Safety and efficacy of medically performed tongue piercing in people with tetraplegia for use with tongue-operated assistive technology

• Published in: Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation 2015, Vol.21 (1), p.61-76
• Main Authors: Laumann, Anne, Holbrook, Jaimee, Minocha, Julia, Rowles, Diane, Nardone, Beatrice, West, Dennis, Kim, Jeonghee, Bruce, Joy, Roth, Elliot J, Ghovanloo, Maysam
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Biomedical Enhancement - methods; Body Piercing - adverse effects; Body Piercing - methods; Female; Humans; Magnets; Male; Man-Machine Systems; Middle Aged; Proffered Paper; Quadriplegia - etiology; Quadriplegia - rehabilitation; Self-Help Devices; Spinal Cord Injuries - complications; Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation; Tongue; User-Computer Interface
• ISSN: 1082-0744; 1945-5763
• DOI: 10.1310/sci2101-61

Individuals with high-level spinal cord injuries need effective ways to perform activities. To develop and test a medically supervised tongue-piercing protocol and the wearing of a magnet-containing tongue barbell for use with the Tongue Drive System (TDS) in persons with tetraplegia. Volunteers with tetraplegia underwent initial screening sessions using a magnet glued on the tongue to activate and use the TDS. This was followed by tongue piercing, insertion of a standard barbell, a 4-week healing period, and an exchange of the standard barbell for a magnet-containing barbell. This was then used twice weekly for 6 to 8 weeks to perform computer tasks, drive a powered wheelchair, accomplish in-chair weight shifts, and dial a phone. Symptoms of intraoral dysfunction, change in tongue size following piercing, and subjective assessment of receiving and wearing a magnet-containing tongue barbell and its usability with the TDS were evaluated. Twenty-one volunteers underwent initial trial sessions. Thirteen had their tongues pierced. One individual's barbell dislodged during healing resulting in tongue-tract closure. Twelve had the barbell exchanged for a magnet-containing barbell. One subject withdrew for unrelated issues. Eleven completed the TDS testing sessions and were able to complete the assigned tasks. No serious adverse events occurred related to wearing or using a tongue barbell to operate the TDS. Using careful selection criteria and a medically supervised piercing protocol, no excess risk was associated with tongue piercing and wearing a tongue barbell in people with tetraplegia. Participants were able to operate the TDS.