Loading…

Remembering Complex Objects in Visual Working Memory: Do Capacity Limits Restrict Objects or Features?

Visual working memory stores stimuli from our environment as representations that can be accessed by high-level control processes. This study addresses a longstanding debate in the literature about whether storage limits in visual working memory include a limit to the complexity of discrete items. W...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2015-03, Vol.41 (2), p.325-347
Main Authors: Hardman, Kyle O., Cowan, Nelson
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a536t-ba14bf57942d4801813193a240c72c492f1a3b3aca9d3c4abf47eba780b287ef3
cites
container_end_page 347
container_issue 2
container_start_page 325
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
container_volume 41
creator Hardman, Kyle O.
Cowan, Nelson
description Visual working memory stores stimuli from our environment as representations that can be accessed by high-level control processes. This study addresses a longstanding debate in the literature about whether storage limits in visual working memory include a limit to the complexity of discrete items. We examined the issue with a number of change-detection experiments that used complex stimuli that possessed multiple features per stimulus item. We manipulated the number of relevant features of the stimulus objects in order to vary feature load. In all of our experiments, we found that increased feature load led to a reduction in change-detection accuracy. However, we found that feature load alone could not account for the results but that a consideration of the number of relevant objects was also required. This study supports capacity limits for both feature and object storage in visual working memory.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xlm0000031
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4317397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1551094568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a536t-ba14bf57942d4801813193a240c72c492f1a3b3aca9d3c4abf47eba780b287ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAURi0EokNhww9AltigooBfiZ0uQNVAAWlQpYrH0rI9N8VDHAc7QZ1_j4cpw2OBN17c408-90PoISXPKOHy-XUfyO5wegstaMvbijJV30YLwqSqJG_5EbqX82YPqbvoiNVEtWWwQN0lBAgWkh-u8DKGsYdrfGE34KaM_YA_-TybHn-O6euOeA8hpu0pfhXx0ozG-WmLVz74Al9CnpJ30-F1TPgczDQnyC_vozud6TM8uLmP0cfz1x-Wb6vVxZt3y7NVZWreTJU1VNiulq1ga6EIVZQXH8MEcZI50bKOGm65caZdcyeM7YQEa6QilikJHT9GL_a542wDrB0MUzK9HpMPJm11NF7_PRn8F30Vv2vBadmHLAFPbgJS_DYXJR18dtD3ZoA4Z02bhgnOy2YL-vgfdBPnNBS9n5Tiqmnof6m6pqQVdaMKdbKnXIo5J-gOX6ZE70rWv0su8KM_JQ_or1YL8HQPlIr0mLfOpMm7HrKbUyriuzAtqGaas5r_AJUfsbY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1551094568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Remembering Complex Objects in Visual Working Memory: Do Capacity Limits Restrict Objects or Features?</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Hardman, Kyle O. ; Cowan, Nelson</creator><contributor>Greene, Robert L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hardman, Kyle O. ; Cowan, Nelson ; Greene, Robert L</creatorcontrib><description>Visual working memory stores stimuli from our environment as representations that can be accessed by high-level control processes. This study addresses a longstanding debate in the literature about whether storage limits in visual working memory include a limit to the complexity of discrete items. We examined the issue with a number of change-detection experiments that used complex stimuli that possessed multiple features per stimulus item. We manipulated the number of relevant features of the stimulus objects in order to vary feature load. In all of our experiments, we found that increased feature load led to a reduction in change-detection accuracy. However, we found that feature load alone could not account for the results but that a consideration of the number of relevant objects was also required. This study supports capacity limits for both feature and object storage in visual working memory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25089739</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention ; Color Perception ; Experimental psychology ; Female ; Form Perception ; Human ; Human Information Storage ; Humans ; Male ; Memory ; Memory, Short-Term ; Models, Psychological ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Quantitative psychology ; Retention ; Short Term Memory ; Visual Perception ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2015-03, Vol.41 (2), p.325-347</ispartof><rights>2014 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>2014, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a536t-ba14bf57942d4801813193a240c72c492f1a3b3aca9d3c4abf47eba780b287ef3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25089739$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Greene, Robert L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hardman, Kyle O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Nelson</creatorcontrib><title>Remembering Complex Objects in Visual Working Memory: Do Capacity Limits Restrict Objects or Features?