Loading…

Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging for Monitoring In Situ High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Exposure

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging is hypothesized to map temperature elevations induced in tissue with high spatial and temporal resolution. To test this hypothesis, QUS techniques were examined to monitor high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) exposure of tissue. In situ experiments were cond...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ultrasonic imaging 2014-10, Vol.36 (4), p.239-255
Main Authors: Ghoshal, Goutam, Kemmerer, Jeremy P., Karunakaran, Chandra, Abuhabsah, Rami, Miller, Rita J., Sarwate, Sandhya, Oelze, Michael L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-b3308c939fbdb54b8d94ce799664df5af885f6713cfcba7f4251ec3984a802703
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-b3308c939fbdb54b8d94ce799664df5af885f6713cfcba7f4251ec3984a802703
container_end_page 255
container_issue 4
container_start_page 239
container_title Ultrasonic imaging
container_volume 36
creator Ghoshal, Goutam
Kemmerer, Jeremy P.
Karunakaran, Chandra
Abuhabsah, Rami
Miller, Rita J.
Sarwate, Sandhya
Oelze, Michael L.
description Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging is hypothesized to map temperature elevations induced in tissue with high spatial and temporal resolution. To test this hypothesis, QUS techniques were examined to monitor high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) exposure of tissue. In situ experiments were conducted on mammary adenocarcinoma tumors grown in rats and lesions were formed using a HIFU system. A thermocouple was inserted into the tumor to provide estimates of temperature at one location. Backscattered time-domain waveforms from the tissue during exposure were recorded using a clinical ultrasonic imaging system. Backscatter coefficients were estimated using a reference phantom technique. Two parameters were estimated from the backscatter coefficient (effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and effective acoustic concentration (EAC). The changes in the average parameters in the regions corresponding to the HIFU focus over time were correlated to the temperature readings from the thermocouple. The changes in the EAC parameter were consistently correlated to temperature during both heating and cooling of the tumors. The changes in the ESD did not have a consistent trend with temperature. The mean ESD and EAC before exposure were 120 ± 16 μm and 32 ± 3 dB/cm3, respectively, and changed to 144 ± 9 μm and 51 ± 7 dB/cm3, respectively, just before the last HIFU pulse was delivered to the tissue. After the tissue cooled down to 37°C, the mean ESD and EAC were 126 ± 8 μm and 35 ± 4 dB/cm3, respectively. Peak temperature in the range of 50-60°C was recorded by a thermocouple placed just behind the tumor. These results suggest that QUS techniques have the potential to be used for non-invasive monitoring of HIFU exposure.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0161734614524179
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4342119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0161734614524179</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1558523020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-b3308c939fbdb54b8d94ce799664df5af885f6713cfcba7f4251ec3984a802703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1LHTEUxUNpqa_afVcyy26mzZ0kk8lGEPHjgVJKdR0ymWSMzEte8yH63zvDs2IFVyGcc3_ncg9C3wD_AOD8J4YWOKEtUNZQ4OIDWgEWbY0F4I9otcj1ou-hLyndYQzQUv4Z7TVUcNwxvkLqd1E-u6yyuzfVzZSjSqH4oVpv1Oj8WNkQq6vgXQ5x-a599cflUl248bZe-2x8cvmxOgu6JDO8Bpw-bEMq0RygT1ZNyXx9fvfRzdnp9clFffnrfH1yfFlrSmiue0JwpwURth96RvtuEFQbLkTb0sEyZbuO2ZYD0Vb3ilvaMDCaiI6qDjcck310tONuS78xgzZ-XmWS2-g2Kj7KoJz8X_HuVo7hXs7xDYCYAd-fATH8LSZluXFJm2lS3oSSJDDWsYbgZsnCO6uOIaVo7EsMYLk0I982M48cvl7vZeBfFbOh3hmSGo28CyX6-VzvA58Ab2GYLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1558523020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging for Monitoring In Situ High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Exposure</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><creator>Ghoshal, Goutam ; Kemmerer, Jeremy P. ; Karunakaran, Chandra ; Abuhabsah, Rami ; Miller, Rita J. ; Sarwate, Sandhya ; Oelze, Michael L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghoshal, Goutam ; Kemmerer, Jeremy P. ; Karunakaran, Chandra ; Abuhabsah, Rami ; Miller, Rita J. ; Sarwate, Sandhya ; Oelze, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging is hypothesized to map temperature elevations induced in tissue with high spatial and temporal resolution. To test this hypothesis, QUS techniques were examined to monitor high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) exposure of tissue. In situ experiments were conducted on mammary adenocarcinoma tumors grown in rats and lesions were formed using a HIFU system. A thermocouple was inserted into the tumor to provide estimates of temperature at one location. Backscattered time-domain waveforms from the tissue during exposure were recorded using a clinical ultrasonic imaging system. Backscatter coefficients were estimated using a reference phantom technique. Two parameters were estimated from the backscatter coefficient (effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and effective acoustic concentration (EAC). The changes in the average