Loading…
Prophylactic intra-peritoneal drain placement following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
To conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with or without prophylactic drainage. Relevant comparative randomized and non-randomized studies were systemically searched based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Postoperative outcomes were compared betwe...
Saved in:
Published in: | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2015-02, Vol.21 (8), p.2510-2521 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-428e4f42fd15e46f61ba5083bf962939bd625a700a0c6713a4b12b8dc8aa04273 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-428e4f42fd15e46f61ba5083bf962939bd625a700a0c6713a4b12b8dc8aa04273 |
container_end_page | 2521 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2510 |
container_title | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Wang, Yi-Chao Szatmary, Peter Zhu, Jing-Qiang Xiong, Jun-Jie Huang, Wei Gomatos, Ilias Nunes, Quentin M Sutton, Robert Liu, Xu-Bao |
description | To conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with or without prophylactic drainage.
Relevant comparative randomized and non-randomized studies were systemically searched based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with and those without routine drainage. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95%CI were calculated using either fixed effects or random effects models.
One randomized controlled trial and four non-randomized comparative studies recruiting 1728 patients were analyzed. Patients without prophylactic drainage after PD had significantly higher mortality (OR=2.32, 95%CI: 1.11-4.85; P=0.02), despite the fact that they were associated with fewer overall complications (OR=0.62, 95%CI: 0.48-0.82; P=0.00), major complications (OR=0.75, 95%CI: 0.60-0.93; P=0.01) and readmissions (OR=0.77, 95%CI: 0.60-0.98; P=0.04). There were no significant differences in the rates of pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal abscesses, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, biliary fistula, delayed gastric emptying, reoperation or radiologic-guided drains between the two groups.
Indiscriminate abandonment of intra-abdominal drainage following PD is associated with greater mortality, but lower complication rates. Future randomized trials should compare routine vs selective drainage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2510 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4342931</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1661327357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-428e4f42fd15e46f61ba5083bf962939bd625a700a0c6713a4b12b8dc8aa04273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1v1DAQxS0EokvhzA35yCVbf-WLA1K1AlqpUjnA2Zo4k60rxw62d1f575uopWpPc3gz783Mj5DPnG1lrZqL0_1-exR8a5utKDl7QzZC8LYQjWJvyYYzVhetFPUZ-ZDSPWNCylK8J2eirBXnldiQ4-8YprvZgcnWUOtzhGLCaHPwCI72Eayn0yLjiD7TITgXTtbv6QTeRIRlKvSH0KNHk8M4f6NA05wyjqtEIx4tnij4no6YoQAPbk42fSTvBnAJPz3Vc_L3548_u6vi5vbX9e7ypjBSyFwo0aAalBh6XqKqhop3ULJGdkNbiVa2XV-JEmrGgJmq5hJUx0XX9KYBYErU8px8f_SdDt2IvcH1QKenaEeIsw5g9WvF2zu9D0etpFoC-GLw9ckghn8HTFmPNhl0DjyGQ9K8qvjyYFmuWRePrSaGlCIOzzGc6ZWWXmjphZa2jV5pLRNfXm733P8fj3wA_GOV6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1661327357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prophylactic intra-peritoneal drain placement following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wang, Yi-Chao ; Szatmary, Peter ; Zhu, Jing-Qiang ; Xiong, Jun-Jie ; Huang, Wei ; Gomatos, Ilias ; Nunes, Quentin M ; Sutton, Robert ; Liu, Xu-Bao</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yi-Chao ; Szatmary, Peter ; Zhu, Jing-Qiang ; Xiong, Jun-Jie ; Huang, Wei ; Gomatos, Ilias ; Nunes, Quentin M ; Sutton, Robert ; Liu, Xu-Bao</creatorcontrib><description>To conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with or without prophylactic drainage.
Relevant comparative randomized and non-randomized studies were systemically searched based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with and those without routine drainage. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95%CI were calculated using either fixed effects or random effects models.
