Loading…

Comparison of the rhythm control treatment strategy versus the rate control strategy in patients with permanent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy - a pilot study of Cardiac Resynchronization in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (Pilot-CRAfT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

The only subgroups of patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation in which the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy has been scientifically proven are patients with indications for right ventricular pacing and patients after atrioventricular junction ablation. However it is unlikely...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Trials 2014-10, Vol.15 (1), p.386-386, Article 386
Main Authors: Ciszewski, Jan, Maciag, Aleksander, Kowalik, Ilona, Syska, Pawel, Lewandowski, Michal, Farkowski, Michal M, Borowiec, Anna, Chwyczko, Tomasz, Pytkowski, Mariusz, Szwed, Hanna, Sterlinski, Maciej
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b593t-bc26f9a83dc99fbf2fae16375f2315ee448fb67395a2e163dcaffb07480fb3ac3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b593t-bc26f9a83dc99fbf2fae16375f2315ee448fb67395a2e163dcaffb07480fb3ac3
container_end_page 386
container_issue 1
container_start_page 386
container_title Trials
container_volume 15
creator Ciszewski, Jan
Maciag, Aleksander
Kowalik, Ilona
Syska, Pawel
Lewandowski, Michal
Farkowski, Michal M
Borowiec, Anna
Chwyczko, Tomasz
Pytkowski, Mariusz
Szwed, Hanna
Sterlinski, Maciej
description The only subgroups of patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation in which the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy has been scientifically proven are patients with indications for right ventricular pacing and patients after atrioventricular junction ablation. However it is unlikely that atrioventricular junction ablation would be a standard procedure in the majority of the heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and concomitant atrial fibrillation due to the irreversible character of the procedure and a spontaneous sinus rhythm resumption that occurs in about 10% of these patients. Pilot-CRAfT is the first randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a rhythm control strategy in atrial fibrillation patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. The aim of this prospective, single center randomized controlled pilot study is to answer the question whether the patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and permanent atrial fibrillation would benefit from a strategy to restore and maintain sinus rhythm (that is 'rhythm control' strategy) in comparison to rate control strategy. The study population consists of 60 patients with heart failure and concomitant long-standing persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation who underwent a cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation at least 3 months before qualification. Study participants are randomly assigned to the rhythm control strategy (including electrical cardioversion and pharmacotherapy) or to the rate control group whose goal is to control ventricular rate. The follow-up time is 12 months. The primary endpoint is the ratio of effectively captured biventricular beats. The secondary endpoints include peak oxygen consumption, six-minute walk test distance, heart failure symptom escalation, reverse remodelling of the heart on echo and quality of life. NCT01850277 registered on 22 April 2013 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1745-6215-15-386
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4283117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A540685332</galeid><sourcerecordid>A540685332</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b593t-bc26f9a83dc99fbf2fae16375f2315ee448fb67395a2e163dcaffb07480fb3ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1k92L1DAUxaso7rr67pMEfNGHrm3TTx-EobgqLCjL-Fxu02SaJU1Kklnp_vXebscygysNNNx7zo-TSxIEb-LoMo7L_GNcpFmYJ3EW4qJl_jQ4X0vPjvZnwUvnbqMopRVNXwRnSZaUcVJk509uazOMYKUzmhhBfM-J7SffD4QZ7a1RxFsOfuDaE-cteL6byB23bu8WMVZW6SqQmozgJZoc-S19T0ZuB9AzxFiijN6FzoPupN7NLSedn3vgrQRFhGytVAoBGApVpOdgPREg1d7yJRDvFjAD20lgxHI3adZbo-X9YsR0FsaJhATIKJWZ8--7aT5lfTDd_GPC4JslxNVxiO1D6f3PGRPWNxux_fDpgBut8Ybh4QWeDHAeujODvMd8h6ko3D4gXwXPBSjHXx_-F8Gvqy_b-lt4_ePr93pzHbZZRX3YsiQXFZS0Y1UlWpEI4HFOi0wkNM44T9NStHlBqwySudExEKKNirSMREuB0Yvg88Id9-3AO4aTtaCa0coB7NQYkM1pR8u-2Zm7Jk1KGscFAuoF0ErzH8Bph5mhme9aM9-1BhdeRaS8Wyg7ULyRWhjUskE61myyNMrLjNIEVZePqPDr-CBxglxIrJ8YosXArHHOcrHmiqNmfhSPJXl7PJDV8PcV0D9r9BWN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the rhythm control treatment strategy versus the rate control strategy in patients with permanent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy - a pilot study of Cardiac Resynchronization in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (Pilot-CRAfT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ciszewski, Jan ; Maciag, Aleksander ; Kowalik, Ilona ; Syska, Pawel ; Lewandowski, Michal ; Farkowski, Michal M ; Borowiec, Anna ; Chwyczko, Tomasz ; Pytkowski, Mariusz ; Szwed, Hanna ; Sterlinski, Maciej</creator><creatorcontrib>Ciszewski, Jan ; Maciag, Aleksander ; Kowalik, Ilona ; Syska, Pawel ; Lewandowski, Michal ; Farkowski, Michal M ; Borowiec, Anna ; Chwyczko, Tomasz ; Pytkowski, Mariusz ; Szwed, Hanna ; Sterlinski, Maciej</creatorcontrib><description>The only subgroups of patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation in which the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy has been scientifically proven are patients with indications for right ventricular pacing and patients after atrioventricular junction ablation. However it is unlikely that atrioventricular junction ablation would be a standard procedure in the majority of the heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and concomitant atrial fibrillation due to the irreversible character of the procedure and a spontaneous sinus rhythm resumption that occurs in about 10% of these patients. Pilot-CRAfT is the first randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a rhythm control strategy in atrial fibrillation patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. The aim of this prospective, single center randomized controlled pilot study is to answer the question whether the patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and permanent atrial fibrillation would benefit from a strategy to restore and maintain sinus rhythm (that is 'rhythm control' strategy) in comparison to rate control strategy. The study population consists of 60 patients with heart failure and concomitant long-standing persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation who underwent a cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation at least 3 months before qualification. Study participants are randomly assigned to the rhythm control strategy (including electrical cardioversion and pharmacotherapy) or to the rate control group whose goal is to control ventricular rate. The follow-up time is 12 months. The primary endpoint is the ratio of effectively captured biventricular beats. The secondary endpoints include peak oxygen consumption, six-minute walk test distance, heart failure symptom escalation, reverse remodelling of the heart on echo and quality of life. NCT01850277 registered on 22 April 2013 (ClinicalTrials.gov).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1745-6215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-386</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25281275</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - adverse effects ; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use ; Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis ; Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology ; Atrial Fibrillation - therapy ; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - adverse effects ; Catheter Ablation - adverse effects ; Clinical Protocols ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Comparative analysis ; Defibrillators ; Electric Countershock - adverse effects ; Electric Countershock - instrumentation ; Heart Failure - diagnosis ; Heart Failure - physiopathology ; Heart Failure - therapy ; Humans ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Pilot Projects ; Poland ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Recovery of Function ; Research Design ; Study Protocol ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Trials, 2014-10, Vol.15 (1), p.386-386, Article 386</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Ciszewski et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b593t-bc26f9a83dc99fbf2fae16375f2315ee448fb67395a2e163dcaffb07480fb3ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b593t-bc26f9a83dc99fbf2fae16375f2315ee448fb67395a2e163dcaffb07480fb3ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4283117/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4283117/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25281275$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ciszewski, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maciag, Aleksander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kowalik, Ilona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syska, Pawel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewandowski, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farkowski, Michal M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borowiec, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chwyczko, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pytkowski, Mariusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szwed, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterlinski, Maciej</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the rhythm control treatment strategy versus the rate control strategy in patients with permanent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy - a pilot study of Cardiac Resynchronization in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (Pilot-CRAfT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</title><title>Trials</title><addtitle>Trials</addtitle><description>The only subgroups of patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation in which the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy has been scientifically proven are patients with indications for right ventricular pacing and patients after atrioventricular junction ablation. However it is unlikely that atrioventricular junction ablation would be a standard procedure in the majority of the heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and concomitant atrial fibrillation due to the irreversible