Practicing evidence based medicine at the bedside: a randomized controlled pilot study in undergraduate medical students assessing the practicality of tablets, smartphones, and computers in clinical life

Practicing evidence-based medicine is an important aspect of providing good medical care. Accessing external information through literature searches on computer-based systems can effectively achieve integration in clinical care. We conducted a pilot study using smartphones, tablets, and stationary c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC medical informatics and decision making 2014-12, Vol.14 (1), p.113-113, Article 113
Main Authors: Friederichs, Hendrik, Marschall, Bernhard, Weissenstein, Anne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Algorithms
Cell Phone - standards
Cell Phone - statistics & numerical data
Computers - classification
Computers - standards
Computers - statistics & numerical data
Computers, Handheld - standards
Computers, Handheld - statistics & numerical data
Devices
Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods
Evidence-Based Medicine - methods
Evidence-Based Medicine - standards
Evidence-Based Medicine - statistics & numerical data
Female
Habits
Humans
Information Seeking Behavior
Internet
Internet access
Male
Medical
Mobile Applications - statistics & numerical data
Patients
Physicians
Pilot Projects
Pilots
Point-of-Care Systems - standards
Point-of-Care Systems - statistics & numerical data
Questionnaires
Searching
Self evaluation
Smart phones
Smartphones
Students
Students, Medical
Tablet computers
Technology application
Variance analysis
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b621t-54cca5623bbc33a53ab22e080f46d78c0efb3e2914518c34e35e7eeb42c893583
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b621t-54cca5623bbc33a53ab22e080f46d78c0efb3e2914518c34e35e7eeb42c893583
container_end_page 113
container_issue 1
container_start_page 113
container_title BMC medical informatics and decision making
container_volume 14
creator Friederichs, Hendrik
Marschall, Bernhard
Weissenstein, Anne
description Practicing evidence-based medicine is an important aspect of providing good medical care. Accessing external information through literature searches on computer-based systems can effectively achieve integration in clinical care. We conducted a pilot study using smartphones, tablets, and stationary computers as search devices at the bedside. The objective was to determine possible differences between the various devices and assess students' internet use habits. In a randomized controlled pilot study, 120 students were divided in three groups. One control group solved clinical problems on a computer and two intervention groups used mobile devices at the bedside. In a questionnaire, students were asked to report their internet use habits as well as their satisfaction with their respective search tool using a 5-point Likert scale. Of 120 surveys, 94 (78.3%) complete data sets were analyzed. The mobility of the tablet (3.90) and the smartphone (4.39) was seen as a significant advantage over the computer (2.38, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12911-014-0113-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4262131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A539698716</galeid><sourcerecordid>A539698716</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b621t-54cca5623bbc33a53ab22e080f46d78c0efb3e2914518c34e35e7eeb42c893583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNU8tu1TAQjRCIlsIHsEGW2LAgJY6dOGFRqSpPqRIsYG05zuReV44dbKfS5Rf5KSZNKb2oSFVkxZ45c2bmjJ1lz2lxTGlTv4m0bCnNC8pxUZaLB9kh5aLM65aLh7f2B9mTGC-KgoqGVY-zg7LiQhSCHWa_vgalk9HGbQhcmh6cBtKpCD0ZoV_sQFQiaYtW6CMC3hJFgnK9H81PRGnvUvDW4nYy1icS09zviHFkdj2ETVD9rBKsbMpeucGlSFSMEOOSdyGf1jKUNWlH_ECS6iyk-JrEUYU0bb0DPGBaTDhOc4IQlxzaGndFa80AT7NHg7IRnl3_j7LvH95_O_uUn3_5-Pns9Dzv6pKmvOJaq6ouWddpxlTFVFeWUDTFwOteNLqAoWOAyvKKNppxYBUIgI6XumlZ1bCj7GTlneYO29LYTlBWTsFgrTvplZH7Hme2cuMvJS-xAEaR4N1K0Bn_H4J9D_Ys12FLHLZchi0F0ry6riP4HzPEJEcTNVirHPg5SloLwURV8Poe0LpABeqG3QOKbVBeUo7Ql_9AL_wcHGqPKFbVnLa8-YvaKAvSuMFjT3ohlacVa-u2EXSp8PgOFH49jAYvGQwG7XsBdA3QwccYYLjRjxZyeR53Kvbi9uRuIv68B_YbbM8PDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1635641948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practicing evidence based medicine at the bedside: a randomized controlled pilot study in undergraduate medical students assessing the practicality of tablets, smartphones, and computers in clinical life</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>NCBI_PubMed Central（免费）</source><creator>Friederichs, Hendrik ; Marschall, Bernhard ; Weissenstein, Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Friederichs, Hendrik ; Marschall, Bernhard ; Weissenstein, Anne</creatorcontrib><description>Practicing evidence-based medicine is an important aspect of providing good medical care. Accessing