Implementation of an Accelerated Physical Examination Course in a Doctor of Pharmacy Program

Objective. To describe the implementation of a 1-day accelerated physical examination course for a doctor of pharmacy program and to evaluate pharmacy students’ knowledge, attitudes, and confidence in performing physical examination. Design. Using a flipped teaching approach, course coordinators col...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of pharmaceutical education 2014-12, Vol.78 (10), p.182-182, Article 182
Main Authors: Ho, Jackie, Bidwal, Monica K., Lopes, Ingrid C., Shah, Bijal M., Ip, Eric J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Ambulatory care
Attitudes
Behavioral Objectives
Blood pressure
Clinical Competence
Colleges & universities
Cooperative Behavior
Core curriculum
Curriculum
Curriculum Design
Doctor of pharmacy degree
Drug stores
Education, Pharmacy - methods
Educational Measurement
Educational research
Educational Strategies
Female
Flipped classroom model
flipped curriculum
Health education
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Heart
Heart rate
Hospitals
Humans
Instructional Design and Assessment
Laboratories
Learning
Male
Medical examination
Methods
patient assessment
Pharmaceutical Education
Pharmacists
Pharmacy
physical assessment
physical examination
Physical Examination - methods
Physical examinations
Physicians
Reading Materials
Schools
Skills
Students
Students, Pharmacy
Study and teaching
Teaching methods
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective. To describe the implementation of a 1-day accelerated physical examination course for a doctor of pharmacy program and to evaluate pharmacy students’ knowledge, attitudes, and confidence in performing physical examination. Design. Using a flipped teaching approach, course coordinators collaborated with a physician faculty member to design and develop the objectives of the course. Knowledge, attitude, and confidence survey questions were administered before and after the practical laboratory. Assessment. Following the practical laboratory, knowledge improved by 8.3% (p
ISSN:0002-9459
1553-6467
DOI:10.5688/ajpe7810182