Loading…

Baseline and follow-up association of the MAX-PC in Men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer

Objective The objective of this paper is to conduct a prospective, longitudinal study employing the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX‐PC) to examine the baseline and follow‐up association of prostate cancer (PCa)‐specific anxiety, health‐related quality of life (HRQOL), and PCa aggress...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2015-04, Vol.24 (4), p.451-457
Main Authors: Tavlarides, Andrea M., Ames, Steven C., Thiel, David D., Diehl, Nancy N., Parker, Alexander S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective The objective of this paper is to conduct a prospective, longitudinal study employing the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX‐PC) to examine the baseline and follow‐up association of prostate cancer (PCa)‐specific anxiety, health‐related quality of life (HRQOL), and PCa aggressiveness in men with newly‐diagnosed PCa undergoing prostatectomy at our institution. Methods From our prospective PCa registry, we identified a total of 350 men with newly‐diagnosed PCa who completed the MAX‐PC and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) at baseline and one‐year following surgery. Scores on both measures were compared with clinical measure and demographics using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum, Fisher's exact, and Cochran‐Armitage Trend tests. Spearman test was used to assess correlation at between the MAX‐PC and EPIC at baseline and one‐year. Results Baseline overall MAX‐PC measures were correlated with measures at one‐year (r = 0.5479, p  6 (p = 0.004), T‐Stage ≥ 2C disease (p = 0.004), and a postoperative prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) > 0.1 (p = 0.002); however, this did not apply to all anxious patients. Baseline EPIC sexual function scores were predictive of follow‐up EPIC sexual function scores as well (r = 0.5790, p 
ISSN:1057-9249
1099-1611
DOI:10.1002/pon.3605