external information through literature searches on computer-based systems can effectively achieve integration in clinical care. We conducted a pilot study using smartphones, tablets, and stationary computers as search devices at the bedside. The objective was to determine possible differences between the various devices and assess students' internet use habits. In a randomized controlled pilot study, 120 students were divided in three groups. One control group solved clinical problems on a computer and two intervention groups used mobile devices at the bedside. In a questionnaire, students were asked to report their internet use habits as well as their satisfaction with their respective search tool using a 5-point Likert scale. Of 120 surveys, 94 (78.3%) complete data sets were analyzed. The mobility of the tablet (3.90) and the smartphone (4.39) was seen as a significant advantage over the computer (2.38, p &lt; .001). However, for performing an effective literature search at the bedside, the computer (3.22) was rated superior to both tablet computers (2.13) and smartphones (1.68). No significant differences were detected between tablets and smartphones except satisfaction with screen size (tablet 4.10, smartphone 2.00, p &lt; .001). Using a mobile device at the bedside to perform an extensive search is not suitable for students who prefer using computers. However, mobility is regarded as a substantial advantage, and therefore future applications might facilitate quick and simple searches at the bedside.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6947</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12911-014-0113-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25477073</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Algorithms ; Cell Phone - standards ; Cell Phone - statistics & numerical data ; Computers - classification ; Computers - standards ; Computers - statistics & numerical data ; Computers, Handheld - standards ; Computers, Handheld - statistics & numerical data ; Devices ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods ; Evidence-Based Medicine - methods ; Evidence-Based Medicine - standards ; Evidence-Based Medicine - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Habits ; Humans ; Information Seeking Behavior ; Internet ; Internet access ; Male ; Medical ; Mobile Applications - statistics & numerical data ; Patients ; Physicians ; Pilot Projects ; Pilots ; Point-of-Care Systems - standards ; Point-of-Care Systems - statistics & numerical data ; Questionnaires ; Searching ; Self evaluation ; Smart phones ; Smartphones ; Students ; Students, Medical ; Tablet computers ; Technology application ; Variance analysis ; Young Adult]]></subject><ispartof>BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2014-12, Vol.14 (1), p.113-113, Article 113</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 Friederichs et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</rights><rights>Friederichs et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b621t-54cca5623bbc33a53ab22e080f46d78c0efb3e2914518c34e35e7eeb42c893583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b621t-54cca5623bbc33a53ab22e080f46d78c0efb3e2914518c34e35e7eeb42c893583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262131/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1635641948?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25477073$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Friederichs, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marschall, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weissenstein, Anne</creatorcontrib><title>Practicing evidence based medicine at the bedside: a randomized controlled pilot study in undergraduate medical students assessing the practicality of tablets, smartphones, and computers in clinical life</title><title>BMC medical informatics and decision making</title><addtitle>BMC Med Inform Decis Mak</addtitle><description>Practicing evidence-based medicine is an important aspect of providing good medical care. Accessing external information through literature searches on computer-based systems can effectively achieve integration in clinical care. We conducted a pilot study using smartphones, tablets, and stationary computers as search devices at the bedside. The objective was to determine possible differences between the various devices and assess students' internet use habits. In a randomized controlled pilot study, 120 students were divided in three groups. One control group solved clinical problems on a computer and two intervention groups used mobile devices at the bedside. In a questionnaire, students were asked to report their internet use habits as well as their satisfaction with their respective search tool using a 5-point Likert scale. Of 120 surveys, 94 (78.3%) complete data sets were analyzed. The mobility of the tablet (3.90) and the smartphone (4.39) was seen as a significant advantage over the computer (2.38, p &lt; .001). However, for performing an effective literature search at the bedside, the computer (3.22) was rated superior to both tablet computers (2.13) and smartphones (1.68). No significant differences were detected between tablets and smartphones except satisfaction with screen size (tablet 4.10, smartphone 2.00, p &lt; .001). Using a mobile device at the bedside to perform an extensive search is not suitable for students who prefer using computers. However, mobility is regarded as a substantial advantage, and therefore future applications might facilitate quick and simple searches at the bedside.