parameters in the regions corresponding to the HIFU focus over time were correlated to the temperature readings from the thermocouple. The changes in the EAC parameter were consistently correlated to temperature during both heating and cooling of the tumors. The changes in the ESD did not have a consistent trend with temperature. The mean ESD and EAC before exposure were 120 ± 16 μm and 32 ± 3 dB/cm3, respectively, and changed to 144 ± 9 μm and 51 ± 7 dB/cm3, respectively, just before the last HIFU pulse was delivered to the tissue. After the tissue cooled down to 37°C, the mean ESD and EAC were 126 ± 8 μm and 35 ± 4 dB/cm3, respectively. Peak temperature in the range of 50-60°C was recorded by a thermocouple placed just behind the tumor. These results suggest that QUS techniques have the potential to be used for non-invasive monitoring of HIFU exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-7346</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0910</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0161734614524179</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24970857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Animals ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Equipment Design ; Female ; High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation - instrumentation ; Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental - diagnostic imaging ; Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental - surgery ; Rats ; Rats, Inbred F344 ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Ultrasonic imaging, 2014-10, Vol.36 (4), p.239-255</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2014.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2014 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-b3308c939fbdb54b8d94ce799664df5af885f6713cfcba7f4251ec3984a802703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-b3308c939fbdb54b8d94ce799664df5af885f6713cfcba7f4251ec3984a802703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24970857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghoshal, Goutam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemmerer, Jeremy P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karunakaran, Chandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abuhabsah, Rami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Rita J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarwate, Sandhya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oelze, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging for Monitoring In Situ High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Exposure</title><title>Ultrasonic imaging</title><addtitle>Ultrason Imaging</addtitle><description>Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging is hypothesized to map temperature elevations induced in tissue with high spatial and temporal resolution. To test this hypothesis, QUS techniques were examined to monitor high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) exposure of tissue. In situ experiments were conducted on mammary adenocarcinoma tumors grown in rats and lesions were formed using a HIFU system. A thermocouple was inserted into the tumor to provide estimates of temperature at one location. Backscattered time-domain waveforms from the tissue during exposure were recorded using a clinical ultrasonic imaging system. Backscatter coefficients were estimated using a reference phantom technique. Two parameters were estimated from the backscatter coefficient (effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and effective acoustic concentration (EAC). The changes in the average parameters in the regions corresponding to the HIFU focus over time were correlated to the temperature readings from the thermocouple. The changes in the EAC parameter were consistently correlated to temperature during both heating and cooling of the tumors. The changes in the ESD did not have a consistent trend with temperature. The mean ESD and EAC before exposure were 120 ± 16 μm and 32 ± 3 dB/cm3, respectively, and changed to 144 ± 9 μm and 51 ± 7 dB/cm3, respectively, just before the last HIFU pulse was delivered to the tissue. After the tissue cooled down to 37°C, the mean ESD and EAC were 126 ± 8 μm and 35 ± 4 dB/cm3, respectively. Peak temperature in the range of 50-60°C was recorded by a thermocouple placed just behind the tumor. These results suggest that QUS techniques have the potential to be used for non-invasive monitoring of HIFU exposure.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cell Line, Tumor</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental - surgery</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Inbred F344</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0161-7346</issn><issn>1096-0910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1LHTEUxUNpqa_afVcyy26mzZ0kk8lGEPHjgVJKdR0ymWSMzEte8yH63zvDs2IFVyGcc3_ncg9C3wD_AOD8J4YWOKEtUNZQ4OIDWgEWbY0F4I9otcj1ou-hLyndYQzQUv4Z7TVUcNwxvkLqd1E-u6yyuzfVzZSjSqH4oVpv1Oj8WNkQq6vgXQ5x-a599cflUl248bZe-2x8cvmxOgu6JDO8Bpw-bEMq0RygT1ZNyXx9fvfRzdnp9clFffnrfH1yfFlrSmiue0JwpwURth96RvtuEFQbLkTb0sEyZbuO2ZYD0Vb3ilvaMDCaiI6qDjcck310tONuS78xgzZ-XmWS2-g2Kj7KoJz8X_HuVo7hXs7xDYCYAd-fATH8LSZluXFJm2lS3oSSJDDWsYbgZsnCO6uOIaVo7EsMYLk0I982M48cvl7vZeBfFbOh3hmSGo28CyX6-VzvA58Ab2GYLQ</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Ghoshal, Goutam</creator><creator>Kemmerer, Jeremy P.