Loading…
Postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer: Analysis of prognostic factors in a series of 282 patients
Abstract Aim To assess the outcomes of patients treated with postoperative RT in relation to the possible prognostic factors. Background Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) has been proved to reduce the risk of biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients. Baseline prostate specific anti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy 2015-03, Vol.20 (2), p.113-122 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Aim To assess the outcomes of patients treated with postoperative RT in relation to the possible prognostic factors. Background Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) has been proved to reduce the risk of biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients. Baseline prostate specific antigen (PSA), pathological Gleason score (GS), positive surgical margins, nodal status and seminal vesicle invasion are independent predictors of biochemical relapse. Materials and methods The clinical records of 282 patients who underwent postoperative RT were retrospectively reviewed. The prognostic value of postoperative PSA, preoperative risk class, nodal status, pathological GS, margins status, and administration of hormonal therapy (HT) was analyzed. Results Postoperative RT was delivered with a median dose to the prostatic fossa of 66 Gy (range 50–72) in 1.8–2 Gy/fraction. Median follow-up was 23.1 months (range 6–119). Five-year actuarial biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) and overall survival rates were 76% and 95%, respectively. Higher bDFS was found for patients with postoperative PSA 0.02 ng/ml could be considered as a prognostic factor and a tool to select patients at risk for progression. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1507-1367 2083-4640 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.10.001 |