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cell Phone - standards</subject><subject>Cell Phone - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Computers - classification</subject><subject>Computers - standards</subject><subject>Computers - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Computers, Handheld - standards</subject><subject>Computers, Handheld - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Devices</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - methods</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Habits</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Seeking Behavior</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internet access</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical</subject><subject>Mobile Applications - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Pilots</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems - standards</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Searching</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Smart phones</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students, Medical</subject><subject>Tablet computers</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1472-6947</issn><issn>1472-6947</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNU8tu1TAQjRCIlsIHsEGW2LAgJY6dOGFRqSpPqRIsYG05zuReV44dbKfS5Rf5KSZNKb2oSFVkxZ45c2bmjJ1lz2lxTGlTv4m0bCnNC8pxUZaLB9kh5aLM65aLh7f2B9mTGC-KgoqGVY-zg7LiQhSCHWa_vgalk9HGbQhcmh6cBtKpCD0ZoV_sQFQiaYtW6CMC3hJFgnK9H81PRGnvUvDW4nYy1icS09zviHFkdj2ETVD9rBKsbMpeucGlSFSMEOOSdyGf1jKUNWlH_ECS6iyk-JrEUYU0bb0DPGBaTDhOc4IQlxzaGndFa80AT7NHg7IRnl3_j7LvH95_O_uUn3_5-Pns9Dzv6pKmvOJaq6ouWddpxlTFVFeWUDTFwOteNLqAoWOAyvKKNppxYBUIgI6XumlZ1bCj7GTlneYO29LYTlBWTsFgrTvplZH7Hme2cuMvJS-xAEaR4N1K0Bn_H4J9D_Ys12FLHLZchi0F0ry6riP4HzPEJEcTNVirHPg5SloLwURV8Poe0LpABeqG3QOKbVBeUo7Ql_9AL_wcHGqPKFbVnLa8-YvaKAvSuMFjT3ohlacVa-u2EXSp8PgOFH49jAYvGQwG7XsBdA3QwccYYLjRjxZyeR53Kvbi9uRuIv68B_YbbM8PDA</recordid><startdate>20141205</startdate><enddate>20141205</enddate><creator>Friederichs, Hendrik</creator><creator>Marschall, Bernhard</creator><creator>Weissenstein, Anne</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141205</creationdate><title>Practicing evidence based medicine at the bedside: a randomized controlled pilot study in undergraduate medical students assessing the practicality of tablets, smartphones, and computers in clinical life</title><author>Friederichs, Hendrik ; Marschall, Bernhard ; Weissenstein, Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b621t-54cca5623bbc33a53ab22e080f46d78c0efb3e2914518c34e35e7eeb42c893583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cell Phone - standards</topic><topic>Cell Phone - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Computers - classification</topic><topic>Computers - standards</topic><topic>Computers - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Computers, Handheld - standards</topic><topic>Computers, Handheld - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Devices</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - methods</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Habits</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Seeking Behavior</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internet access</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical</topic><topic>Mobile Applications - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Pilots</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems - standards</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Searching</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Smart phones</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students, Medical</topic><topic>Tablet computers</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Friederichs, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marschall, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weissenstein, Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer science database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health Management</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC medical informatics