Loading…

Linking habitat selection and predation risk to spatial variation in survival

A central assumption underlying the study of habitat selection is that selected habitats confer enhanced fitness. Unfortunately, this assumption is rarely tested, and in some systems, gradients of predation risk may more accurately characterize spatial variation in vital rates than gradients describ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of animal ecology 2014-03, Vol.83 (2), p.343-352
Main Authors: DeCesare, Nicholas J, Hebblewhite, Mark, Bradley, Mark, Hervieux, David, Neufeld, Lalenia, Musiani, Marco, Mysterud, Atle
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5444-b66f4a1acc9cf0a38e68f00a77f161f96746ccad8eddbb97eecc6be575702923
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5444-b66f4a1acc9cf0a38e68f00a77f161f96746ccad8eddbb97eecc6be575702923
container_end_page 352
container_issue 2
container_start_page 343
container_title The Journal of animal ecology
container_volume 83
creator DeCesare, Nicholas J
Hebblewhite, Mark
Bradley, Mark
Hervieux, David
Neufeld, Lalenia
Musiani, Marco
Mysterud, Atle
description A central assumption underlying the study of habitat selection is that selected habitats confer enhanced fitness. Unfortunately, this assumption is rarely tested, and in some systems, gradients of predation risk may more accurately characterize spatial variation in vital rates than gradients described by habitat selection studies. Here, we separately measured spatial patterns of both resource selection and predation risk and tested their relationships with a key demographic trait, adult female survival, for a threatened ungulate, woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou Gmelin). We also evaluated whether exposure to gradients in both predation risk and resource selection value was manifested temporally through instantaneous or seasonal effects on survival outcomes. We used Cox proportional hazards spatial survival modelling to assess the relative support for 5 selection‐ and risk‐based definitions of habitat quality, as quantified by woodland caribou adult female survival. These hypotheses included scenarios in which selection ideally mirrored survival, risk entirely drove survival, non‐ideal selection correlated with survival but with additive risk effects, an ecological trap with maladaptive selection and a non‐spatial effect of annual variation in weather. Indeed, we found positive relationships between the predicted values of a resource selection function (RSF) and survival, yet subsequently incorporating an additional negative effect of predation risk greatly improved models further. This revealed a positive, but non‐ideal relationship between selection and survival. Gradients in these covariates were also shown to affect individual survival probability at multiple temporal scales. Exposure to increased predation risk had a relatively instantaneous effect on survival outcomes, whereas variation in habitat suitability predicted by an RSF had both instantaneous and longer‐term seasonal effects on survival. Predation risk was an additive source of hazard beyond that detected through selection alone, and woodland caribou selection thus was shown to be non‐ideal. Furthermore, by combining spatial adult female survival models with herd‐specific estimates of recruitment in matrix population models, we estimated a spatially explicit landscape of population growth predictions for this endangered species.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2656.12144
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4285818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24034594</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24034594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5444-b66f4a1acc9cf0a38e68f00a77f161f96746ccad8eddbb97eecc6be575702923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhzAmIhJC4pB07juNckKqqfGmBA-VsTRxn623WXuxkUf89TrNdChd8scbvM-MZvybkOYUTmtYpLUSZM1GKE8oo5w_I4nDykCwAGM1lVcMReRLjGgAqBsVjcsQ41DUTYkG-LK27tm6VXWFjBxyyaHqjB-tdhq7NtsG0eBsFG6-zwWdxm2Lssx0GOyvWZXEMO7vD_il51GEfzbP9fkwu319cnn_Ml98-fDo_W-a65JznjRAdR4pa17oDLKQRsgPAquqooF0tKi60xlaatm2aujJGa9GYsiorYDUrjsm7uex2bDam1cYNAXu1DXaD4UZ5tOpvxdkrtfI7xZksJZWpwNt9geB_jiYOamOjNn2PzvgxKiqkSE8kiwl9_Q-69mNwaTpFSwAKHKhI1OlM6eBjDKY7NENBTU6pyRc1-aJunUoZL-_PcODvrEnAmz2AUWPfBXTaxj-cZIliVeLEzP2yvbn5373q89nXi7sOXsyJ6zj4cL-Bgpf1pL-a9Q69wlX6AOrHdwaUp38keS3K4jdk7r6M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500104016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linking habitat selection and predation risk to spatial variation in survival</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>DeCesare, Nicholas J ; Hebblewhite, Mark ; Bradley, Mark ; Hervieux, David ; Neufeld, Lalenia ; Musiani, Marco ; Mysterud, Atle</creator><contributor>Mysterud, Atle</contributor><creatorcontrib>DeCesare, Nicholas J ; Hebblewhite, Mark ; Bradley, Mark ; Hervieux, David ; Neufeld, Lalenia ; Musiani, Marco ; Mysterud, Atle ; Mysterud, Atle</creatorcontrib><description>A central assumption underlying the study of habitat selection is that selected habitats confer enhanced fitness. Unfortunately, this assumption is rarely tested, and in some systems, gradients of predation risk may more accurately characterize spatial variation in vital rates than gradients described by habitat selection studies. Here, we separately measured spatial