character of the procedure and a spontaneous sinus rhythm resumption that occurs in about 10% of these patients. Pilot-CRAfT is the first randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a rhythm control strategy in atrial fibrillation patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. The aim of this prospective, single center randomized controlled pilot study is to answer the question whether the patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and permanent atrial fibrillation would benefit from a strategy to restore and maintain sinus rhythm (that is 'rhythm control' strategy) in comparison to rate control strategy. The study population consists of 60 patients with heart failure and concomitant long-standing persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation who underwent a cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation at least 3 months before qualification. Study participants are randomly assigned to the rhythm control strategy (including electrical cardioversion and pharmacotherapy) or to the rate control group whose goal is to control ventricular rate. The follow-up time is 12 months. The primary endpoint is the ratio of effectively captured biventricular beats. The secondary endpoints include peak oxygen consumption, six-minute walk test distance, heart failure symptom escalation, reverse remodelling of the heart on echo and quality of life. NCT01850277 registered on 22 April 2013 (ClinicalTrials.gov).</description><subject>Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Defibrillators</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - adverse effects</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - instrumentation</subject><subject>Heart Failure - diagnosis</subject><subject>Heart Failure - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Failure - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Poland</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Study Protocol</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1745-6215</issn><issn>1745-6215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1k92L1DAUxaso7rr67pMEfNGHrm3TTx-EobgqLCjL-Fxu02SaJU1Kklnp_vXebscygysNNNx7zo-TSxIEb-LoMo7L_GNcpFmYJ3EW4qJl_jQ4X0vPjvZnwUvnbqMopRVNXwRnSZaUcVJk509uazOMYKUzmhhBfM-J7SffD4QZ7a1RxFsOfuDaE-cteL6byB23bu8WMVZW6SqQmozgJZoc-S19T0ZuB9AzxFiijN6FzoPupN7NLSedn3vgrQRFhGytVAoBGApVpOdgPREg1d7yJRDvFjAD20lgxHI3adZbo-X9YsR0FsaJhATIKJWZ8--7aT5lfTDd_GPC4JslxNVxiO1D6f3PGRPWNxux_fDpgBut8Ybh4QWeDHAeujODvMd8h6ko3D4gXwXPBSjHXx_-F8Gvqy_b-lt4_ePr93pzHbZZRX3YsiQXFZS0Y1UlWpEI4HFOi0wkNM44T9NStHlBqwySudExEKKNirSMREuB0Yvg88Id9-3AO4aTtaCa0coB7NQYkM1pR8u-2Zm7Jk1KGscFAuoF0ErzH8Bph5mhme9aM9-1BhdeRaS8Wyg7ULyRWhjUskE61myyNMrLjNIEVZePqPDr-CBxglxIrJ8YosXArHHOcrHmiqNmfhSPJXl7PJDV8PcV0D9r9BWN</recordid><startdate>20141004</startdate><enddate>20141004</enddate><creator>Ciszewski, Jan</creator><creator>Maciag, Aleksander</creator><creator>Kowalik, Ilona</creator><creator>Syska, Pawel</creator><creator>Lewandowski, Michal</creator><creator>Farkowski, Michal M</creator><creator>Borowiec, Anna</creator><creator>Chwyczko, Tomasz</creator><creator>Pytkowski, Mariusz</creator><creator>Szwed, Hanna</creator><creator>Sterlinski, Maciej</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141004</creationdate><title>Comparison of the rhythm control treatment strategy versus the rate control strategy in patients with permanent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy - a pilot study of Cardiac Resynchronization in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (Pilot-CRAfT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Ciszewski, Jan ; Maciag, Aleksander ; Kowalik, Ilona ; Syska, Pawel ; Lewandowski, Michal ; Farkowski, Michal M ; Borowiec, Anna ; Chwyczko, Tomasz ; Pytkowski, Mariusz ; Szwed, Hanna ; Sterlinski, Maciej</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b593t-bc26f9a83dc99fbf2fae16375f2315ee448fb67395a2e163dcaffb07480fb3ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Defibrillators</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - adverse effects</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - instrumentation</topic><topic>Heart Failure - diagnosis</topic><topic>Heart Failure - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Failure - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Poland</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Study Protocol</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ciszewski, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maciag, Aleksander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kowalik, Ilona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syska, Pawel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewandowski, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farkowski, Michal M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borowiec, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chwyczko, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pytkowski, Mariusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szwed, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterlinski, Maciej</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Trials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ciszewski, Jan</au><au>Maciag, Aleksander</au><au>Kowalik, Ilona</au><au>Syska, Pawel</au><au>Lewandowski, Michal</au><au>Farkowski, Michal