</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Visual working memory stores stimuli from our environment as representations that can be accessed by high-level control processes. This study addresses a longstanding debate in the literature about whether storage limits in visual working memory include a limit to the complexity of discrete items. We examined the issue with a number of change-detection experiments that used complex stimuli that possessed multiple features per stimulus item. We manipulated the number of relevant features of the stimulus objects in order to vary feature load. In all of our experiments, we found that increased feature load led to a reduction in change-detection accuracy. However, we found that feature load alone could not account for the results but that a consideration of the number of relevant objects was also required. This study supports capacity limits for both feature and object storage in visual working memory.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Color Perception</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Form Perception</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Information Storage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAURi0EokNhww9AltigooBfiZ0uQNVAAWlQpYrH0rI9N8VDHAc7QZ1_j4cpw2OBN17c408-90PoISXPKOHy-XUfyO5wegstaMvbijJV30YLwqSqJG_5EbqX82YPqbvoiNVEtWWwQN0lBAgWkh-u8DKGsYdrfGE34KaM_YA_-TybHn-O6euOeA8hpu0pfhXx0ozG-WmLVz74Al9CnpJ30-F1TPgczDQnyC_vozud6TM8uLmP0cfz1x-Wb6vVxZt3y7NVZWreTJU1VNiulq1ga6EIVZQXH8MEcZI50bKOGm65caZdcyeM7YQEa6QilikJHT9GL_a542wDrB0MUzK9HpMPJm11NF7_PRn8F30Vv2vBadmHLAFPbgJS_DYXJR18dtD3ZoA4Z02bhgnOy2YL-vgfdBPnNBS9n5Tiqmnof6m6pqQVdaMKdbKnXIo5J-gOX6ZE70rWv0su8KM_JQ_or1YL8HQPlIr0mLfOpMm7HrKbUyriuzAtqGaas5r_AJUfsbY</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Hardman, Kyle O.</creator><creator>Cowan, Nelson</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Remembering Complex Objects in Visual Working Memory: Do Capacity Limits Restrict Objects or Features?</title><author>Hardman, Kyle O. ; Cowan, Nelson</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a536t-ba14bf57942d4801813193a240c72c492f1a3b3aca9d3c4abf47eba780b287ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Color Perception</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Form Perception</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Information Storage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hardman, Kyle O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Nelson</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hardman, Kyle O.</au><au>Cowan, Nelson</au><au>Greene, Robert L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Remembering Complex Objects in Visual Working Memory: Do Capacity Limits Restrict Objects or Features?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>347</epage><pages>325-347</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>Visual working memory stores stimuli from our environment as representations that can be accessed by high-level control processes. This study addresses a longstanding debate in the literature about whether storage limits in visual working memory include a limit to the complexity of discrete items. We examined the issue with a number of change-detection experiments that used complex stimuli that possessed multiple features per stimulus item. We manipulated the number of relevant features of the stimulus objects in order to vary feature load. In all of our experiments, we found that increased feature load led to a reduction in change-detection accuracy. However, we found that feature load alone could not account for the results but that a consideration of the number of relevant objects was also required. This study supports capacity limits for both feature and object storage in visual working memory.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>25089739</pmid><doi>10.1037/xlm0000031</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7393
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2015-03, Vol.41 (2), p.325-347
issn 0278-7393
1939-1285
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4317397
source APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Adult
Attention
Color Perception
Experimental psychology
Female
Form Perception
Human
Human Information Storage
Humans
Male
Memory
Memory, Short-Term
Models, Psychological
Neuropsychological Tests
Quantitative psychology
Retention
Short Term Memory
Visual Perception
Young Adult
title Remembering Complex Objects in Visual Working Memory: Do Capacity Limits Restrict Objects or Features?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A02%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Remembering%20Complex%20Objects%20in%20Visual%20Working%20Memory:%20Do%20Capacity%20Limits%20Restrict%20Objects%20or%20Features?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Hardman,%20Kyle%20O.&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=347&rft.pages=325-347&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xlm0000031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1551094568%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a536t-ba14bf57942d4801813193a240c72c492f1a3b3aca9d3c4abf47eba780b287ef3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1551094568&rft_id=info:pmid/25089739&rfr_iscdi=true