patterns of both resource selection and predation risk and tested their relationships with a key demographic trait, adult female survival, for a threatened ungulate, woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou Gmelin). We also evaluated whether exposure to gradients in both predation risk and resource selection value was manifested temporally through instantaneous or seasonal effects on survival outcomes. We used Cox proportional hazards spatial survival modelling to assess the relative support for 5 selection‐ and risk‐based definitions of habitat quality, as quantified by woodland caribou adult female survival. These hypotheses included scenarios in which selection ideally mirrored survival, risk entirely drove survival, non‐ideal selection correlated with survival but with additive risk effects, an ecological trap with maladaptive selection and a non‐spatial effect of annual variation in weather. Indeed, we found positive relationships between the predicted values of a resource selection function (RSF) and survival, yet subsequently incorporating an additional negative effect of predation risk greatly improved models further. This revealed a positive, but non‐ideal relationship between selection and survival. Gradients in these covariates were also shown to affect individual survival probability at multiple temporal scales. Exposure to increased predation risk had a relatively instantaneous effect on survival outcomes, whereas variation in habitat suitability predicted by an RSF had both instantaneous and longer‐term seasonal effects on survival. Predation risk was an additive source of hazard beyond that detected through selection alone, and woodland caribou selection thus was shown to be non‐ideal. Furthermore, by combining spatial adult female survival models with herd‐specific estimates of recruitment in matrix population models, we estimated a spatially explicit landscape of population growth predictions for this endangered species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12144</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24099266</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAECAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Alberta ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal ecology ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; British Columbia ; Caribou ; Caribous ; Ecological modeling ; ecological trap ; Ecosystem ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; endangered species ; Female ; Food Chain ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; habitat quality ; Habitat selection ; Habitats ; Longevity ; Mammalia ; Population Dynamics ; population growth ; Predation ; Probabilities ; Rangifer tarandus caribou ; recruitment ; Reindeer - physiology ; resource selection functions ; risk ; seasonal variation ; Spatial Analysis ; Spatial Ecology ; Spatial models ; species distribution models ; Summer ; survival ; ungulates ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; weather ; Wildlife management ; Winter ; wolves ; woodland caribou ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>The Journal of animal ecology, 2014-03, Vol.83 (2), p.343-352</ispartof><rights>2014 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>2014 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5444-b66f4a1acc9cf0a38e68f00a77f161f96746ccad8eddbb97eecc6be575702923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5444-b66f4a1acc9cf0a38e68f00a77f161f96746ccad8eddbb97eecc6be575702923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24034594$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24034594$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28226627$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24099266$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mysterud, Atle</contributor><creatorcontrib>DeCesare, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebblewhite, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hervieux, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neufeld, Lalenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musiani, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mysterud, Atle</creatorcontrib><title>Linking habitat selection and predation risk to spatial variation in survival</title><title>The Journal of animal ecology</title><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><description>A central assumption underlying the study of habitat selection is that selected habitats confer enhanced fitness. Unfortunately, this assumption is rarely tested, and in some systems, gradients of predation risk may more accurately characterize spatial variation in vital rates than gradients described by habitat selection studies. Here, we separately measured spatial patterns of both resource selection and predation risk and tested their relationships with a key demographic trait, adult female survival, for a threatened ungulate, woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou Gmelin). We also evaluated whether exposure to gradients in both predation risk and resource selection value was manifested temporally through instantaneous or seasonal effects on survival outcomes. We used Cox proportional hazards spatial survival modelling to assess the relative support for 5 selection‐ and risk‐based definitions of habitat quality, as quantified by woodland caribou adult female survival. These