</creator><creator>Karunakaran, Chandra</creator><creator>Abuhabsah, Rami</creator><creator>Miller, Rita J.</creator><creator>Sarwate, Sandhya</creator><creator>Oelze, Michael L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging for Monitoring In Situ High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Exposure</title><author>Ghoshal, Goutam ; Kemmerer, Jeremy P. ; Karunakaran, Chandra ; Abuhabsah, Rami ; Miller, Rita J. ; Sarwate, Sandhya ; Oelze, Michael L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-b3308c939fbdb54b8d94ce799664df5af885f6713cfcba7f4251ec3984a802703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cell Line, Tumor</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental - surgery</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Inbred F344</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghoshal, Goutam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemmerer, Jeremy P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karunakaran, Chandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abuhabsah, Rami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Rita J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarwate, Sandhya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oelze, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ultrasonic imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghoshal, Goutam</au><au>Kemmerer, Jeremy P.</au><au>Karunakaran, Chandra</au><au>Abuhabsah, Rami</au><au>Miller, Rita J.</au><au>Sarwate, Sandhya</au><au>Oelze, Michael L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging for Monitoring In Situ High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Exposure</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasonic imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrason Imaging</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>255</epage><pages>239-255</pages><issn>0161-7346</issn><eissn>1096-0910</eissn><abstract>Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging is hypothesized to map temperature elevations induced in tissue with high spatial and temporal resolution. To test this hypothesis, QUS techniques were examined to monitor high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) exposure of tissue. In situ experiments were conducted on mammary adenocarcinoma tumors grown in rats and lesions were formed using a HIFU system. A thermocouple was inserted into the tumor to provide estimates of temperature at one location. Backscattered time-domain waveforms from the tissue during exposure were recorded using a clinical ultrasonic imaging system. Backscatter coefficients were estimated using a reference phantom technique. Two parameters were estimated from the backscatter coefficient (effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and effective acoustic concentration (EAC). The changes in the average parameters in the regions corresponding to the HIFU focus over time were correlated to the temperature readings from the thermocouple. The changes in the EAC parameter were consistently correlated to temperature during both heating and cooling of the tumors. The changes in the ESD did not have a consistent trend with temperature. The mean ESD and EAC before exposure were 120 ± 16 μm and 32 ± 3 dB/cm3, respectively, and changed to 144 ± 9 μm and 51 ± 7 dB/cm3, respectively, just before the last HIFU pulse was delivered to the tissue. After the tissue cooled down to 37°C, the mean ESD and EAC were 126 ± 8 μm and 35 ± 4 dB/cm3, respectively. Peak temperature in the range of 50-60°C was recorded by a thermocouple placed just behind the tumor. These results suggest that QUS techniques have the potential to be used for non-invasive monitoring of HIFU exposure.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>24970857</pmid><doi>10.1177/0161734614524179</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-7346
ispartof Ultrasonic imaging, 2014-10, Vol.36 (4), p.239-255
issn 0161-7346
1096-0910
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4342119
source SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)
subjects Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Animals
Cell Line, Tumor
Equipment Design
Female
High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation - instrumentation
Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental - diagnostic imaging
Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental - surgery
Rats
Rats, Inbred F344
Ultrasonography
title Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging for Monitoring In Situ High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Exposure
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A48%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20Ultrasound%20Imaging%20for%20Monitoring%20In%20Situ%20High-Intensity%20Focused%20Ultrasound%20Exposure&rft.jtitle=Ultrasonic%20imaging&rft.au=Ghoshal,%20Goutam&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=255&rft.pages=239-255&rft.issn=0161-7346&rft.eissn=1096-0910&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0161734614524179&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1558523020%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-b3308c939fbdb54b8d94ce799664df5af885f6713cfcba7f4251ec3984a802703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1558523020&rft_id=info:pmid/24970857&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0161734614524179&rfr_iscdi=true