One randomized controlled trial and four non-randomized comparative studies recruiting 1728 patients were analyzed. Patients without prophylactic drainage after PD had significantly higher mortality (OR=2.32, 95%CI: 1.11-4.85; P=0.02), despite the fact that they were associated with fewer overall complications (OR=0.62, 95%CI: 0.48-0.82; P=0.00), major complications (OR=0.75, 95%CI: 0.60-0.93; P=0.01) and readmissions (OR=0.77, 95%CI: 0.60-0.98; P=0.04). There were no significant differences in the rates of pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal abscesses, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, biliary fistula, delayed gastric emptying, reoperation or radiologic-guided drains between the two groups.
Indiscriminate abandonment of intra-abdominal drainage following PD is associated with greater mortality, but lower complication rates. Future randomized trials should compare routine vs selective drainage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1007-9327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2219-2840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2510</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25741162</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Drainage - adverse effects ; Drainage - instrumentation ; Drainage - methods ; Drainage - mortality ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Meta-Analysis ; Middle Aged ; Odds Ratio ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy - mortality ; Patient Readmission ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Postoperative Complications - therapy ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2015-02, Vol.21 (8), p.2510-2521</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2015</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-428e4f42fd15e46f61ba5083bf962939bd625a700a0c6713a4b12b8dc8aa04273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-428e4f42fd15e46f61ba5083bf962939bd625a700a0c6713a4b12b8dc8aa04273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342931/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342931/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741162$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yi-Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szatmary, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jing-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Jun-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomatos, Ilias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Quentin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xu-Bao</creatorcontrib><title>Prophylactic intra-peritoneal drain placement following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</title><addtitle>World J Gastroenterol</addtitle><description>To conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with or without prophylactic drainage.
Relevant comparative randomized and non-randomized studies were systemically searched based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with and those without routine drainage. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95%CI were calculated using either fixed effects or random effects models.
One randomized controlled trial and four non-randomized comparative studies recruiting 1728 patients were analyzed. Patients without prophylactic drainage after PD had significantly higher mortality (OR=2.32, 95%CI: 1.11-4.85; P=0.02), despite the fact that they were associated with fewer overall complications (OR=0.62, 95%CI: 0.48-0.82; P=0.00), major complications (OR=0.75, 95%CI: 0.60-0.93; P=0.01) and readmissions (OR=0.77, 95%CI: 0.60-0.98; P=0.04). There were no significant differences in the rates of pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal abscesses, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, biliary fistula, delayed gastric emptying, reoperation or radiologic-guided drains between the two groups.
Indiscriminate abandonment of intra-abdominal drainage following PD is associated with greater mortality, but lower complication rates. Future randomized trials should compare routine vs selective drainage.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Drainage - adverse effects</subject><subject>Drainage - instrumentation</subject><subject>Drainage - methods</subject><subject>Drainage - mortality</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - mortality</subject><subject>Patient Readmission</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - therapy</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1007-9327</issn><issn>2219-2840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc1v1DAQxS0EokvhzA35yCVbf-WLA1K1AlqpUjnA2Zo4k60rxw62d1f575uopWpPc3gz783Mj5DPnG1lrZqL0_1-exR8a5utKDl7QzZC8LYQjWJvyYYzVhetFPUZ-ZDSPWNCylK8J2eirBXnldiQ4-8YprvZgcnWUOtzhGLCaHPwCI72Eayn0yLjiD7TITgXTtbv6QTeRIRlKvSH0KNHk8M4f6NA05wyjqtEIx4tnij4no6YoQAPbk42fSTvBnAJPz3Vc_L3548_u6vi5vbX9e7ypjBSyFwo0aAalBh6XqKqhop3ULJGdkNbiVa2XV-JEmrGgJmq5hJUx0XX9KYBYErU8px8f_SdDt2IvcH1QKenaEeIsw5g9WvF2zu9D0etpFoC-GLw9ckghn8HTFmPNhl0DjyGQ9K8qvjyYFmuWRePrSaGlCIOzzGc6ZWWXmjphZa2jV5pLRNfXm733P8fj3wA_GOV6w</recordid><startdate>20150228</startdate><enddate>20150228</enddate><creator>Wang, Yi-Chao</creator><creator>Szatmary, Peter</creator><creator>Zhu, Jing-Qiang</creator><creator>Xiong, Jun-Jie</creator><creator>Huang, Wei</creator><creator>Gomatos, Ilias</creator><creator>Nunes, Quentin