M</au><au>Borowiec, Anna</au><au>Chwyczko, Tomasz</au><au>Pytkowski, Mariusz</au><au>Szwed, Hanna</au><au>Sterlinski, Maciej</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the rhythm control treatment strategy versus the rate control strategy in patients with permanent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy - a pilot study of Cardiac Resynchronization in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (Pilot-CRAfT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Trials</jtitle><addtitle>Trials</addtitle><date>2014-10-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>386</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>386-386</pages><artnum>386</artnum><issn>1745-6215</issn><eissn>1745-6215</eissn><abstract>The only subgroups of patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation in which the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy has been scientifically proven are patients with indications for right ventricular pacing and patients after atrioventricular junction ablation. However it is unlikely that atrioventricular junction ablation would be a standard procedure in the majority of the heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and concomitant atrial fibrillation due to the irreversible character of the procedure and a spontaneous sinus rhythm resumption that occurs in about 10% of these patients. Pilot-CRAfT is the first randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a rhythm control strategy in atrial fibrillation patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. The aim of this prospective, single center randomized controlled pilot study is to answer the question whether the patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and permanent atrial fibrillation would benefit from a strategy to restore and maintain sinus rhythm (that is 'rhythm control' strategy) in comparison to rate control strategy. The study population consists of 60 patients with heart failure and concomitant long-standing persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation who underwent a cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation at least 3 months before qualification. Study participants are randomly assigned to the rhythm control strategy (including electrical cardioversion and pharmacotherapy) or to the rate control group whose goal is to control ventricular rate. The follow-up time is 12 months. The primary endpoint is the ratio of effectively captured biventricular beats. The secondary endpoints include peak oxygen consumption, six-minute walk test distance, heart failure symptom escalation, reverse remodelling of the heart on echo and quality of life. NCT01850277 registered on 22 April 2013 (ClinicalTrials.gov).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>25281275</pmid><doi>10.1186/1745-6215-15-386</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1745-6215
ispartof Trials, 2014-10, Vol.15 (1), p.386-386, Article 386
issn 1745-6215
1745-6215
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4283117
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - adverse effects
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use
Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis
Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology
Atrial Fibrillation - therapy
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - adverse effects
Catheter Ablation - adverse effects
Clinical Protocols
Combined Modality Therapy
Comparative analysis
Defibrillators
Electric Countershock - adverse effects
Electric Countershock - instrumentation
Heart Failure - diagnosis
Heart Failure - physiopathology
Heart Failure - therapy
Humans
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Pilot Projects
Poland
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Recovery of Function
Research Design
Study Protocol
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Comparison of the rhythm control treatment strategy versus the rate control strategy in patients with permanent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy - a pilot study of Cardiac Resynchronization in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (Pilot-CRAfT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A04%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20rhythm%20control%20treatment%20strategy%20versus%20the%20rate%20control%20strategy%20in%20patients%20with%20permanent%20or%20long-standing%20persistent%20atrial%20fibrillation%20and%20heart%20failure%20treated%20with%20cardiac%20resynchronization%20therapy%20-%20a%20pilot%20study%20of%20Cardiac%20Resynchronization%20in%20Atrial%20Fibrillation%20Trial%20(Pilot-CRAfT):%20study%20protocol%20for%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Trials&rft.au=Ciszewski,%20Jan&rft.date=2014-10-04&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=386&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=386-386&rft.artnum=386&rft.issn=1745-6215&rft.eissn=1745-6215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1745-6215-15-386&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA540685332%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b593t-bc26f9a83dc99fbf2fae16375f2315ee448fb67395a2e163dcaffb07480fb3ac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/25281275&rft_galeid=A540685332&rfr_iscdi=true