hypotheses included scenarios in which selection ideally mirrored survival, risk entirely drove survival, non‐ideal selection correlated with survival but with additive risk effects, an ecological trap with maladaptive selection and a non‐spatial effect of annual variation in weather. Indeed, we found positive relationships between the predicted values of a resource selection function (RSF) and survival, yet subsequently incorporating an additional negative effect of predation risk greatly improved models further. This revealed a positive, but non‐ideal relationship between selection and survival. Gradients in these covariates were also shown to affect individual survival probability at multiple temporal scales. Exposure to increased predation risk had a relatively instantaneous effect on survival outcomes, whereas variation in habitat suitability predicted by an RSF had both instantaneous and longer‐term seasonal effects on survival. Predation risk was an additive source of hazard beyond that detected through selection alone, and woodland caribou selection thus was shown to be non‐ideal. Furthermore, by combining spatial adult female survival models with herd‐specific estimates of recruitment in matrix population models, we estimated a spatially explicit landscape of population growth predictions for this endangered species.</description><subject>Alberta</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal ecology</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>British Columbia</subject><subject>Caribou</subject><subject>Caribous</subject><subject>Ecological modeling</subject><subject>ecological trap</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>endangered species</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food Chain</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>habitat quality</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Longevity</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>population growth</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Probabilities</subject><subject>Rangifer tarandus caribou</subject><subject>recruitment</subject><subject>Reindeer - physiology</subject><subject>resource selection functions</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>seasonal variation</subject><subject>Spatial Analysis</subject><subject>Spatial Ecology</subject><subject>Spatial models</subject><subject>species distribution models</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>survival</subject><subject>ungulates</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>weather</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Winter</subject><subject>wolves</subject><subject>woodland caribou</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0021-8790</issn><issn>1365-2656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhzAmIhJC4pB07juNckKqqfGmBA-VsTRxn623WXuxkUf89TrNdChd8scbvM-MZvybkOYUTmtYpLUSZM1GKE8oo5w_I4nDykCwAGM1lVcMReRLjGgAqBsVjcsQ41DUTYkG-LK27tm6VXWFjBxyyaHqjB-tdhq7NtsG0eBsFG6-zwWdxm2Lssx0GOyvWZXEMO7vD_il51GEfzbP9fkwu319cnn_Ml98-fDo_W-a65JznjRAdR4pa17oDLKQRsgPAquqooF0tKi60xlaatm2aujJGa9GYsiorYDUrjsm7uex2bDam1cYNAXu1DXaD4UZ5tOpvxdkrtfI7xZksJZWpwNt9geB_jiYOamOjNn2PzvgxKiqkSE8kiwl9_Q-69mNwaTpFSwAKHKhI1OlM6eBjDKY7NENBTU6pyRc1-aJunUoZL-_PcODvrEnAmz2AUWPfBXTaxj-cZIliVeLEzP2yvbn5373q89nXi7sOXsyJ6zj4cL-Bgpf1pL-a9Q69wlX6AOrHdwaUp38keS3K4jdk7r6M</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>DeCesare, Nicholas J</creator><creator>Hebblewhite, Mark</creator><creator>Bradley, Mark</creator><creator>Hervieux, David</creator><creator>Neufeld, Lalenia</creator><creator>Musiani, Marco</creator><creator>Mysterud, Atle</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>BlackWell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>Linking habitat selection and predation risk to spatial variation in survival</title><author>DeCesare, Nicholas J ; Hebblewhite, Mark ; Bradley, Mark ; Hervieux, David ; Neufeld, Lalenia ; Musiani, Marco ; Mysterud, Atle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5444-b66f4a1acc9cf0a38e68f00a77f161f96746ccad8eddbb97eecc6be575702923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Alberta</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal ecology</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>British Columbia</topic><topic>Caribou</topic><topic>Caribous</topic><topic>Ecological modeling</topic><topic>ecological trap</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>endangered species</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food Chain</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>habitat quality</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Longevity</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>population growth</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Probabilities</topic><topic>Rangifer tarandus caribou</topic><topic>recruitment</topic><topic>Reindeer - physiology</topic><topic>resource selection functions</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>seasonal variation</topic><topic>Spatial Analysis</topic><topic>Spatial Ecology</topic><topic>Spatial models</topic><topic>species distribution models</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>ungulates</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>weather</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Winter</topic><topic>wolves</topic><topic>woodland