic>Industrial Societies</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>Latin America</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Level of education</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Mate selection</topic><topic>Mexico</topic><topic>Panama</topic><topic>Parametric models</topic><topic>Poor</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Single status</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Womens studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Esteve, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCaa, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, Luis Ángel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Population research and policy review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Esteve, Albert</au><au>McCaa, Robert</au><au>López, Luis Ángel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Educational Homogamy Gap Between Married and Cohabiting Couples in Latin America</atitle><jtitle>Population research and policy review</jtitle><stitle>Popul Res Policy Rev</stitle><addtitle>Popul Res Policy Rev</addtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>81-102</pages><issn>0167-5923</issn><eissn>1573-7829</eissn><coden>PRPRE8</coden><abstract>The explosive expansion of non-marital cohabitation in Latin America since the 1970s has led to the narrowing of the gap in educational homogamy between married and cohabiting couples (what we call "homogamy gap") as shown by our analysis of 29 census samples encompassing eight countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, and Panama (N = 2,295,160 young couples). Most research on the homogamy gap is limited to a single decade and a small group of developed countries (the United States, Canada, and Europe). We take a historical and cross-national perspective and expand the research to a range of developing countries, where since early colonial times, traditional forms of cohabitation among the poor, uneducated sectors of society have coexisted with marriage, although to widely varying degrees from country to country. In recent decades, cohabitation is emerging in all sectors of society. We find that among married couples, educational homogamy continues to be higher than for those who cohabit, but in recent decades, the difference has narrowed substantially in all countries. We argue that assortative mating between cohabiting and married couples tends to be similar when the contexts in which they are formed are also increasingly similar.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>25506110</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11113-012-9263-4</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-5923
ispartof Population research and policy review, 2013-02, Vol.32 (1), p.81-102
issn 0167-5923
1573-7829
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4261155
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Sociology Collection; PAIS Index; Springer Link; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCO_EconLit with Full Text（美国经济学会全文数据库）
subjects Analysis
Argentina
Assortative mating
Brazil
Canada
Census
Censuses
Chile
Cohabitation
Colombia
Costa Rica
Countries
Couples
Demography
Developed countries
Developing Countries
Ecuador
Education policy
Educational attainment
Europe
Explosives
Historical account
Homogamy
Industrial Societies
Institutionalization
Latin America
LDCs
Level of education
Marriage
Mate selection
Mexico
Panama
Parametric models
Poor
Population Economics
Reviews
Single status
Social Sciences
Sociology
Studies
U.S.A
United States
Womens studies
title The Educational Homogamy Gap Between Married and Cohabiting Couples in Latin America
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A51%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Educational%20Homogamy%20Gap%20Between%20Married%20and%20Cohabiting%20Couples%20in%20Latin%20America&rft.jtitle=Population%20research%20and%20policy%20review&rft.au=Esteve,%20Albert&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=81-102&rft.issn=0167-5923&rft.eissn=1573-7829&rft.coden=PRPRE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11113-012-9263-4&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E23360538%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-f47e356479254f999a92a5f72cd613f89e167c4358a23bbebcb16557c07a6b873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1272253162&rft_id=info:pmid/25506110&rft_jstor_id=23360538&rfr_iscdi=true