and decision making</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Friederichs, Hendrik</au><au>Marschall, Bernhard</au><au>Weissenstein, Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practicing evidence based medicine at the bedside: a randomized controlled pilot study in undergraduate medical students assessing the practicality of tablets, smartphones, and computers in clinical life</atitle><jtitle>BMC medical informatics and decision making</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Med Inform Decis Mak</addtitle><date>2014-12-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>113-113</pages><artnum>113</artnum><issn>1472-6947</issn><eissn>1472-6947</eissn><abstract>Practicing evidence-based medicine is an important aspect of providing good medical care. Accessing external information through literature searches on computer-based systems can effectively achieve integration in clinical care. We conducted a pilot study using smartphones, tablets, and stationary computers as search devices at the bedside. The objective was to determine possible differences between the various devices and assess students' internet use habits. In a randomized controlled pilot study, 120 students were divided in three groups. One control group solved clinical problems on a computer and two intervention groups used mobile devices at the bedside. In a questionnaire, students were asked to report their internet use habits as well as their satisfaction with their respective search tool using a 5-point Likert scale. Of 120 surveys, 94 (78.3%) complete data sets were analyzed. The mobility of the tablet (3.90) and the smartphone (4.39) was seen as a significant advantage over the computer (2.38, p &lt; .001). However, for performing an effective literature search at the bedside, the computer (3.22) was rated superior to both tablet computers (2.13) and smartphones (1.68). No significant differences were detected between tablets and smartphones except satisfaction with screen size (tablet 4.10, smartphone 2.00, p &lt; .001). Using a mobile device at the bedside to perform an extensive search is not suitable for students who prefer using computers. However, mobility is regarded as a substantial advantage, and therefore future applications might facilitate quick and simple searches at the bedside.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25477073</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12911-014-0113-7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1472-6947
ispartof BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2014-12, Vol.14 (1), p.113-113, Article 113
issn 1472-6947
1472-6947
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4262131
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); NCBI_PubMed Central（免费）
subjects Algorithms
Cell Phone - standards
Cell Phone - statistics & numerical data
Computers - classification
Computers - standards
Computers - statistics & numerical data
Computers, Handheld - standards
Computers, Handheld - statistics & numerical data
Devices
Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods
Evidence-Based Medicine - methods
Evidence-Based Medicine - standards
Evidence-Based Medicine - statistics & numerical data
Female
Habits
Humans
Information Seeking Behavior
Internet
Internet access
Male
Medical
Mobile Applications - statistics & numerical data
Patients
Physicians
Pilot Projects
Pilots
Point-of-Care Systems - standards
Point-of-Care Systems - statistics & numerical data
Questionnaires
Searching
Self evaluation
Smart phones
Smartphones
Students
Students, Medical
Tablet computers
Technology application
Variance analysis
Young Adult
title Practicing evidence based medicine at the bedside: a randomized controlled pilot study in undergraduate medical students assessing the practicality of tablets, smartphones, and computers in clinical life
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A04%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practicing%20evidence%20based%20medicine%20at%20the%20bedside:%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20pilot%20study%20in%20undergraduate%20medical%20students%20assessing%20the%20practicality%20of%20tablets,%20smartphones,%20and%20computers%20in%20clinical%20life&rft.jtitle=BMC%20medical%20informatics%20and%20decision%20making&rft.au=Friederichs,%20Hendrik&rft.date=2014-12-05&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=113-113&rft.artnum=113&rft.issn=1472-6947&rft.eissn=1472-6947&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12911-014-0113-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA539698716%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b621t-54cca5623bbc33a53ab22e080f46d78c0efb3e2914518c34e35e7eeb42c893583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1635641948&rft_id=info:pmid/25477073&rft_galeid=A539698716&rfr_iscdi=true