caribou</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeCesare, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebblewhite, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hervieux, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neufeld, Lalenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musiani, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mysterud, Atle</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Wiley Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Journals</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeCesare, Nicholas J</au><au>Hebblewhite, Mark</au><au>Bradley, Mark</au><au>Hervieux, David</au><au>Neufeld, Lalenia</au><au>Musiani, Marco</au><au>Mysterud, Atle</au><au>Mysterud, Atle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Linking habitat selection and predation risk to spatial variation in survival</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>343-352</pages><issn>0021-8790</issn><eissn>1365-2656</eissn><coden>JAECAP</coden><abstract>A central assumption underlying the study of habitat selection is that selected habitats confer enhanced fitness. Unfortunately, this assumption is rarely tested, and in some systems, gradients of predation risk may more accurately characterize spatial variation in vital rates than gradients described by habitat selection studies. Here, we separately measured spatial patterns of both resource selection and predation risk and tested their relationships with a key demographic trait, adult female survival, for a threatened ungulate, woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou Gmelin). We also evaluated whether exposure to gradients in both predation risk and resource selection value was manifested temporally through instantaneous or seasonal effects on survival outcomes. We used Cox proportional hazards spatial survival modelling to assess the relative support for 5 selection‐ and risk‐based definitions of habitat quality, as quantified by woodland caribou adult female survival. These hypotheses included scenarios in which selection ideally mirrored survival, risk entirely drove survival, non‐ideal selection correlated with survival but with additive risk effects, an ecological trap with maladaptive selection and a non‐spatial effect of annual variation in weather. Indeed, we found positive relationships between the predicted values of a resource selection function (RSF) and survival, yet subsequently incorporating an additional negative effect of predation risk greatly improved models further. This revealed a positive, but non‐ideal relationship between selection and survival. Gradients in these covariates were also shown to affect individual survival probability at multiple temporal scales. Exposure to increased predation risk had a relatively instantaneous effect on survival outcomes, whereas variation in habitat suitability predicted by an RSF had both instantaneous and longer‐term seasonal effects on survival. Predation risk was an additive source of hazard beyond that detected through selection alone, and woodland caribou selection thus was shown to be non‐ideal. Furthermore, by combining spatial adult female survival models with herd‐specific estimates of recruitment in matrix population models, we estimated a spatially explicit landscape of population growth predictions for this endangered species.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</pub><pmid>24099266</pmid><doi>10.1111/1365-2656.12144</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8790
ispartof The Journal of animal ecology, 2014-03, Vol.83 (2), p.343-352
issn 0021-8790
1365-2656
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4285818
source Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Alberta
Animal and plant ecology
Animal ecology
Animal populations
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
British Columbia
Caribou
Caribous
Ecological modeling
ecological trap
Ecosystem
Endangered & extinct species
endangered species
Female
Food Chain
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
habitat quality
Habitat selection
Habitats
Longevity
Mammalia
Population Dynamics
population growth
Predation
Probabilities
Rangifer tarandus caribou
recruitment
Reindeer - physiology
resource selection functions
risk
seasonal variation
Spatial Analysis
Spatial Ecology
Spatial models
species distribution models
Summer
survival
ungulates
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
weather
Wildlife management
Winter
wolves
woodland caribou
Woodlands
title Linking habitat selection and predation risk to spatial variation in survival
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A18%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linking%20habitat%20selection%20and%20predation%20risk%20to%20spatial%20variation%20in%20survival&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20animal%20ecology&rft.au=DeCesare,%20Nicholas%20J&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=343-352&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft.coden=JAECAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2656.12144&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E24034594%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5444-b66f4a1acc9cf0a38e68f00a77f161f96746ccad8eddbb97eecc6be575702923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500104016&rft_id=info:pmid/24099266&rft_jstor_id=24034594&rfr_iscdi=true