M</creator><creator>Sutton, Robert</creator><creator>Liu, Xu-Bao</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150228</creationdate><title>Prophylactic intra-peritoneal drain placement following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Wang, Yi-Chao ; Szatmary, Peter ; Zhu, Jing-Qiang ; Xiong, Jun-Jie ; Huang, Wei ; Gomatos, Ilias ; Nunes, Quentin M ; Sutton, Robert ; Liu, Xu-Bao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-428e4f42fd15e46f61ba5083bf962939bd625a700a0c6713a4b12b8dc8aa04273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Drainage - adverse effects</topic><topic>Drainage - instrumentation</topic><topic>Drainage - methods</topic><topic>Drainage - mortality</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - mortality</topic><topic>Patient Readmission</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - therapy</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yi-Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szatmary, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jing-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Jun-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomatos, Ilias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Quentin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xu-Bao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Yi-Chao</au><au>Szatmary, Peter</au><au>Zhu, Jing-Qiang</au><au>Xiong, Jun-Jie</au><au>Huang, Wei</au><au>Gomatos, Ilias</au><au>Nunes, Quentin M</au><au>Sutton, Robert</au><au>Liu, Xu-Bao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prophylactic intra-peritoneal drain placement following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle><addtitle>World J Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2015-02-28</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2510</spage><epage>2521</epage><pages>2510-2521</pages><issn>1007-9327</issn><eissn>2219-2840</eissn><abstract>To conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with or without prophylactic drainage.
Relevant comparative randomized and non-randomized studies were systemically searched based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with and those without routine drainage. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95%CI were calculated using either fixed effects or random effects models.
One randomized controlled trial and four non-randomized comparative studies recruiting 1728 patients were analyzed. Patients without prophylactic drainage after PD had significantly higher mortality (OR=2.32, 95%CI: 1.11-4.85; P=0.02), despite the fact that they were associated with fewer overall complications (OR=0.62, 95%CI: 0.48-0.82; P=0.00), major complications (OR=0.75, 95%CI: 0.60-0.93; P=0.01) and readmissions (OR=0.77, 95%CI: 0.60-0.98; P=0.04). There were no significant differences in the rates of pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal abscesses, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, biliary fistula, delayed gastric emptying, reoperation or radiologic-guided drains between the two groups.
Indiscriminate abandonment of intra-abdominal drainage following PD is associated with greater mortality, but lower complication rates. Future randomized trials should compare routine vs selective drainage.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><pmid>25741162</pmid><doi>10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2510</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1007-9327 |
ispartof | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2015-02, Vol.21 (8), p.2510-2521 |
issn | 1007-9327 2219-2840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4342931 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Chi-Square Distribution Drainage - adverse effects Drainage - instrumentation Drainage - methods Drainage - mortality Female Humans Male Meta-Analysis Middle Aged Odds Ratio Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects Pancreaticoduodenectomy - mortality Patient Readmission Postoperative Complications - mortality Postoperative Complications - therapy Risk Factors Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
title | Prophylactic intra-peritoneal drain placement following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A02%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prophylactic%20intra-peritoneal%20drain%20placement%20following%20pancreaticoduodenectomy:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20:%20WJG&rft.au=Wang,%20Yi-Chao&rft.date=2015-02-28&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2510&rft.epage=2521&rft.pages=2510-2521&rft.issn=1007-9327&rft.eissn=2219-2840&rft_id=info:doi/10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2510&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1661327357%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-428e4f42fd15e46f61ba5083bf962939bd625a700a0c6713a4b12b8dc8aa04273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1661327357&rft_id=info:pmid/25741162&rfr_iscdi=true |